All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: "linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	xen-devel <Xen-devel@lists.xen.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"linux390@de.ibm.com" <linux390@de.ibm.com>,
	Linux Virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] virtio: Clean up scatterlists and use the DMA API
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 09:21:34 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438125694.7562.177.camel@kernel.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrW+YynS13qgXnUR-Vw9uyve9Js3RQb2RV9NBHxwyft5=w@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 15:43 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Let me try to summarize a proposal:
> 
> Add a feature flag that indicates IOMMU support.
> 
> New kernels acknowledge that flag on any device that advertises it.
> 
> New kernels always respect the IOMMU (except on PowerPC).

Why ? I disagree, the flag should be honored when set in any
architecture. PowerPC is no different than any other platform in that
regard.

>   New kernels
> optionally refuse to talk to devices that don't have that feature flag
> if the device appears to be behind an IOMMU.  (This presumably
> includes any device whatsoever on an x86 platform with an IOMMU,
> including Xen's fake IOMMU.)
> 
> New QEMU always respects the IOMMU, if any, except on PPC.

This is just a matter of what is the default of the flag, ie we
should have a machine flag that indicates what the default is for
new virtio devices, otherwise, it should be specified per device
as an attribute of the device instance.

I would argue that we should default to "bypass IOMMU" on *all*
architecture due to the performance impact, and to essentially
default to the same behaviour as today. With things like DDW even
powerpc might be able to mostly alleviate the performance impact
so we might to change in the long term, but I tend to prefer
more incremental approaches.

>   New QEMU
> always advertises this feature flag.  If iommu=on, QEMU's virtio
> devices refuse to work unless the driver acknowledges the flag.

This should be configurable.

> On PPC, new QEMU will not respect the IOMMU and will not set the flag.
> New kernels will not talk to devices that set the flag.  If someone
> wants to fix that, then they get to figure out how.

I disagree with the kernel bit and I disagree with special casing PPC in
any shape or form in the code. The only difference should be a default
value for the iommu mode of virtio in qemu set per machine.

You can then feel free to change that default (in a separate patch for
bisectability) on x86 for the sake of Xen.

Ben.

> This results in:
> 
> New kernels work fine with old QEMU unless iommu=on.
> 
> New kernels work with new devices (QEMU and physical devices that set
> the flag) under all circumstances, except on PPC where physical
> devices are and remain broken.
> 
> Xen works work new QEMU and cleanly refuses to interoperate with old
> QEMU.  (This is worse than with just my patches, but it's better than
> the status quo in which the Xen guest corrupts itself and possibly
> corrupts the Xen hypervisor.)
> 
> New kernels with old QEMU with iommu=on optionally refuses to interoperate.
> 
> Old kernels are oblivious.  They work exactly the same as they do
> today except that they fail cleanly with new QEMU with iommu=on.  Old
> kernels continue to fail with physical virtio devices if they're
> behind an iommu.
> 
> Old physical virtio devices that don't advertise the flag fail cleanly
> if the host uses an iommu.  The driver could optionally whitelist such
> devices.
> 
> PPC works as well as it currently does.
> 
> I'm unsure about the arm64 situation.
> 
> 
> Did I get this right?
> 
> --Andy

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-28 23:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-28  1:08 [PATCH v4 0/4] virtio: Clean up scatterlists and use the DMA API Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28  7:05 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-07-28  7:05 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-07-28  8:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-28  8:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-28 10:12   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-07-28 10:12   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-07-28 12:46     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-28 13:06       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-28 13:06       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-28 13:11         ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 16:11           ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 16:44             ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 16:44             ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 17:10               ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 17:10               ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 17:17                 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 17:17                 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 18:22                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 18:22                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 19:06                     ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 19:06                     ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 19:24                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 19:24                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 19:33                         ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 21:16                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 21:16                           ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 22:43                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 22:43                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 23:21                               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt [this message]
2015-07-28 23:33                                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 23:33                                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-29  0:36                                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-07-29  0:36                                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-07-29  0:47                                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-29  0:47                                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-29  0:54                                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-07-29  0:54                                       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-07-29  8:17                                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-29  8:20                                         ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-29  8:20                                         ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-29  9:21                                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-07-29  9:21                                         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-07-29  8:17                                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-29  8:07                                 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-29  8:07                                 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 23:21                               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2015-07-28 19:33                         ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 16:11           ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-28 16:36           ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-28 16:36           ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-28 16:42             ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 17:15               ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-28 17:15               ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-28 17:19                 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 17:19                 ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 17:31                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-28 17:31                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-28 16:42             ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 13:11         ` Jan Kiszka
2015-07-28 12:46     ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-28 13:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-28 13:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-28  1:08 Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-01 17:39 Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-01 22:16 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-02  5:55   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-02 20:53     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-02 20:56       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-09-02 21:08         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-02 21:37       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-02 22:10         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-02 23:11           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-02 23:20             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-02 23:42               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-03  0:25                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-03  0:32                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-03  0:43                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-04  2:03                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-03  7:47                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-03  7:52                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-03  8:01                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-03  8:05                     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-03 12:11                       ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-03 15:07                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-03 15:11                           ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-03 16:39                           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-03 20:38                             ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-03  7:43               ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-09-03  6:42         ` Rusty Russell
2014-09-03  7:50           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-05  2:31             ` Rusty Russell
2014-09-05  2:57               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-05  5:20                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-05  7:33                 ` Christian Borntraeger
2014-09-10 15:36                 ` Christopher Covington
2014-09-10 16:15                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-05  5:16               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2014-09-14  8:58               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-03 12:51           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-05  2:32             ` Rusty Russell
2014-09-05  3:06               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-09-02 21:10     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2014-09-02 21:49       ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1438125694.7562.177.camel@kernel.crashing.org \
    --to=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=Xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux390@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.