* Re: DEBUG_RCU vs RCU_DEBUG [not found] <5534B3CA.6030306@free.fr> @ 2015-04-23 19:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [not found] ` <1338447584.35237.1429818280158.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2015-04-23 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Duncan Sands; +Cc: lttng-dev ----- Original Message ----- > I noticed that urcu-qsbr.h checks for RCU_DEBUG being defined while the rest > of > userspace-rcu (0.8.6) checks DEBUG_RCU. Is this a mistake or a cunning plan? Good catch! Even urcu/static/urcu-qsbr.h has a ifdef based on DEBUG_RCU. Will rename the urcu-qsbr.[ch] RCU_DEBUG to DEBUG_RCU, and I will define RCU_DEBUG if DEBUG_RCU is defined in qsbr (for backward compat). Fixes pushed into master, stable-0.8 and stable-0.7. Thanks! Mathieu > > Ciao, Duncan. > > _______________________________________________ > lttng-dev mailing list > lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev > -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1338447584.35237.1429818280158.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>]
* Re: DEBUG_RCU vs RCU_DEBUG [not found] ` <1338447584.35237.1429818280158.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> @ 2015-04-23 19:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2015-04-23 19:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Duncan Sands; +Cc: lttng-dev ----- Original Message ----- > ----- Original Message ----- > > I noticed that urcu-qsbr.h checks for RCU_DEBUG being defined while the > > rest > > of > > userspace-rcu (0.8.6) checks DEBUG_RCU. Is this a mistake or a cunning > > plan? > > Good catch! Even urcu/static/urcu-qsbr.h has a ifdef based on > DEBUG_RCU. > > Will rename the urcu-qsbr.[ch] RCU_DEBUG to DEBUG_RCU, and I will > define RCU_DEBUG if DEBUG_RCU is defined in qsbr (for backward compat). I rather mean the opposite: we define DEBUG_RCU if RCU_DEBUG is defined. Thanks, Mathieu > Fixes pushed into master, stable-0.8 and stable-0.7. > > Thanks! > > Mathieu > > > > > Ciao, Duncan. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lttng-dev mailing list > > lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org > > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev > > > > -- > Mathieu Desnoyers > EfficiOS Inc. > http://www.efficios.com > > _______________________________________________ > lttng-dev mailing list > lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev > -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* DEBUG_RCU vs RCU_DEBUG @ 2015-04-20 8:07 Duncan Sands 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Duncan Sands @ 2015-04-20 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: lttng-dev I noticed that urcu-qsbr.h checks for RCU_DEBUG being defined while the rest of userspace-rcu (0.8.6) checks DEBUG_RCU. Is this a mistake or a cunning plan? Ciao, Duncan. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-04-23 19:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <5534B3CA.6030306@free.fr>
2015-04-23 19:44 ` DEBUG_RCU vs RCU_DEBUG Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <1338447584.35237.1429818280158.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
2015-04-23 19:47 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-04-20 8:07 Duncan Sands
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.