* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] armv7m: Rename nvic_state to NVICState
2017-02-02 20:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite NVIC to not depend on the GIC Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-02 20:02 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-10 14:23 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-02-14 17:00 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] armv7m: Implement reading and writing of PRIGROUP Peter Maydell
` (8 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 2 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-02 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Cc: patches, Alex Bennée, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
Rename the nvic_state struct to NVICState, to match
our naming conventions.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
index fe5c303..09975f3 100644
--- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#include "gic_internal.h"
#include "qemu/log.h"
-typedef struct {
+typedef struct NVICState {
GICState gic;
ARMCPU *cpu;
struct {
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ typedef struct {
MemoryRegion container;
uint32_t num_irq;
qemu_irq sysresetreq;
-} nvic_state;
+} NVICState;
#define TYPE_NVIC "armv7m_nvic"
/**
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ typedef struct NVICClass {
#define NVIC_GET_CLASS(obj) \
OBJECT_GET_CLASS(NVICClass, (obj), TYPE_NVIC)
#define NVIC(obj) \
- OBJECT_CHECK(nvic_state, (obj), TYPE_NVIC)
+ OBJECT_CHECK(NVICState, (obj), TYPE_NVIC)
static const uint8_t nvic_id[] = {
0x00, 0xb0, 0x1b, 0x00, 0x0d, 0xe0, 0x05, 0xb1
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static const uint8_t nvic_id[] = {
int system_clock_scale;
/* Conversion factor from qemu timer to SysTick frequencies. */
-static inline int64_t systick_scale(nvic_state *s)
+static inline int64_t systick_scale(NVICState *s)
{
if (s->systick.control & SYSTICK_CLKSOURCE)
return system_clock_scale;
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static inline int64_t systick_scale(nvic_state *s)
return 1000;
}
-static void systick_reload(nvic_state *s, int reset)
+static void systick_reload(NVICState *s, int reset)
{
/* The Cortex-M3 Devices Generic User Guide says that "When the
* ENABLE bit is set to 1, the counter loads the RELOAD value from the
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static void systick_reload(nvic_state *s, int reset)
static void systick_timer_tick(void * opaque)
{
- nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
+ NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
s->systick.control |= SYSTICK_COUNTFLAG;
if (s->systick.control & SYSTICK_TICKINT) {
/* Trigger the interrupt. */
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void systick_timer_tick(void * opaque)
}
}
-static void systick_reset(nvic_state *s)
+static void systick_reset(NVICState *s)
{
s->systick.control = 0;
s->systick.reload = 0;
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void systick_reset(nvic_state *s)
IRQ is #16. The internal GIC routines use #32 as the first IRQ. */
void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq)
{
- nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
+ NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
if (irq >= 16)
irq += 16;
gic_set_pending_private(&s->gic, 0, irq);
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq)
/* Make pending IRQ active. */
int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
{
- nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
+ NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
uint32_t irq;
irq = gic_acknowledge_irq(&s->gic, 0, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
@@ -148,13 +148,13 @@ int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
void armv7m_nvic_complete_irq(void *opaque, int irq)
{
- nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
+ NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
if (irq >= 16)
irq += 16;
gic_complete_irq(&s->gic, 0, irq, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
}
-static uint32_t nvic_readl(nvic_state *s, uint32_t offset)
+static uint32_t nvic_readl(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset)
{
ARMCPU *cpu = s->cpu;
uint32_t val;
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static uint32_t nvic_readl(nvic_state *s, uint32_t offset)
}
}
-static void nvic_writel(nvic_state *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
+static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
{
ARMCPU *cpu = s->cpu;
uint32_t oldval;
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static void nvic_writel(nvic_state *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
static uint64_t nvic_sysreg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
unsigned size)
{
- nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
+ NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
uint32_t offset = addr;
int i;
uint32_t val;
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static uint64_t nvic_sysreg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
static void nvic_sysreg_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
uint64_t value, unsigned size)
{
- nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
+ NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
uint32_t offset = addr;
int i;
@@ -486,17 +486,17 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_nvic = {
.version_id = 1,
.minimum_version_id = 1,
.fields = (VMStateField[]) {
- VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.control, nvic_state),
- VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.reload, nvic_state),
- VMSTATE_INT64(systick.tick, nvic_state),
- VMSTATE_TIMER_PTR(systick.timer, nvic_state),
+ VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.control, NVICState),
+ VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.reload, NVICState),
+ VMSTATE_INT64(systick.tick, NVICState),
+ VMSTATE_TIMER_PTR(systick.timer, NVICState),
VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
}
};
static void armv7m_nvic_reset(DeviceState *dev)
{
- nvic_state *s = NVIC(dev);
+ NVICState *s = NVIC(dev);
NVICClass *nc = NVIC_GET_CLASS(s);
nc->parent_reset(dev);
/* Common GIC reset resets to disabled; the NVIC doesn't have
@@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static void armv7m_nvic_reset(DeviceState *dev)
static void armv7m_nvic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
{
- nvic_state *s = NVIC(dev);
+ NVICState *s = NVIC(dev);
NVICClass *nc = NVIC_GET_CLASS(s);
Error *local_err = NULL;
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static void armv7m_nvic_instance_init(Object *obj)
*/
GICState *s = ARM_GIC_COMMON(obj);
DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
- nvic_state *nvic = NVIC(obj);
+ NVICState *nvic = NVIC(obj);
/* The ARM v7m may have anything from 0 to 496 external interrupt
* IRQ lines. We default to 64. Other boards may differ and should
* set the num-irq property appropriately.
@@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static const TypeInfo armv7m_nvic_info = {
.name = TYPE_NVIC,
.parent = TYPE_ARM_GIC_COMMON,
.instance_init = armv7m_nvic_instance_init,
- .instance_size = sizeof(nvic_state),
+ .instance_size = sizeof(NVICState),
.class_init = armv7m_nvic_class_init,
.class_size = sizeof(NVICClass),
};
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] armv7m: Rename nvic_state to NVICState
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] armv7m: Rename nvic_state to NVICState Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-10 14:23 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-02-14 17:00 ` Alex Bennée
1 sibling, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2017-02-10 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell, qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Cc: Liviu Ionescu, Michael Davidsaver, Alex Bennée, patches
On 02/02/2017 05:02 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Rename the nvic_state struct to NVICState, to match
> our naming conventions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> index fe5c303..09975f3 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> #include "gic_internal.h"
> #include "qemu/log.h"
>
> -typedef struct {
> +typedef struct NVICState {
> GICState gic;
> ARMCPU *cpu;
> struct {
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ typedef struct {
> MemoryRegion container;
> uint32_t num_irq;
> qemu_irq sysresetreq;
> -} nvic_state;
> +} NVICState;
>
> #define TYPE_NVIC "armv7m_nvic"
> /**
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ typedef struct NVICClass {
> #define NVIC_GET_CLASS(obj) \
> OBJECT_GET_CLASS(NVICClass, (obj), TYPE_NVIC)
> #define NVIC(obj) \
> - OBJECT_CHECK(nvic_state, (obj), TYPE_NVIC)
> + OBJECT_CHECK(NVICState, (obj), TYPE_NVIC)
>
> static const uint8_t nvic_id[] = {
> 0x00, 0xb0, 0x1b, 0x00, 0x0d, 0xe0, 0x05, 0xb1
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static const uint8_t nvic_id[] = {
> int system_clock_scale;
>
> /* Conversion factor from qemu timer to SysTick frequencies. */
> -static inline int64_t systick_scale(nvic_state *s)
> +static inline int64_t systick_scale(NVICState *s)
> {
> if (s->systick.control & SYSTICK_CLKSOURCE)
> return system_clock_scale;
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static inline int64_t systick_scale(nvic_state *s)
> return 1000;
> }
>
> -static void systick_reload(nvic_state *s, int reset)
> +static void systick_reload(NVICState *s, int reset)
> {
> /* The Cortex-M3 Devices Generic User Guide says that "When the
> * ENABLE bit is set to 1, the counter loads the RELOAD value from the
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static void systick_reload(nvic_state *s, int reset)
>
> static void systick_timer_tick(void * opaque)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
> + NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> s->systick.control |= SYSTICK_COUNTFLAG;
> if (s->systick.control & SYSTICK_TICKINT) {
> /* Trigger the interrupt. */
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void systick_timer_tick(void * opaque)
> }
> }
>
> -static void systick_reset(nvic_state *s)
> +static void systick_reset(NVICState *s)
> {
> s->systick.control = 0;
> s->systick.reload = 0;
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void systick_reset(nvic_state *s)
> IRQ is #16. The internal GIC routines use #32 as the first IRQ. */
> void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
> + NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> if (irq >= 16)
> irq += 16;
> gic_set_pending_private(&s->gic, 0, irq);
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq)
> /* Make pending IRQ active. */
> int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
> + NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> uint32_t irq;
>
> irq = gic_acknowledge_irq(&s->gic, 0, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
> @@ -148,13 +148,13 @@ int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
>
> void armv7m_nvic_complete_irq(void *opaque, int irq)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
> + NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> if (irq >= 16)
> irq += 16;
> gic_complete_irq(&s->gic, 0, irq, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
> }
>
> -static uint32_t nvic_readl(nvic_state *s, uint32_t offset)
> +static uint32_t nvic_readl(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset)
> {
> ARMCPU *cpu = s->cpu;
> uint32_t val;
> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static uint32_t nvic_readl(nvic_state *s, uint32_t offset)
> }
> }
>
> -static void nvic_writel(nvic_state *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
> +static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
> {
> ARMCPU *cpu = s->cpu;
> uint32_t oldval;
> @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static void nvic_writel(nvic_state *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
> static uint64_t nvic_sysreg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> unsigned size)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
> + NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> uint32_t offset = addr;
> int i;
> uint32_t val;
> @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static uint64_t nvic_sysreg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> static void nvic_sysreg_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> uint64_t value, unsigned size)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
> + NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> uint32_t offset = addr;
> int i;
>
> @@ -486,17 +486,17 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_nvic = {
> .version_id = 1,
> .minimum_version_id = 1,
> .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> - VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.control, nvic_state),
> - VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.reload, nvic_state),
> - VMSTATE_INT64(systick.tick, nvic_state),
> - VMSTATE_TIMER_PTR(systick.timer, nvic_state),
> + VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.control, NVICState),
> + VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.reload, NVICState),
> + VMSTATE_INT64(systick.tick, NVICState),
> + VMSTATE_TIMER_PTR(systick.timer, NVICState),
> VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> }
> };
>
> static void armv7m_nvic_reset(DeviceState *dev)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = NVIC(dev);
> + NVICState *s = NVIC(dev);
> NVICClass *nc = NVIC_GET_CLASS(s);
> nc->parent_reset(dev);
> /* Common GIC reset resets to disabled; the NVIC doesn't have
> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static void armv7m_nvic_reset(DeviceState *dev)
>
> static void armv7m_nvic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = NVIC(dev);
> + NVICState *s = NVIC(dev);
> NVICClass *nc = NVIC_GET_CLASS(s);
> Error *local_err = NULL;
>
> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static void armv7m_nvic_instance_init(Object *obj)
> */
> GICState *s = ARM_GIC_COMMON(obj);
> DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
> - nvic_state *nvic = NVIC(obj);
> + NVICState *nvic = NVIC(obj);
> /* The ARM v7m may have anything from 0 to 496 external interrupt
> * IRQ lines. We default to 64. Other boards may differ and should
> * set the num-irq property appropriately.
> @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static const TypeInfo armv7m_nvic_info = {
> .name = TYPE_NVIC,
> .parent = TYPE_ARM_GIC_COMMON,
> .instance_init = armv7m_nvic_instance_init,
> - .instance_size = sizeof(nvic_state),
> + .instance_size = sizeof(NVICState),
> .class_init = armv7m_nvic_class_init,
> .class_size = sizeof(NVICClass),
> };
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] armv7m: Rename nvic_state to NVICState
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] armv7m: Rename nvic_state to NVICState Peter Maydell
2017-02-10 14:23 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2017-02-14 17:00 ` Alex Bennée
1 sibling, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2017-02-14 17:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell
Cc: qemu-arm, qemu-devel, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> Rename the nvic_state struct to NVICState, to match
> our naming conventions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> index fe5c303..09975f3 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
> #include "gic_internal.h"
> #include "qemu/log.h"
>
> -typedef struct {
> +typedef struct NVICState {
> GICState gic;
> ARMCPU *cpu;
> struct {
> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ typedef struct {
> MemoryRegion container;
> uint32_t num_irq;
> qemu_irq sysresetreq;
> -} nvic_state;
> +} NVICState;
>
> #define TYPE_NVIC "armv7m_nvic"
> /**
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ typedef struct NVICClass {
> #define NVIC_GET_CLASS(obj) \
> OBJECT_GET_CLASS(NVICClass, (obj), TYPE_NVIC)
> #define NVIC(obj) \
> - OBJECT_CHECK(nvic_state, (obj), TYPE_NVIC)
> + OBJECT_CHECK(NVICState, (obj), TYPE_NVIC)
>
> static const uint8_t nvic_id[] = {
> 0x00, 0xb0, 0x1b, 0x00, 0x0d, 0xe0, 0x05, 0xb1
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static const uint8_t nvic_id[] = {
> int system_clock_scale;
>
> /* Conversion factor from qemu timer to SysTick frequencies. */
> -static inline int64_t systick_scale(nvic_state *s)
> +static inline int64_t systick_scale(NVICState *s)
> {
> if (s->systick.control & SYSTICK_CLKSOURCE)
> return system_clock_scale;
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static inline int64_t systick_scale(nvic_state *s)
> return 1000;
> }
>
> -static void systick_reload(nvic_state *s, int reset)
> +static void systick_reload(NVICState *s, int reset)
> {
> /* The Cortex-M3 Devices Generic User Guide says that "When the
> * ENABLE bit is set to 1, the counter loads the RELOAD value from the
> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ static void systick_reload(nvic_state *s, int reset)
>
> static void systick_timer_tick(void * opaque)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
> + NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> s->systick.control |= SYSTICK_COUNTFLAG;
> if (s->systick.control & SYSTICK_TICKINT) {
> /* Trigger the interrupt. */
> @@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static void systick_timer_tick(void * opaque)
> }
> }
>
> -static void systick_reset(nvic_state *s)
> +static void systick_reset(NVICState *s)
> {
> s->systick.control = 0;
> s->systick.reload = 0;
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static void systick_reset(nvic_state *s)
> IRQ is #16. The internal GIC routines use #32 as the first IRQ. */
> void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
> + NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> if (irq >= 16)
> irq += 16;
> gic_set_pending_private(&s->gic, 0, irq);
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq)
> /* Make pending IRQ active. */
> int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
> + NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> uint32_t irq;
>
> irq = gic_acknowledge_irq(&s->gic, 0, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
> @@ -148,13 +148,13 @@ int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
>
> void armv7m_nvic_complete_irq(void *opaque, int irq)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
> + NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> if (irq >= 16)
> irq += 16;
> gic_complete_irq(&s->gic, 0, irq, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
> }
>
> -static uint32_t nvic_readl(nvic_state *s, uint32_t offset)
> +static uint32_t nvic_readl(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset)
> {
> ARMCPU *cpu = s->cpu;
> uint32_t val;
> @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ static uint32_t nvic_readl(nvic_state *s, uint32_t offset)
> }
> }
>
> -static void nvic_writel(nvic_state *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
> +static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
> {
> ARMCPU *cpu = s->cpu;
> uint32_t oldval;
> @@ -425,7 +425,7 @@ static void nvic_writel(nvic_state *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
> static uint64_t nvic_sysreg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> unsigned size)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
> + NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> uint32_t offset = addr;
> int i;
> uint32_t val;
> @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static uint64_t nvic_sysreg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> static void nvic_sysreg_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> uint64_t value, unsigned size)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = (nvic_state *)opaque;
> + NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> uint32_t offset = addr;
> int i;
>
> @@ -486,17 +486,17 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_nvic = {
> .version_id = 1,
> .minimum_version_id = 1,
> .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> - VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.control, nvic_state),
> - VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.reload, nvic_state),
> - VMSTATE_INT64(systick.tick, nvic_state),
> - VMSTATE_TIMER_PTR(systick.timer, nvic_state),
> + VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.control, NVICState),
> + VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.reload, NVICState),
> + VMSTATE_INT64(systick.tick, NVICState),
> + VMSTATE_TIMER_PTR(systick.timer, NVICState),
> VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> }
> };
>
> static void armv7m_nvic_reset(DeviceState *dev)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = NVIC(dev);
> + NVICState *s = NVIC(dev);
> NVICClass *nc = NVIC_GET_CLASS(s);
> nc->parent_reset(dev);
> /* Common GIC reset resets to disabled; the NVIC doesn't have
> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static void armv7m_nvic_reset(DeviceState *dev)
>
> static void armv7m_nvic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> {
> - nvic_state *s = NVIC(dev);
> + NVICState *s = NVIC(dev);
> NVICClass *nc = NVIC_GET_CLASS(s);
> Error *local_err = NULL;
>
> @@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static void armv7m_nvic_instance_init(Object *obj)
> */
> GICState *s = ARM_GIC_COMMON(obj);
> DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
> - nvic_state *nvic = NVIC(obj);
> + NVICState *nvic = NVIC(obj);
> /* The ARM v7m may have anything from 0 to 496 external interrupt
> * IRQ lines. We default to 64. Other boards may differ and should
> * set the num-irq property appropriately.
