[ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior

[sandeep suresh <sandeep.suresh@yahoo.co.in>]

Hello Mr.Adrian,
????Thanks for your response. I understand the following: Please correct if I am wrong.
1. With WLAN_ACTIVE and BT_ACTIVE, the wireless medium is managed between BT and WLAN without stomping the traffic. 
2. With WLAN_ACTIVE, BT_ACTIVE and BT_PRIORITY, WiFI traffic stomping is possible.
?
Regards
Sandeep.


________________________________
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: sandeep suresh <sandeep.suresh@yahoo.co.in> 
Cc: Sujith Manoharan <sujith@msujith.org>; ath9k-devel <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>; "linux-wireless at vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2013 11:07 AM
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior


Right, but same deal - if it asserts the line, it should stomp wifi
transmission in your particular scheme.



adrian


On 9 April 2013 19:37, sandeep suresh <sandeep.suresh@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
> Hello Mr.Adrian,
>? ? Thanks for your response. During googling, I had come across the
> following 2-wire coexistence solution from owl modules.
>
> http://support.connectblue.com/display/PRODWLAN/cB-OWL22x+Bluetooth+co-existence+application+note
> According to this application note, for 2-wire coexistence, WLAN_ACTIVE and
> BT_PRIORITY signals are used rather than WLAN_ACTIVE and BT_ACTIVE.? What is
> your opinion on this? And as I understand owl modules are based on Atheros
> chipsets.
>
> Regards
> Sandeep.
>
> From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
> To: sandeep suresh <sandeep.suresh@yahoo.co.in>
> Cc: Sujith Manoharan <sujith@msujith.org>; ath9k-devel
> <ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org>; "linux-wireless at vger.kernel.org"
> <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2013 4:30 AM
>
> Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] AR9287 ; 2-wire coexistence expected behavior
>
> Hi,
>
> Yes, "WLAN_ACTIVE" here is just both TX and RX activity.
>
> So if it were working, that would stay low.
>
>
>
> adrian
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.ath9k.org/pipermail/ath9k-devel/attachments/20130410/eb89df8b/attachment-0001.htm