All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
To: YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>
Cc: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Mao Huang <littlecvr@chromium.org>,
	Bibby Hsieh <bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@mediatek.com,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, emil.l.velikov@gmail.com,
	thierry.reding@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:03:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469613816.2470.50.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469529774.4678.34.camel@mtksdaap41>

Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2016, 18:42 +0800 schrieb YT Shen:
> Hi CK,
> 
> On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 14:53 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> > Hi, YT:
> > 
> > Some comments inline.
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 18:07 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
> > > This patch add support for the Mediatek MT2701 DISP subsystem.
> > > There is only one OVL engine in MT2701.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c     |    6 ++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c    |    6 ++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c      |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c |    7 +++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.h |    1 +
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c      |   31 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  6 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > 
> > [snip...]
> > 
> > >  
> > >  static const struct of_device_id mtk_ddp_comp_dt_ids[] = {
> > > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-ovl",   .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OVL },
> > >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-ovl",   .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OVL },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-rdma",  .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_RDMA },
> > >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-rdma",  .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_RDMA },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-wdma",  .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_WDMA },
> > 
> > Is WDMA different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need
> > not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-disp-wdma' because use
> > 'mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma' is enough.
> Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible
> 'mt2701-disp-wdma'

It would be nice if you could add a short paragraph to the patch
description about what the hardware differences are (probably just
changed register layout in most cases).

regards
Philipp

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>
To: YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	srv_heupstream@mediatek.com, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	emil.l.velikov@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	Mao Huang <littlecvr@chromium.org>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com, Sascha Hauer <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:03:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469613816.2470.50.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469529774.4678.34.camel@mtksdaap41>

Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2016, 18:42 +0800 schrieb YT Shen:
> Hi CK,
> 
> On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 14:53 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> > Hi, YT:
> > 
> > Some comments inline.
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 18:07 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
> > > This patch add support for the Mediatek MT2701 DISP subsystem.
> > > There is only one OVL engine in MT2701.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c     |    6 ++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c    |    6 ++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c      |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c |    7 +++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.h |    1 +
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c      |   31 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  6 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > 
> > [snip...]
> > 
> > >  
> > >  static const struct of_device_id mtk_ddp_comp_dt_ids[] = {
> > > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-ovl",   .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OVL },
> > >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-ovl",   .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OVL },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-rdma",  .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_RDMA },
> > >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-rdma",  .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_RDMA },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-wdma",  .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_WDMA },
> > 
> > Is WDMA different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need
> > not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-disp-wdma' because use
> > 'mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma' is enough.
> Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible
> 'mt2701-disp-wdma'

It would be nice if you could add a short paragraph to the patch
description about what the hardware differences are (probably just
changed register layout in most cases).

regards
Philipp

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: p.zabel@pengutronix.de (Philipp Zabel)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2016 12:03:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1469613816.2470.50.camel@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1469529774.4678.34.camel@mtksdaap41>

Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2016, 18:42 +0800 schrieb YT Shen:
> Hi CK,
> 
> On Wed, 2016-07-20 at 14:53 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> > Hi, YT:
> > 
> > Some comments inline.
> > 
> > On Fri, 2016-07-15 at 18:07 +0800, YT Shen wrote:
> > > This patch add support for the Mediatek MT2701 DISP subsystem.
> > > There is only one OVL engine in MT2701.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: YT Shen <yt.shen@mediatek.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_ovl.c     |    6 ++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_disp_rdma.c    |    6 ++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp.c      |   41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c |    7 +++++
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.h |    1 +
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c      |   31 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  6 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > 
> > [snip...]
> > 
> > >  
> > >  static const struct of_device_id mtk_ddp_comp_dt_ids[] = {
> > > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-ovl",   .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OVL },
> > >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-ovl",   .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_OVL },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-rdma",  .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_RDMA },
> > >  	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-rdma",  .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_RDMA },
> > > +	{ .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-wdma",  .data = (void *)MTK_DISP_WDMA },
> > 
> > Is WDMA different from MT8173 to MT2701. If they are the same, you need
> > not to add compatible of 'mediatek,mt2701-disp-wdma' because use
> > 'mediatek,mt8173-disp-wdma' is enough.
> Yes, the hardware has differences, so we need add new compatible
> 'mt2701-disp-wdma'

It would be nice if you could add a short paragraph to the patch
description about what the hardware differences are (probably just
changed register layout in most cases).

regards
Philipp

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-27 10:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-15 10:07 [PATCH v4 0/8] MT2701 DRM support YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07 ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07 ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] drm/mediatek: rename macros, add chip prefix YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] drm/mediatek: add *driver_data for different hardware settings YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] drm/mediatek: add shadow register support YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-18  6:32   ` CK Hu
2016-07-18  6:32     ` CK Hu
2016-07-18  6:32     ` CK Hu
2016-07-18  8:36     ` Philipp Zabel
2016-07-18  8:36       ` Philipp Zabel
2016-07-18  8:36       ` Philipp Zabel
2016-07-19 11:12       ` YT Shen
2016-07-19 11:12         ` YT Shen
2016-07-19 11:12         ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] drm/mediatek: add support for Mediatek SoC MT2701 YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-18  6:58   ` CK Hu
2016-07-18  6:58     ` CK Hu
2016-07-18  6:58     ` CK Hu
2016-07-19 11:09     ` YT Shen
2016-07-19 11:09       ` YT Shen
2016-07-19 11:09       ` YT Shen
2016-07-20  6:53   ` CK Hu
2016-07-20  6:53     ` CK Hu
2016-07-20  6:53     ` CK Hu
2016-07-26 10:42     ` YT Shen
2016-07-26 10:42       ` YT Shen
2016-07-26 10:42       ` YT Shen
2016-07-27 10:03       ` Philipp Zabel [this message]
2016-07-27 10:03         ` Philipp Zabel
2016-07-27 10:03         ` Philipp Zabel
2016-07-28  2:07         ` CK Hu
2016-07-28  2:07           ` CK Hu
2016-07-28  2:07           ` CK Hu
2016-07-28  7:17           ` YT Shen
2016-07-28  7:17             ` YT Shen
2016-07-28  7:17             ` YT Shen
2016-07-28  9:41             ` CK Hu
2016-07-28  9:41               ` CK Hu
2016-07-28  9:41               ` CK Hu
2016-07-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] drm/mediatek: add dsi interrupt control YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-19  5:39   ` CK Hu
2016-07-19  5:39     ` CK Hu
2016-07-19  5:39     ` CK Hu
2016-07-19 11:08     ` YT Shen
2016-07-19 11:08       ` YT Shen
2016-07-19 11:08       ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] drm/mediatek: add dsi transfer function YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-20  5:59   ` CK Hu
2016-07-20  5:59     ` CK Hu
2016-07-20  5:59     ` CK Hu
2016-07-26 10:42     ` YT Shen
2016-07-26 10:42       ` YT Shen
2016-07-26 10:42       ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] drm/mediatek: add mipi panel support YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-20  6:27   ` CK Hu
2016-07-20  6:27     ` CK Hu
2016-07-20  6:27     ` CK Hu
2016-07-26 10:42     ` YT Shen
2016-07-26 10:42       ` YT Shen
2016-07-26 10:42       ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] arm: dts: mt2701: Add display subsystem related nodes for MT2701 YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen
2016-07-15 10:07   ` YT Shen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1469613816.2470.50.camel@pengutronix.de \
    --to=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=bibby.hsieh@mediatek.com \
    --cc=ck.hu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=emil.l.velikov@gmail.com \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=littlecvr@chromium.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=srv_heupstream@mediatek.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=yt.shen@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.