Re: [Bug 106241] New: shutdown(3)/close(3) behaviour is incorrect for sockets in accept(3)

[Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>]

On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 12:27 +0000, Alan Burlison wrote:
> On 27/10/2015 12:01, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
> > Are non multi threaded applications considered well written ?
> >
> > listener = socket(...);
> > bind(listener, ...);
> > listen(fd, 10000);
> > Loop 1 10
> >    if (fork() == 0)
> >      do_accept(listener)
> >
> > Now if a child does a close(listener), or is killed, you propose that it
> > does an implicit shutdown() and all other children no longer can
> > accept() ?
> 
> No, of course not. I made it quite clear I was talking about MT programs.

Nothing is clear. Sorry.

Now shat about programs using both fork() model and MT, to get one MT
process per NUMA node ?