> @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static const TypeInfo armv7m_nvic_info = {
> .name = TYPE_NVIC,
> .parent = TYPE_ARM_GIC_COMMON,
> .instance_init = armv7m_nvic_instance_init,
> - .instance_size = sizeof(nvic_state),
> + .instance_size = sizeof(NVICState),
> .class_init = armv7m_nvic_class_init,
> .class_size = sizeof(NVICClass),
> };
--
Alex Bennée
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] armv7m: Implement reading and writing of PRIGROUP
2017-02-02 20:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite NVIC to not depend on the GIC Peter Maydell
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] armv7m: Rename nvic_state to NVICState Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-02 20:02 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-10 14:27 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-02-14 17:08 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] armv7m: Rewrite NVIC to not use any GIC code Peter Maydell
` (7 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 2 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-02 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Cc: patches, Alex Bennée, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
Add a state field for the v7M PRIGROUP register and implent
reading and writing it. The current NVIC doesn't honour
the values written, but the new version will.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 14 ++++++++------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
index 09975f3..ce22001 100644
--- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
@@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
typedef struct NVICState {
GICState gic;
ARMCPU *cpu;
+
+ uint32_t prigroup;
+
struct {
uint32_t control;
uint32_t reload;
@@ -223,7 +226,7 @@ static uint32_t nvic_readl(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset)
case 0xd08: /* Vector Table Offset. */
return cpu->env.v7m.vecbase;
case 0xd0c: /* Application Interrupt/Reset Control. */
- return 0xfa050000;
+ return 0xfa050000 | (s->prigroup << 8);
case 0xd10: /* System Control. */
/* TODO: Implement SLEEPONEXIT. */
return 0;
@@ -362,9 +365,7 @@ static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
if (value & 1) {
qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "AIRCR system reset unimplemented\n");
}
- if (value & 0x700) {
- qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "PRIGROUP unimplemented\n");
- }
+ s->prigroup = extract32(value, 8, 3);
}
break;
case 0xd10: /* System Control. */
@@ -483,13 +484,14 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps nvic_sysreg_ops = {
static const VMStateDescription vmstate_nvic = {
.name = "armv7m_nvic",
- .version_id = 1,
- .minimum_version_id = 1,
+ .version_id = 2,
+ .minimum_version_id = 2,
.fields = (VMStateField[]) {
VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.control, NVICState),
VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.reload, NVICState),
VMSTATE_INT64(systick.tick, NVICState),
VMSTATE_TIMER_PTR(systick.timer, NVICState),
+ VMSTATE_UINT32(prigroup, NVICState),
VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
}
};
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] armv7m: Implement reading and writing of PRIGROUP
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] armv7m: Implement reading and writing of PRIGROUP Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-10 14:27 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-02-14 17:08 ` Alex Bennée
1 sibling, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2017-02-10 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell, qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Cc: Liviu Ionescu, Michael Davidsaver, Alex Bennée, patches
On 02/02/2017 05:02 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Add a state field for the v7M PRIGROUP register and implent
> reading and writing it. The current NVIC doesn't honour
> the values written, but the new version will.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> index 09975f3..ce22001 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
> typedef struct NVICState {
> GICState gic;
> ARMCPU *cpu;
> +
> + uint32_t prigroup;
> +
> struct {
> uint32_t control;
> uint32_t reload;
> @@ -223,7 +226,7 @@ static uint32_t nvic_readl(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset)
> case 0xd08: /* Vector Table Offset. */
> return cpu->env.v7m.vecbase;
> case 0xd0c: /* Application Interrupt/Reset Control. */
> - return 0xfa050000;
> + return 0xfa050000 | (s->prigroup << 8);
> case 0xd10: /* System Control. */
> /* TODO: Implement SLEEPONEXIT. */
> return 0;
> @@ -362,9 +365,7 @@ static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
> if (value & 1) {
> qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "AIRCR system reset unimplemented\n");
> }
> - if (value & 0x700) {
> - qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "PRIGROUP unimplemented\n");
> - }
> + s->prigroup = extract32(value, 8, 3);
> }
> break;
> case 0xd10: /* System Control. */
> @@ -483,13 +484,14 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps nvic_sysreg_ops = {
>
> static const VMStateDescription vmstate_nvic = {
> .name = "armv7m_nvic",
> - .version_id = 1,
> - .minimum_version_id = 1,
> + .version_id = 2,
> + .minimum_version_id = 2,
> .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.control, NVICState),
> VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.reload, NVICState),
> VMSTATE_INT64(systick.tick, NVICState),
> VMSTATE_TIMER_PTR(systick.timer, NVICState),
> + VMSTATE_UINT32(prigroup, NVICState),
> VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> }
> };
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] armv7m: Implement reading and writing of PRIGROUP
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] armv7m: Implement reading and writing of PRIGROUP Peter Maydell
2017-02-10 14:27 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2017-02-14 17:08 ` Alex Bennée
1 sibling, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2017-02-14 17:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell
Cc: qemu-arm, qemu-devel, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> Add a state field for the v7M PRIGROUP register and implent
> reading and writing it. The current NVIC doesn't honour
> the values written, but the new version will.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 14 ++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> index 09975f3..ce22001 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,9 @@
> typedef struct NVICState {
> GICState gic;
> ARMCPU *cpu;
> +
> + uint32_t prigroup;
It might be worth mentioning the field resets to 0b000 here.
Nevertheless:
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> +
> struct {
> uint32_t control;
> uint32_t reload;
> @@ -223,7 +226,7 @@ static uint32_t nvic_readl(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset)
> case 0xd08: /* Vector Table Offset. */
> return cpu->env.v7m.vecbase;
> case 0xd0c: /* Application Interrupt/Reset Control. */
> - return 0xfa050000;
> + return 0xfa050000 | (s->prigroup << 8);
> case 0xd10: /* System Control. */
> /* TODO: Implement SLEEPONEXIT. */
> return 0;
> @@ -362,9 +365,7 @@ static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
> if (value & 1) {
> qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "AIRCR system reset unimplemented\n");
> }
> - if (value & 0x700) {
> - qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "PRIGROUP unimplemented\n");
> - }
> + s->prigroup = extract32(value, 8, 3);
> }
> break;
> case 0xd10: /* System Control. */
> @@ -483,13 +484,14 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps nvic_sysreg_ops = {
>
> static const VMStateDescription vmstate_nvic = {
> .name = "armv7m_nvic",
> - .version_id = 1,
> - .minimum_version_id = 1,
> + .version_id = 2,
> + .minimum_version_id = 2,
> .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.control, NVICState),
> VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.reload, NVICState),
> VMSTATE_INT64(systick.tick, NVICState),
> VMSTATE_TIMER_PTR(systick.timer, NVICState),
> + VMSTATE_UINT32(prigroup, NVICState),
> VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> }
> };
--
Alex Bennée
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] armv7m: Rewrite NVIC to not use any GIC code
2017-02-02 20:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite NVIC to not depend on the GIC Peter Maydell
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/9] armv7m: Rename nvic_state to NVICState Peter Maydell
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/9] armv7m: Implement reading and writing of PRIGROUP Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-02 20:02 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-15 12:46 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] armv7m: Fix condition check for taking exceptions Peter Maydell
` (6 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-02 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Cc: patches, Alex Bennée, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
Despite some superficial similarities of register layout, the
M-profile NVIC is really very different from the A-profile GIC.
Our current attempt to reuse the GIC code means that we have
significant bugs in our NVIC.
Implement the NVIC as an entirely separate device, to give
us somewhere we can get the behaviour correct.
This initial commit does not attempt to implement exception
priority escalation, since the GIC-based code didn't either.
It does fix a few bugs in passing:
* ICSR.RETTOBASE polarity was wrong and didn't account for
internal exceptions
* ICSR.VECTPENDING was 16 too high if the pending exception
was for an external interrupt
* UsageFault, BusFault and MemFault were not disabled on reset
as they are supposed to be
Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
[PMM: reworked, various bugs and stylistic cleanups]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 721 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
hw/intc/trace-events | 15 ++
2 files changed, 592 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
index ce22001..e319077 100644
--- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
@@ -17,48 +17,79 @@
#include "hw/sysbus.h"
#include "qemu/timer.h"
#include "hw/arm/arm.h"
+#include "target/arm/cpu.h"
#include "exec/address-spaces.h"
-#include "gic_internal.h"
#include "qemu/log.h"
+#include "trace.h"
+
+/* IRQ number counting:
+ *
+ * the num-irq property counts the number of external IRQ lines
+ *
+ * NVICState::num_irq counts the total number of exceptions
+ * (external IRQs, the 15 internal exceptions including reset,
+ * and one for the unused exception number 0).
+ *
+ * NVIC_MAX_IRQ is the highest permitted number of external IRQ lines.
+ *
+ * NVIC_MAX_VECTORS is the highest permitted number of exceptions.
+ *
+ * Iterating through all exceptions should typically be done with
+ * for (i = 1; i < s->num_irq; i++) to avoid the unused slot 0.
+ *
+ * The external qemu_irq lines are the NVIC's external IRQ lines,
+ * so line 0 is exception 16.
+ */
+#define NVIC_FIRST_IRQ 16
+#define NVIC_MAX_VECTORS 512
+#define NVIC_MAX_IRQ (NVIC_MAX_VECTORS - NVIC_FIRST_IRQ)
+
+/* Effective running priority of the CPU when no exception is active
+ * (higher than the highest possible priority value)
+ */
+#define NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO 0x100
+
+typedef struct VecInfo {
+ int16_t prio; /* priorities can range from -3 to 255 */
+ uint8_t enabled;
+ uint8_t pending;
+ uint8_t active;
+ uint8_t level; /* exceptions <=15 never set level */
+} VecInfo;
typedef struct NVICState {
- GICState gic;
+ /*< private >*/
+ SysBusDevice parent_obj;
+ /*< public >*/
+
ARMCPU *cpu;
+ VecInfo vectors[NVIC_MAX_VECTORS];
uint32_t prigroup;
+ /* vectpending and exception_prio are both cached state that can
+ * be recalculated from the vectors[] array and the prigroup field.
+ */
+ unsigned int vectpending; /* highest prio pending enabled exception */
+ int exception_prio; /* group prio of the highest prio active exception */
+
struct {
uint32_t control;
uint32_t reload;
int64_t tick;
QEMUTimer *timer;
} systick;
+
MemoryRegion sysregmem;
- MemoryRegion gic_iomem_alias;
MemoryRegion container;
+
uint32_t num_irq;
+ qemu_irq excpout;
qemu_irq sysresetreq;
} NVICState;
#define TYPE_NVIC "armv7m_nvic"
-/**
- * NVICClass:
- * @parent_reset: the parent class' reset handler.
- *
- * A model of the v7M NVIC and System Controller
- */
-typedef struct NVICClass {
- /*< private >*/
- ARMGICClass parent_class;
- /*< public >*/
- DeviceRealize parent_realize;
- void (*parent_reset)(DeviceState *dev);
-} NVICClass;
-
-#define NVIC_CLASS(klass) \
- OBJECT_CLASS_CHECK(NVICClass, (klass), TYPE_NVIC)
-#define NVIC_GET_CLASS(obj) \
- OBJECT_GET_CLASS(NVICClass, (obj), TYPE_NVIC)
+
#define NVIC(obj) \
OBJECT_CHECK(NVICState, (obj), TYPE_NVIC)
@@ -125,47 +156,274 @@ static void systick_reset(NVICState *s)
timer_del(s->systick.timer);
}
-/* The external routines use the hardware vector numbering, ie. the first
- IRQ is #16. The internal GIC routines use #32 as the first IRQ. */
+static int nvic_pending_prio(NVICState *s)
+{
+ /* return the priority of the current pending interrupt,
+ * or NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO if no interrupt is pending
+ */
+ return s->vectpending ? s->vectors[s->vectpending].prio : NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO;
+}
+
+/* Return the value of the ISCR RETTOBASE bit:
+ * 1 if there is exactly one active exception
+ * 0 if there is more than one active exception
+ * UNKNOWN if there are no active exceptions (we choose 0)
+ */
+static bool nvic_rettobase(NVICState *s)
+{
+ int irq, nhand = 0;
+
+ for (irq = ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET; irq < s->num_irq; irq++) {
+ if (s->vectors[irq].active) {
+ nhand++;
+ if (nhand == 2) {
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ return nhand == 1;
+}
+
+/* Return the value of the ISCR ISRPENDING bit:
+ * 1 if an external interrupt is pending
+ * 0 if no external interrupt is pending
+ */
+static bool nvic_isrpending(NVICState *s)
+{
+ int irq;
+
+ /* We can shortcut if the highest priority pending interrupt
+ * happens to be external or if there is nothing pending.
+ */
+ if (s->vectpending > NVIC_FIRST_IRQ) {
+ return true;
+ }
+ if (s->vectpending == 0) {
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ for (irq = NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; irq < s->num_irq; irq++) {
+ if (s->vectors[irq].pending) {
+ return true;
+ }
+ }
+ return false;
+}
+
+/* Return a mask word which clears the subpriority bits from
+ * a priority value for an M-profile exception, leaving only
+ * the group priority.
+ */
+static inline uint32_t nvic_gprio_mask(NVICState *s)
+{
+ return ~0U << (s->prigroup + 1);
+}
+
+/* Recompute vectpending and exception_prio */
+static void nvic_recompute_state(NVICState *s)
+{
+ int i;
+ int pend_prio = NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO;
+ int active_prio = NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO;
+ int pend_irq = 0;
+
+ for (i = 1; i < s->num_irq; i++) {
+ VecInfo *vec = &s->vectors[i];
+
+ if (vec->enabled && vec->pending && vec->prio < pend_prio) {
+ pend_prio = vec->prio;
+ pend_irq = i;
+ }
+ if (vec->active && vec->prio < active_prio) {
+ active_prio = vec->prio;
+ }
+ }
+
+ s->vectpending = pend_irq;
+ s->exception_prio = active_prio & nvic_gprio_mask(s);
+
+ trace_nvic_recompute_state(s->vectpending, s->exception_prio);
+}
+
+/* Return the current execution priority of the CPU
+ * (equivalent to the pseudocode ExecutionPriority function).
+ * This is a value between -2 (NMI priority) and NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO.
+ */
+static inline int nvic_exec_prio(NVICState *s)
+{
+ CPUARMState *env = &s->cpu->env;
+ int running;
+
+ if (env->daif & PSTATE_F) { /* FAULTMASK */
+ running = -1;
+ } else if (env->daif & PSTATE_I) { /* PRIMASK */
+ running = 0;
+ } else if (env->v7m.basepri > 0) {
+ running = env->v7m.basepri & nvic_gprio_mask(s);
+ } else {
+ running = NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO; /* lower than any possible priority */
+ }
+ /* consider priority of active handler */
+ return MIN(running, s->exception_prio);
+}
+
+/* caller must call nvic_irq_update() after this */
+static void set_prio(NVICState *s, unsigned irq, uint8_t prio)
+{
+ assert(irq > ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI); /* only use for configurable prios */
+ assert(irq < s->num_irq);
+
+ s->vectors[irq].prio = prio;
+
+ trace_nvic_set_prio(irq, prio);
+}
+
+/* Recompute state and assert irq line accordingly.
+ * Must be called after changes to:
+ * vec->active, vec->enabled, vec->pending or vec->prio for any vector
+ * prigroup
+ */
+static void nvic_irq_update(NVICState *s)
+{
+ int lvl;
+ int pend_prio;
+
+ nvic_recompute_state(s);
+ pend_prio = nvic_pending_prio(s);
+
+ /* Raise NVIC output if this IRQ would be taken, except that we
+ * ignore the effects of the BASEPRI, FAULTMASK and PRIMASK (which
+ * will be checked for in arm_v7m_cpu_exec_interrupt()); changes
+ * to those CPU registers don't cause us to recalculate the NVIC
+ * pending info.
+ */
+ lvl = (pend_prio < s->exception_prio);
+ trace_nvic_irq_update(s->vectpending, pend_prio, s->exception_prio, lvl);
+ qemu_set_irq(s->excpout, lvl);
+}
+
+static void armv7m_nvic_clear_pending(void *opaque, int irq)
+{
+ NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
+ VecInfo *vec;
+
+ assert(irq > ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET && irq < s->num_irq);
+
+ vec = &s->vectors[irq];
+ trace_nvic_clear_pending(irq, vec->enabled, vec->prio);
+ if (vec->pending) {
+ vec->pending = 0;
+ nvic_irq_update(s);
+ }
+}
+
void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq)
{
NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
- if (irq >= 16)
- irq += 16;
- gic_set_pending_private(&s->gic, 0, irq);
+ VecInfo *vec;
+
+ assert(irq > ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET && irq < s->num_irq);
+
+ vec = &s->vectors[irq];
+ trace_nvic_set_pending(irq, vec->enabled, vec->prio);
+ if (!vec->pending) {
+ vec->pending = 1;
+ nvic_irq_update(s);
+ }
}
/* Make pending IRQ active. */
int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
{
NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
- uint32_t irq;
-
- irq = gic_acknowledge_irq(&s->gic, 0, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
- if (irq == 1023)
- hw_error("Interrupt but no vector\n");
- if (irq >= 32)
- irq -= 16;
- return irq;
+ CPUARMState *env = &s->cpu->env;
+ const int pending = s->vectpending;
+ const int running = nvic_exec_prio(s);
+ int pendgroupprio;
+ VecInfo *vec;
+
+ assert(pending > ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET && pending < s->num_irq);
+
+ vec = &s->vectors[pending];
+
+ assert(vec->enabled);
+ assert(vec->pending);
+
+ pendgroupprio = vec->prio & nvic_gprio_mask(s);
+ assert(pendgroupprio < running);
+
+ trace_nvic_acknowledge_irq(pending, vec->prio);
+
+ vec->active = 1;
+ vec->pending = 0;
+
+ env->v7m.exception = s->vectpending;
+
+ nvic_irq_update(s);
+
+ return env->v7m.exception;
}
void armv7m_nvic_complete_irq(void *opaque, int irq)
{
NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
- if (irq >= 16)
- irq += 16;
- gic_complete_irq(&s->gic, 0, irq, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
+ VecInfo *vec;
+
+ assert(irq > ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET && irq < s->num_irq);
+
+ vec = &s->vectors[irq];
+
+ trace_nvic_complete_irq(irq);
+
+ vec->active = 0;
+ if (vec->level) {
+ /* Re-pend the exception if it's still held high; only
+ * happens for extenal IRQs
+ */
+ assert(irq >= NVIC_FIRST_IRQ);
+ vec->pending = 1;
+ }
+
+ nvic_irq_update(s);
+}
+
+/* callback when external interrupt line is changed */
+static void set_irq_level(void *opaque, int n, int level)
+{
+ NVICState *s = opaque;
+ VecInfo *vec;
+
+ n += NVIC_FIRST_IRQ;
+
+ assert(n >= NVIC_FIRST_IRQ && n < s->num_irq);
+
+ trace_nvic_set_irq_level(n, level);
+
+ /* The pending status of an external interrupt is
+ * latched on rising edge and exception handler return.
