All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
To: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
	David Brown <david.brown@linaro.org>,
	anjiandi@codeaurora.org,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"thierry.reding@gmail.com" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [v5] pinctrl: qcom: add support for sparse GPIOs
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:43:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaUV1Mjh7U9bBAgZA5Zq1oqN0HBT=VH5NkvPnY4gHxDVw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ecdf6ee-5098-15d3-f85e-66b39a6c25f9@codeaurora.org>

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 9/19/17 3:15 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> Oh we already have that I think, Mika Westerberg and Andy Shevcheno
>> implemented that for anyone using CONFIG_GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP, and
>> this driver does. Timur please check: irq_need_valid_mask, irq_valid_mask
>> usage.
>
> These patches already use irq_valid_mask!  But that doesn't block complete
> access to the GPIO.

Aha sorry for my ignorance :(

Doesn't that mean we need something like irq_valid_mask but rather
gpio_valid_mask that just block all usage of certain GPIOs?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linus.walleij@linaro.org (Linus Walleij)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] [v5] pinctrl: qcom: add support for sparse GPIOs
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2017 13:43:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaUV1Mjh7U9bBAgZA5Zq1oqN0HBT=VH5NkvPnY4gHxDVw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ecdf6ee-5098-15d3-f85e-66b39a6c25f9@codeaurora.org>

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> On 9/19/17 3:15 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> Oh we already have that I think, Mika Westerberg and Andy Shevcheno
>> implemented that for anyone using CONFIG_GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP, and
>> this driver does. Timur please check: irq_need_valid_mask, irq_valid_mask
>> usage.
>
> These patches already use irq_valid_mask!  But that doesn't block complete
> access to the GPIO.

Aha sorry for my ignorance :(

Doesn't that mean we need something like irq_valid_mask but rather
gpio_valid_mask that just block all usage of certain GPIOs?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-20 11:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-07 15:33 [PATCH 0/2] [v5] pinctrl: qcom: add support for sparse GPIOs Timur Tabi
2017-09-07 15:33 ` Timur Tabi
2017-09-07 15:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] [v5] pinctrl: qcom: disable GPIO groups with no pins Timur Tabi
2017-09-07 15:33   ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-02 17:44   ` Bjorn Andersson
2017-10-02 17:44     ` Bjorn Andersson
2017-10-02 20:47     ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-02 20:47       ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-07 11:07       ` Linus Walleij
2017-10-07 11:07         ` Linus Walleij
2017-10-13 23:35         ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-13 23:35           ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-19 22:44         ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-19 22:44           ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-16  8:01   ` Thierry Reding
2017-10-16  8:01     ` Thierry Reding
2017-10-16 13:52     ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-16 13:52       ` Timur Tabi
2017-09-07 15:33 ` [PATCH 2/2] [v3] pinctrl: qcom: qdf2xxx: add support for new ACPI HID QCOM8002 Timur Tabi
2017-09-07 15:33   ` Timur Tabi
2017-09-08 12:50 ` [PATCH 0/2] [v5] pinctrl: qcom: add support for sparse GPIOs Linus Walleij
2017-09-08 12:50   ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-13 17:09   ` Timur Tabi
2017-09-13 17:09     ` Timur Tabi
2017-09-19  7:04 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-09-19  7:04   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-09-19  8:15   ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-19  8:15     ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-19 12:32     ` Timur Tabi
2017-09-19 12:32       ` Timur Tabi
2017-09-20 11:43       ` Linus Walleij [this message]
2017-09-20 11:43         ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-20 13:04         ` Timur Tabi
2017-09-20 13:04           ` Timur Tabi
2017-09-21 12:08           ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-21 12:08             ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-21 12:12             ` Timur Tabi
2017-09-21 12:12               ` Timur Tabi
2017-09-22 13:29               ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-22 13:29                 ` Linus Walleij
2017-09-22 13:37                 ` Timur Tabi
2017-09-22 13:37                   ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-03 22:03                   ` Stephen Boyd
2017-10-03 22:03                     ` Stephen Boyd
2017-10-03 22:12                     ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-03 22:12                       ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-04 21:50                       ` Stephen Boyd
2017-10-04 21:50                         ` Stephen Boyd
2017-10-04 22:41                         ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-04 22:41                           ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-05 21:30                           ` Stephen Boyd
2017-10-05 21:30                             ` Stephen Boyd
2017-10-11  7:51                     ` Linus Walleij
2017-10-11  7:51                       ` Linus Walleij
2017-10-12  7:39                       ` Stephen Boyd
2017-10-12  7:39                         ` Stephen Boyd
2017-10-14 22:43                         ` Linus Walleij
2017-10-14 22:43                           ` Linus Walleij
2017-10-16 13:42                           ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-16 13:42                             ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-13 23:26                     ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-13 23:26                       ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-15 20:18                       ` Thierry Reding
2017-10-15 20:18                         ` Thierry Reding
2017-10-15 21:09                         ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-15 21:09                           ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-02 16:02                 ` Timur Tabi
2017-10-02 16:02                   ` Timur Tabi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACRpkdaUV1Mjh7U9bBAgZA5Zq1oqN0HBT=VH5NkvPnY4gHxDVw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
    --cc=anjiandi@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=david.brown@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.