All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	punit.agrawal@arm.com, arm@kernel.org,
	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/12] arm-cci: CCI-500: Work around PMU counter writes
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:49:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450374559-23315-11-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450374559-23315-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

The CCI PMU driver sets the event counter to the half of the maximum
value(2^31) it can count before we start the counters via
pmu_event_set_period(). This is done to give us the best chance to
handle the overflow interrupt, taking care of extreme interrupt latencies.

However, CCI-500 comes with advanced power saving schemes, which
disables the clock to the event counters unless the counters are enabled to
count (PMCR.CEN). This prevents the driver from writing the period to the
counters before starting them.  Also, there is no way we can reset the
individual event counter to 0 (PMCR.RST resets all the counters, losing
their current readings). However the value of the counter is preserved and
could be read back, when the counters are not enabled.

So we cannot reliably use the counters and compute the number of events
generated during the sampling period since we don't have the value of the
counter at start.

This patch works around this issue by changing writes to the counter
with the following steps.

 1) Disable all the counters (remembering any counters which were enabled)
 2) Save the current event and program the target counter to count an
    invalid event, which by spec is guaranteed to not-generate any events.
 3) Enable the target counter.
 4) Enable the CCI PMU
 5) Write to the target counter.
 6) Disable the CCI PMU and the target counter
 7) Restore the event back on the target counter.
 8) Restore the status of the all the counters

Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
 drivers/bus/arm-cci.c |   52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
index 43f2523..b0a64cf 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
@@ -846,6 +846,57 @@ static void __pmu_write_counter(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, u32 value, int idx)
 	pmu_write_register(cci_pmu, value, idx, CCI_PMU_CNTR);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI500_PMU
+
+/*
+ * CCI-500 has advanced power saving policies, which could gate the
+ * clocks to the PMU counters, which makes the writes to them ineffective.
+ * The only way to write to those counters is when the global counters
+ * are enabled and the particular counter is enabled.
+ *
+ * So we do the following :
+ *
+ * 1) Disable all the PMU counters, saving their current state
+ * 2) Save the programmed event, and write an invalid event code
+ *    to the event control register for the counter, so that the
+ *    counters are not modified.
+ * 3) Enable the counter control for the counter.
+ * 4) Enable the global PMU profiling
+ * 5) Set the counter value
+ * 6) Disable the counter, global PMU.
+ * 7) Restore the event in the target counter
+ * 8) Restore the status of the rest of the counters.
+ *
+ * We choose an event code which has very little chances of getting
+ * assigned a valid code for step(2). We use the highest possible
+ * event code (0x1f) for the master interface 0.
+ */
+#define CCI500_INVALID_EVENT	((CCI500_PORT_M0 << CCI500_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE_SHIFT) | \
+				 (CCI500_PMU_EVENT_CODE_MASK << CCI500_PMU_EVENT_CODE_SHIFT))
+static void cci500_pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask, u32 value)
+{
+	unsigned long saved_mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(cci_pmu->num_cntrs)];
+	u32 event;
+	int i;
+
+	pmu_save_counters(cci_pmu, saved_mask);
+
+	for_each_set_bit(i, mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs) {
+		event = pmu_get_event(cci_pmu, i);
+		pmu_set_event(cci_pmu, i, CCI500_INVALID_EVENT);
+		pmu_enable_counter(cci_pmu, i);
+		__cci_pmu_enable();
+		__pmu_write_counter(cci_pmu, value, i);
+		__cci_pmu_disable();
+		pmu_disable_counter(cci_pmu, i);
+		pmu_set_event(cci_pmu, i, event);
+	}
+
+	pmu_restore_counters(cci_pmu, saved_mask);
+}
+
+#endif	/* CONFIG_ARM_CCI500_PMU */
+
 static void pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value)
 {
 	struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu = to_cci_pmu(event->pmu);
@@ -1550,6 +1601,7 @@ static struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[] = {
 			},
 		},
 		.validate_hw_event = cci500_validate_hw_event,
+		.write_counters	= cci500_pmu_write_counters,
 	},
 #endif
 };
-- 
1.7.9.5


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: suzuki.poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K. Poulose)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 10/12] arm-cci: CCI-500: Work around PMU counter writes
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:49:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450374559-23315-11-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450374559-23315-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

The CCI PMU driver sets the event counter to the half of the maximum
value(2^31) it can count before we start the counters via
pmu_event_set_period(). This is done to give us the best chance to
handle the overflow interrupt, taking care of extreme interrupt latencies.

However, CCI-500 comes with advanced power saving schemes, which
disables the clock to the event counters unless the counters are enabled to
count (PMCR.CEN). This prevents the driver from writing the period to the
counters before starting them.  Also, there is no way we can reset the
individual event counter to 0 (PMCR.RST resets all the counters, losing
their current readings). However the value of the counter is preserved and
could be read back, when the counters are not enabled.