+ *
+ * Pulsing the IRQ will always run the handler
+ * once, and the handler will re-run until the
+ * level is low when the handler completes.
+ */
+ vec = &s->vectors[n];
+ if (level != vec->level) {
+ vec->level = level;
+ if (level) {
+ armv7m_nvic_set_pending(s, n);
+ }
+ }
}
static uint32_t nvic_readl(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset)
{
ARMCPU *cpu = s->cpu;
uint32_t val;
- int irq;
switch (offset) {
case 4: /* Interrupt Control Type. */
- return (s->num_irq / 32) - 1;
+ return ((s->num_irq - NVIC_FIRST_IRQ) / 32) - 1;
case 0x10: /* SysTick Control and Status. */
val = s->systick.control;
s->systick.control &= ~SYSTICK_COUNTFLAG;
@@ -195,33 +453,29 @@ static uint32_t nvic_readl(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset)
case 0xd04: /* Interrupt Control State. */
/* VECTACTIVE */
val = cpu->env.v7m.exception;
- if (val == 1023) {
- val = 0;
- } else if (val >= 32) {
- val -= 16;
- }
/* VECTPENDING */
- if (s->gic.current_pending[0] != 1023)
- val |= (s->gic.current_pending[0] << 12);
- /* ISRPENDING and RETTOBASE */
- for (irq = 32; irq < s->num_irq; irq++) {
- if (s->gic.irq_state[irq].pending) {
- val |= (1 << 22);
- break;
- }
- if (irq != cpu->env.v7m.exception && s->gic.irq_state[irq].active) {
- val |= (1 << 11);
- }
+ val |= (s->vectpending & 0xff) << 12;
+ /* ISRPENDING - set if any external IRQ is pending */
+ if (nvic_isrpending(s)) {
+ val |= (1 << 22);
+ }
+ /* RETTOBASE - set if only one handler is active */
+ if (nvic_rettobase(s)) {
+ val |= (1 << 11);
}
/* PENDSTSET */
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK].pending)
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK].pending) {
val |= (1 << 26);
+ }
/* PENDSVSET */
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV].pending)
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV].pending) {
val |= (1 << 28);
+ }
/* NMIPENDSET */
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI].pending)
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI].pending) {
val |= (1 << 31);
+ }
+ /* ISRPREEMPT not implemented */
return val;
case 0xd08: /* Vector Table Offset. */
return cpu->env.v7m.vecbase;
@@ -234,20 +488,48 @@ static uint32_t nvic_readl(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset)
return cpu->env.v7m.ccr;
case 0xd24: /* System Handler Status. */
val = 0;
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].active) val |= (1 << 0);
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].active) val |= (1 << 1);
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].active) val |= (1 << 3);
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_SVC].active) val |= (1 << 7);
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_DEBUG].active) val |= (1 << 8);
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV].active) val |= (1 << 10);
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK].active) val |= (1 << 11);
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].pending) val |= (1 << 12);
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].pending) val |= (1 << 13);
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].pending) val |= (1 << 14);
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_SVC].pending) val |= (1 << 15);
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].enabled) val |= (1 << 16);
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].enabled) val |= (1 << 17);
- if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].enabled) val |= (1 << 18);
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].active) {
+ val |= (1 << 0);
+ }
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].active) {
+ val |= (1 << 1);
+ }
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].active) {
+ val |= (1 << 3);
+ }
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_SVC].active) {
+ val |= (1 << 7);
+ }
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_DEBUG].active) {
+ val |= (1 << 8);
+ }
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV].active) {
+ val |= (1 << 10);
+ }
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK].active) {
+ val |= (1 << 11);
+ }
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].pending) {
+ val |= (1 << 12);
+ }
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].pending) {
+ val |= (1 << 13);
+ }
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].pending) {
+ val |= (1 << 14);
+ }
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_SVC].pending) {
+ val |= (1 << 15);
+ }
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].enabled) {
+ val |= (1 << 16);
+ }
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].enabled) {
+ val |= (1 << 17);
+ }
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].enabled) {
+ val |= (1 << 18);
+ }
return val;
case 0xd28: /* Configurable Fault Status. */
return cpu->env.v7m.cfsr;
@@ -341,14 +623,12 @@ static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
if (value & (1 << 28)) {
armv7m_nvic_set_pending(s, ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV);
} else if (value & (1 << 27)) {
- s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV].pending = 0;
- gic_update(&s->gic);
+ armv7m_nvic_clear_pending(s, ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV);
}
if (value & (1 << 26)) {
armv7m_nvic_set_pending(s, ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK);
} else if (value & (1 << 25)) {
- s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK].pending = 0;
- gic_update(&s->gic);
+ armv7m_nvic_clear_pending(s, ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK);
}
break;
case 0xd08: /* Vector Table Offset. */
@@ -366,6 +646,7 @@ static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "AIRCR system reset unimplemented\n");
}
s->prigroup = extract32(value, 8, 3);
+ nvic_irq_update(s);
}
break;
case 0xd10: /* System Control. */
@@ -386,9 +667,10 @@ static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
case 0xd24: /* System Handler Control. */
/* TODO: Real hardware allows you to set/clear the active bits
under some circumstances. We don't implement this. */
- s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].enabled = (value & (1 << 16)) != 0;
- s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].enabled = (value & (1 << 17)) != 0;
- s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].enabled = (value & (1 << 18)) != 0;
+ s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].enabled = (value & (1 << 16)) != 0;
+ s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].enabled = (value & (1 << 17)) != 0;
+ s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].enabled = (value & (1 << 18)) != 0;
+ nvic_irq_update(s);
break;
case 0xd28: /* Configurable Fault Status. */
cpu->env.v7m.cfsr &= ~value; /* W1C */
@@ -410,13 +692,16 @@ static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
"NVIC: Aux fault status registers unimplemented\n");
break;
case 0xf00: /* Software Triggered Interrupt Register */
+ {
/* user mode can only write to STIR if CCR.USERSETMPEND permits it */
- if ((value & 0x1ff) < s->num_irq &&
+ int excnum = (value & 0x1ff) + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ;
+ if (excnum < s->num_irq &&
(arm_current_el(&cpu->env) ||
(cpu->env.v7m.ccr & R_V7M_CCR_USERSETMPEND_MASK))) {
- gic_set_pending_private(&s->gic, 0, value & 0x1ff);
+ armv7m_nvic_set_pending(s, excnum);
}
break;
+ }
default:
qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
"NVIC: Bad write offset 0x%x\n", offset);
@@ -428,28 +713,81 @@ static uint64_t nvic_sysreg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
{
NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
uint32_t offset = addr;
- int i;
+ unsigned i, end;
uint32_t val;
switch (offset) {
+ /* reads of set and clear both return the status */
+ case 0x100 ... 0x13f: /* NVIC Set enable */
+ offset += 0x80;
+ /* fall through */
+ case 0x180 ... 0x1bf: /* NVIC Clear enable */
+ val = 0;
+ offset = offset - 0x180 + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
+
+ for (i = 0, end = size * 8; i < end && offset + i < s->num_irq; i++) {
+ if (s->vectors[offset + i].enabled) {
+ val |= (1 << i);
+ }
+ }
+ break;
+ case 0x200 ... 0x23f: /* NVIC Set pend */
+ offset += 0x80;
+ /* fall through */
+ case 0x280 ... 0x2bf: /* NVIC Clear pend */
+ val = 0;
+ offset = offset - 0x280 + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
+
+ for (i = 0, end = size * 8; i < end && offset + i < s->num_irq; i++) {
+ if (s->vectors[offset + i].pending) {
+ val |= (1 << i);
+ }
+ }
+ break;
+ case 0x300 ... 0x33f: /* NVIC Active */
+ val = 0;
+ offset = offset - 0x300 + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
+
+ for (i = 0, end = size * 8; i < end && offset + i < s->num_irq; i++) {
+ if (s->vectors[offset + i].active) {
+ val |= (1 << i);
+ }
+ }
+ break;
+ case 0x400 ... 0x5ef: /* NVIC Priority */
+ val = 0;
+ offset = offset - 0x400 + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
+
+ for (i = 0; i < size && offset + i < s->num_irq; i++) {
+ val |= s->vectors[offset + i].prio << (8 * i);
+ }
+ break;
case 0xd18 ... 0xd23: /* System Handler Priority. */
val = 0;
for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
- val |= s->gic.priority1[(offset - 0xd14) + i][0] << (i * 8);
+ val |= s->vectors[(offset - 0xd14) + i].prio << (i * 8);
}
- return val;
+ break;
case 0xfe0 ... 0xfff: /* ID. */
if (offset & 3) {
- return 0;
+ val = 0;
+ } else {
+ val = nvic_id[(offset - 0xfe0) >> 2];
+ }
+ break;
+ default:
+ if (size == 4) {
+ val = nvic_readl(s, offset);
+ } else {
+ qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+ "NVIC: Bad read of size %d at offset 0x%x\n",
+ size, offset);
+ val = 0;
}
- return nvic_id[(offset - 0xfe0) >> 2];
- }
- if (size == 4) {
- return nvic_readl(s, offset);
}
- qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
- "NVIC: Bad read of size %d at offset 0x%x\n", size, offset);
- return 0;
+
+ trace_nvic_sysreg_read(addr, val, size);
+ return val;
}
static void nvic_sysreg_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
@@ -457,15 +795,59 @@ static void nvic_sysreg_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
{
NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
uint32_t offset = addr;
- int i;
+ unsigned i, end;
+ unsigned setval = 0;
+
+ trace_nvic_sysreg_write(addr, value, size);
switch (offset) {
+ case 0x100 ... 0x13f: /* NVIC Set enable */
+ offset += 0x80;
+ setval = 1;
+ /* fall through */
+ case 0x180 ... 0x1bf: /* NVIC Clear enable */
+ offset = 8 * (offset - 0x180) + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
+
+ for (i = 0, end = size * 8; i < end && offset + i < s->num_irq; i++) {
+ if (value & (1 << i)) {
+ s->vectors[offset + i].enabled = setval;
+ }
+ }
+ nvic_irq_update(s);
+ return;
+ case 0x200 ... 0x23f: /* NVIC Set pend */
+ /* the special logic in armv7m_nvic_set_pending()
+ * is not needed since IRQs are never escalated
+ */
+ offset += 0x80;
+ setval = 1;
+ /* fall through */
+ case 0x280 ... 0x2bf: /* NVIC Clear pend */
+ offset = 8 * (offset - 0x280) + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
+
+ for (i = 0, end = size * 8; i < end && offset + i < s->num_irq; i++) {
+ if (value & (1 << i)) {
+ s->vectors[offset + i].pending = setval;
+ }
+ }
+ nvic_irq_update(s);
+ return;
+ case 0x300 ... 0x33f: /* NVIC Active */
+ return; /* R/O */
+ case 0x400 ... 0x5ef: /* NVIC Priority */
+ offset = 8 * (offset - 0x400) + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
+
+ for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
+ set_prio(s, offset + i, (value >> (i * 8)) & 0xff);
+ }
+ nvic_irq_update(s);
+ return;
case 0xd18 ... 0xd23: /* System Handler Priority. */
for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
- s->gic.priority1[(offset - 0xd14) + i][0] =
- (value >> (i * 8)) & 0xff;
+ unsigned hdlidx = (offset - 0xd14) + i;
+ set_prio(s, hdlidx, (value >> (i * 8)) & 0xff);
}
- gic_update(&s->gic);
+ nvic_irq_update(s);
return;
}
if (size == 4) {
@@ -482,11 +864,50 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps nvic_sysreg_ops = {
.endianness = DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN,
};
+static int nvic_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)
+{
+ NVICState *s = opaque;
+ unsigned i;
+
+ /* Check for out of range priority settings */
+ if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET].prio != -3 ||
+ s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI].prio != -2 ||
+ s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_HARD].prio != -1) {
+ return 1;
+ }
+ for (i = ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM; i < s->num_irq; i++) {
+ if (s->vectors[i].prio & ~0xff) {
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+
+ nvic_recompute_state(s);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const VMStateDescription vmstate_VecInfo = {
+ .name = "armv7m_nvic_info",
+ .version_id = 1,
+ .minimum_version_id = 1,
+ .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
+ VMSTATE_INT16(prio, VecInfo),
+ VMSTATE_UINT8(enabled, VecInfo),
+ VMSTATE_UINT8(pending, VecInfo),
+ VMSTATE_UINT8(active, VecInfo),
+ VMSTATE_UINT8(level, VecInfo),
+ VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
+ }
+};
+
static const VMStateDescription vmstate_nvic = {
.name = "armv7m_nvic",
- .version_id = 2,
- .minimum_version_id = 2,
+ .version_id = 3,
+ .minimum_version_id = 3,
+ .post_load = &nvic_post_load,
.fields = (VMStateField[]) {
+ VMSTATE_STRUCT_ARRAY(vectors, NVICState, NVIC_MAX_VECTORS, 1,
+ vmstate_VecInfo, VecInfo),
VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.control, NVICState),
VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.reload, NVICState),
VMSTATE_INT64(systick.tick, NVICState),
@@ -496,48 +917,72 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_nvic = {
}
};
+static Property props_nvic[] = {
+ /* Number of external IRQ lines (so excluding the 16 internal exceptions) */
+ DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("num-irq", NVICState, num_irq, 64),
+ DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST()
+};
+
static void armv7m_nvic_reset(DeviceState *dev)
{
NVICState *s = NVIC(dev);
- NVICClass *nc = NVIC_GET_CLASS(s);
- nc->parent_reset(dev);
- /* Common GIC reset resets to disabled; the NVIC doesn't have
- * per-CPU interfaces so mark our non-existent CPU interface
- * as enabled by default, and with a priority mask which allows
- * all interrupts through.
+
+ s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI].enabled = 1;
+ s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_HARD].enabled = 1;
+ /* MEM, BUS, and USAGE are enabled through
+ * the System Handler Control register
*/
- s->gic.cpu_ctlr[0] = GICC_CTLR_EN_GRP0;
- s->gic.priority_mask[0] = 0x100;
- /* The NVIC as a whole is always enabled. */
- s->gic.ctlr = 1;
+ s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_SVC].enabled = 1;
+ s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_DEBUG].enabled = 1;
+ s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV].enabled = 1;
+ s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK].enabled = 1;
+
+ s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET].prio = -3;
+ s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI].prio = -2;
+ s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_HARD].prio = -1;
+
+ /* Strictly speaking the reset handler should be enabled.
+ * However, we don't simulate soft resets through the NVIC,
+ * and the reset vector should never be pended.
+ * So we leave it disabled to catch logic errors.
+ */
+
+ s->exception_prio = NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO;
+ s->vectpending = 0;
+
systick_reset(s);
}
static void armv7m_nvic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
{
NVICState *s = NVIC(dev);
- NVICClass *nc = NVIC_GET_CLASS(s);
- Error *local_err = NULL;
s->cpu = ARM_CPU(qemu_get_cpu(0));
assert(s->cpu);
- /* The NVIC always has only one CPU */
- s->gic.num_cpu = 1;
- /* Tell the common code we're an NVIC */
- s->gic.revision = 0xffffffff;
- s->num_irq = s->gic.num_irq;
- nc->parent_realize(dev, &local_err);
- if (local_err) {
- error_propagate(errp, local_err);
+
+ if (s->num_irq > NVIC_MAX_IRQ) {
+ error_setg(errp, "num-irq %d exceeds NVIC maximum", s->num_irq);
return;
}
- gic_init_irqs_and_distributor(&s->gic);
- /* The NVIC and system controller register area looks like this:
- * 0..0xff : system control registers, including systick
- * 0x100..0xcff : GIC-like registers
- * 0xd00..0xfff : system control registers
- * We use overlaying to put the GIC like registers
- * over the top of the system control register region.
