All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@amlogic.com>,
	Victor Wan <victor.wan@amlogic.com>,
	XianWei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>,
	Kelvin Zhang <kelvin.zhang@amlogic.com>,
	BiChao Zheng <bichao.zheng@amlogic.com>,
	YongHui Yu <yonghui.yu@amlogic.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: discard the common MMC sub clock framework
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:44:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0435d1f5-af28-2a3a-b53c-d7557e3fe75f@amlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d30b32fe-e1d4-0684-a1fa-710c1da3faea@baylibre.com>

Hi Neil,


On 2022/4/4 20:40, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 02/04/2022 09:49, Liang Yang wrote:
>> EMMC and NAND have the same clock control register named 
>> 'SD_EMMC_CLOCK' which is
>> defined in EMMC port internally. bit0~5 of 'SD_EMMC_CLOCK' is the 
>> divider and
>> bit6~7 is the mux for fix pll and xtal.A common MMC and NAND sub-clock 
>> has been
>> implemented and can be used by the eMMC and NAND controller (which are 
>> mutually
>> exclusive anyway). Let's use this new clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 89 +++++++++++++++----------------
>>   1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c 
>> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> index ac3be92872d0..1b1a9407fb2f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>>   #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>   #include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>>   #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
>>   #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
>>   #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>> @@ -19,6 +20,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>>   #include <linux/of.h>
>>   #include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>>   #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
>>   #define NFC_REG_CMD        0x00
>> @@ -104,6 +106,9 @@
>>   #define PER_INFO_BYTE        8
>> +#define CLK_DIV_SHIFT        0
>> +#define CLK_DIV_WIDTH        6
>> +
>>   struct meson_nfc_nand_chip {
>>       struct list_head node;
>>       struct nand_chip nand;
>> @@ -151,15 +156,15 @@ struct meson_nfc {
>>       struct nand_controller controller;
>>       struct clk *core_clk;
>>       struct clk *device_clk;
>> -    struct clk *phase_tx;
>> -    struct clk *phase_rx;
>> +    struct clk *nand_clk;
>> +    struct clk_divider nand_divider;
>>       unsigned long clk_rate;
>>       u32 bus_timing;
>>       struct device *dev;
>>       void __iomem *reg_base;
>> -    struct regmap *reg_clk;
>> +    void __iomem *sd_emmc_clock;
> 
> The name could still be reg_clk, even if not a regmap anymore.

ok, i will do it.
> 
>>       struct completion completion;
>>       struct list_head chips;
>>       const struct meson_nfc_data *data;
>> @@ -235,7 +240,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_select_chip(struct nand_chip 
>> *nand, int chip)
>>       nfc->timing.tbers_max = meson_chip->tbers_max;
>>       if (nfc->clk_rate != meson_chip->clk_rate) {
>> -        ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->device_clk, meson_chip->clk_rate);
>> +        ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->nand_clk, meson_chip->clk_rate);
>>           if (ret) {
>>               dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to set clock rate\n");
>>               return;
>> @@ -406,7 +411,6 @@ static int meson_nfc_queue_rb(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc, int timeout_ms)
>>       cmd = NFC_CMD_RB | NFC_CMD_RB_INT
>>           | nfc->param.chip_select | nfc->timing.tbers_max;
>>       writel(cmd, nfc->reg_base + NFC_REG_CMD);
>> -
>>       ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&nfc->completion,
>>                         msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms));
>>       if (ret == 0)
>> @@ -985,9 +989,11 @@ static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops 
>> meson_ooblayout_ops = {
>>       .free = meson_ooblayout_free,
>>   };
>> +struct clk_parent_data nfc_divider_parent_data[1];
> 
> This should be in the meson_nfc_clk_init() function, not global

ok.

> 
>>   static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
>>   {
>>       int ret;
>> +    struct clk_init_data init = {0};
>>       /* request core clock */
>>       nfc->core_clk = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "core");
>> @@ -1002,21 +1008,26 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc)
>>           return PTR_ERR(nfc->device_clk);
>>       }
>> -    nfc->phase_tx = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "tx");
>> -    if (IS_ERR(nfc->phase_tx)) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get TX clk\n");
>> -        return PTR_ERR(nfc->phase_tx);
>> -    }
>> -
>> -    nfc->phase_rx = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "rx");
>> -    if (IS_ERR(nfc->phase_rx)) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get RX clk\n");
>> -        return PTR_ERR(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -    }
>> +    init.name = devm_kstrdup(nfc->dev, "nfc#div", GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> name = devm_kasprintf(nfc->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s#div", dev_name(dev));
> 
> would be better.

ok, thanks.

