From: Alan Burlison <Alan.Burlison@oracle.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>, Casper.Dik@oracle.com
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, stephen@networkplumber.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, dholland-tech@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 106241] New: shutdown(3)/close(3) behaviour is incorrect for sockets in accept(3)
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 12:58:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5628CF79.2000507@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1445513425.22974.100.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
On 22/10/2015 12:30, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> We absolutely do not _want_ to do this just so that linux becomes slower
> to the point Solaris can compete, or you guys can avoid some work.
Sentiments such as that really have no place in a discussion that's been
focussed primarily on the behaviour of interfaces, albeit with
digressions into the potential performance impacts. The discussion has
been cordial and I for one appreciate Al Viro's posts on the subject,
from which I've leaned a lot. Can we please keep it that way? Thanks.
> close(fd) is very far from knowing a file is a 'listener' or even a
> 'socket' without extra cache line misses.
>
> To force a close of an accept() or whatever blocking socket related
> system call a shutdown() makes a lot of sense.
>
> This would have zero additional overhead for the fast path.
Yes, that would I believe be a significant improvement.
--
Alan Burlison
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-22 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 138+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 16:59 Fw: [Bug 106241] New: shutdown(3)/close(3) behaviour is incorrect for sockets in accept(3) Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 23:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-20 1:12 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-20 1:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-20 9:59 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-20 11:24 ` David Miller
2015-10-20 11:39 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-20 13:19 ` Fw: " Eric Dumazet
2015-10-20 13:45 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-20 15:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-20 18:31 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-20 18:42 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-21 10:25 ` David Laight
2015-10-21 10:49 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-21 11:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-21 13:03 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-21 13:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-21 3:49 ` Al Viro
2015-10-21 14:38 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-21 15:30 ` David Miller
2015-10-21 16:04 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-21 21:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-21 21:28 ` Al Viro
2015-10-21 16:32 ` Fw: " Eric Dumazet
2015-10-21 18:51 ` Al Viro
2015-10-21 20:33 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-22 4:21 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 10:55 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 18:16 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 20:15 ` Alan Burlison
2015-11-02 10:03 ` David Laight
2015-11-02 10:29 ` Al Viro
2015-10-21 22:28 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 1:29 ` David Miller
2015-10-22 4:17 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 4:44 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 6:03 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 6:34 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-22 17:21 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 18:24 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-22 19:07 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 19:51 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-22 21:57 ` Al Viro
2015-10-23 9:52 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-23 13:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-23 13:20 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-23 13:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-23 14:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-23 13:35 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-23 14:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-23 15:46 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-23 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-23 16:07 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-23 16:19 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-23 16:40 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-23 17:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-23 17:59 ` [PATCH net-next] af_unix: do not report POLLOUT on listeners Eric Dumazet
2015-10-25 13:45 ` David Miller
2015-10-24 2:30 ` [Bug 106241] New: shutdown(3)/close(3) behaviour is incorrect for sockets in accept(3) Al Viro
2015-10-27 9:08 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-27 10:52 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-27 12:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-27 12:27 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-27 12:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-27 13:42 ` David Miller
2015-10-27 13:37 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-27 13:59 ` David Miller
2015-10-27 14:13 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-27 14:39 ` David Miller
2015-10-27 14:39 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-27 15:04 ` David Miller
2015-10-27 15:53 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-27 23:17 ` Al Viro
2015-10-28 0:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-28 12:35 ` Al Viro
2015-10-28 13:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-28 14:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-28 21:13 ` Al Viro
2015-10-28 21:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-28 22:33 ` Al Viro
2015-10-28 23:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-29 0:15 ` Al Viro
2015-10-29 3:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-29 4:16 ` Al Viro
2015-10-29 12:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-29 13:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-30 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-30 21:02 ` Al Viro
2015-10-30 21:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-30 21:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-30 22:33 ` Al Viro
2015-10-30 23:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-31 0:09 ` Al Viro
2015-10-31 15:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-31 19:34 ` Al Viro
2015-10-31 19:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-31 20:29 ` Al Viro
2015-11-02 0:24 ` Al Viro
2015-11-02 0:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-02 2:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-11-02 6:22 ` Al Viro
2015-10-31 20:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-31 21:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-10-31 21:51 ` Al Viro
2015-10-31 22:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-31 1:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-28 16:04 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-29 14:58 ` David Holland
2015-10-29 15:18 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-29 16:01 ` David Holland
2015-10-29 16:15 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-29 17:07 ` Al Viro
2015-10-29 17:12 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-30 1:54 ` David Miller
2015-10-30 1:55 ` David Miller
2015-10-30 5:44 ` David Holland
2015-10-30 17:43 ` David Laight
2015-10-30 21:09 ` Al Viro
2015-11-04 15:54 ` David Laight
2015-11-04 16:27 ` Al Viro
2015-11-06 15:07 ` David Laight
2015-11-06 19:31 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 6:51 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-22 11:18 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 11:15 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 6:15 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-22 11:30 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-22 11:58 ` Alan Burlison [this message]
2015-10-22 12:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2015-10-22 13:12 ` David Miller
2015-10-22 13:14 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 17:05 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 17:39 ` Alan Burlison
2015-10-22 18:56 ` Al Viro
2015-10-22 19:50 ` Casper.Dik
2015-10-23 17:09 ` Al Viro
2015-10-23 18:30 ` Fw: " David Holland
2015-10-23 19:51 ` Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5628CF79.2000507@oracle.com \
--to=alan.burlison@oracle.com \
--cc=Casper.Dik@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dholland-tech@netbsd.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.