+
+ qdev_init_gpio_in(dev, set_irq_level, s->num_irq);
+
+ /* include space for internal exception vectors */
+ s->num_irq += NVIC_FIRST_IRQ;
+
+ /* The NVIC and system controller register area starts at 0xe000e000
+ * and looks like this:
+ * 0x004 - ICTR
+ * 0x010 - 0x1c - systick
+ * 0x100..0x7ec - NVIC
+ * 0x7f0..0xcff - Reserved
+ * 0xd00..0xd3c - SCS registers
+ * 0xd40..0xeff - Reserved or Not implemented
+ * 0xf00 - STIR
+ *
+ * At the moment there is only one thing in the container region,
+ * but we leave it in place to allow us to pull systick out into
+ * its own device object later.
*/
memory_region_init(&s->container, OBJECT(s), "nvic", 0x1000);
/* The system register region goes at the bottom of the priority
@@ -546,14 +991,7 @@ static void armv7m_nvic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
memory_region_init_io(&s->sysregmem, OBJECT(s), &nvic_sysreg_ops, s,
"nvic_sysregs", 0x1000);
memory_region_add_subregion(&s->container, 0, &s->sysregmem);
- /* Alias the GIC region so we can get only the section of it
- * we need, and layer it on top of the system register region.
- */
- memory_region_init_alias(&s->gic_iomem_alias, OBJECT(s),
- "nvic-gic", &s->gic.iomem,
- 0x100, 0xc00);
- memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(&s->container, 0x100,
- &s->gic_iomem_alias, 1);
+
/* Map the whole thing into system memory at the location required
* by the v7M architecture.
*/
@@ -569,36 +1007,31 @@ static void armv7m_nvic_instance_init(Object *obj)
* any user-specified property setting, so just modify the
* value in the GICState struct.
*/
- GICState *s = ARM_GIC_COMMON(obj);
DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
NVICState *nvic = NVIC(obj);
- /* The ARM v7m may have anything from 0 to 496 external interrupt
- * IRQ lines. We default to 64. Other boards may differ and should
- * set the num-irq property appropriately.
- */
- s->num_irq = 64;
+ SysBusDevice *sbd = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj);
+
+ sysbus_init_irq(sbd, &nvic->excpout);
qdev_init_gpio_out_named(dev, &nvic->sysresetreq, "SYSRESETREQ", 1);
}
static void armv7m_nvic_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
{
- NVICClass *nc = NVIC_CLASS(klass);
DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
- nc->parent_reset = dc->reset;
- nc->parent_realize = dc->realize;
dc->vmsd = &vmstate_nvic;
+ dc->props = props_nvic;
dc->reset = armv7m_nvic_reset;
dc->realize = armv7m_nvic_realize;
}
static const TypeInfo armv7m_nvic_info = {
.name = TYPE_NVIC,
- .parent = TYPE_ARM_GIC_COMMON,
+ .parent = TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE,
.instance_init = armv7m_nvic_instance_init,
.instance_size = sizeof(NVICState),
.class_init = armv7m_nvic_class_init,
- .class_size = sizeof(NVICClass),
+ .class_size = sizeof(SysBusDeviceClass),
};
static void armv7m_nvic_register_types(void)
diff --git a/hw/intc/trace-events b/hw/intc/trace-events
index 39a538d..729c128 100644
--- a/hw/intc/trace-events
+++ b/hw/intc/trace-events
@@ -161,3 +161,18 @@ gicv3_redist_write(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t offset, uint64_t data, unsigned size,
gicv3_redist_badwrite(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t offset, uint64_t data, unsigned size, bool secure) "GICv3 redistributor %x write: offset 0x%" PRIx64 " data 0x%" PRIx64 " size %u secure %d: error"
gicv3_redist_set_irq(uint32_t cpu, int irq, int level) "GICv3 redistributor %x interrupt %d level changed to %d"
gicv3_redist_send_sgi(uint32_t cpu, int irq) "GICv3 redistributor %x pending SGI %d"
+
+# hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
+nvic_recompute_state(int vectpending, int exception_prio) "NVIC state recomputed: vectpending %d exception_prio %d"
+nvic_set_prio(int irq, uint8_t prio) "NVIC set irq %d priority %d"
+nvic_irq_update(int vectpending, int pendprio, int exception_prio, int level) "NVIC vectpending %d pending prio %d exception_prio %d: setting irq line to %d"
+nvic_escalate_prio(int irq, int irqprio, int runprio) "NVIC escalating irq %d to HardFault: insufficient priority %d >= %d"
+nvic_escalate_disabled(int irq) "NVIC escalating irq %d to HardFault: disabled"
+nvic_set_pending(int irq, int en, int prio) "NVIC set pending irq %d (enabled: %d priority %d)"
+nvic_clear_pending(int irq, int en, int prio) "NVIC clear pending irq %d (enabled: %d priority %d)"
+nvic_set_pending_level(int irq) "NVIC set pending: irq %d higher prio than vectpending: setting irq line to 1"
+nvic_acknowledge_irq(int irq, int prio) "NVIC acknowledge IRQ: %d now active (prio %d)"
+nvic_complete_irq(int irq) "NVIC complete IRQ %d"
+nvic_set_irq_level(int irq, int level) "NVIC external irq %d level set to %d"
+nvic_sysreg_read(uint64_t addr, uint32_t value, unsigned size) "NVIC sysreg read addr 0x%" PRIx64 " data 0x%" PRIx32 " size %u"
+nvic_sysreg_write(uint64_t addr, uint32_t value, unsigned size) "NVIC sysreg write addr 0x%" PRIx64 " data 0x%" PRIx32 " size %u"
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] armv7m: Rewrite NVIC to not use any GIC code
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] armv7m: Rewrite NVIC to not use any GIC code Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-15 12:46 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-15 13:34 ` Peter Maydell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2017-02-15 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell
Cc: qemu-arm, qemu-devel, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
>
> Despite some superficial similarities of register layout, the
> M-profile NVIC is really very different from the A-profile GIC.
> Our current attempt to reuse the GIC code means that we have
> significant bugs in our NVIC.
>
> Implement the NVIC as an entirely separate device, to give
> us somewhere we can get the behaviour correct.
>
> This initial commit does not attempt to implement exception
> priority escalation, since the GIC-based code didn't either.
> It does fix a few bugs in passing:
> * ICSR.RETTOBASE polarity was wrong and didn't account for
> internal exceptions
> * ICSR.VECTPENDING was 16 too high if the pending exception
> was for an external interrupt
> * UsageFault, BusFault and MemFault were not disabled on reset
> as they are supposed to be
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
> [PMM: reworked, various bugs and stylistic cleanups]
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 721 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> hw/intc/trace-events | 15 ++
> 2 files changed, 592 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> index ce22001..e319077 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> @@ -17,48 +17,79 @@
> #include "hw/sysbus.h"
> #include "qemu/timer.h"
> #include "hw/arm/arm.h"
> +#include "target/arm/cpu.h"
> #include "exec/address-spaces.h"
> -#include "gic_internal.h"
> #include "qemu/log.h"
> +#include "trace.h"
> +
> +/* IRQ number counting:
> + *
> + * the num-irq property counts the number of external IRQ lines
> + *
> + * NVICState::num_irq counts the total number of exceptions
> + * (external IRQs, the 15 internal exceptions including reset,
> + * and one for the unused exception number 0).
> + *
> + * NVIC_MAX_IRQ is the highest permitted number of external IRQ lines.
> + *
> + * NVIC_MAX_VECTORS is the highest permitted number of exceptions.
> + *
> + * Iterating through all exceptions should typically be done with
> + * for (i = 1; i < s->num_irq; i++) to avoid the unused slot 0.
> + *
> + * The external qemu_irq lines are the NVIC's external IRQ lines,
> + * so line 0 is exception 16.
> + */
> +#define NVIC_FIRST_IRQ 16
> +#define NVIC_MAX_VECTORS 512
> +#define NVIC_MAX_IRQ (NVIC_MAX_VECTORS - NVIC_FIRST_IRQ)
> +
> +/* Effective running priority of the CPU when no exception is active
> + * (higher than the highest possible priority value)
> + */
> +#define NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO 0x100
> +
> +typedef struct VecInfo {
> + int16_t prio; /* priorities can range from -3 to 255 */
> + uint8_t enabled;
> + uint8_t pending;
> + uint8_t active;
> + uint8_t level; /* exceptions <=15 never set level */
> +} VecInfo;
>
> typedef struct NVICState {
> - GICState gic;
> + /*< private >*/
> + SysBusDevice parent_obj;
> + /*< public >*/
> +
> ARMCPU *cpu;
>
> + VecInfo vectors[NVIC_MAX_VECTORS];
> uint32_t prigroup;
>
> + /* vectpending and exception_prio are both cached state that can
> + * be recalculated from the vectors[] array and the prigroup field.
> + */
> + unsigned int vectpending; /* highest prio pending enabled exception */
> + int exception_prio; /* group prio of the highest prio active exception */
> +
nit: the field comments could be more neatly rolled into the block
comment above them.
> struct {
> uint32_t control;
> uint32_t reload;
> int64_t tick;
> QEMUTimer *timer;
> } systick;
> +
> MemoryRegion sysregmem;
> - MemoryRegion gic_iomem_alias;
> MemoryRegion container;
> +
> uint32_t num_irq;
> + qemu_irq excpout;
> qemu_irq sysresetreq;
> } NVICState;
>
> #define TYPE_NVIC "armv7m_nvic"
> -/**
> - * NVICClass:
> - * @parent_reset: the parent class' reset handler.
> - *
> - * A model of the v7M NVIC and System Controller
> - */
> -typedef struct NVICClass {
> - /*< private >*/
> - ARMGICClass parent_class;
> - /*< public >*/
> - DeviceRealize parent_realize;
> - void (*parent_reset)(DeviceState *dev);
> -} NVICClass;
> -
> -#define NVIC_CLASS(klass) \
> - OBJECT_CLASS_CHECK(NVICClass, (klass), TYPE_NVIC)
> -#define NVIC_GET_CLASS(obj) \
> - OBJECT_GET_CLASS(NVICClass, (obj), TYPE_NVIC)
> +
> #define NVIC(obj) \
> OBJECT_CHECK(NVICState, (obj), TYPE_NVIC)
>
> @@ -125,47 +156,274 @@ static void systick_reset(NVICState *s)
> timer_del(s->systick.timer);
> }
>
> -/* The external routines use the hardware vector numbering, ie. the first
> - IRQ is #16. The internal GIC routines use #32 as the first IRQ. */
> +static int nvic_pending_prio(NVICState *s)
> +{
> + /* return the priority of the current pending interrupt,
> + * or NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO if no interrupt is pending
> + */
> + return s->vectpending ? s->vectors[s->vectpending].prio : NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return the value of the ISCR RETTOBASE bit:
> + * 1 if there is exactly one active exception
> + * 0 if there is more than one active exception
> + * UNKNOWN if there are no active exceptions (we choose 0)
> + */
This doesn't match what the ARMv7M ARM says (for Handler mode):
0 There is an active exception other than the exception shown by IPSR.
1 There is no active exception other than any exception shown by IPSR.
> +static bool nvic_rettobase(NVICState *s)
> +{
> + int irq, nhand = 0;
> +
> + for (irq = ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET; irq < s->num_irq; irq++) {
> + if (s->vectors[irq].active) {
I would expect && !what the ISPR is reporting. However looking at the
code it doesn't look like we ever report an exception in the IPSR
(assuming HELPER(v7m_mrs) is the right one).
> + nhand++;
> + if (nhand == 2) {
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return nhand == 1;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return the value of the ISCR ISRPENDING bit:
> + * 1 if an external interrupt is pending
> + * 0 if no external interrupt is pending
> + */
> +static bool nvic_isrpending(NVICState *s)
> +{
> + int irq;
> +
> + /* We can shortcut if the highest priority pending interrupt
> + * happens to be external or if there is nothing pending.
> + */
> + if (s->vectpending > NVIC_FIRST_IRQ) {
> + return true;
> + }
> + if (s->vectpending == 0) {
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + for (irq = NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; irq < s->num_irq; irq++) {
Should NVIC_FIRST_IRQ be renamed to NVIC_FIRST_EXTERNAL_IRQ?
> + if (s->vectors[irq].pending) {
> + return true;
> + }
> + }
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> +/* Return a mask word which clears the subpriority bits from
> + * a priority value for an M-profile exception, leaving only
> + * the group priority.
> + */
> +static inline uint32_t nvic_gprio_mask(NVICState *s)
> +{
> + return ~0U << (s->prigroup + 1);
I wonder if it is worth adding MAKE_32BIT_MASK to bitops.h?
> +}
> +
> +/* Recompute vectpending and exception_prio */
> +static void nvic_recompute_state(NVICState *s)
> +{
> + int i;
> + int pend_prio = NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO;
> + int active_prio = NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO;
> + int pend_irq = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 1; i < s->num_irq; i++) {
> + VecInfo *vec = &s->vectors[i];
> +
> + if (vec->enabled && vec->pending && vec->prio < pend_prio) {
> + pend_prio = vec->prio;
> + pend_irq = i;
> + }
> + if (vec->active && vec->prio < active_prio) {
> + active_prio = vec->prio;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + s->vectpending = pend_irq;
> + s->exception_prio = active_prio & nvic_gprio_mask(s);
> +
> + trace_nvic_recompute_state(s->vectpending, s->exception_prio);
> +}
> +
> +/* Return the current execution priority of the CPU
> + * (equivalent to the pseudocode ExecutionPriority function).
> + * This is a value between -2 (NMI priority) and NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO.
> + */
> +static inline int nvic_exec_prio(NVICState *s)
> +{
> + CPUARMState *env = &s->cpu->env;
> + int running;
> +
> + if (env->daif & PSTATE_F) { /* FAULTMASK */
> + running = -1;
> + } else if (env->daif & PSTATE_I) { /* PRIMASK */
> + running = 0;
> + } else if (env->v7m.basepri > 0) {
> + running = env->v7m.basepri & nvic_gprio_mask(s);
> + } else {
> + running = NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO; /* lower than any possible priority */
> + }
> + /* consider priority of active handler */
> + return MIN(running, s->exception_prio);
> +}
> +
> +/* caller must call nvic_irq_update() after this */
> +static void set_prio(NVICState *s, unsigned irq, uint8_t prio)
> +{
> + assert(irq > ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI); /* only use for configurable prios */
> + assert(irq < s->num_irq);
> +
> + s->vectors[irq].prio = prio;
So this means the negative priorities are hardwired parts of the NVIC
for NMI/RESET? Maybe we should make that clearer in the comment for
VecInfo.
> +
> + trace_nvic_set_prio(irq, prio);
> +}
> +
> +/* Recompute state and assert irq line accordingly.
> + * Must be called after changes to:
> + * vec->active, vec->enabled, vec->pending or vec->prio for any vector
> + * prigroup
> + */
> +static void nvic_irq_update(NVICState *s)
> +{
> + int lvl;
> + int pend_prio;
> +
> + nvic_recompute_state(s);
> + pend_prio = nvic_pending_prio(s);
> +
> + /* Raise NVIC output if this IRQ would be taken, except that we
> + * ignore the effects of the BASEPRI, FAULTMASK and PRIMASK (which
> + * will be checked for in arm_v7m_cpu_exec_interrupt()); changes
> + * to those CPU registers don't cause us to recalculate the NVIC
> + * pending info.
> + */
> + lvl = (pend_prio < s->exception_prio);
> + trace_nvic_irq_update(s->vectpending, pend_prio, s->exception_prio, lvl);
> + qemu_set_irq(s->excpout, lvl);
> +}
> +
> +static void armv7m_nvic_clear_pending(void *opaque, int irq)
> +{
> + NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> + VecInfo *vec;
> +
> + assert(irq > ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET && irq < s->num_irq);
> +
> + vec = &s->vectors[irq];
> + trace_nvic_clear_pending(irq, vec->enabled, vec->prio);
> + if (vec->pending) {
> + vec->pending = 0;
> + nvic_irq_update(s);
> + }
> +}
> +
> void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq)
> {
> NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> - if (irq >= 16)
> - irq += 16;
> - gic_set_pending_private(&s->gic, 0, irq);
> + VecInfo *vec;
> +
> + assert(irq > ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET && irq < s->num_irq);
> +
> + vec = &s->vectors[irq];
> + trace_nvic_set_pending(irq, vec->enabled, vec->prio);
> + if (!vec->pending) {
> + vec->pending = 1;
> + nvic_irq_update(s);
> + }
> }
>
> /* Make pending IRQ active. */
> int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
> {
> NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> - uint32_t irq;
> -
> - irq = gic_acknowledge_irq(&s->gic, 0, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
> - if (irq == 1023)
> - hw_error("Interrupt but no vector\n");
> - if (irq >= 32)
> - irq -= 16;
> - return irq;
> + CPUARMState *env = &s->cpu->env;
> + const int pending = s->vectpending;
> + const int running = nvic_exec_prio(s);
> + int pendgroupprio;
> + VecInfo *vec;
> +
> + assert(pending > ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET && pending < s->num_irq);
> +
> + vec = &s->vectors[pending];
> +
> + assert(vec->enabled);
> + assert(vec->pending);
> +
> + pendgroupprio = vec->prio & nvic_gprio_mask(s);
> + assert(pendgroupprio < running);
I'm all for asserts to declare what the API is expecting. These are
starting to look like being unsure of the nvic being in the correct
state. Are they left over from debugging?
