From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <quic_subbaram@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define support for name based regulators
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 19:32:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfREsxeSSX2pbALf@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcd130891cc1d52cb09b8bfc866ab7ef1ce3b2a1.1643069954.git.quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 755 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:27:35PM -0800, David Collins wrote:
> Name based SCMI regulator specification helps ensure that an SCMI
> agent doesn't need to be aware of the numbering scheme used for
What is a "SCMI agent" in this context? This is changing how the DT
bindings are specified, at some point things are going to need to be
hard coded.
> + regulator-name: true
> +
> + anyOf:
> + - required:
> + - reg
> + - required:
> + - regulator-name
This is abusing the existing regulator-name property which is there to
allow a human readable descriptive string to be attached to a regulator.
It should have no effect other than being included in diagnostic output.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <quic_subbaram@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define support for name based regulators
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 19:32:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YfREsxeSSX2pbALf@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcd130891cc1d52cb09b8bfc866ab7ef1ce3b2a1.1643069954.git.quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 755 bytes --]
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 04:27:35PM -0800, David Collins wrote:
> Name based SCMI regulator specification helps ensure that an SCMI
> agent doesn't need to be aware of the numbering scheme used for
What is a "SCMI agent" in this context? This is changing how the DT
bindings are specified, at some point things are going to need to be
hard coded.
> + regulator-name: true
> +
> + anyOf:
> + - required:
> + - reg
> + - required:
> + - regulator-name
This is abusing the existing regulator-name property which is there to
allow a human readable descriptive string to be attached to a regulator.
It should have no effect other than being included in diagnostic output.
[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-28 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-25 0:27 [RESEND PATCH 0/2] regulator: scmi: add support for registering SCMI regulators by name David Collins
2022-01-25 0:27 ` David Collins
2022-01-25 0:27 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define support for name based regulators David Collins
2022-01-25 0:27 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scmi: " David Collins
2022-01-28 19:32 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-01-28 19:32 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: " Mark Brown
2022-01-28 23:09 ` David Collins
2022-01-28 23:09 ` David Collins
2022-02-02 17:38 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-02 17:38 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03 0:09 ` David Collins
2022-02-03 0:09 ` David Collins
2022-02-03 11:28 ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03 11:28 ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25 0:27 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] regulator: scmi: add support for registering SCMI regulators by name David Collins
2022-01-25 0:27 ` David Collins
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-12-10 1:54 [PATCH 0/2] " David Collins
2022-01-24 23:20 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scmi: define support for name based regulators David Collins
2022-01-24 23:20 ` David Collins
2022-01-24 23:20 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: " David Collins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YfREsxeSSX2pbALf@sirena.org.uk \
--to=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_collinsd@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_subbaram@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.