All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	perex@perex.cz, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 15:33:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105211533.49082.luke@dashjr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aefc95$1usaq@orsmga001.jf.intel.com>

On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:40:17 AM Chris Wilson wrote:
> The bisection is into an old DRI1 bug on 945GM. That DRI has inadequate
> locking between release and IRQ and so is prone to such races as befell
> Kirill should not surprise anyone. As neither UMS nor DRI supported SNB,
> I can quite confidently state they are separate bugs.

Unfortunately, I cannot help troubleshoot that bug any further, as I no longer 
have the affected motherboard. I was unable to reproduce it on my Intel 
DQ67SW.

However, I did encounter a new regression, which I have reported as:
	https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35552
This one is related to Intel HD Audio, not Graphics.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, perex@perex.cz,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: Re: Major 2.6.38 regression ignored?
Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 15:33:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201105211533.49082.luke@dashjr.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aefc95$1usaq@orsmga001.jf.intel.com>

On Saturday, May 21, 2011 11:40:17 AM Chris Wilson wrote:
> The bisection is into an old DRI1 bug on 945GM. That DRI has inadequate
> locking between release and IRQ and so is prone to such races as befell
> Kirill should not surprise anyone. As neither UMS nor DRI supported SNB,
> I can quite confidently state they are separate bugs.

Unfortunately, I cannot help troubleshoot that bug any further, as I no longer 
have the affected motherboard. I was unable to reproduce it on my Intel 
DQ67SW.

However, I did encounter a new regression, which I have reported as:
	https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35552
This one is related to Intel HD Audio, not Graphics.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-21 19:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-20 17:06 Major 2.6.38 regression ignored? Luke-Jr
2011-05-20 18:08 ` Ray Lee
2011-05-20 20:24   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-05-20 21:11     ` Ray Lee
2011-05-21  8:41   ` Chris Wilson
2011-05-21 15:23     ` Luke-Jr
2011-05-21 15:40       ` Chris Wilson
2011-05-21 15:40         ` Chris Wilson
2011-05-21 19:33         ` Luke-Jr [this message]
2011-05-21 19:33           ` Luke-Jr
2011-05-28 13:19         ` Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-12 17:17           ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-12 18:07             ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-12 18:07               ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-22  2:59               ` Linux 3.0 release Linus Torvalds
2011-07-22 11:08                 ` Major 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 / 3.0 regression ignored? Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 11:08                   ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 14:12                   ` Herbert Xu
2011-07-22 14:12                     ` Herbert Xu
2011-07-22 18:00                   ` Keith Packard
2011-07-22 18:00                     ` Keith Packard
2011-07-22 20:23                     ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 20:23                       ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 20:50                       ` Keith Packard
2011-07-22 20:50                         ` Keith Packard
2011-07-22 21:08                         ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 21:08                           ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 21:31                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 21:31                             ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-23 15:10                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Alex Deucher
2011-07-23 15:10                               ` Alex Deucher
2011-07-23 18:19                               ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-23 18:19                                 ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-23 15:55                         ` Pekka Enberg
2011-07-25  4:29                           ` Keith Packard
2011-07-26 13:48                       ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-26 13:48                         ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 12:08                         ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 12:08                           ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 14:00                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 14:00                             ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 14:47                             ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 14:47                               ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 15:09                               ` [Intel-gfx] " Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 15:09                                 ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 15:34                                 ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 15:34                                   ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 16:02                                   ` [Intel-gfx] " Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 16:02                                     ` Vasily Khoruzhick
2011-08-09 16:32                                     ` [Intel-gfx] " Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 16:32                                       ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 16:56                                       ` Ray Lee
2011-08-09 16:56                                         ` Ray Lee
2011-08-09 17:40                                         ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 17:40                                           ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-09 17:43                                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Ray Lee
2011-08-09 17:43                                             ` Ray Lee
2011-08-10  8:36                                             ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-10  8:36                                               ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-10  9:41                                           ` [Intel-gfx] " Alan Cox
2011-08-10  9:41                                             ` Alan Cox
2011-08-10 11:37                                             ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-08-10 11:37                                               ` Kirill Smelkov
2011-07-22 12:52                 ` Linux 3.0 release Martin Knoblauch
2011-07-22 19:11                 ` David
2011-07-22 19:21                   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-22 19:44                     ` Ben Greear
2011-07-22 20:32                       ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-07-22 20:35                         ` Linus Torvalds
2011-07-23  2:27                           ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-23  2:30                             ` Tejun Heo
2011-07-22 21:26                         ` Francois Romieu
2011-07-22 22:09                           ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-07-22 22:53                             ` [PATCH] net: allow netif_carrier to be called safely from IRQ Stephen Hemminger
2011-07-23  0:16                               ` David Miller
2011-07-22 23:21                 ` Linux 3.0 release - btrfs possible locking deadlock Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-25 19:49                   ` Chris Mason
2011-07-26  0:22                     ` Ed Tomlinson
2011-07-24 22:04                 ` Linux 3.0 release Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-25  2:21                   ` Yoshinori Sato
2011-07-25 15:50                     ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-27 15:22                       ` Yoshinori Sato
2011-07-27 17:29                         ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-07-28  2:08                         ` Arnaud Lacombe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201105211533.49082.luke@dashjr.org \
    --to=luke@dashjr.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.