> 
>> +    init.ops = &clk_divider_ops;
>> +    nfc_divider_parent_data[0].fw_name = "device";
>> +    init.parent_data = nfc_divider_parent_data;
>> +    init.num_parents = 1;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.reg = nfc->sd_emmc_clock;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.shift = CLK_DIV_SHIFT;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.width = CLK_DIV_WIDTH;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.hw.init = &init;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.flags = CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED |
>> +                  CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST |
>> +                  CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO;
>> +
>> +    nfc->nand_clk = devm_clk_register(nfc->dev, &nfc->nand_divider.hw);
>> +    if (IS_ERR(nfc->nand_clk))
>> +        return PTR_ERR(nfc->nand_clk);
>>       /* init SD_EMMC_CLOCK to sane defaults w/min clock rate */
>> -    regmap_update_bits(nfc->reg_clk,
>> -               0, CLK_SELECT_NAND, CLK_SELECT_NAND);
>> +    writel(CLK_SELECT_NAND | readl(nfc->sd_emmc_clock),
>> +           nfc->sd_emmc_clock);
>>       ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->core_clk);
>>       if (ret) {
>> @@ -1030,29 +1041,21 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc)
>>           goto err_device_clk;
>>       }
>> -    ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->phase_tx);
>> +    ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->nand_clk);
>>       if (ret) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to enable TX clock\n");
>> -        goto err_phase_tx;
>> +        dev_err(nfc->dev, "pre enable NFC divider fail\n");
>> +        goto err_nand_clk;
>>       }
>> -    ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -    if (ret) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to enable RX clock\n");
>> -        goto err_phase_rx;
>> -    }
>> -
>> -    ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->device_clk, 24000000);
>> +    ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->nand_clk, 24000000);
>>       if (ret)
>> -        goto err_disable_rx;
>> +        goto err_disable_clk;
>>       return 0;
>> -err_disable_rx:
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -err_phase_rx:
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_tx);
>> -err_phase_tx:
>> +err_disable_clk:
>> +    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->nand_clk);
>> +err_nand_clk:
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->device_clk);
>>   err_device_clk:
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->core_clk);
>> @@ -1061,8 +1064,7 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc)
>>   static void meson_nfc_disable_clk(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
>>   {
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_tx);
>> +    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->nand_clk);
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->device_clk);
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->core_clk);
>>   }
>> @@ -1374,7 +1376,6 @@ static int meson_nfc_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>   {
>>       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>       struct meson_nfc *nfc;
>> -    struct resource *res;
>>       int ret, irq;
>>       nfc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*nfc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -1388,21 +1389,15 @@ static int meson_nfc_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>       nand_controller_init(&nfc->controller);
>>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfc->chips);
>>       init_completion(&nfc->completion);
>> -
>>       nfc->dev = dev;
>> -    res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> -    nfc->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>> +    nfc->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "nfc");
>>       if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_base))
>>           return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_base);
>> -    nfc->reg_clk =
>> -        syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node,
>> -                        "amlogic,mmc-syscon");
>> -    if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_clk)) {
>> -        dev_err(dev, "Failed to lookup clock base\n");
>> -        return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_clk);
>> -    }
>> +    nfc->sd_emmc_clock = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, 
>> "emmc");
>> +    if (IS_ERR(nfc->sd_emmc_clock))
>> +        return PTR_ERR(nfc->sd_emmc_clock);
>>       irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>>       if (irq < 0)
> 
> Thanks,
> Neil
> 
> .

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@amlogic.com>,
	Victor Wan <victor.wan@amlogic.com>,
	XianWei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>,
	Kelvin Zhang <kelvin.zhang@amlogic.com>,
	BiChao Zheng <bichao.zheng@amlogic.com>,
	YongHui Yu <yonghui.yu@amlogic.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: discard the common MMC sub clock framework
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:44:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0435d1f5-af28-2a3a-b53c-d7557e3fe75f@amlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d30b32fe-e1d4-0684-a1fa-710c1da3faea@baylibre.com>

