* Re: RAID 0 went down...
2004-10-11 12:28 RAID 0 went down Romeyn Prescott
@ 2004-10-11 10:10 ` Mike Tran
2004-10-11 18:38 ` Romeyn Prescott
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Tran @ 2004-10-11 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Hi Romeyn,
If there were I/O errors on one of the disks, I am not sure that you
want to re-assemble/re-create this "corrupted" raid0 array. However, if
you just want to get some data out of the volume /dev/md0, you can use
mdadm to re-create the array:
mdmadm -C -R /dev/md0 -c 64 -l 0 -n 2 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1
Regards,
Mike T.
On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 07:28, Romeyn Prescott wrote:
> I have a RH 9.0 box with a RAID 0. I started getting some I/O errors
> and when I rebooted the box md0 wouldn't mount.
>
> /etc/raiddtab:
> -----
> raiddev /dev/md0
> raid-level 0
> nr-raid-disks 2
> chunk-size 64k
> persistent-superblock 1
> nr-spare-disks 0
> device /dev/sdb1
> raid-disk 0
> device /dev/sdc1
> raid-disk 1
> -----
>
> The problem appears to be with /dev/sdc, yet it passes all of the
> manufacturer's (Seagate) diagnostics. Here's what /var/log/dmesg
> says:
> -----
> md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
> [events: 00000095]
> [events: 00000031]
> md: autorun ...
> md: considering sdc1 ...
> md: adding sdc1 ...
> md: adding sdb1 ...
> md: created md0
> md: bind<sdb1,1>
> md: bind<sdc1,2>
> md: running: <sdc1><sdb1>
> md: sdc1's event counter: 00000031
> md: sdb1's event counter: 00000095
> md: superblock update time inconsistency -- using the most recent one
> md: freshest: sdb1
> md: kicking non-fresh sdc1 from array!
> md: unbind<sdc1,1>
> md: export_rdev(sdc1)
> md0: former device sdc1 is unavailable, removing from array!
> md0: max total readahead window set to 512k
> md0: 2 data-disks, max readahead per data-disk: 256k
> md: md0, array needs 2 disks, has 1, aborting.
> raid0: disks are not ordered, aborting!
> md: pers->run() failed ...
> md :do_md_run() returned -22
> md: md0 stopped.
> md: unbind<sdb1,0>
> md: export_rdev(sdb1)
> md: ... autorun DONE.
> -----
>
> Is there any way I can recover from this? I've been googling my
> brains out, but most of what I find relates to RAID1. Restoring from
> a backup is possible, but..."complicated" and is my last resort.
>
> TIA,
> ...ROMeyn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* RAID 0 went down...
@ 2004-10-11 12:28 Romeyn Prescott
2004-10-11 10:10 ` Mike Tran
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Romeyn Prescott @ 2004-10-11 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
I have a RH 9.0 box with a RAID 0. I started getting some I/O errors
and when I rebooted the box md0 wouldn't mount.
/etc/raiddtab:
-----
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level 0
nr-raid-disks 2
chunk-size 64k
persistent-superblock 1
nr-spare-disks 0
device /dev/sdb1
raid-disk 0
device /dev/sdc1
raid-disk 1
-----
The problem appears to be with /dev/sdc, yet it passes all of the
manufacturer's (Seagate) diagnostics. Here's what /var/log/dmesg
says:
-----
md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
[events: 00000095]
[events: 00000031]
md: autorun ...
md: considering sdc1 ...
md: adding sdc1 ...
md: adding sdb1 ...
md: created md0
md: bind<sdb1,1>
md: bind<sdc1,2>
md: running: <sdc1><sdb1>
md: sdc1's event counter: 00000031
md: sdb1's event counter: 00000095
md: superblock update time inconsistency -- using the most recent one
md: freshest: sdb1
md: kicking non-fresh sdc1 from array!
md: unbind<sdc1,1>
md: export_rdev(sdc1)
md0: former device sdc1 is unavailable, removing from array!
md0: max total readahead window set to 512k
md0: 2 data-disks, max readahead per data-disk: 256k
md: md0, array needs 2 disks, has 1, aborting.
raid0: disks are not ordered, aborting!
md: pers->run() failed ...
md :do_md_run() returned -22
md: md0 stopped.
md: unbind<sdb1,0>
md: export_rdev(sdb1)
md: ... autorun DONE.
