From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> To: "Nambiar, Amritha" <amritha.nambiar@intel.com>, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com Cc: alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, kiran.patil@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mitch.a.williams@intel.com, alexander.duyck@gmail.com, neerav.parikh@intel.com, sridhar.samudrala@intel.com, carolyn.wyborny@intel.com, Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC 0/6] Configure cloud filters in i40e via tc/flower classifier Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 08:01:07 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <146b5375-5d70-bb65-74aa-5c19c1de7daf@mojatatu.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <78fbc08d-f846-a3e4-ffbd-f0cba43780e3@intel.com> On 17-08-01 08:57 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote: > > On 8/1/2017 3:15 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: >> On 17-07-31 08:36 PM, Amritha Nambiar wrote: >>> >>> # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent ffff: prio 1 flower\ >>> dst_ip 192.168.1.1/32 ip_proto udp dst_port 22\ >>> skip_sw indev eth0 action mirred ingress redirect dev eth0 tc 1 >>> >> >> I think "queue 1" sounds better than "tc 1". >> "tc" is already a keyword in a few places (even within that declaration >> above). > > The idea is to redirect to a traffic class that has queues assigned to > it and not a single queue i.e. these are actually queue groups and not a > single queue. So may be "qgroup 1" or "tcqgroup 1" fits better. > Can you describe how this works? So the specific memeber of a a tcgroups show up on a specific rx DMA ring? If you only have 16 and 512 RX DMA rings - how does that work? cheers, jamal
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next RFC 0/6] Configure cloud filters in i40e via tc/flower classifier Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2017 08:01:07 -0400 [thread overview] Message-ID: <146b5375-5d70-bb65-74aa-5c19c1de7daf@mojatatu.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <78fbc08d-f846-a3e4-ffbd-f0cba43780e3@intel.com> On 17-08-01 08:57 PM, Nambiar, Amritha wrote: > > On 8/1/2017 3:15 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: >> On 17-07-31 08:36 PM, Amritha Nambiar wrote: >>> >>> # tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent ffff: prio 1 flower\ >>> dst_ip 192.168.1.1/32 ip_proto udp dst_port 22\ >>> skip_sw indev eth0 action mirred ingress redirect dev eth0 tc 1 >>> >> >> I think "queue 1" sounds better than "tc 1". >> "tc" is already a keyword in a few places (even within that declaration >> above). > > The idea is to redirect to a traffic class that has queues assigned to > it and not a single queue i.e. these are actually queue groups and not a > single queue. So may be "qgroup 1" or "tcqgroup 1" fits better. > Can you describe how this works? So the specific memeber of a a tcgroups show up on a specific rx DMA ring? If you only have 16 and 512 RX DMA rings - how does that work? cheers, jamal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-02 12:01 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-08-01 0:36 [PATCH net-next RFC 0/6] Configure cloud filters in i40e via tc/flower classifier Amritha Nambiar 2017-08-01 0:36 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Amritha Nambiar 2017-08-01 0:37 ` [PATCH 1/6] [net-next]net: sched: act_mirred: Extend redirect action to accept a traffic class Amritha Nambiar 2017-08-01 0:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Amritha Nambiar 2017-08-01 10:22 ` Jamal Hadi Salim 2017-08-01 10:22 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jamal Hadi Salim 2017-08-02 1:12 ` Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-02 1:12 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-01 10:44 ` Jamal Hadi Salim 2017-08-01 10:44 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jamal Hadi Salim 2017-08-02 1:42 ` Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-02 1:42 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-01 11:12 ` Jiri Pirko 2017-08-01 11:12 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jiri Pirko 2017-08-02 2:20 ` Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-02 2:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-01 0:37 ` [PATCH 2/6] [net-next]net: i40e: Maintain a mapping of TCs with the VSI seids Amritha Nambiar 2017-08-01 0:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Amritha Nambiar 2017-08-01 0:37 ` [PATCH 3/6] [net-next]net: i40e: Extend set switch config command to accept cloud filter mode Amritha Nambiar 2017-08-01 0:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Amritha Nambiar 2017-08-01 10:48 ` Jamal Hadi Salim 2017-08-01 10:48 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jamal Hadi Salim 2017-08-01 0:37 ` [PATCH 4/6] [net-next]net: i40e: Admin queue definitions for cloud filters Amritha Nambiar 2017-08-01 0:37 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Amritha Nambiar 2017-08-01 19:16 ` Shannon Nelson 2017-08-01 19:16 ` Shannon Nelson 2017-08-14 18:59 ` Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-14 18:59 ` Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-01 0:38 ` [PATCH 5/6] [net-next]net: i40e: Clean up of " Amritha Nambiar 2017-08-01 0:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Amritha Nambiar 2017-08-01 19:16 ` Shannon Nelson 2017-08-01 19:16 ` Shannon Nelson 2017-08-14 19:06 ` Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-14 19:06 ` Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-01 0:38 ` [PATCH 6/6] [net-next]net: i40e: Enable cloud filters in i40e via tc/flower classifier Amritha Nambiar 2017-08-01 0:38 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Amritha Nambiar 2017-08-01 10:56 ` Jamal Hadi Salim 2017-08-01 10:56 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jamal Hadi Salim 2017-08-02 2:13 ` Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-02 2:13 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-02 12:02 ` Jamal Hadi Salim 2017-08-02 12:02 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jamal Hadi Salim 2017-08-02 18:20 ` Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-02 18:20 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-01 19:16 ` Shannon Nelson 2017-08-01 19:16 ` Shannon Nelson 2017-08-14 19:21 ` Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-14 19:21 ` Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-01 10:15 ` [PATCH net-next RFC 0/6] Configure " Jamal Hadi Salim 2017-08-01 10:15 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Jamal Hadi Salim 2017-08-02 0:57 ` Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-02 0:57 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-02 12:01 ` Jamal Hadi Salim [this message] 2017-08-02 12:01 ` Jamal Hadi Salim 2017-08-02 18:17 ` Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-02 18:17 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Nambiar, Amritha 2017-08-01 19:16 ` Shannon Nelson 2017-08-01 19:16 ` Shannon Nelson
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=146b5375-5d70-bb65-74aa-5c19c1de7daf@mojatatu.com \ --to=jhs@mojatatu.com \ --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \ --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \ --cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \ --cc=carolyn.wyborny@intel.com \ --cc=gerlitz.or@gmail.com \ --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \ --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \ --cc=kiran.patil@intel.com \ --cc=mitch.a.williams@intel.com \ --cc=neerav.parikh@intel.com \ --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.