Hi Neil,


On 2022/4/4 20:40, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 02/04/2022 09:49, Liang Yang wrote:
>> EMMC and NAND have the same clock control register named 
>> 'SD_EMMC_CLOCK' which is
>> defined in EMMC port internally. bit0~5 of 'SD_EMMC_CLOCK' is the 
>> divider and
>> bit6~7 is the mux for fix pll and xtal.A common MMC and NAND sub-clock 
>> has been
>> implemented and can be used by the eMMC and NAND controller (which are 
>> mutually
>> exclusive anyway). Let's use this new clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 89 +++++++++++++++----------------
>>   1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c 
>> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> index ac3be92872d0..1b1a9407fb2f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>>   #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>   #include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>>   #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
>>   #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
>>   #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>> @@ -19,6 +20,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>>   #include <linux/of.h>
>>   #include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>>   #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
>>   #define NFC_REG_CMD        0x00
>> @@ -104,6 +106,9 @@
>>   #define PER_INFO_BYTE        8
>> +#define CLK_DIV_SHIFT        0
>> +#define CLK_DIV_WIDTH        6
>> +
>>   struct meson_nfc_nand_chip {
>>       struct list_head node;
>>       struct nand_chip nand;
>> @@ -151,15 +156,15 @@ struct meson_nfc {
>>       struct nand_controller controller;
>>       struct clk *core_clk;
>>       struct clk *device_clk;
>> -    struct clk *phase_tx;
>> -    struct clk *phase_rx;
>> +    struct clk *nand_clk;
>> +    struct clk_divider nand_divider;
>>       unsigned long clk_rate;
>>       u32 bus_timing;
>>       struct device *dev;
>>       void __iomem *reg_base;
>> -    struct regmap *reg_clk;
>> +    void __iomem *sd_emmc_clock;
> 
> The name could still be reg_clk, even if not a regmap anymore.

ok, i will do it.
> 
>>       struct completion completion;
>>       struct list_head chips;
>>       const struct meson_nfc_data *data;
>> @@ -235,7 +240,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_select_chip(struct nand_chip 
>> *nand, int chip)
>>       nfc->timing.tbers_max = meson_chip->tbers_max;
>>       if (nfc->clk_rate != meson_chip->clk_rate) {
>> -        ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->device_clk, meson_chip->clk_rate);
>> +        ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->nand_clk, meson_chip->clk_rate);
>>           if (ret) {
>>               dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to set clock rate\n");
>>               return;
>> @@ -406,7 +411,6 @@ static int meson_nfc_queue_rb(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc, int timeout_ms)
>>       cmd = NFC_CMD_RB | NFC_CMD_RB_INT
>>           | nfc->param.chip_select | nfc->timing.tbers_max;
>>       writel(cmd, nfc->reg_base + NFC_REG_CMD);
>> -
>>       ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&nfc->completion,
>>                         msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms));
>>       if (ret == 0)
>> @@ -985,9 +989,11 @@ static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops 
>> meson_ooblayout_ops = {
>>       .free = meson_ooblayout_free,
>>   };
>> +struct clk_parent_data nfc_divider_parent_data[1];
> 
> This should be in the meson_nfc_clk_init() function, not global

ok.

> 
>>   static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
>>   {
>>       int ret;
>> +    struct clk_init_data init = {0};
>>       /* request core clock */
>>       nfc->core_clk = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "core");
>> @@ -1002,21 +1008,26 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc)
>>           return PTR_ERR(nfc->device_clk);
>>       }
>> -    nfc->phase_tx = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "tx");
>> -    if (IS_ERR(nfc->phase_tx)) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get TX clk\n");
>> -        return PTR_ERR(nfc->phase_tx);
>> -    }
>> -
>> -    nfc->phase_rx = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "rx");
>> -    if (IS_ERR(nfc->phase_rx)) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get RX clk\n");
>> -        return PTR_ERR(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -    }
>> +    init.name = devm_kstrdup(nfc->dev, "nfc#div", GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> name = devm_kasprintf(nfc->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s#div", dev_name(dev));
> 
> would be better.

ok, thanks.

