All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <quic_subbaram@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define support for name based regulators
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:28:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yfu8XulvWQbpQoBR@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <532aa931-2471-8fb3-0db4-7ab8a60333e8@quicinc.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 812 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:09:43PM -0800, David Collins wrote:
> On 2/2/22 9:38 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > This seems like a scenario where the DT should be being generated at
> > runtime along with the virtualisation of the platform?  TBH a setup
> > where this is an issue feels like it's asking for trouble.

> I'm not familiar with runtime device tree generation.  Could you please
> point to an example of it or documentation for it?  How would this
> handle kernel devices on the VM side which need a phandle to an
> scmi-regulator DT subnode in order to get a pointer to the corresponding
> regulator device at runtime via devm_regulator_get()?

I believe qemu does this for the virt machine.  I'm not sure what you're
seeing as particularly complex about generating regulator links in
particular though?

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: David Collins <quic_collinsd@quicinc.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Subbaraman Narayanamurthy <quic_subbaram@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define support for name based regulators
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:28:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yfu8XulvWQbpQoBR@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <532aa931-2471-8fb3-0db4-7ab8a60333e8@quicinc.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 812 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 02, 2022 at 04:09:43PM -0800, David Collins wrote:
> On 2/2/22 9:38 AM, Mark Brown wrote:

> > This seems like a scenario where the DT should be being generated at
> > runtime along with the virtualisation of the platform?  TBH a setup
> > where this is an issue feels like it's asking for trouble.

> I'm not familiar with runtime device tree generation.  Could you please
> point to an example of it or documentation for it?  How would this
> handle kernel devices on the VM side which need a phandle to an
> scmi-regulator DT subnode in order to get a pointer to the corresponding
> regulator device at runtime via devm_regulator_get()?

I believe qemu does this for the virt machine.  I'm not sure what you're
seeing as particularly complex about generating regulator links in
particular though?

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 176 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-03 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-25  0:27 [RESEND PATCH 0/2] regulator: scmi: add support for registering SCMI regulators by name David Collins
2022-01-25  0:27 ` David Collins
2022-01-25  0:27 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: define support for name based regulators David Collins
2022-01-25  0:27   ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scmi: " David Collins
2022-01-28 19:32   ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: " Mark Brown
2022-01-28 19:32     ` Mark Brown
2022-01-28 23:09     ` David Collins
2022-01-28 23:09       ` David Collins
2022-02-02 17:38       ` Mark Brown
2022-02-02 17:38         ` Mark Brown
2022-02-03  0:09         ` David Collins
2022-02-03  0:09           ` David Collins
2022-02-03 11:28           ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-02-03 11:28             ` Mark Brown
2022-01-25  0:27 ` [RESEND PATCH 2/2] regulator: scmi: add support for registering SCMI regulators by name David Collins
2022-01-25  0:27   ` David Collins
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-12-10  1:54 [PATCH 0/2] " David Collins
2022-01-24 23:20 ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm, scmi: define support for name based regulators David Collins
2022-01-24 23:20   ` David Collins
2022-01-24 23:20     ` [RESEND PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: " David Collins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yfu8XulvWQbpQoBR@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quic_collinsd@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_subbaram@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.