So we cannot reliably use the counters and compute the number of events
generated during the sampling period since we don't have the value of the
counter at start.

This patch works around this issue by changing writes to the counter
with the following steps.

 1) Disable all the counters (remembering any counters which were enabled)
 2) Save the current event and program the target counter to count an
    invalid event, which by spec is guaranteed to not-generate any events.
 3) Enable the target counter.
 4) Enable the CCI PMU
 5) Write to the target counter.
 6) Disable the CCI PMU and the target counter
 7) Restore the event back on the target counter.
 8) Restore the status of the all the counters

Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
 drivers/bus/arm-cci.c |   52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
index 43f2523..b0a64cf 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
@@ -846,6 +846,57 @@ static void __pmu_write_counter(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, u32 value, int idx)
 	pmu_write_register(cci_pmu, value, idx, CCI_PMU_CNTR);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_CCI500_PMU
+
+/*
+ * CCI-500 has advanced power saving policies, which could gate the
+ * clocks to the PMU counters, which makes the writes to them ineffective.
+ * The only way to write to those counters is when the global counters
+ * are enabled and the particular counter is enabled.
+ *
+ * So we do the following :
+ *
+ * 1) Disable all the PMU counters, saving their current state
+ * 2) Save the programmed event, and write an invalid event code
+ *    to the event control register for the counter, so that the
+ *    counters are not modified.
+ * 3) Enable the counter control for the counter.
+ * 4) Enable the global PMU profiling
+ * 5) Set the counter value
+ * 6) Disable the counter, global PMU.
+ * 7) Restore the event in the target counter
+ * 8) Restore the status of the rest of the counters.
+ *
+ * We choose an event code which has very little chances of getting
+ * assigned a valid code for step(2). We use the highest possible
+ * event code (0x1f) for the master interface 0.
+ */
+#define CCI500_INVALID_EVENT	((CCI500_PORT_M0 << CCI500_PMU_EVENT_SOURCE_SHIFT) | \
+				 (CCI500_PMU_EVENT_CODE_MASK << CCI500_PMU_EVENT_CODE_SHIFT))
+static void cci500_pmu_write_counters(struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu, unsigned long *mask, u32 value)
+{
+	unsigned long saved_mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(cci_pmu->num_cntrs)];
+	u32 event;
+	int i;
+
+	pmu_save_counters(cci_pmu, saved_mask);
+
+	for_each_set_bit(i, mask, cci_pmu->num_cntrs) {
+		event = pmu_get_event(cci_pmu, i);
+		pmu_set_event(cci_pmu, i, CCI500_INVALID_EVENT);
+		pmu_enable_counter(cci_pmu, i);
+		__cci_pmu_enable();
+		__pmu_write_counter(cci_pmu, value, i);
+		__cci_pmu_disable();
+		pmu_disable_counter(cci_pmu, i);
+		pmu_set_event(cci_pmu, i, event);
+	}
+
+	pmu_restore_counters(cci_pmu, saved_mask);
+}
+
+#endif	/* CONFIG_ARM_CCI500_PMU */
+
 static void pmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u32 value)
 {
 	struct cci_pmu *cci_pmu = to_cci_pmu(event->pmu);
@@ -1550,6 +1601,7 @@ static struct cci_pmu_model cci_pmu_models[] = {
 			},
 		},
 		.validate_hw_event = cci500_validate_hw_event,
+		.write_counters	= cci500_pmu_write_counters,
 	},
 #endif
 };
-- 
1.7.9.5

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-17 17:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-17 17:49 [PATCHv4 00/12] arm-cci: PMU updates Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] arm-cci: Define CCI counter period Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] arm-cci: Refactor pmu_write_counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] arm-cci: Group writes to counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] arm-cci: Fix the flags for pmu_start called from pmu_add Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] arm-cci: PMU: Add support for transactions Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 18:42   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-17 18:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-18 10:28     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-18 10:28       ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-18 10:42       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-18 10:42         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-18 10:58         ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-18 10:58           ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-18 11:47           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-18 11:47             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-21 10:55             ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-21 10:55               ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-05 13:37               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-05 13:37                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-05 13:43                 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-05 13:43                   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-05 14:53                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-05 14:53                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] arm-cci: Refactor CCI PMU enable/disable methods Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] arm-cci: Get the status of a counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] arm-cci: Add routines to save/restore all counters Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] arm-cci: Provide hook for writing to PMU counters Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` Suzuki K. Poulose [this message]
2015-12-17 17:49   ` [PATCH v4 10/12] arm-cci: CCI-500: Work around PMU counter writes Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] arm-cci500: Rearrange PMU driver for code sharing with CCI-550 PMU Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] arm-cci: CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1450374559-23315-11-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=arm@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.