> 
>> +    init.ops = &clk_divider_ops;
>> +    nfc_divider_parent_data[0].fw_name = "device";
>> +    init.parent_data = nfc_divider_parent_data;
>> +    init.num_parents = 1;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.reg = nfc->sd_emmc_clock;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.shift = CLK_DIV_SHIFT;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.width = CLK_DIV_WIDTH;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.hw.init = &init;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.flags = CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED |
>> +                  CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST |
>> +                  CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO;
>> +
>> +    nfc->nand_clk = devm_clk_register(nfc->dev, &nfc->nand_divider.hw);
>> +    if (IS_ERR(nfc->nand_clk))
>> +        return PTR_ERR(nfc->nand_clk);
>>       /* init SD_EMMC_CLOCK to sane defaults w/min clock rate */
>> -    regmap_update_bits(nfc->reg_clk,
>> -               0, CLK_SELECT_NAND, CLK_SELECT_NAND);
>> +    writel(CLK_SELECT_NAND | readl(nfc->sd_emmc_clock),
>> +           nfc->sd_emmc_clock);
>>       ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->core_clk);
>>       if (ret) {
>> @@ -1030,29 +1041,21 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc)
>>           goto err_device_clk;
>>       }
>> -    ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->phase_tx);
>> +    ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->nand_clk);
>>       if (ret) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to enable TX clock\n");
>> -        goto err_phase_tx;
>> +        dev_err(nfc->dev, "pre enable NFC divider fail\n");
>> +        goto err_nand_clk;
>>       }
>> -    ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -    if (ret) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to enable RX clock\n");
>> -        goto err_phase_rx;
>> -    }
>> -
>> -    ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->device_clk, 24000000);
>> +    ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->nand_clk, 24000000);
>>       if (ret)
>> -        goto err_disable_rx;
>> +        goto err_disable_clk;
>>       return 0;
>> -err_disable_rx:
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -err_phase_rx:
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_tx);
>> -err_phase_tx:
>> +err_disable_clk:
>> +    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->nand_clk);
>> +err_nand_clk:
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->device_clk);
>>   err_device_clk:
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->core_clk);
>> @@ -1061,8 +1064,7 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc)
>>   static void meson_nfc_disable_clk(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
>>   {
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_tx);
>> +    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->nand_clk);
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->device_clk);
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->core_clk);
>>   }
>> @@ -1374,7 +1376,6 @@ static int meson_nfc_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>   {
>>       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>       struct meson_nfc *nfc;
>> -    struct resource *res;
>>       int ret, irq;
>>       nfc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*nfc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -1388,21 +1389,15 @@ static int meson_nfc_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>       nand_controller_init(&nfc->controller);
>>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfc->chips);
>>       init_completion(&nfc->completion);
>> -
>>       nfc->dev = dev;
>> -    res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> -    nfc->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>> +    nfc->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "nfc");
>>       if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_base))
>>           return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_base);
>> -    nfc->reg_clk =
>> -        syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node,
>> -                        "amlogic,mmc-syscon");
>> -    if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_clk)) {
>> -        dev_err(dev, "Failed to lookup clock base\n");
>> -        return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_clk);
>> -    }
>> +    nfc->sd_emmc_clock = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, 
>> "emmc");
>> +    if (IS_ERR(nfc->sd_emmc_clock))
>> +        return PTR_ERR(nfc->sd_emmc_clock);
>>       irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>>       if (irq < 0)
> 
> Thanks,
> Neil
> 
> .

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@amlogic.com>,
	Victor Wan <victor.wan@amlogic.com>,
	XianWei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>,
	Kelvin Zhang <kelvin.zhang@amlogic.com>,
	BiChao Zheng <bichao.zheng@amlogic.com>,
	YongHui Yu <yonghui.yu@amlogic.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: discard the common MMC sub clock framework
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:44:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0435d1f5-af28-2a3a-b53c-d7557e3fe75f@amlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d30b32fe-e1d4-0684-a1fa-710c1da3faea@baylibre.com>

Hi Neil,


On 2022/4/4 20:40, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 02/04/2022 09:49, Liang Yang wrote:
>> EMMC and NAND have the same clock control register named 
>> 'SD_EMMC_CLOCK' which is
>> defined in EMMC port internally. bit0~5 of 'SD_EMMC_CLOCK' is the 
>> divider and
>> bit6~7 is the mux for fix pll and xtal.A common MMC and NAND sub-clock 
>> has been
>> implemented and can be used by the eMMC and NAND controller (which are 
>> mutually
>> exclusive anyway). Let's use this new clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 89 +++++++++++++++----------------
>>   1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c 
>> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> index ac3be92872d0..1b1a9407fb2f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>>   #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>   #include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>>   #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
>>   #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
>>   #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>> @@ -19,6 +20,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>>   #include <linux/of.h>
>>   #include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>>   #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
>>   #define NFC_REG_CMD        0x00
>> @@ -104,6 +106,9 @@
>>   #define PER_INFO_BYTE        8
>> +#define CLK_DIV_SHIFT        0
>> +#define CLK_DIV_WIDTH        6
>> +
>>   struct meson_nfc_nand_chip {
>>       struct list_head node;
>>       struct nand_chip nand;
>> @@ -151,15 +156,15 @@ struct meson_nfc {
>>       struct nand_controller controller;
>>       struct clk *core_clk;
>>       struct clk *device_clk;
>> -    struct clk *phase_tx;
>> -    struct clk *phase_rx;
>> +    struct clk *nand_clk;
>> +    struct clk_divider nand_divider;
>>       unsigned long clk_rate;
>>       u32 bus_timing;
>>       struct device *dev;
>>       void __iomem *reg_base;
>> -    struct regmap *reg_clk;
>> +    void __iomem *sd_emmc_clock;
> 
> The name could still be reg_clk, even if not a regmap anymore.

