From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-audit@redhat.com, keescook@chromium.org,
john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v35 26/29] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:28:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSaUHp=zGtU-yQ++uayfaLig_airHVo_8WcvPVZO2MemQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418145945.38797-27-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 11:12 AM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
> Create a new audit record AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS.
> An example of the MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS (1420) record is:
>
> type=MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS[1420]
> msg=audit(1600880931.832:113)
> subj_apparmor=unconfined
> subj_smack=_
>
> When an audit event includes a AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS record
> the "subj=" field in other records in the event will be "subj=?".
> An AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS record is supplied when the system has
> multiple security modules that may make access decisions based
> on a subject security context.
>
> Functions are created to manage the skb list in the audit_buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 1 +
> kernel/audit.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
The audit_buffer_aux_new() and audit_buffer_aux_end() belong in patch
25/29, but otherwise this looks okay.
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
--
paul-moore.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: john.johansen@canonical.com, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
jmorris@namei.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com,
casey.schaufler@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v35 26/29] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:28:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhSaUHp=zGtU-yQ++uayfaLig_airHVo_8WcvPVZO2MemQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220418145945.38797-27-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2022 at 11:12 AM Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
>
> Create a new audit record AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS.
> An example of the MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS (1420) record is:
>
> type=MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS[1420]
> msg=audit(1600880931.832:113)
> subj_apparmor=unconfined
> subj_smack=_
>
> When an audit event includes a AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS record
> the "subj=" field in other records in the event will be "subj=?".
> An AUDIT_MAC_TASK_CONTEXTS record is supplied when the system has
> multiple security modules that may make access decisions based
> on a subject security context.
>
> Functions are created to manage the skb list in the audit_buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 1 +
> kernel/audit.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
The audit_buffer_aux_new() and audit_buffer_aux_end() belong in patch
25/29, but otherwise this looks okay.
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
--
paul-moore.com
--
Linux-audit mailing list
Linux-audit@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-audit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-22 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 132+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220418145945.38797-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 00/29] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 01/29] integrity: disassociate ima_filter_rule from security_audit_rule Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:51 ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:51 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 02/29] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 03/29] LSM: Add the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-26 23:15 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 23:15 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 04/29] LSM: provide lsm name and id slot mappings Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:50 ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:50 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 05/29] IMA: avoid label collisions with stacked LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-19 16:50 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-20 19:23 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-20 21:15 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 3:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-04-21 16:50 ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:50 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 06/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-21 16:49 ` John Johansen
2022-04-21 16:49 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 07/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 08/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 0:38 ` John Johansen
2022-04-27 0:38 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 09/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 10/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 11/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_current_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 12/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 13/29] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 18:02 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-18 18:02 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19 0:41 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19 0:41 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19 0:51 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-19 0:51 ` kernel test robot
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 14/29] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 15/29] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 16/29] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 17/29] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 18/29] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 19/29] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 20/29] binder: Pass LSM identifier for confirmation Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 21/29] LSM: Extend security_secid_to_secctx to include module selection Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:32 ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:32 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 22/29] Audit: Keep multiple LSM data in audit_names Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:32 ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:32 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 17:57 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 17:57 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 23/29] Audit: Create audit_stamp structure Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-25 23:31 ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:31 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:03 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:03 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:58 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:58 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:18 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:18 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-27 15:49 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 15:49 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 16:02 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-27 16:02 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-27 20:55 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-27 20:55 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 24/29] LSM: Add a function to report multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:26 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:26 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-25 23:33 ` John Johansen
2022-04-25 23:33 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 25/29] Audit: Allow multiple records in an audit_buffer Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:27 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:27 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 1:06 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 1:06 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:12 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:12 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:01 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:01 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 26/29] Audit: Add record for multiple task security contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:28 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2022-04-22 16:28 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 1:08 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 1:08 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:15 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:15 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:07 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:07 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 27/29] Audit: Add record for multiple object contexts Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 16:29 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-22 16:29 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 3:37 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 3:37 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 18:57 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 18:57 ` Paul Moore
2022-04-26 19:24 ` John Johansen
2022-04-26 19:24 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 28/29] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
2022-04-22 8:37 ` John Johansen
2022-04-22 8:37 ` John Johansen
2022-04-18 14:59 ` [PATCH v35 29/29] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2022-04-18 14:59 ` Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAHC9VhSaUHp=zGtU-yQ++uayfaLig_airHVo_8WcvPVZO2MemQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.