All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	mauro.chehab@huawei.com, Binghui Wang <wangbinghui@hisilicon.com>,
	Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	Xiaowei Song <songxiaowei@hisilicon.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] DT schema changes for HiKey970 PCIe hardware to work
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 10:28:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQrARd7wgYS1nywt@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210804085045.3dddbb9c@coco.lan>

On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 08:50:45AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 3 Aug 2021 16:11:42 -0600
> Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> escreveu:
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 10:39 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > > That's the third version of the DT bindings for Kirin 970 PCIE and its
> > > corresponding PHY.
> > >
> > > It is identical to v2, except by:
> > >         -          pcie@7,0 { // Lane 7: Ethernet
> > >         +          pcie@7,0 { // Lane 6: Ethernet  
> > 
> > Can you check whether you have DT node links in sysfs for the PCI
> > devices? If you don't, then something is wrong still in the topology
> > or the PCI core is failing to set the DT node pointer in struct
> > device. Though you don't rely on that currently, we want the topology
> > to match. It's possible this never worked on arm/arm64 as mainly
> > powerpc relied on this.
> >
> > I'd like some way to validate the DT matches the PCI topology. We
> > could have a tool that generates the DT structure based on the PCI
> > topology.
> 
> The of_node node link is on those places:
> 
> 	$ find /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/ -name of_node
> 	/sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/of_node
> 	/sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/of_node
> 	/sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/pci_bus/0000:01/of_node
> 	/sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/pci_bus/0000:00/of_node

Looks like we're missing some... 

It's not immediately obvious to me what's wrong here. Only the root 
bus is getting it's DT node set. The relevant code is pci_scan_device(), 
pci_set_of_node() and pci_set_bus_of_node(). Give me a few days to try 
to reproduce and debug it.

In the mean time, I applied the series but haven't pushed it out.

Rob

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	mauro.chehab@huawei.com, Binghui Wang <wangbinghui@hisilicon.com>,
	Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	Xiaowei Song <songxiaowei@hisilicon.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] DT schema changes for HiKey970 PCIe hardware to work
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 10:28:53 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YQrARd7wgYS1nywt@robh.at.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210804085045.3dddbb9c@coco.lan>

On Wed, Aug 04, 2021 at 08:50:45AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Tue, 3 Aug 2021 16:11:42 -0600
> Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> escreveu:
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 10:39 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> > <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Rob,
> > >
> > > That's the third version of the DT bindings for Kirin 970 PCIE and its
> > > corresponding PHY.
> > >
> > > It is identical to v2, except by:
> > >         -          pcie@7,0 { // Lane 7: Ethernet
> > >         +          pcie@7,0 { // Lane 6: Ethernet  
> > 
> > Can you check whether you have DT node links in sysfs for the PCI
> > devices? If you don't, then something is wrong still in the topology
> > or the PCI core is failing to set the DT node pointer in struct
> > device. Though you don't rely on that currently, we want the topology
> > to match. It's possible this never worked on arm/arm64 as mainly
> > powerpc relied on this.
> >
> > I'd like some way to validate the DT matches the PCI topology. We
> > could have a tool that generates the DT structure based on the PCI
> > topology.
> 
> The of_node node link is on those places:
> 
> 	$ find /sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/ -name of_node
> 	/sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/of_node
> 	/sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/of_node
> 	/sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.0/pci_bus/0000:01/of_node
> 	/sys/devices/platform/soc/f4000000.pcie/pci0000:00/pci_bus/0000:00/of_node

Looks like we're missing some... 

It's not immediately obvious to me what's wrong here. Only the root 
bus is getting it's DT node set. The relevant code is pci_scan_device(), 
pci_set_of_node() and pci_set_bus_of_node(). Give me a few days to try 
to reproduce and debug it.

In the mean time, I applied the series but haven't pushed it out.

Rob

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-04 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-03  4:38 [PATCH v3 0/4] DT schema changes for HiKey970 PCIe hardware to work Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-03  4:38 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-03  4:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: PCI: kirin: Fix compatible string Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-03 22:22   ` Rob Herring
2021-08-03  4:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: PCI: kirin: Convert kirin-pcie.txt to yaml Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-03 22:27   ` Rob Herring
2021-08-03  4:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] dt-bindings: PCI: kirin: Add support for Kirin970 Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-03  4:38 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] dt-bindings: phy: Add bindings for HiKey 970 PCIe PHY Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-03  4:38   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-03 22:29   ` Rob Herring
2021-08-03 22:29     ` Rob Herring
2021-08-03 22:11 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] DT schema changes for HiKey970 PCIe hardware to work Rob Herring
2021-08-03 22:11   ` Rob Herring
2021-08-04  6:50   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-04  6:50     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-04 16:28     ` Rob Herring [this message]
2021-08-04 16:28       ` Rob Herring
2021-08-05  7:46       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-05  7:46         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-05  7:58         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-05  7:58           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-06 16:23           ` Rob Herring
2021-08-06 16:23             ` Rob Herring
2021-08-10  9:42             ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-10  9:42               ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-10 13:44               ` Rob Herring
2021-08-10 13:44                 ` Rob Herring
2021-08-10 14:20                 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-10 14:20                   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-10 17:13                   ` Rob Herring
2021-08-10 17:13                     ` Rob Herring
2021-08-10 17:52                     ` Rob Herring
2021-08-10 17:52                       ` Rob Herring
2021-08-11  7:11                       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-11  7:11                         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-11  6:46                     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-11  6:46                       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-12  3:13                       ` Rob Herring
2021-08-12  3:13                         ` Rob Herring
2021-08-12  7:48                         ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2021-08-12  7:48                           ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YQrARd7wgYS1nywt@robh.at.kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mauro.chehab@huawei.com \
    --cc=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
    --cc=songxiaowei@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=wangbinghui@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.