ok, i will do it.
> 
>>       struct completion completion;
>>       struct list_head chips;
>>       const struct meson_nfc_data *data;
>> @@ -235,7 +240,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_select_chip(struct nand_chip 
>> *nand, int chip)
>>       nfc->timing.tbers_max = meson_chip->tbers_max;
>>       if (nfc->clk_rate != meson_chip->clk_rate) {
>> -        ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->device_clk, meson_chip->clk_rate);
>> +        ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->nand_clk, meson_chip->clk_rate);
>>           if (ret) {
>>               dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to set clock rate\n");
>>               return;
>> @@ -406,7 +411,6 @@ static int meson_nfc_queue_rb(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc, int timeout_ms)
>>       cmd = NFC_CMD_RB | NFC_CMD_RB_INT
>>           | nfc->param.chip_select | nfc->timing.tbers_max;
>>       writel(cmd, nfc->reg_base + NFC_REG_CMD);
>> -
>>       ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&nfc->completion,
>>                         msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms));
>>       if (ret == 0)
>> @@ -985,9 +989,11 @@ static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops 
>> meson_ooblayout_ops = {
>>       .free = meson_ooblayout_free,
>>   };
>> +struct clk_parent_data nfc_divider_parent_data[1];
> 
> This should be in the meson_nfc_clk_init() function, not global

ok.

> 
>>   static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
>>   {
>>       int ret;
>> +    struct clk_init_data init = {0};
>>       /* request core clock */
>>       nfc->core_clk = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "core");
>> @@ -1002,21 +1008,26 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc)
>>           return PTR_ERR(nfc->device_clk);
>>       }
>> -    nfc->phase_tx = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "tx");
>> -    if (IS_ERR(nfc->phase_tx)) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get TX clk\n");
>> -        return PTR_ERR(nfc->phase_tx);
>> -    }
>> -
>> -    nfc->phase_rx = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "rx");
>> -    if (IS_ERR(nfc->phase_rx)) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get RX clk\n");
>> -        return PTR_ERR(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -    }
>> +    init.name = devm_kstrdup(nfc->dev, "nfc#div", GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> name = devm_kasprintf(nfc->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s#div", dev_name(dev));
> 
> would be better.

ok, thanks.

> 
>> +    init.ops = &clk_divider_ops;
>> +    nfc_divider_parent_data[0].fw_name = "device";
>> +    init.parent_data = nfc_divider_parent_data;
>> +    init.num_parents = 1;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.reg = nfc->sd_emmc_clock;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.shift = CLK_DIV_SHIFT;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.width = CLK_DIV_WIDTH;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.hw.init = &init;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.flags = CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED |
>> +                  CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST |
>> +                  CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO;
>> +
>> +    nfc->nand_clk = devm_clk_register(nfc->dev, &nfc->nand_divider.hw);
>> +    if (IS_ERR(nfc->nand_clk))
>> +        return PTR_ERR(nfc->nand_clk);
>>       /* init SD_EMMC_CLOCK to sane defaults w/min clock rate */
>> -    regmap_update_bits(nfc->reg_clk,
>> -               0, CLK_SELECT_NAND, CLK_SELECT_NAND);
>> +    writel(CLK_SELECT_NAND | readl(nfc->sd_emmc_clock),
>> +           nfc->sd_emmc_clock);
>>       ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->core_clk);
>>       if (ret) {
>> @@ -1030,29 +1041,21 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc)
>>           goto err_device_clk;
>>       }
>> -    ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->phase_tx);
>> +    ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->nand_clk);
>>       if (ret) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to enable TX clock\n");
>> -        goto err_phase_tx;
>> +        dev_err(nfc->dev, "pre enable NFC divider fail\n");
>> +        goto err_nand_clk;
>>       }
>> -    ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -    if (ret) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to enable RX clock\n");
>> -        goto err_phase_rx;
>> -    }
>> -
>> -    ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->device_clk, 24000000);
>> +    ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->nand_clk, 24000000);
>>       if (ret)
>> -        goto err_disable_rx;
>> +        goto err_disable_clk;
>>       return 0;
>> -err_disable_rx:
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -err_phase_rx:
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_tx);
>> -err_phase_tx:
>> +err_disable_clk:
>> +    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->nand_clk);
>> +err_nand_clk:
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->device_clk);
>>   err_device_clk:
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->core_clk);
>> @@ -1061,8 +1064,7 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc)
>>   static void meson_nfc_disable_clk(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
>>   {
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_tx);
>> +    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->nand_clk);
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->device_clk);
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->core_clk);
>>   }
>> @@ -1374,7 +1376,6 @@ static int meson_nfc_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>   {
>>       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>       struct meson_nfc *nfc;
>> -    struct resource *res;
>>       int ret, irq;
>>       nfc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*nfc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -1388,21 +1389,15 @@ static int meson_nfc_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>       nand_controller_init(&nfc->controller);
>>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfc->chips);
>>       init_completion(&nfc->completion);
>> -
>>       nfc->dev = dev;
>> -    res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> -    nfc->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>> +    nfc->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "nfc");
>>       if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_base))
>>           return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_base);
>> -    nfc->reg_clk =
>> -        syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node,
>> -                        "amlogic,mmc-syscon");
>> -    if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_clk)) {
>> -        dev_err(dev, "Failed to lookup clock base\n");
>> -        return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_clk);
>> -    }
>> +    nfc->sd_emmc_clock = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, 
>> "emmc");
>> +    if (IS_ERR(nfc->sd_emmc_clock))
>> +        return PTR_ERR(nfc->sd_emmc_clock);
>>       irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>>       if (irq < 0)
> 
> Thanks,
> Neil
> 
> .