-----
Is there any way I can recover from this? I've been googling my
brains out, but most of what I find relates to RAID1. Restoring from
a backup is possible, but..."complicated" and is my last resort.
TIA,
...ROMeyn
--
http://www2.potsdam.edu/prescor/signat-url.htm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: RAID 0 went down...
2004-10-11 10:10 ` Mike Tran
@ 2004-10-11 18:38 ` Romeyn Prescott
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Romeyn Prescott @ 2004-10-11 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-raid
Thanks for the advice.
Actually, after I posted I did some more Googling and discovered
mdadm, which didn't appear to be included with RH 9.0. I installed it
and was able to use the -A option with the -f (force) command ti get
the RAID back up and mounted. I have copied just about all of the
data off of it!
As I look over this some more (I'm no RAID expert) it seems to me that
if I could just somehow re-synchronize the "superblock update times"
that md0 would get automatically recreated at boot instead of failing
out. Is there any way to do that? When I forced the mount, I checked
the logs and the filesystem has been flagged for an fsck, but that'll
never happen if md0 isn't reconstituted at boot!
TIA,
...ROMeyn
On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 05:10:40 -0500, Mike Tran <mhtran@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Romeyn,
>
> If there were I/O errors on one of the disks, I am not sure that you
> want to re-assemble/re-create this "corrupted" raid0 array. However, if
> you just want to get some data out of the volume /dev/md0, you can use
> mdadm to re-create the array:
>
> mdmadm -C -R /dev/md0 -c 64 -l 0 -n 2 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1
>
> Regards,
> Mike T.
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2004-10-11 at 07:28, Romeyn Prescott wrote:
> > I have a RH 9.0 box with a RAID 0. I started getting some I/O errors
> > and when I rebooted the box md0 wouldn't mount.
> >
> > /etc/raiddtab:
> > -----
> > raiddev /dev/md0
> > raid-level 0
> > nr-raid-disks 2
> > chunk-size 64k
> > persistent-superblock 1
> > nr-spare-disks 0
> > device /dev/sdb1
> > raid-disk 0
> > device /dev/sdc1
> > raid-disk 1
> > -----
> >
> > The problem appears to be with /dev/sdc, yet it passes all of the
> > manufacturer's (Seagate) diagnostics. Here's what /var/log/dmesg
> > says:
> > -----
> > md: Autodetecting RAID arrays.
> > [events: 00000095]
> > [events: 00000031]
> > md: autorun ...
> > md: considering sdc1 ...
> > md: adding sdc1 ...
> > md: adding sdb1 ...
> > md: created md0
> > md: bind<sdb1,1>
> > md: bind<sdc1,2>
> > md: running: <sdc1><sdb1>
> > md: sdc1's event counter: 00000031
> > md: sdb1's event counter: 00000095
> > md: superblock update time inconsistency -- using the most recent one
> > md: freshest: sdb1
> > md: kicking non-fresh sdc1 from array!
> > md: unbind<sdc1,1>
> > md: export_rdev(sdc1)
> > md0: former device sdc1 is unavailable, removing from array!
> > md0: max total readahead window set to 512k
> > md0: 2 data-disks, max readahead per data-disk: 256k
> > md: md0, array needs 2 disks, has 1, aborting.
> > raid0: disks are not ordered, aborting!
> > md: pers->run() failed ...
> > md :do_md_run() returned -22
> > md: md0 stopped.
> > md: unbind<sdb1,0>
> > md: export_rdev(sdb1)
> > md: ... autorun DONE.
> > -----
> >
> > Is there any way I can recover from this? I've been googling my
> > brains out, but most of what I find relates to RAID1. Restoring from
> > a backup is possible, but..."complicated" and is my last resort.
> >
> > TIA,
> > ...ROMeyn
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
http://www2.potsdam.edu/prescor/signat-url.htm
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-11 18:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-10-11 12:28 RAID 0 went down Romeyn Prescott
2004-10-11 10:10 ` Mike Tran
2004-10-11 18:38 ` Romeyn Prescott
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.