> +
> + trace_nvic_acknowledge_irq(pending, vec->prio);
> +
> + vec->active = 1;
> + vec->pending = 0;
> +
> + env->v7m.exception = s->vectpending;
> +
> + nvic_irq_update(s);
> +
> + return env->v7m.exception;
> }
>
> void armv7m_nvic_complete_irq(void *opaque, int irq)
> {
> NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> - if (irq >= 16)
> - irq += 16;
> - gic_complete_irq(&s->gic, 0, irq, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
> + VecInfo *vec;
> +
> + assert(irq > ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET && irq < s->num_irq);
> +
> + vec = &s->vectors[irq];
> +
> + trace_nvic_complete_irq(irq);
> +
> + vec->active = 0;
> + if (vec->level) {
> + /* Re-pend the exception if it's still held high; only
> + * happens for extenal IRQs
> + */
> + assert(irq >= NVIC_FIRST_IRQ);
> + vec->pending = 1;
> + }
> +
> + nvic_irq_update(s);
> +}
> +
> +/* callback when external interrupt line is changed */
> +static void set_irq_level(void *opaque, int n, int level)
> +{
> + NVICState *s = opaque;
> + VecInfo *vec;
> +
> + n += NVIC_FIRST_IRQ;
> +
> + assert(n >= NVIC_FIRST_IRQ && n < s->num_irq);
> +
> + trace_nvic_set_irq_level(n, level);
> +
> + /* The pending status of an external interrupt is
> + * latched on rising edge and exception handler return.
> + *
> + * Pulsing the IRQ will always run the handler
> + * once, and the handler will re-run until the
> + * level is low when the handler completes.
> + */
> + vec = &s->vectors[n];
> + if (level != vec->level) {
> + vec->level = level;
> + if (level) {
> + armv7m_nvic_set_pending(s, n);
> + }
> + }
> }
>
> static uint32_t nvic_readl(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset)
> {
> ARMCPU *cpu = s->cpu;
> uint32_t val;
> - int irq;
>
> switch (offset) {
> case 4: /* Interrupt Control Type. */
> - return (s->num_irq / 32) - 1;
> + return ((s->num_irq - NVIC_FIRST_IRQ) / 32) - 1;
> case 0x10: /* SysTick Control and Status. */
> val = s->systick.control;
> s->systick.control &= ~SYSTICK_COUNTFLAG;
> @@ -195,33 +453,29 @@ static uint32_t nvic_readl(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset)
> case 0xd04: /* Interrupt Control State. */
> /* VECTACTIVE */
> val = cpu->env.v7m.exception;
> - if (val == 1023) {
> - val = 0;
> - } else if (val >= 32) {
> - val -= 16;
> - }
> /* VECTPENDING */
> - if (s->gic.current_pending[0] != 1023)
> - val |= (s->gic.current_pending[0] << 12);
> - /* ISRPENDING and RETTOBASE */
> - for (irq = 32; irq < s->num_irq; irq++) {
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[irq].pending) {
> - val |= (1 << 22);
> - break;
> - }
> - if (irq != cpu->env.v7m.exception && s->gic.irq_state[irq].active) {
> - val |= (1 << 11);
> - }
> + val |= (s->vectpending & 0xff) << 12;
> + /* ISRPENDING - set if any external IRQ is pending */
> + if (nvic_isrpending(s)) {
> + val |= (1 << 22);
> + }
> + /* RETTOBASE - set if only one handler is active */
> + if (nvic_rettobase(s)) {
> + val |= (1 << 11);
> }
> /* PENDSTSET */
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK].pending)
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK].pending) {
> val |= (1 << 26);
> + }
> /* PENDSVSET */
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV].pending)
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV].pending) {
> val |= (1 << 28);
> + }
> /* NMIPENDSET */
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI].pending)
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI].pending) {
> val |= (1 << 31);
> + }
> + /* ISRPREEMPT not implemented */
> return val;
> case 0xd08: /* Vector Table Offset. */
> return cpu->env.v7m.vecbase;
> @@ -234,20 +488,48 @@ static uint32_t nvic_readl(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset)
> return cpu->env.v7m.ccr;
> case 0xd24: /* System Handler Status. */
> val = 0;
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].active) val |= (1 << 0);
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].active) val |= (1 << 1);
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].active) val |= (1 << 3);
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_SVC].active) val |= (1 << 7);
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_DEBUG].active) val |= (1 << 8);
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV].active) val |= (1 << 10);
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK].active) val |= (1 << 11);
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].pending) val |= (1 << 12);
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].pending) val |= (1 << 13);
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].pending) val |= (1 << 14);
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_SVC].pending) val |= (1 << 15);
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].enabled) val |= (1 << 16);
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].enabled) val |= (1 << 17);
> - if (s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].enabled) val |= (1 << 18);
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].active) {
> + val |= (1 << 0);
> + }
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].active) {
> + val |= (1 << 1);
> + }
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].active) {
> + val |= (1 << 3);
> + }
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_SVC].active) {
> + val |= (1 << 7);
> + }
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_DEBUG].active) {
> + val |= (1 << 8);
> + }
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV].active) {
> + val |= (1 << 10);
> + }
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK].active) {
> + val |= (1 << 11);
> + }
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].pending) {
> + val |= (1 << 12);
> + }
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].pending) {
> + val |= (1 << 13);
> + }
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].pending) {
> + val |= (1 << 14);
> + }
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_SVC].pending) {
> + val |= (1 << 15);
> + }
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].enabled) {
> + val |= (1 << 16);
> + }
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].enabled) {
> + val |= (1 << 17);
> + }
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].enabled) {
> + val |= (1 << 18);
> + }
> return val;
> case 0xd28: /* Configurable Fault Status. */
> return cpu->env.v7m.cfsr;
> @@ -341,14 +623,12 @@ static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
> if (value & (1 << 28)) {
> armv7m_nvic_set_pending(s, ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV);
> } else if (value & (1 << 27)) {
> - s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV].pending = 0;
> - gic_update(&s->gic);
> + armv7m_nvic_clear_pending(s, ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV);
> }
> if (value & (1 << 26)) {
> armv7m_nvic_set_pending(s, ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK);
> } else if (value & (1 << 25)) {
> - s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK].pending = 0;
> - gic_update(&s->gic);
> + armv7m_nvic_clear_pending(s, ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK);
> }
> break;
> case 0xd08: /* Vector Table Offset. */
> @@ -366,6 +646,7 @@ static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
> qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "AIRCR system reset unimplemented\n");
> }
> s->prigroup = extract32(value, 8, 3);
> + nvic_irq_update(s);
> }
> break;
> case 0xd10: /* System Control. */
> @@ -386,9 +667,10 @@ static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
> case 0xd24: /* System Handler Control. */
> /* TODO: Real hardware allows you to set/clear the active bits
> under some circumstances. We don't implement this. */
> - s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].enabled = (value & (1 << 16)) != 0;
> - s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].enabled = (value & (1 << 17)) != 0;
> - s->gic.irq_state[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].enabled = (value & (1 << 18)) != 0;
> + s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM].enabled = (value & (1 << 16)) != 0;
> + s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_BUS].enabled = (value & (1 << 17)) != 0;
> + s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE].enabled = (value & (1 << 18)) != 0;
> + nvic_irq_update(s);
> break;
> case 0xd28: /* Configurable Fault Status. */
> cpu->env.v7m.cfsr &= ~value; /* W1C */
> @@ -410,13 +692,16 @@ static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
> "NVIC: Aux fault status registers unimplemented\n");
> break;
> case 0xf00: /* Software Triggered Interrupt Register */
> + {
> /* user mode can only write to STIR if CCR.USERSETMPEND permits it */
> - if ((value & 0x1ff) < s->num_irq &&
> + int excnum = (value & 0x1ff) + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ;
> + if (excnum < s->num_irq &&
> (arm_current_el(&cpu->env) ||
> (cpu->env.v7m.ccr & R_V7M_CCR_USERSETMPEND_MASK))) {
> - gic_set_pending_private(&s->gic, 0, value & 0x1ff);
> + armv7m_nvic_set_pending(s, excnum);
> }
> break;
> + }
> default:
> qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> "NVIC: Bad write offset 0x%x\n", offset);
> @@ -428,28 +713,81 @@ static uint64_t nvic_sysreg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> {
> NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> uint32_t offset = addr;
> - int i;
> + unsigned i, end;
> uint32_t val;
>
> switch (offset) {
> + /* reads of set and clear both return the status */
> + case 0x100 ... 0x13f: /* NVIC Set enable */
> + offset += 0x80;
> + /* fall through */
> + case 0x180 ... 0x1bf: /* NVIC Clear enable */
> + val = 0;
> + offset = offset - 0x180 + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
Can we not calculate a vector index rather than abusing the meaning of
offset while switching on it?
> +
> + for (i = 0, end = size * 8; i < end && offset + i < s->num_irq; i++) {
> + if (s->vectors[offset + i].enabled) {
> + val |= (1 << i);
> + }
> + }
> + break;
> + case 0x200 ... 0x23f: /* NVIC Set pend */
> + offset += 0x80;
> + /* fall through */
> + case 0x280 ... 0x2bf: /* NVIC Clear pend */
> + val = 0;
> + offset = offset - 0x280 + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
> +
> + for (i = 0, end = size * 8; i < end && offset + i < s->num_irq; i++) {
> + if (s->vectors[offset + i].pending) {
> + val |= (1 << i);
> + }
> + }
> + break;
> + case 0x300 ... 0x33f: /* NVIC Active */
> + val = 0;
> + offset = offset - 0x300 + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
> +
> + for (i = 0, end = size * 8; i < end && offset + i < s->num_irq; i++) {
> + if (s->vectors[offset + i].active) {
> + val |= (1 << i);
> + }
> + }
> + break;
> + case 0x400 ... 0x5ef: /* NVIC Priority */
> + val = 0;
> + offset = offset - 0x400 + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < size && offset + i < s->num_irq; i++) {
> + val |= s->vectors[offset + i].prio << (8 * i);
> + }
> + break;
> case 0xd18 ... 0xd23: /* System Handler Priority. */
> val = 0;
> for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> - val |= s->gic.priority1[(offset - 0xd14) + i][0] << (i * 8);
> + val |= s->vectors[(offset - 0xd14) + i].prio << (i * 8);
> }
> - return val;
> + break;
> case 0xfe0 ... 0xfff: /* ID. */
> if (offset & 3) {
> - return 0;
> + val = 0;
> + } else {
> + val = nvic_id[(offset - 0xfe0) >> 2];
> + }
> + break;
> + default:
> + if (size == 4) {
> + val = nvic_readl(s, offset);
> + } else {
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> + "NVIC: Bad read of size %d at offset 0x%x\n",
> + size, offset);
> + val = 0;
> }
> - return nvic_id[(offset - 0xfe0) >> 2];
> - }
> - if (size == 4) {
> - return nvic_readl(s, offset);
> }
> - qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> - "NVIC: Bad read of size %d at offset 0x%x\n", size, offset);
> - return 0;
> +
> + trace_nvic_sysreg_read(addr, val, size);
> + return val;
> }
>
> static void nvic_sysreg_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> @@ -457,15 +795,59 @@ static void nvic_sysreg_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
> {
> NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> uint32_t offset = addr;
> - int i;
> + unsigned i, end;
> + unsigned setval = 0;
> +
> + trace_nvic_sysreg_write(addr, value, size);
>
> switch (offset) {
> + case 0x100 ... 0x13f: /* NVIC Set enable */
> + offset += 0x80;
> + setval = 1;
> + /* fall through */
> + case 0x180 ... 0x1bf: /* NVIC Clear enable */
> + offset = 8 * (offset - 0x180) + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
> +
> + for (i = 0, end = size * 8; i < end && offset + i < s->num_irq; i++) {
> + if (value & (1 << i)) {
> + s->vectors[offset + i].enabled = setval;
> + }
> + }
> + nvic_irq_update(s);
> + return;
> + case 0x200 ... 0x23f: /* NVIC Set pend */
> + /* the special logic in armv7m_nvic_set_pending()
> + * is not needed since IRQs are never escalated
> + */
> + offset += 0x80;
> + setval = 1;
> + /* fall through */
> + case 0x280 ... 0x2bf: /* NVIC Clear pend */
> + offset = 8 * (offset - 0x280) + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
> +
> + for (i = 0, end = size * 8; i < end && offset + i < s->num_irq; i++) {
> + if (value & (1 << i)) {
> + s->vectors[offset + i].pending = setval;
> + }
> + }
> + nvic_irq_update(s);
> + return;
> + case 0x300 ... 0x33f: /* NVIC Active */
> + return; /* R/O */
> + case 0x400 ... 0x5ef: /* NVIC Priority */
> + offset = 8 * (offset - 0x400) + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> + set_prio(s, offset + i, (value >> (i * 8)) & 0xff);
> + }
> + nvic_irq_update(s);
> + return;
> case 0xd18 ... 0xd23: /* System Handler Priority. */
> for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
> - s->gic.priority1[(offset - 0xd14) + i][0] =
> - (value >> (i * 8)) & 0xff;
> + unsigned hdlidx = (offset - 0xd14) + i;
> + set_prio(s, hdlidx, (value >> (i * 8)) & 0xff);
> }
> - gic_update(&s->gic);
> + nvic_irq_update(s);
> return;
> }
> if (size == 4) {
> @@ -482,11 +864,50 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps nvic_sysreg_ops = {
> .endianness = DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN,
> };
>
> +static int nvic_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)
> +{
> + NVICState *s = opaque;
> + unsigned i;
> +
> + /* Check for out of range priority settings */
> + if (s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET].prio != -3 ||
> + s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI].prio != -2 ||
> + s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_HARD].prio != -1) {
> + return 1;
> + }
> + for (i = ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM; i < s->num_irq; i++) {
> + if (s->vectors[i].prio & ~0xff) {
> + return 1;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + nvic_recompute_state(s);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_VecInfo = {
> + .name = "armv7m_nvic_info",
> + .version_id = 1,
> + .minimum_version_id = 1,
> + .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> + VMSTATE_INT16(prio, VecInfo),
> + VMSTATE_UINT8(enabled, VecInfo),
> + VMSTATE_UINT8(pending, VecInfo),
> + VMSTATE_UINT8(active, VecInfo),
> + VMSTATE_UINT8(level, VecInfo),
> + VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST()
> + }
> +};
> +
> static const VMStateDescription vmstate_nvic = {
> .name = "armv7m_nvic",
> - .version_id = 2,
> - .minimum_version_id = 2,
> + .version_id = 3,
> + .minimum_version_id = 3,
> + .post_load = &nvic_post_load,
> .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
> + VMSTATE_STRUCT_ARRAY(vectors, NVICState, NVIC_MAX_VECTORS, 1,
> + vmstate_VecInfo, VecInfo),
> VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.control, NVICState),
> VMSTATE_UINT32(systick.reload, NVICState),
> VMSTATE_INT64(systick.tick, NVICState),
> @@ -496,48 +917,72 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_nvic = {
> }
> };
>
> +static Property props_nvic[] = {
> + /* Number of external IRQ lines (so excluding the 16 internal exceptions) */
> + DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("num-irq", NVICState, num_irq, 64),
> + DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST()
> +};
> +
> static void armv7m_nvic_reset(DeviceState *dev)
> {
> NVICState *s = NVIC(dev);
> - NVICClass *nc = NVIC_GET_CLASS(s);
> - nc->parent_reset(dev);
> - /* Common GIC reset resets to disabled; the NVIC doesn't have
> - * per-CPU interfaces so mark our non-existent CPU interface
> - * as enabled by default, and with a priority mask which allows
> - * all interrupts through.
> +
> + s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI].enabled = 1;
> + s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_HARD].enabled = 1;
> + /* MEM, BUS, and USAGE are enabled through
> + * the System Handler Control register
> */
> - s->gic.cpu_ctlr[0] = GICC_CTLR_EN_GRP0;
> - s->gic.priority_mask[0] = 0x100;
> - /* The NVIC as a whole is always enabled. */
> - s->gic.ctlr = 1;
> + s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_SVC].enabled = 1;
> + s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_DEBUG].enabled = 1;
> + s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV].enabled = 1;
> + s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_SYSTICK].enabled = 1;
> +
> + s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET].prio = -3;
> + s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI].prio = -2;
> + s->vectors[ARMV7M_EXCP_HARD].prio = -1;
> +
> + /* Strictly speaking the reset handler should be enabled.
> + * However, we don't simulate soft resets through the NVIC,
> + * and the reset vector should never be pended.
> + * So we leave it disabled to catch logic errors.
> + */
> +
> + s->exception_prio = NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO;
> + s->vectpending = 0;
> +
> systick_reset(s);
> }
>
> static void armv7m_nvic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> {
> NVICState *s = NVIC(dev);
> - NVICClass *nc = NVIC_GET_CLASS(s);
> - Error *local_err = NULL;
>
> s->cpu = ARM_CPU(qemu_get_cpu(0));
> assert(s->cpu);
> - /* The NVIC always has only one CPU */
> - s->gic.num_cpu = 1;
> - /* Tell the common code we're an NVIC */
> - s->gic.revision = 0xffffffff;
> - s->num_irq = s->gic.num_irq;
> - nc->parent_realize(dev, &local_err);
> - if (local_err) {
> - error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> +
> + if (s->num_irq > NVIC_MAX_IRQ) {
> + error_setg(errp, "num-irq %d exceeds NVIC maximum", s->num_irq);
> return;
> }
> - gic_init_irqs_and_distributor(&s->gic);
> - /* The NVIC and system controller register area looks like this:
> - * 0..0xff : system control registers, including systick
> - * 0x100..0xcff : GIC-like registers
> - * 0xd00..0xfff : system control registers
> - * We use overlaying to put the GIC like registers
> - * over the top of the system control register region.