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@amlogic.com>,
	Victor Wan <victor.wan@amlogic.com>,
	XianWei Zhao <xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com>,
	Kelvin Zhang <kelvin.zhang@amlogic.com>,
	BiChao Zheng <bichao.zheng@amlogic.com>,
	YongHui Yu <yonghui.yu@amlogic.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: discard the common MMC sub clock framework
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2022 10:44:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0435d1f5-af28-2a3a-b53c-d7557e3fe75f@amlogic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d30b32fe-e1d4-0684-a1fa-710c1da3faea@baylibre.com>

Hi Neil,


On 2022/4/4 20:40, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On 02/04/2022 09:49, Liang Yang wrote:
>> EMMC and NAND have the same clock control register named 
>> 'SD_EMMC_CLOCK' which is
>> defined in EMMC port internally. bit0~5 of 'SD_EMMC_CLOCK' is the 
>> divider and
>> bit6~7 is the mux for fix pll and xtal.A common MMC and NAND sub-clock 
>> has been
>> implemented and can be used by the eMMC and NAND controller (which are 
>> mutually
>> exclusive anyway). Let's use this new clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liang Yang <liang.yang@amlogic.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 89 +++++++++++++++----------------
>>   1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c 
>> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> index ac3be92872d0..1b1a9407fb2f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
>> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>>   #include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>   #include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>>   #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
>>   #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
>>   #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>> @@ -19,6 +20,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/iopoll.h>
>>   #include <linux/of.h>
>>   #include <linux/of_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>>   #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
>>   #define NFC_REG_CMD        0x00
>> @@ -104,6 +106,9 @@
>>   #define PER_INFO_BYTE        8
>> +#define CLK_DIV_SHIFT        0
>> +#define CLK_DIV_WIDTH        6
>> +
>>   struct meson_nfc_nand_chip {
>>       struct list_head node;
>>       struct nand_chip nand;
>> @@ -151,15 +156,15 @@ struct meson_nfc {
>>       struct nand_controller controller;
>>       struct clk *core_clk;
>>       struct clk *device_clk;
>> -    struct clk *phase_tx;
>> -    struct clk *phase_rx;
>> +    struct clk *nand_clk;
>> +    struct clk_divider nand_divider;
>>       unsigned long clk_rate;
>>       u32 bus_timing;
>>       struct device *dev;
>>       void __iomem *reg_base;
>> -    struct regmap *reg_clk;
>> +    void __iomem *sd_emmc_clock;
> 
> The name could still be reg_clk, even if not a regmap anymore.

