All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	punit.agrawal@arm.com, arm@kernel.org,
	"Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 01/12] arm-cci: Define CCI counter period
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:49:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450374559-23315-2-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450374559-23315-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

Instead of hard coding the period we program on the PMU
counters, define a symbol.

Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
 drivers/bus/arm-cci.c |   19 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
index ee47e6b..3786879 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
@@ -85,6 +85,14 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_matches[] = {
 #define CCI_PMU_CNTR_MASK		((1ULL << 32) -1)
 #define CCI_PMU_CNTR_LAST(cci_pmu)	(cci_pmu->num_cntrs - 1)
 
+/*
+ * The CCI PMU counters have a period of 2^32. To account for the
+ * possiblity of extreme interrupt latency we program for a period of
+ * half that. Hopefully we can handle the interrupt before another 2^31
+ * events occur and the counter overtakes its previous value.
+ */
+#define CCI_CNTR_PERIOD		(1UL << 31)
+
 #define CCI_PMU_MAX_HW_CNTRS(model) \
 	((model)->num_hw_cntrs + (model)->fixed_hw_cntrs)
 
@@ -797,15 +805,8 @@ static void pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
 void pmu_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
-	/*
-	 * The CCI PMU counters have a period of 2^32. To account for the
-	 * possiblity of extreme interrupt latency we program for a period of
-	 * half that. Hopefully we can handle the interrupt before another 2^31
-	 * events occur and the counter overtakes its previous value.
-	 */
-	u64 val = 1ULL << 31;
-	local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, val);
-	pmu_write_counter(event, val);
+	local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, CCI_CNTR_PERIOD);
+	pmu_write_counter(event, CCI_CNTR_PERIOD);
 }
 
 static irqreturn_t pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, void *dev)
-- 
1.7.9.5


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: suzuki.poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K. Poulose)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 01/12] arm-cci: Define CCI counter period
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:49:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1450374559-23315-2-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450374559-23315-1-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com>

Instead of hard coding the period we program on the PMU
counters, define a symbol.

Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
---
 drivers/bus/arm-cci.c |   19 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
index ee47e6b..3786879 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/arm-cci.c
@@ -85,6 +85,14 @@ static const struct of_device_id arm_cci_matches[] = {
 #define CCI_PMU_CNTR_MASK		((1ULL << 32) -1)
 #define CCI_PMU_CNTR_LAST(cci_pmu)	(cci_pmu->num_cntrs - 1)
 
+/*
+ * The CCI PMU counters have a period of 2^32. To account for the
+ * possiblity of extreme interrupt latency we program for a period of
+ * half that. Hopefully we can handle the interrupt before another 2^31
+ * events occur and the counter overtakes its previous value.
+ */
+#define CCI_CNTR_PERIOD		(1UL << 31)
+
 #define CCI_PMU_MAX_HW_CNTRS(model) \
 	((model)->num_hw_cntrs + (model)->fixed_hw_cntrs)
 
@@ -797,15 +805,8 @@ static void pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
 void pmu_event_set_period(struct perf_event *event)
 {
 	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
-	/*
-	 * The CCI PMU counters have a period of 2^32. To account for the
-	 * possiblity of extreme interrupt latency we program for a period of
-	 * half that. Hopefully we can handle the interrupt before another 2^31
-	 * events occur and the counter overtakes its previous value.
-	 */
-	u64 val = 1ULL << 31;
-	local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, val);
-	pmu_write_counter(event, val);
+	local64_set(&hwc->prev_count, CCI_CNTR_PERIOD);
+	pmu_write_counter(event, CCI_CNTR_PERIOD);
 }
 
 static irqreturn_t pmu_handle_irq(int irq_num, void *dev)
-- 
1.7.9.5

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-17 17:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-17 17:49 [PATCHv4 00/12] arm-cci: PMU updates Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` Suzuki K. Poulose [this message]
2015-12-17 17:49   ` [PATCH v4 01/12] arm-cci: Define CCI counter period Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] arm-cci: Refactor pmu_write_counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] arm-cci: Group writes to counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] arm-cci: Fix the flags for pmu_start called from pmu_add Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] arm-cci: PMU: Add support for transactions Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 18:42   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-17 18:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-18 10:28     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-18 10:28       ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-18 10:42       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-18 10:42         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-18 10:58         ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-18 10:58           ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-18 11:47           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-18 11:47             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-21 10:55             ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-21 10:55               ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-05 13:37               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-05 13:37                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-05 13:43                 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-05 13:43                   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2016-01-05 14:53                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-05 14:53                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] arm-cci: Refactor CCI PMU enable/disable methods Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] arm-cci: Get the status of a counter Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] arm-cci: Add routines to save/restore all counters Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] arm-cci: Provide hook for writing to PMU counters Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] arm-cci: CCI-500: Work around PMU counter writes Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] arm-cci500: Rearrange PMU driver for code sharing with CCI-550 PMU Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] arm-cci: CoreLink CCI-550 PMU driver Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-17 17:49   ` Suzuki K. Poulose

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1450374559-23315-2-git-send-email-suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=arm@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.