> +
> + qdev_init_gpio_in(dev, set_irq_level, s->num_irq);
> +
> + /* include space for internal exception vectors */
> + s->num_irq += NVIC_FIRST_IRQ;
> +
> + /* The NVIC and system controller register area starts at 0xe000e000
> + * and looks like this:
s/system controller register area/System Control Space (SCS)/ to make it
easier to find in the ARM ARM.
> + * 0x004 - ICTR
> + * 0x010 - 0x1c - systick
> + * 0x100..0x7ec - NVIC
> + * 0x7f0..0xcff - Reserved
> + * 0xd00..0xd3c - SCS registers
> + * 0xd40..0xeff - Reserved or Not implemented
> + * 0xf00 - STIR
> + *
> + * At the moment there is only one thing in the container region,
> + * but we leave it in place to allow us to pull systick out into
> + * its own device object later.
> */
> memory_region_init(&s->container, OBJECT(s), "nvic", 0x1000);
> /* The system register region goes at the bottom of the priority
> @@ -546,14 +991,7 @@ static void armv7m_nvic_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> memory_region_init_io(&s->sysregmem, OBJECT(s), &nvic_sysreg_ops, s,
> "nvic_sysregs", 0x1000);
> memory_region_add_subregion(&s->container, 0, &s->sysregmem);
> - /* Alias the GIC region so we can get only the section of it
> - * we need, and layer it on top of the system register region.
> - */
> - memory_region_init_alias(&s->gic_iomem_alias, OBJECT(s),
> - "nvic-gic", &s->gic.iomem,
> - 0x100, 0xc00);
> - memory_region_add_subregion_overlap(&s->container, 0x100,
> - &s->gic_iomem_alias, 1);
> +
> /* Map the whole thing into system memory at the location required
> * by the v7M architecture.
> */
> @@ -569,36 +1007,31 @@ static void armv7m_nvic_instance_init(Object *obj)
> * any user-specified property setting, so just modify the
> * value in the GICState struct.
> */
> - GICState *s = ARM_GIC_COMMON(obj);
> DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(obj);
> NVICState *nvic = NVIC(obj);
> - /* The ARM v7m may have anything from 0 to 496 external interrupt
> - * IRQ lines. We default to 64. Other boards may differ and should
> - * set the num-irq property appropriately.
> - */
> - s->num_irq = 64;
> + SysBusDevice *sbd = SYS_BUS_DEVICE(obj);
> +
> + sysbus_init_irq(sbd, &nvic->excpout);
> qdev_init_gpio_out_named(dev, &nvic->sysresetreq, "SYSRESETREQ", 1);
> }
>
> static void armv7m_nvic_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> {
> - NVICClass *nc = NVIC_CLASS(klass);
> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>
> - nc->parent_reset = dc->reset;
> - nc->parent_realize = dc->realize;
> dc->vmsd = &vmstate_nvic;
> + dc->props = props_nvic;
> dc->reset = armv7m_nvic_reset;
> dc->realize = armv7m_nvic_realize;
> }
>
> static const TypeInfo armv7m_nvic_info = {
> .name = TYPE_NVIC,
> - .parent = TYPE_ARM_GIC_COMMON,
> + .parent = TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE,
> .instance_init = armv7m_nvic_instance_init,
> .instance_size = sizeof(NVICState),
> .class_init = armv7m_nvic_class_init,
> - .class_size = sizeof(NVICClass),
> + .class_size = sizeof(SysBusDeviceClass),
> };
>
> static void armv7m_nvic_register_types(void)
> diff --git a/hw/intc/trace-events b/hw/intc/trace-events
> index 39a538d..729c128 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/trace-events
> +++ b/hw/intc/trace-events
> @@ -161,3 +161,18 @@ gicv3_redist_write(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t offset, uint64_t data, unsigned size,
> gicv3_redist_badwrite(uint32_t cpu, uint64_t offset, uint64_t data, unsigned size, bool secure) "GICv3 redistributor %x write: offset 0x%" PRIx64 " data 0x%" PRIx64 " size %u secure %d: error"
> gicv3_redist_set_irq(uint32_t cpu, int irq, int level) "GICv3 redistributor %x interrupt %d level changed to %d"
> gicv3_redist_send_sgi(uint32_t cpu, int irq) "GICv3 redistributor %x pending SGI %d"
> +
> +# hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> +nvic_recompute_state(int vectpending, int exception_prio) "NVIC state recomputed: vectpending %d exception_prio %d"
> +nvic_set_prio(int irq, uint8_t prio) "NVIC set irq %d priority %d"
> +nvic_irq_update(int vectpending, int pendprio, int exception_prio, int level) "NVIC vectpending %d pending prio %d exception_prio %d: setting irq line to %d"
> +nvic_escalate_prio(int irq, int irqprio, int runprio) "NVIC escalating irq %d to HardFault: insufficient priority %d >= %d"
> +nvic_escalate_disabled(int irq) "NVIC escalating irq %d to HardFault: disabled"
> +nvic_set_pending(int irq, int en, int prio) "NVIC set pending irq %d (enabled: %d priority %d)"
> +nvic_clear_pending(int irq, int en, int prio) "NVIC clear pending irq %d (enabled: %d priority %d)"
> +nvic_set_pending_level(int irq) "NVIC set pending: irq %d higher prio than vectpending: setting irq line to 1"
> +nvic_acknowledge_irq(int irq, int prio) "NVIC acknowledge IRQ: %d now active (prio %d)"
> +nvic_complete_irq(int irq) "NVIC complete IRQ %d"
> +nvic_set_irq_level(int irq, int level) "NVIC external irq %d level set to %d"
> +nvic_sysreg_read(uint64_t addr, uint32_t value, unsigned size) "NVIC sysreg read addr 0x%" PRIx64 " data 0x%" PRIx32 " size %u"
> +nvic_sysreg_write(uint64_t addr, uint32_t value, unsigned size) "NVIC sysreg write addr 0x%" PRIx64 " data 0x%" PRIx32 " size %u"
--
Alex Bennée
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] armv7m: Rewrite NVIC to not use any GIC code
2017-02-15 12:46 ` Alex Bennée
@ 2017-02-15 13:34 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-15 14:14 ` Alex Bennée
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-15 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Bennée
Cc: qemu-arm, QEMU Developers, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
On 15 February 2017 at 12:46, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
>
>> From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
>>
>> Despite some superficial similarities of register layout, the
>> M-profile NVIC is really very different from the A-profile GIC.
>> Our current attempt to reuse the GIC code means that we have
>> significant bugs in our NVIC.
>>
>> Implement the NVIC as an entirely separate device, to give
>> us somewhere we can get the behaviour correct.
>>
>> This initial commit does not attempt to implement exception
>> priority escalation, since the GIC-based code didn't either.
>> It does fix a few bugs in passing:
>> * ICSR.RETTOBASE polarity was wrong and didn't account for
>> internal exceptions
>> * ICSR.VECTPENDING was 16 too high if the pending exception
>> was for an external interrupt
>> * UsageFault, BusFault and MemFault were not disabled on reset
>> as they are supposed to be
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
>> [PMM: reworked, various bugs and stylistic cleanups]
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 721 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>> hw/intc/trace-events | 15 ++
>> 2 files changed, 592 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
>> index ce22001..e319077 100644
>> --- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
>> +++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
>> @@ -17,48 +17,79 @@
>> #include "hw/sysbus.h"
>> #include "qemu/timer.h"
>> #include "hw/arm/arm.h"
>> +#include "target/arm/cpu.h"
>> #include "exec/address-spaces.h"
>> -#include "gic_internal.h"
>> #include "qemu/log.h"
>> +#include "trace.h"
>> +
>> +/* IRQ number counting:
>> + *
>> + * the num-irq property counts the number of external IRQ lines
>> + *
>> + * NVICState::num_irq counts the total number of exceptions
>> + * (external IRQs, the 15 internal exceptions including reset,
>> + * and one for the unused exception number 0).
>> + *
>> + * NVIC_MAX_IRQ is the highest permitted number of external IRQ lines.
>> + *
>> + * NVIC_MAX_VECTORS is the highest permitted number of exceptions.
>> + *
>> + * Iterating through all exceptions should typically be done with
>> + * for (i = 1; i < s->num_irq; i++) to avoid the unused slot 0.
>> + *
>> + * The external qemu_irq lines are the NVIC's external IRQ lines,
>> + * so line 0 is exception 16.
>> + */
>> +#define NVIC_FIRST_IRQ 16
>> +#define NVIC_MAX_VECTORS 512
>> +#define NVIC_MAX_IRQ (NVIC_MAX_VECTORS - NVIC_FIRST_IRQ)
>> +
>> +/* Effective running priority of the CPU when no exception is active
>> + * (higher than the highest possible priority value)
>> + */
>> +#define NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO 0x100
>> +
>> +typedef struct VecInfo {
>> + int16_t prio; /* priorities can range from -3 to 255 */
>> + uint8_t enabled;
>> + uint8_t pending;
>> + uint8_t active;
>> + uint8_t level; /* exceptions <=15 never set level */
>> +} VecInfo;
>>
>> typedef struct NVICState {
>> - GICState gic;
>> + /*< private >*/
>> + SysBusDevice parent_obj;
>> + /*< public >*/
>> +
>> ARMCPU *cpu;
>>
>> + VecInfo vectors[NVIC_MAX_VECTORS];
>> uint32_t prigroup;
>>
>> + /* vectpending and exception_prio are both cached state that can
>> + * be recalculated from the vectors[] array and the prigroup field.
>> + */
>> + unsigned int vectpending; /* highest prio pending enabled exception */
>> + int exception_prio; /* group prio of the highest prio active exception */
>> +
>
> nit: the field comments could be more neatly rolled into the block
> comment above them.
I prefer this way. The block comment is describing the properties
of a category of the fields. The per-line comments are describing
the semantics of the fields defined on the lines they're on.
>> +static int nvic_pending_prio(NVICState *s)
>> +{
>> + /* return the priority of the current pending interrupt,
>> + * or NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO if no interrupt is pending
>> + */
>> + return s->vectpending ? s->vectors[s->vectpending].prio : NVIC_NOEXC_PRIO;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Return the value of the ISCR RETTOBASE bit:
>> + * 1 if there is exactly one active exception
>> + * 0 if there is more than one active exception
>> + * UNKNOWN if there are no active exceptions (we choose 0)
>> + */
>
> This doesn't match what the ARMv7M ARM says (for Handler mode):
>
> 0 There is an active exception other than the exception shown by IPSR.
> 1 There is no active exception other than any exception shown by IPSR.
They're only different if the guest code has managed
to deactivate the IPSR exception without leaving the
exception handler. This is bogus guest code and will cause
an exception-return-integrity-check to fail when the guest
exits the handler. It's also pretty hard to do: the only
method is to clear the SHCSR bits for those few exceptions
which report their active state there.
Otherwise "no active exceptions" => not in handler mode;
"more than 1 active exception" => IPSR exception and another;
"exactly one active exception" => the IPSR exception
I would be unsurprised to find that the documentation of the
RETTOBASE bit was just phrased in a way that forgot about
the possible effect of the deactivated-your-own-exception
corner case. I'll investigate a bit more what's going on
here and whether eg the v8M ARM ARM nails down the behaviour
more precisely, though.
>> +static bool nvic_rettobase(NVICState *s)
>> +{
>> + int irq, nhand = 0;
>> +
>> + for (irq = ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET; irq < s->num_irq; irq++) {
>> + if (s->vectors[irq].active) {
>
> I would expect && !what the ISPR is reporting. However looking at the
> code it doesn't look like we ever report an exception in the IPSR
> (assuming HELPER(v7m_mrs) is the right one).
See xpsr_read() in target/arm/cpu.h -- we report
v7m.exception in the IPSR bits.
>> + nhand++;
>> + if (nhand == 2) {
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return nhand == 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Return the value of the ISCR ISRPENDING bit:
>> + * 1 if an external interrupt is pending
>> + * 0 if no external interrupt is pending
>> + */
>> +static bool nvic_isrpending(NVICState *s)
>> +{
>> + int irq;
>> +
>> + /* We can shortcut if the highest priority pending interrupt
>> + * happens to be external or if there is nothing pending.
>> + */
>> + if (s->vectpending > NVIC_FIRST_IRQ) {
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> + if (s->vectpending == 0) {
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for (irq = NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; irq < s->num_irq; irq++) {
>
> Should NVIC_FIRST_IRQ be renamed to NVIC_FIRST_EXTERNAL_IRQ?
The internal ones aren't IRQs, they're exceptions.
The terminology is a bit confusing, though.
>> + if (s->vectors[irq].pending) {
>> + return true;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Return a mask word which clears the subpriority bits from
>> + * a priority value for an M-profile exception, leaving only
>> + * the group priority.
>> + */
>> +static inline uint32_t nvic_gprio_mask(NVICState *s)
>> +{
>> + return ~0U << (s->prigroup + 1);
>
> I wonder if it is worth adding MAKE_32BIT_MASK to bitops.h?
MAKE_64BIT_MASK would work here too. This is the same way
arm_gicv3_cpuif.c writes it, though.
>> +/* caller must call nvic_irq_update() after this */
>> +static void set_prio(NVICState *s, unsigned irq, uint8_t prio)
>> +{
>> + assert(irq > ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI); /* only use for configurable prios */
>> + assert(irq < s->num_irq);
>> +
>> + s->vectors[irq].prio = prio;
>
> So this means the negative priorities are hardwired parts of the NVIC
> for NMI/RESET? Maybe we should make that clearer in the comment for
> VecInfo.
Sure. (Yes, the priorities for NMI and HardFault are architecturally
hardwired. I suspect that in hardware they are not in fact represented
as negative numbers :-))
>> /* Make pending IRQ active. */
>> int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
>> {
>> NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
>> - uint32_t irq;
>> -
>> - irq = gic_acknowledge_irq(&s->gic, 0, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
>> - if (irq == 1023)
>> - hw_error("Interrupt but no vector\n");
>> - if (irq >= 32)
>> - irq -= 16;
>> - return irq;
>> + CPUARMState *env = &s->cpu->env;
>> + const int pending = s->vectpending;
>> + const int running = nvic_exec_prio(s);
>> + int pendgroupprio;
>> + VecInfo *vec;
>> +
>> + assert(pending > ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET && pending < s->num_irq);
>> +
>> + vec = &s->vectors[pending];
>> +
>> + assert(vec->enabled);
>> + assert(vec->pending);
>> +
>> + pendgroupprio = vec->prio & nvic_gprio_mask(s);
>> + assert(pendgroupprio < running);
>
> I'm all for asserts to declare what the API is expecting. These are
> starting to look like being unsure of the nvic being in the correct
> state. Are they left over from debugging?
They're mostly left over from Michael's code where I didn't
see any reason to specifically delete them. For this particular
assert the situation is quite complicated -- we know the
pending priority must be such that we can take this
exception, but that is only true because the code
in target/arm is required to only try to acknowledge
(take) the exception if the priority permits it,
which in turn is the result of a combination of the
conditions that the NVIC applies to decide whether to
assert the interrupt line and the conditions applied
in arm_v7m_cpu_exec_interrupt() to decide whether to
call the CPU do_interrupt hook. That's quite a lot of
moving parts which need to all agree, which I think makes
an assert() justified.
>> @@ -428,28 +713,81 @@ static uint64_t nvic_sysreg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>> {
>> NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
>> uint32_t offset = addr;
>> - int i;
>> + unsigned i, end;
>> uint32_t val;
>>
>> switch (offset) {
>> + /* reads of set and clear both return the status */
>> + case 0x100 ... 0x13f: /* NVIC Set enable */
>> + offset += 0x80;
>> + /* fall through */
>> + case 0x180 ... 0x1bf: /* NVIC Clear enable */
>> + val = 0;
>> + offset = offset - 0x180 + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
>
> Can we not calculate a vector index rather than abusing the meaning of
> offset while switching on it?
Yeah, we could. (This is just a case where I thought "I could
rewrite the code Michael did initially, but it doesn't quite
reach my threshold for doing that just because it's not the
way I'd have written it.".)
>> + /* include space for internal exception vectors */
>> + s->num_irq += NVIC_FIRST_IRQ;
>> +
>> + /* The NVIC and system controller register area starts at 0xe000e000
>> + * and looks like this:
>
> s/system controller register area/System Control Space (SCS)/ to make it
> easier to find in the ARM ARM.
OK.
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] armv7m: Rewrite NVIC to not use any GIC code
2017-02-15 13:34 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-15 14:14 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-15 14:27 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-16 14:11 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-16 16:12 ` Peter Maydell
2 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2017-02-15 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell
Cc: qemu-arm, QEMU Developers, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> On 15 February 2017 at 12:46, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
>>
>>> From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
>>>
>>> Despite some superficial similarities of register layout, the
>>> M-profile NVIC is really very different from the A-profile GIC.
>>> Our current attempt to reuse the GIC code means that we have
>>> significant bugs in our NVIC.
>>>
>>> Implement the NVIC as an entirely separate device, to give
>>> us somewhere we can get the behaviour correct.
>>>
>>> This initial commit does not attempt to implement exception
>>> priority escalation, since the GIC-based code didn't either.