ok, i will do it.
> 
>>       struct completion completion;
>>       struct list_head chips;
>>       const struct meson_nfc_data *data;
>> @@ -235,7 +240,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_select_chip(struct nand_chip 
>> *nand, int chip)
>>       nfc->timing.tbers_max = meson_chip->tbers_max;
>>       if (nfc->clk_rate != meson_chip->clk_rate) {
>> -        ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->device_clk, meson_chip->clk_rate);
>> +        ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->nand_clk, meson_chip->clk_rate);
>>           if (ret) {
>>               dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to set clock rate\n");
>>               return;
>> @@ -406,7 +411,6 @@ static int meson_nfc_queue_rb(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc, int timeout_ms)
>>       cmd = NFC_CMD_RB | NFC_CMD_RB_INT
>>           | nfc->param.chip_select | nfc->timing.tbers_max;
>>       writel(cmd, nfc->reg_base + NFC_REG_CMD);
>> -
>>       ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&nfc->completion,
>>                         msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms));
>>       if (ret == 0)
>> @@ -985,9 +989,11 @@ static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops 
>> meson_ooblayout_ops = {
>>       .free = meson_ooblayout_free,
>>   };
>> +struct clk_parent_data nfc_divider_parent_data[1];
> 
> This should be in the meson_nfc_clk_init() function, not global

ok.

> 
>>   static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
>>   {
>>       int ret;
>> +    struct clk_init_data init = {0};
>>       /* request core clock */
>>       nfc->core_clk = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "core");
>> @@ -1002,21 +1008,26 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc)
>>           return PTR_ERR(nfc->device_clk);
>>       }
>> -    nfc->phase_tx = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "tx");
>> -    if (IS_ERR(nfc->phase_tx)) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get TX clk\n");
>> -        return PTR_ERR(nfc->phase_tx);
>> -    }
>> -
>> -    nfc->phase_rx = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "rx");
>> -    if (IS_ERR(nfc->phase_rx)) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get RX clk\n");
>> -        return PTR_ERR(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -    }
>> +    init.name = devm_kstrdup(nfc->dev, "nfc#div", GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> name = devm_kasprintf(nfc->dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s#div", dev_name(dev));
> 
> would be better.

ok, thanks.

> 
>> +    init.ops = &clk_divider_ops;
>> +    nfc_divider_parent_data[0].fw_name = "device";
>> +    init.parent_data = nfc_divider_parent_data;
>> +    init.num_parents = 1;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.reg = nfc->sd_emmc_clock;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.shift = CLK_DIV_SHIFT;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.width = CLK_DIV_WIDTH;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.hw.init = &init;
>> +    nfc->nand_divider.flags = CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED |
>> +                  CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST |
>> +                  CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO;
>> +
>> +    nfc->nand_clk = devm_clk_register(nfc->dev, &nfc->nand_divider.hw);
>> +    if (IS_ERR(nfc->nand_clk))
>> +        return PTR_ERR(nfc->nand_clk);
>>       /* init SD_EMMC_CLOCK to sane defaults w/min clock rate */
>> -    regmap_update_bits(nfc->reg_clk,
>> -               0, CLK_SELECT_NAND, CLK_SELECT_NAND);
>> +    writel(CLK_SELECT_NAND | readl(nfc->sd_emmc_clock),
>> +           nfc->sd_emmc_clock);
>>       ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->core_clk);
>>       if (ret) {
>> @@ -1030,29 +1041,21 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc)
>>           goto err_device_clk;
>>       }
>> -    ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->phase_tx);
>> +    ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->nand_clk);
>>       if (ret) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to enable TX clock\n");
>> -        goto err_phase_tx;
>> +        dev_err(nfc->dev, "pre enable NFC divider fail\n");
>> +        goto err_nand_clk;
>>       }
>> -    ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -    if (ret) {
>> -        dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to enable RX clock\n");
>> -        goto err_phase_rx;
>> -    }
>> -
>> -    ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->device_clk, 24000000);
>> +    ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->nand_clk, 24000000);
>>       if (ret)
>> -        goto err_disable_rx;
>> +        goto err_disable_clk;
>>       return 0;
>> -err_disable_rx:
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -err_phase_rx:
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_tx);
>> -err_phase_tx:
>> +err_disable_clk:
>> +    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->nand_clk);
>> +err_nand_clk:
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->device_clk);
>>   err_device_clk:
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->core_clk);
>> @@ -1061,8 +1064,7 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc 
>> *nfc)
>>   static void meson_nfc_disable_clk(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
>>   {
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_rx);
>> -    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_tx);
>> +    clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->nand_clk);
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->device_clk);
>>       clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->core_clk);
>>   }
>> @@ -1374,7 +1376,6 @@ static int meson_nfc_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>   {
>>       struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>       struct meson_nfc *nfc;
>> -    struct resource *res;
>>       int ret, irq;
>>       nfc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*nfc), GFP_KERNEL);
>> @@ -1388,21 +1389,15 @@ static int meson_nfc_probe(struct 
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>       nand_controller_init(&nfc->controller);
>>       INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfc->chips);
>>       init_completion(&nfc->completion);
>> -
>>       nfc->dev = dev;
>> -    res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> -    nfc->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
>> +    nfc->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "nfc");
>>       if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_base))
>>           return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_base);
>> -    nfc->reg_clk =
>> -        syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node,
>> -                        "amlogic,mmc-syscon");
>> -    if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_clk)) {
>> -        dev_err(dev, "Failed to lookup clock base\n");
>> -        return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_clk);
>> -    }
>> +    nfc->sd_emmc_clock = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, 
>> "emmc");
>> +    if (IS_ERR(nfc->sd_emmc_clock))
>> +        return PTR_ERR(nfc->sd_emmc_clock);
>>       irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>>       if (irq < 0)
> 
> Thanks,
> Neil
> 
> .

