From: Martin Knoblauch <spamtrap@knobisoft.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.0 release
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 05:52:34 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1311339154.34811.YahooMailNeo@web113303.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFxakA2U+oMJ1T7awTYa+p6xp9N0aCbfrUqgkF7BJ8gnQw@mail.gmail.com>
>From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
>To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
>Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 4:59 AM
>Subject: Linux 3.0 release
>
>So there it is. Gone are the 2.6.<bignum> days, and 3.0 is out.
>
>This obviously also opens the merge window for the next kernel, which
>will be 3.1. The stable team will take the third digit, so 3.0.1 will
>be the first stable release based on 3.0.
>
Hi Linus,
congratulations to the new release !!!! I definitely like that you kept the three digit scheme, leaving the third one to stable. Much more symmetric now:-)
OK, I know I am going to regret this later :-) I build and installed it, going from my 2.6.38 configuration, and it works OK. The evil 3rd party driver built out of the box and the even more evil 3rd party virtualization stuff built with a already available patch. Cool.
Have a good weekend and vacation
Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-22 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-05-20 17:06 Major 2.6.38 regression ignored? Luke-Jr
2011-05-20 18:08 ` Ray Lee
2011-05-20 20:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-20 21:11 ` Ray Lee
2011-05-21 8:41 ` Chris Wilson
2011-05-21 15:23 ` Luke-Jr
2011-05-21 15:40 ` Chris Wilson
2011-05-21 15:40 ` Chris Wilson
2011-05-21 19:33 ` Luke-Jr
2011-05-21 19:33 ` Luke-Jr
2011-05-28 13:19 ` Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-12 17:17 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-12 18:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-12 18:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-22 2:59 ` Linux 3.0 release Linus Torvalds
2011-07-22 11:08 ` Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored? Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 11:08 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 14:12 ` Herbert Xu
2011-07-22 14:12 ` Herbert Xu
2011-07-22 18:00 ` Keith Packard
2011-07-22 18:00 ` Keith Packard
2011-07-22 20:23 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 20:23 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 20:50 ` Keith Packard
2011-07-22 20:50 ` Keith Packard
2011-07-22 21:08 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 21:08 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 21:31 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 21:31 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-23 15:10 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher
2011-07-23 15:10 ` Alex Deucher
2011-07-23 18:19 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-23 18:19 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-23 15:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25 4:29 ` Keith Packard
2011-07-26 13:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-26 13:48 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 12:08 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 12:08 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 14:00 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 14:00 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 14:47 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 14:47 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 15:09 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 15:09 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 15:34 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 15:34 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 16:02 ` [Intel-gfx] " Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 16:02 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 16:32 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 16:32 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 16:56 ` Ray Lee
2011-08-09 16:56 ` Ray Lee
2011-08-09 17:40 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 17:40 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 17:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ray Lee
2011-08-09 17:43 ` Ray Lee
2011-08-10 8:36 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-10 8:36 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-10 9:41 ` [Intel-gfx] " Alan Cox
2011-08-10 9:41 ` Alan Cox
2011-08-10 11:37 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-10 11:37 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 12:52 ` Martin Knoblauch [this message]
2011-07-22 19:11 ` Linux 3.0 release David
2011-07-22 19:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-22 19:44 ` Ben Greear
2011-07-22 20:32 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-07-22 20:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-23 2:27 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-23 2:30 ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-22 21:26 ` Francois Romieu
2011-07-22 22:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-07-22 22:53 ` [PATCH] net: allow netif_carrier to be called safely from IRQ Stephen Hemminger
2011-07-23 0:16 ` David Miller
2011-07-22 23:21 ` Linux 3.0 release - btrfs possible locking deadlock Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-25 19:49 ` Chris Mason
2011-07-26 0:22 ` Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-24 22:04 ` Linux 3.0 release Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-25 2:21 ` Yoshinori Sato
2011-07-25 15:50 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-27 15:22 ` Yoshinori Sato
2011-07-27 17:29 ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-28 2:08 ` Arnaud Lacombe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1311339154.34811.YahooMailNeo@web113303.mail.gq1.yahoo.com \
--to=spamtrap@knobisoft.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.