>>> It does fix a few bugs in passing:
>>> * ICSR.RETTOBASE polarity was wrong and didn't account for
>>> internal exceptions
>>> * ICSR.VECTPENDING was 16 too high if the pending exception
>>> was for an external interrupt
>>> * UsageFault, BusFault and MemFault were not disabled on reset
>>> as they are supposed to be
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
>>> [PMM: reworked, various bugs and stylistic cleanups]
>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>>> hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 721 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>> hw/intc/trace-events | 15 ++
>>> 2 files changed, 592 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
>>> index ce22001..e319077 100644
>>> --- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
>>> +++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
>>> @@ -17,48 +17,79 @@
<snip>
>>> +static bool nvic_rettobase(NVICState *s)
>>> +{
>>> + int irq, nhand = 0;
>>> +
>>> + for (irq = ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET; irq < s->num_irq; irq++) {
>>> + if (s->vectors[irq].active) {
>>
>> I would expect && !what the ISPR is reporting. However looking at the
>> code it doesn't look like we ever report an exception in the IPSR
>> (assuming HELPER(v7m_mrs) is the right one).
>
> See xpsr_read() in target/arm/cpu.h -- we report
> v7m.exception in the IPSR bits.
So depending on your re-reading of the latest spec should we we count
s->vectors[irq].active && s->vect_pending != irq?
>
>>> + nhand++;
>>> + if (nhand == 2) {
>>> + break;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return nhand == 1;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* Return the value of the ISCR ISRPENDING bit:
>>> + * 1 if an external interrupt is pending
>>> + * 0 if no external interrupt is pending
>>> + */
>>> +static bool nvic_isrpending(NVICState *s)
>>> +{
>>> + int irq;
>>> +
>>> + /* We can shortcut if the highest priority pending interrupt
>>> + * happens to be external or if there is nothing pending.
>>> + */
>>> + if (s->vectpending > NVIC_FIRST_IRQ) {
>>> + return true;
>>> + }
>>> + if (s->vectpending == 0) {
>>> + return false;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + for (irq = NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; irq < s->num_irq; irq++) {
>>
>> Should NVIC_FIRST_IRQ be renamed to NVIC_FIRST_EXTERNAL_IRQ?
>
> The internal ones aren't IRQs, they're exceptions.
> The terminology is a bit confusing, though.
Ahh ok. Maybe just a comment to that effect by the define?
>
>>> + if (s->vectors[irq].pending) {
>>> + return true;
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> + return false;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* Return a mask word which clears the subpriority bits from
>>> + * a priority value for an M-profile exception, leaving only
>>> + * the group priority.
>>> + */
>>> +static inline uint32_t nvic_gprio_mask(NVICState *s)
>>> +{
>>> + return ~0U << (s->prigroup + 1);
>>
>> I wonder if it is worth adding MAKE_32BIT_MASK to bitops.h?
>
> MAKE_64BIT_MASK would work here too. This is the same way
> arm_gicv3_cpuif.c writes it, though.
>
>>> +/* caller must call nvic_irq_update() after this */
>>> +static void set_prio(NVICState *s, unsigned irq, uint8_t prio)
>>> +{
>>> + assert(irq > ARMV7M_EXCP_NMI); /* only use for configurable prios */
>>> + assert(irq < s->num_irq);
>>> +
>>> + s->vectors[irq].prio = prio;
>>
>> So this means the negative priorities are hardwired parts of the NVIC
>> for NMI/RESET? Maybe we should make that clearer in the comment for
>> VecInfo.
>
> Sure. (Yes, the priorities for NMI and HardFault are architecturally
> hardwired. I suspect that in hardware they are not in fact represented
> as negative numbers :-))
>
>>> /* Make pending IRQ active. */
>>> int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
>>> {
>>> NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
>>> - uint32_t irq;
>>> -
>>> - irq = gic_acknowledge_irq(&s->gic, 0, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED);
>>> - if (irq == 1023)
>>> - hw_error("Interrupt but no vector\n");
>>> - if (irq >= 32)
>>> - irq -= 16;
>>> - return irq;
>>> + CPUARMState *env = &s->cpu->env;
>>> + const int pending = s->vectpending;
>>> + const int running = nvic_exec_prio(s);
>>> + int pendgroupprio;
>>> + VecInfo *vec;
>>> +
>>> + assert(pending > ARMV7M_EXCP_RESET && pending < s->num_irq);
>>> +
>>> + vec = &s->vectors[pending];
>>> +
>>> + assert(vec->enabled);
>>> + assert(vec->pending);
>>> +
>>> + pendgroupprio = vec->prio & nvic_gprio_mask(s);
>>> + assert(pendgroupprio < running);
>>
>> I'm all for asserts to declare what the API is expecting. These are
>> starting to look like being unsure of the nvic being in the correct
>> state. Are they left over from debugging?
>
> They're mostly left over from Michael's code where I didn't
> see any reason to specifically delete them. For this particular
> assert the situation is quite complicated -- we know the
> pending priority must be such that we can take this
> exception, but that is only true because the code
> in target/arm is required to only try to acknowledge
> (take) the exception if the priority permits it,
> which in turn is the result of a combination of the
> conditions that the NVIC applies to decide whether to
> assert the interrupt line and the conditions applied
> in arm_v7m_cpu_exec_interrupt() to decide whether to
> call the CPU do_interrupt hook. That's quite a lot of
> moving parts which need to all agree, which I think makes
> an assert() justified.
I guess it would be easier to remove the asserts if we had run test
cases that explicitly exercised all this code. What are you currently
running to test this code?
>
>>> @@ -428,28 +713,81 @@ static uint64_t nvic_sysreg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>>> {
>>> NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
>>> uint32_t offset = addr;
>>> - int i;
>>> + unsigned i, end;
>>> uint32_t val;
>>>
>>> switch (offset) {
>>> + /* reads of set and clear both return the status */
>>> + case 0x100 ... 0x13f: /* NVIC Set enable */
>>> + offset += 0x80;
>>> + /* fall through */
>>> + case 0x180 ... 0x1bf: /* NVIC Clear enable */
>>> + val = 0;
>>> + offset = offset - 0x180 + NVIC_FIRST_IRQ; /* vector # */
>>
>> Can we not calculate a vector index rather than abusing the meaning of
>> offset while switching on it?
>
> Yeah, we could. (This is just a case where I thought "I could
> rewrite the code Michael did initially, but it doesn't quite
> reach my threshold for doing that just because it's not the
> way I'd have written it.".)
>
>
>>> + /* include space for internal exception vectors */
>>> + s->num_irq += NVIC_FIRST_IRQ;
>>> +
>>> + /* The NVIC and system controller register area starts at 0xe000e000
>>> + * and looks like this:
>>
>> s/system controller register area/System Control Space (SCS)/ to make it
>> easier to find in the ARM ARM.
>
> OK.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
--
Alex Bennée
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] armv7m: Rewrite NVIC to not use any GIC code
2017-02-15 14:14 ` Alex Bennée
@ 2017-02-15 14:27 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-15 14:51 ` Alex Bennée
0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-15 14:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Bennée
Cc: qemu-arm, QEMU Developers, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
On 15 February 2017 at 14:14, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
> I guess it would be easier to remove the asserts if we had run test
> cases that explicitly exercised all this code. What are you currently
> running to test this code?
The cover letter has a pointer to the tests I've been using
(plus the usual "run a random stellaris image").
I think the benefit of the asserts is in warding off future
bugs; so I think they're worth keeping where we know something
should never happen but the code is complicated enough that
perhaps a future patch might put things in a state where the
impossible does happen.
Also, number of assert()s is to some extent a coding style
issue, and in this patchset I'm really taking Michael's code
and doing a review/cleanup pass on it, so I've tried not to
do too much rework of the "well I wouldn't have put quite this
many asserts in" flavour.
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] armv7m: Rewrite NVIC to not use any GIC code
2017-02-15 14:27 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-15 14:51 ` Alex Bennée
0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2017-02-15 14:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell
Cc: qemu-arm, QEMU Developers, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> On 15 February 2017 at 14:14, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>> I guess it would be easier to remove the asserts if we had run test
>> cases that explicitly exercised all this code. What are you currently
>> running to test this code?
>
> The cover letter has a pointer to the tests I've been using
> (plus the usual "run a random stellaris image").
Doh, teach me for not reading that. I shall snarf them now ;-)
>
> I think the benefit of the asserts is in warding off future
> bugs; so I think they're worth keeping where we know something
> should never happen but the code is complicated enough that
> perhaps a future patch might put things in a state where the
> impossible does happen.
>
> Also, number of assert()s is to some extent a coding style
> issue, and in this patchset I'm really taking Michael's code
> and doing a review/cleanup pass on it, so I've tried not to
> do too much rework of the "well I wouldn't have put quite this
> many asserts in" flavour.
Sure no problem.
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
--
Alex Bennée
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] armv7m: Rewrite NVIC to not use any GIC code
2017-02-15 13:34 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-15 14:14 ` Alex Bennée
@ 2017-02-16 14:11 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-18 17:45 ` Michael Davidsaver
2017-02-16 16:12 ` Peter Maydell
2 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-16 14:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Bennée
Cc: qemu-arm, QEMU Developers, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
On 15 February 2017 at 13:34, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 15 February 2017 at 12:46, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
>>> +/* Return the value of the ISCR RETTOBASE bit:
>>> + * 1 if there is exactly one active exception
>>> + * 0 if there is more than one active exception
>>> + * UNKNOWN if there are no active exceptions (we choose 0)
>>> + */
>>
>> This doesn't match what the ARMv7M ARM says (for Handler mode):
>>
>> 0 There is an active exception other than the exception shown by IPSR.
>> 1 There is no active exception other than any exception shown by IPSR.
>
> They're only different if the guest code has managed
> to deactivate the IPSR exception without leaving the
> exception handler. This is bogus guest code and will cause
> an exception-return-integrity-check to fail when the guest
> exits the handler. It's also pretty hard to do: the only
> method is to clear the SHCSR bits for those few exceptions
> which report their active state there.
>
> Otherwise "no active exceptions" => not in handler mode;
> "more than 1 active exception" => IPSR exception and another;
> "exactly one active exception" => the IPSR exception
>
> I would be unsurprised to find that the documentation of the
> RETTOBASE bit was just phrased in a way that forgot about
> the possible effect of the deactivated-your-own-exception
> corner case. I'll investigate a bit more what's going on
> here and whether eg the v8M ARM ARM nails down the behaviour
> more precisely, though.
The v8M ARM ARM defines RETTOBASE as:
Handler mode:
0: "there is more than one active exception"
1: "there is only one active exception"
Thread mode:
UNKNOWN
The Cortex-M3 Devices Generic User Guide
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.dui0552a/Cihfaaha.html
defines RETTOBASE as:
0 = there are preempted active exceptions to execute
1 = there are no active exceptions, or the currently-executing
exception is the only active exception.
(ie it doesn't have Thread mode giving an UNKNOWN value)
I haven't actually checked real hardware behaviour, but I think
we can fairly safely implement this as not checking the IPSR
exception field. (We might as well go with the "reads 1 in
handler mode" choice of UNKNOWN that the M3 documents, though.)
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] armv7m: Rewrite NVIC to not use any GIC code
2017-02-16 14:11 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-18 17:45 ` Michael Davidsaver
2017-02-18 18:38 ` Peter Maydell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Michael Davidsaver @ 2017-02-18 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell
Cc: Alex Bennée, qemu-arm, QEMU Developers, patches, Liviu Ionescu
On 02/16/2017 09:11 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> I haven't actually checked real hardware behaviour, but I think
> we can fairly safely implement this as not checking the IPSR
> exception field. (We might as well go with the "reads 1 in
> handler mode" choice of UNKNOWN that the M3 documents, though.)
For what it's worth, I dug up my TI TM4C1294 eval board and re-ran
test10.c [1] which is designed to probe this behavior by nesting
exceptions PendSV within SVC. RETTOBASE is 0x800 in ICSR.
> 1..12
> # BASEPRI mask 000000e0
> # DEBUG prio 000000e0
> ok 1 - 00000000 == 00000000 ICSR
> ok 2 - 00000000 == 00000000 SHCSR
> # Call SVC
> # In SVC
> ok 3 - 0000080b == 0000080b ICSR
> ok 4 - 00000080 == 00000080 SHCSR
> # In PendSV
> ok 5 - 0000000e == 0000000e ICSR
> ok 6 - 00000480 == 00000480 SHCSR
> # Back in SVC
> ok 7 - 00000003 == 00000003 Back in SVC
> ok 8 - 0000080b == 0000080b ICSR
> ok 9 - 00000080 == 00000080 SHCSR
> # Back in main
> ok 10 - 00000004 == 00000004 Back in main
> ok 11 - 00000000 == 00000000 ICSR
> ok 12 - 00000000 == 00000000 SHCSR
> # Done
[1] https://github.com/mdavidsaver/baremetal/blob/qemutest/test10.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] armv7m: Rewrite NVIC to not use any GIC code
2017-02-18 17:45 ` Michael Davidsaver
@ 2017-02-18 18:38 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-19 18:10 ` Michael Davidsaver
0 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-18 18:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Davidsaver
Cc: Alex Bennée, qemu-arm, QEMU Developers, patches, Liviu Ionescu
On 18 February 2017 at 17:45, Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 02/16/2017 09:11 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> I haven't actually checked real hardware behaviour, but I think
>> we can fairly safely implement this as not checking the IPSR
>> exception field. (We might as well go with the "reads 1 in
>> handler mode" choice of UNKNOWN that the M3 documents, though.)
>
> For what it's worth, I dug up my TI TM4C1294 eval board and re-ran
> test10.c [1] which is designed to probe this behavior by nesting
> exceptions PendSV within SVC. RETTOBASE is 0x800 in ICSR.
That's a Cortex-M4. From the test it looks like it
has a different choice of UNKNOWN behaviour for
the value in Handler mode, so real code in the field
isn't going to be relying on that and it doesn't
matter what we choose.
I don't think the test looks at the "what happens if the
exception in the IPSR exception field isn't actually
active" case, right?
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] armv7m: Rewrite NVIC to not use any GIC code
2017-02-18 18:38 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-19 18:10 ` Michael Davidsaver
0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Michael Davidsaver @ 2017-02-19 18:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell
Cc: Alex Bennée, qemu-arm, QEMU Developers, patches, Liviu Ionescu
On 02/18/2017 01:38 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 18 February 2017 at 17:45, Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 02/16/2017 09:11 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> I haven't actually checked real hardware behaviour, but I think
>>> we can fairly safely implement this as not checking the IPSR
>>> exception field. (We might as well go with the "reads 1 in
>>> handler mode" choice of UNKNOWN that the M3 documents, though.)
>>
>> For what it's worth, I dug up my TI TM4C1294 eval board and re-ran
>> test10.c [1] which is designed to probe this behavior by nesting
>> exceptions PendSV within SVC. RETTOBASE is 0x800 in ICSR.
>
> That's a Cortex-M4. From the test it looks like it
> has a different choice of UNKNOWN behaviour for
> the value in Handler mode, so real code in the field
> isn't going to be relying on that and it doesn't
> matter what we choose.
I've been away from arm/m for too long to claim any detailed knowledge
of the documentation. My intent here is only to provide a data point w/
real hardware, not to interpret it.
> I don't think the test looks at the "what happens if the
> exception in the IPSR exception field isn't actually
> active" case, right?
Correct.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] armv7m: Rewrite NVIC to not use any GIC code
2017-02-15 13:34 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-15 14:14 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-16 14:11 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-16 16:12 ` Peter Maydell
2 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-16 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alex Bennée
Cc: qemu-arm, QEMU Developers, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
On 15 February 2017 at 13:34, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 15 February 2017 at 12:46, Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> wrote:
>> Can we not calculate a vector index rather than abusing the meaning of
>> offset while switching on it?
>
> Yeah, we could. (This is just a case where I thought "I could
> rewrite the code Michael did initially, but it doesn't quite
> reach my threshold for doing that just because it's not the
> way I'd have written it.".)
FWIW, it took me five attempts at rewriting these loops before
I got a version that actually worked. I think I'm going to
take that as justification for my bias towards not rewriting
code that already works :-)
(The change I ended up with just uses a local 'startvec' instead
of modifying 'offset'.)
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] armv7m: Fix condition check for taking exceptions
2017-02-02 20:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite NVIC to not depend on the GIC Peter Maydell
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/9] armv7m: Rewrite NVIC to not use any GIC code Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-02 20:02 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-15 12:48 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] arm: gic: Remove references to NVIC Peter Maydell
` (5 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-02 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Cc: patches, Alex Bennée, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
The M profile condition for when we can take a pending exception or
interrupt is not the same as that for A/R profile. The code
originally copied from the A/R profile version of the
cpu_exec_interrupt function only worked by chance for the
very simple case of exceptions being masked by PRIMASK.
Replace it with a call to a function in the NVIC code that
correctly compares the priority of the pending exception
against the current execution priority of the CPU.
[Michael Davidsaver's patchset had a patch to do something
similar but the implementation ended up being a rewrite.]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/cpu.h | 8 ++++++++
hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 7 +++++++
target/arm/cpu.c | 16 ++++++++--------
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index 39bff86..ac20a56 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -1335,6 +1335,14 @@ uint32_t arm_phys_excp_target_el(CPUState *cs, uint32_t excp_idx,
uint32_t cur_el, bool secure);
/* Interface between CPU and Interrupt controller. */
+#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+bool armv7m_nvic_can_take_pending_exception(void *opaque);
+#else
+static inline bool armv7m_nvic_can_take_pending_exception(void *opaque)
+{
+ return true;
+}
+#endif
void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq);
int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque);
void armv7m_nvic_complete_irq(void *opaque, int irq);
diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
index e319077..3d77cbf 100644
--- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
@@ -268,6 +268,13 @@ static inline int nvic_exec_prio(NVICState *s)
return MIN(running, s->exception_prio);
}
+bool armv7m_nvic_can_take_pending_exception(void *opaque)
+{
+ NVICState *s = opaque;
+
+ return nvic_exec_prio(s) > nvic_pending_prio(s);
+}
+
/* caller must call nvic_irq_update() after this */
static void set_prio(NVICState *s, unsigned irq, uint8_t prio)
{
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
index e9f10f7..7713d88 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.c
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
@@ -338,13 +338,6 @@ static bool arm_v7m_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
bool ret = false;
-
- if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ
- && !(env->daif & PSTATE_F)) {
- cs->exception_index = EXCP_FIQ;
- cc->do_interrupt(cs);
- ret = true;
- }
/* ARMv7-M interrupt return works by loading a magic value
* into the PC. On real hardware the load causes the
* return to occur. The qemu implementation performs the
@@ -354,9 +347,16 @@ static bool arm_v7m_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
* the stack if an interrupt occurred at the wrong time.