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-11  2:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-02  7:49 [PATCH v4 0/2] refine the NFC clock framework Liang Yang
2022-04-02  7:49 ` Liang Yang
2022-04-02  7:49 ` Liang Yang
2022-04-02  7:49 ` Liang Yang
2022-04-02  7:49 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] mtd: rawnand: meson: discard the common MMC sub " Liang Yang
2022-04-02  7:49   ` Liang Yang
2022-04-02  7:49   ` Liang Yang
2022-04-02  7:49   ` Liang Yang
2022-04-04  8:30   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-04  8:30     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-04  8:30     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-04  8:30     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-11  2:40     ` Liang Yang
2022-04-11  2:40       ` Liang Yang
2022-04-11  2:40       ` Liang Yang
2022-04-11  2:40       ` Liang Yang
2022-04-11  7:00       ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-11  7:00         ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-11  7:00         ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-11  7:00         ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-11  9:03         ` Liang Yang
2022-04-11  9:03           ` Liang Yang
2022-04-11  9:03           ` Liang Yang
2022-04-11  9:03           ` Liang Yang
2022-04-18  3:40       ` Liang Yang
2022-04-18  3:40         ` Liang Yang
2022-04-18  3:40         ` Liang Yang
2022-04-18  3:40         ` Liang Yang
2022-04-19  8:26         ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-19  8:26           ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-19  8:26           ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-19  8:26           ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-19  9:17           ` Liang Yang
2022-04-19  9:17             ` Liang Yang
2022-04-19  9:17             ` Liang Yang
2022-04-19  9:17             ` Liang Yang
2022-04-19 15:25             ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-19 15:25               ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-19 15:25               ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-19 15:25               ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-20  5:44               ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20  5:44                 ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20  5:44                 ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20  5:44                 ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20  7:29                 ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-20  7:29                   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-20  7:29                   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-20  7:29                   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-20  8:19                   ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20  8:19                     ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20  8:19                     ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20  8:19                     ` Liang Yang
2022-04-04 12:40   ` Neil Armstrong
2022-04-04 12:40     ` Neil Armstrong
2022-04-04 12:40     ` Neil Armstrong
2022-04-04 12:40     ` Neil Armstrong
2022-04-11  2:44     ` Liang Yang [this message]
2022-04-11  2:44       ` Liang Yang
2022-04-11  2:44       ` Liang Yang
2022-04-11  2:44       ` Liang Yang
2022-04-04 14:26   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-04 14:26     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-04 14:26     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-04 14:26     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-05 11:48   ` kernel test robot
2022-04-05 11:48     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-05 11:48     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-05 11:48     ` kernel test robot
2022-04-02  7:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] dt-bindings: nand: meson: refine Amlogic NAND controller driver Liang Yang
2022-04-02  7:49   ` Liang Yang
2022-04-02  7:49   ` Liang Yang
2022-04-02  7:49   ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20  7:41   ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-20  7:41     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-20  7:41     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-20  7:41     ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-20 11:55     ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20 11:55       ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20 11:55       ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20 11:55       ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20 12:16       ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-20 12:16         ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-20 12:16         ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-20 12:16         ` Miquel Raynal
2022-04-20 12:35         ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20 12:35           ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20 12:35           ` Liang Yang
2022-04-20 12:35           ` Liang Yang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0435d1f5-af28-2a3a-b53c-d7557e3fe75f@amlogic.com \
    --to=liang.yang@amlogic.com \
    --cc=bichao.zheng@amlogic.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jianxin.pan@amlogic.com \
    --cc=kelvin.zhang@amlogic.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=victor.wan@amlogic.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    --cc=xianwei.zhao@amlogic.com \
    --cc=yonghui.yu@amlogic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.