* We avoid this by disabling interrupts when
* pc contains a magic address.
+ *
+ * ARMv7-M interrupt masking works differently than -A or -R.
+ * There is no FIQ/IRQ distinction. Instead of I and F bits
+ * masking FIQ and IRQ interrupts, an exception is taken only
+ * if it is higher priority than the current execution priority
+ * (which depends on state like BASEPRI, FAULTMASK and the
+ * currently active exception).
*/
if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD
- && !(env->daif & PSTATE_I)
+ && (armv7m_nvic_can_take_pending_exception(env->nvic))
&& (env->regs[15] < 0xfffffff0)) {
cs->exception_index = EXCP_IRQ;
cc->do_interrupt(cs);
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] armv7m: Fix condition check for taking exceptions
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] armv7m: Fix condition check for taking exceptions Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-15 12:48 ` Alex Bennée
0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2017-02-15 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell
Cc: qemu-arm, qemu-devel, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> The M profile condition for when we can take a pending exception or
> interrupt is not the same as that for A/R profile. The code
> originally copied from the A/R profile version of the
> cpu_exec_interrupt function only worked by chance for the
> very simple case of exceptions being masked by PRIMASK.
> Replace it with a call to a function in the NVIC code that
> correctly compares the priority of the pending exception
> against the current execution priority of the CPU.
>
> [Michael Davidsaver's patchset had a patch to do something
> similar but the implementation ended up being a rewrite.]
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> ---
> target/arm/cpu.h | 8 ++++++++
> hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 7 +++++++
> target/arm/cpu.c | 16 ++++++++--------
> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
> index 39bff86..ac20a56 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> @@ -1335,6 +1335,14 @@ uint32_t arm_phys_excp_target_el(CPUState *cs, uint32_t excp_idx,
> uint32_t cur_el, bool secure);
>
> /* Interface between CPU and Interrupt controller. */
> +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
> +bool armv7m_nvic_can_take_pending_exception(void *opaque);
> +#else
> +static inline bool armv7m_nvic_can_take_pending_exception(void *opaque)
> +{
> + return true;
> +}
> +#endif
> void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq);
> int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque);
> void armv7m_nvic_complete_irq(void *opaque, int irq);
> diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> index e319077..3d77cbf 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> @@ -268,6 +268,13 @@ static inline int nvic_exec_prio(NVICState *s)
> return MIN(running, s->exception_prio);
> }
>
> +bool armv7m_nvic_can_take_pending_exception(void *opaque)
> +{
> + NVICState *s = opaque;
> +
> + return nvic_exec_prio(s) > nvic_pending_prio(s);
> +}
> +
> /* caller must call nvic_irq_update() after this */
> static void set_prio(NVICState *s, unsigned irq, uint8_t prio)
> {
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.c b/target/arm/cpu.c
> index e9f10f7..7713d88 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.c
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.c
> @@ -338,13 +338,6 @@ static bool arm_v7m_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
> CPUARMState *env = &cpu->env;
> bool ret = false;
>
> -
> - if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_FIQ
> - && !(env->daif & PSTATE_F)) {
> - cs->exception_index = EXCP_FIQ;
> - cc->do_interrupt(cs);
> - ret = true;
> - }
> /* ARMv7-M interrupt return works by loading a magic value
> * into the PC. On real hardware the load causes the
> * return to occur. The qemu implementation performs the
> @@ -354,9 +347,16 @@ static bool arm_v7m_cpu_exec_interrupt(CPUState *cs, int interrupt_request)
> * the stack if an interrupt occurred at the wrong time.
> * We avoid this by disabling interrupts when
> * pc contains a magic address.
> + *
> + * ARMv7-M interrupt masking works differently than -A or -R.
> + * There is no FIQ/IRQ distinction. Instead of I and F bits
> + * masking FIQ and IRQ interrupts, an exception is taken only
> + * if it is higher priority than the current execution priority
> + * (which depends on state like BASEPRI, FAULTMASK and the
> + * currently active exception).
> */
> if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HARD
> - && !(env->daif & PSTATE_I)
> + && (armv7m_nvic_can_take_pending_exception(env->nvic))
> && (env->regs[15] < 0xfffffff0)) {
> cs->exception_index = EXCP_IRQ;
> cc->do_interrupt(cs);
--
Alex Bennée
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] arm: gic: Remove references to NVIC
2017-02-02 20:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite NVIC to not depend on the GIC Peter Maydell
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/9] armv7m: Fix condition check for taking exceptions Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-02 20:02 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-15 12:49 ` Alex Bennée
2017-04-17 3:11 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/9] armv7m: Escalate exceptions to HardFault if necessary Peter Maydell
` (4 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 2 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-02 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Cc: patches, Alex Bennée, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
Now that the NVIC is its own separate implementation, we can
clean up the GIC code by removing REV_NVIC and conditionals
which use it.
Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
hw/intc/gic_internal.h | 7 ++-----
hw/intc/arm_gic.c | 31 +++++--------------------------
hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/intc/gic_internal.h b/hw/intc/gic_internal.h
index 3f31174..7fe87b1 100644
--- a/hw/intc/gic_internal.h
+++ b/hw/intc/gic_internal.h
@@ -25,9 +25,7 @@
#define ALL_CPU_MASK ((unsigned)(((1 << GIC_NCPU) - 1)))
-/* The NVIC has 16 internal vectors. However these are not exposed
- through the normal GIC interface. */
-#define GIC_BASE_IRQ ((s->revision == REV_NVIC) ? 32 : 0)
+#define GIC_BASE_IRQ 0
#define GIC_SET_ENABLED(irq, cm) s->irq_state[irq].enabled |= (cm)
#define GIC_CLEAR_ENABLED(irq, cm) s->irq_state[irq].enabled &= ~(cm)
@@ -75,7 +73,6 @@
/* The special cases for the revision property: */
#define REV_11MPCORE 0
-#define REV_NVIC 0xffffffff
void gic_set_pending_private(GICState *s, int cpu, int irq);
uint32_t gic_acknowledge_irq(GICState *s, int cpu, MemTxAttrs attrs);
@@ -87,7 +84,7 @@ void gic_set_priority(GICState *s, int cpu, int irq, uint8_t val,
static inline bool gic_test_pending(GICState *s, int irq, int cm)
{
- if (s->revision == REV_NVIC || s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
+ if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
return s->irq_state[irq].pending & cm;
} else {
/* Edge-triggered interrupts are marked pending on a rising edge, but
diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
index 521aac3..8e5a9d8 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
@@ -156,17 +156,6 @@ static void gic_set_irq_11mpcore(GICState *s, int irq, int level,
}
}
-static void gic_set_irq_nvic(GICState *s, int irq, int level,
- int cm, int target)
-{
- if (level) {
- GIC_SET_LEVEL(irq, cm);
- GIC_SET_PENDING(irq, target);
- } else {
- GIC_CLEAR_LEVEL(irq, cm);
- }
-}
-
static void gic_set_irq_generic(GICState *s, int irq, int level,
int cm, int target)
{
@@ -214,8 +203,6 @@ static void gic_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
gic_set_irq_11mpcore(s, irq, level, cm, target);
- } else if (s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
- gic_set_irq_nvic(s, irq, level, cm, target);
} else {
gic_set_irq_generic(s, irq, level, cm, target);
}
@@ -367,7 +354,7 @@ uint32_t gic_acknowledge_irq(GICState *s, int cpu, MemTxAttrs attrs)
return 1023;
}
- if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
+ if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
/* Clear pending flags for both level and edge triggered interrupts.
* Level triggered IRQs will be reasserted once they become inactive.
*/
@@ -589,11 +576,6 @@ void gic_complete_irq(GICState *s, int cpu, int irq, MemTxAttrs attrs)
DPRINTF("Set %d pending mask %x\n", irq, cm);
GIC_SET_PENDING(irq, cm);
}
- } else if (s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
- if (GIC_TEST_LEVEL(irq, cm)) {
- DPRINTF("Set nvic %d pending mask %x\n", irq, cm);
- GIC_SET_PENDING(irq, cm);
- }
}
group = gic_has_groups(s) && GIC_TEST_GROUP(irq, cm);
@@ -768,7 +750,7 @@ static uint32_t gic_dist_readb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, MemTxAttrs attrs)
} else if (offset < 0xf10) {
goto bad_reg;
} else if (offset < 0xf30) {
- if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
+ if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
goto bad_reg;
}
@@ -802,9 +784,6 @@ static uint32_t gic_dist_readb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, MemTxAttrs attrs)
case 2:
res = gic_id_gicv2[(offset - 0xfd0) >> 2];
break;
- case REV_NVIC:
- /* Shouldn't be able to get here */
- abort();
default:
res = 0;
}
@@ -1028,7 +1007,7 @@ static void gic_dist_writeb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
continue; /* Ignore Non-secure access of Group0 IRQ */
}
- if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
+ if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
if (value & (1 << (i * 2))) {
GIC_SET_MODEL(irq + i);
} else {
@@ -1046,7 +1025,7 @@ static void gic_dist_writeb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
goto bad_reg;
} else if (offset < 0xf20) {
/* GICD_CPENDSGIRn */
- if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
+ if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
goto bad_reg;
}
irq = (offset - 0xf10);
@@ -1060,7 +1039,7 @@ static void gic_dist_writeb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
}
} else if (offset < 0xf30) {
/* GICD_SPENDSGIRn */
- if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
+ if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
goto bad_reg;
}
irq = (offset - 0xf20);
diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
index 4a8df44..70f1134 100644
--- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
+++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
@@ -99,9 +99,7 @@ void gic_init_irqs_and_mmio(GICState *s, qemu_irq_handler handler,
* [N+32..N+63] PPIs for CPU 1
* ...
*/
- if (s->revision != REV_NVIC) {
- i += (GIC_INTERNAL * s->num_cpu);
- }
+ i += (GIC_INTERNAL * s->num_cpu);
qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(s), handler, i);
for (i = 0; i < s->num_cpu; i++) {
@@ -121,16 +119,12 @@ void gic_init_irqs_and_mmio(GICState *s, qemu_irq_handler handler,
memory_region_init_io(&s->iomem, OBJECT(s), ops, s, "gic_dist", 0x1000);
sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->iomem);
- if (s->revision != REV_NVIC) {
- /* This is the main CPU interface "for this core". It is always
- * present because it is required by both software emulation and KVM.
- * NVIC is not handled here because its CPU interface is different,
- * neither it can use KVM.
- */
- memory_region_init_io(&s->cpuiomem[0], OBJECT(s), ops ? &ops[1] : NULL,
- s, "gic_cpu", s->revision == 2 ? 0x2000 : 0x100);
- sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->cpuiomem[0]);
- }
+ /* This is the main CPU interface "for this core". It is always
+ * present because it is required by both software emulation and KVM.
+ */
+ memory_region_init_io(&s->cpuiomem[0], OBJECT(s), ops ? &ops[1] : NULL,
+ s, "gic_cpu", s->revision == 2 ? 0x2000 : 0x100);
+ sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->cpuiomem[0]);
}
static void arm_gic_common_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
@@ -162,7 +156,7 @@ static void arm_gic_common_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
}
if (s->security_extn &&
- (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC)) {
+ (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE)) {
error_setg(errp, "this GIC revision does not implement "
"the security extensions");
return;
@@ -255,7 +249,6 @@ static Property arm_gic_common_properties[] = {
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("num-irq", GICState, num_irq, 32),
/* Revision can be 1 or 2 for GIC architecture specification
* versions 1 or 2, or 0 to indicate the legacy 11MPCore GIC.
- * (Internally, 0xffffffff also indicates "not a GIC but an NVIC".)
*/
DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("revision", GICState, revision, 1),
/* True if the GIC should implement the security extensions */
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] arm: gic: Remove references to NVIC
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] arm: gic: Remove references to NVIC Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-15 12:49 ` Alex Bennée
2017-04-17 3:11 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
1 sibling, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2017-02-15 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell
Cc: qemu-arm, qemu-devel, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
>
> Now that the NVIC is its own separate implementation, we can
> clean up the GIC code by removing REV_NVIC and conditionals
> which use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/intc/gic_internal.h | 7 ++-----
> hw/intc/arm_gic.c | 31 +++++--------------------------
> hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/gic_internal.h b/hw/intc/gic_internal.h
> index 3f31174..7fe87b1 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/gic_internal.h
> +++ b/hw/intc/gic_internal.h
> @@ -25,9 +25,7 @@
>
> #define ALL_CPU_MASK ((unsigned)(((1 << GIC_NCPU) - 1)))
>
> -/* The NVIC has 16 internal vectors. However these are not exposed
> - through the normal GIC interface. */
> -#define GIC_BASE_IRQ ((s->revision == REV_NVIC) ? 32 : 0)
> +#define GIC_BASE_IRQ 0
>
> #define GIC_SET_ENABLED(irq, cm) s->irq_state[irq].enabled |= (cm)
> #define GIC_CLEAR_ENABLED(irq, cm) s->irq_state[irq].enabled &= ~(cm)
> @@ -75,7 +73,6 @@
>
> /* The special cases for the revision property: */
> #define REV_11MPCORE 0
> -#define REV_NVIC 0xffffffff
>
> void gic_set_pending_private(GICState *s, int cpu, int irq);
> uint32_t gic_acknowledge_irq(GICState *s, int cpu, MemTxAttrs attrs);
> @@ -87,7 +84,7 @@ void gic_set_priority(GICState *s, int cpu, int irq, uint8_t val,
>
> static inline bool gic_test_pending(GICState *s, int irq, int cm)
> {
> - if (s->revision == REV_NVIC || s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> + if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> return s->irq_state[irq].pending & cm;
> } else {
> /* Edge-triggered interrupts are marked pending on a rising edge, but
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
> index 521aac3..8e5a9d8 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
> @@ -156,17 +156,6 @@ static void gic_set_irq_11mpcore(GICState *s, int irq, int level,
> }
> }
>
> -static void gic_set_irq_nvic(GICState *s, int irq, int level,
> - int cm, int target)
> -{
> - if (level) {
> - GIC_SET_LEVEL(irq, cm);
> - GIC_SET_PENDING(irq, target);
> - } else {
> - GIC_CLEAR_LEVEL(irq, cm);
> - }
> -}
> -
> static void gic_set_irq_generic(GICState *s, int irq, int level,
> int cm, int target)
> {
> @@ -214,8 +203,6 @@ static void gic_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
>
> if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> gic_set_irq_11mpcore(s, irq, level, cm, target);
> - } else if (s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
> - gic_set_irq_nvic(s, irq, level, cm, target);
> } else {
> gic_set_irq_generic(s, irq, level, cm, target);
> }
> @@ -367,7 +354,7 @@ uint32_t gic_acknowledge_irq(GICState *s, int cpu, MemTxAttrs attrs)
> return 1023;
> }
>
> - if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
> + if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> /* Clear pending flags for both level and edge triggered interrupts.
> * Level triggered IRQs will be reasserted once they become inactive.
> */
> @@ -589,11 +576,6 @@ void gic_complete_irq(GICState *s, int cpu, int irq, MemTxAttrs attrs)
> DPRINTF("Set %d pending mask %x\n", irq, cm);
> GIC_SET_PENDING(irq, cm);
> }
> - } else if (s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
> - if (GIC_TEST_LEVEL(irq, cm)) {
> - DPRINTF("Set nvic %d pending mask %x\n", irq, cm);
> - GIC_SET_PENDING(irq, cm);
> - }
> }
>
> group = gic_has_groups(s) && GIC_TEST_GROUP(irq, cm);
> @@ -768,7 +750,7 @@ static uint32_t gic_dist_readb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, MemTxAttrs attrs)
> } else if (offset < 0xf10) {
> goto bad_reg;
> } else if (offset < 0xf30) {
> - if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
> + if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> goto bad_reg;
> }
>
> @@ -802,9 +784,6 @@ static uint32_t gic_dist_readb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, MemTxAttrs attrs)
> case 2:
> res = gic_id_gicv2[(offset - 0xfd0) >> 2];
> break;
> - case REV_NVIC:
> - /* Shouldn't be able to get here */
> - abort();
> default:
> res = 0;
> }
> @@ -1028,7 +1007,7 @@ static void gic_dist_writeb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
> continue; /* Ignore Non-secure access of Group0 IRQ */
> }
>
> - if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
> + if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> if (value & (1 << (i * 2))) {
> GIC_SET_MODEL(irq + i);
> } else {
> @@ -1046,7 +1025,7 @@ static void gic_dist_writeb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
> goto bad_reg;
> } else if (offset < 0xf20) {
> /* GICD_CPENDSGIRn */
> - if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
> + if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> goto bad_reg;
> }
> irq = (offset - 0xf10);
> @@ -1060,7 +1039,7 @@ static void gic_dist_writeb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
> }
> } else if (offset < 0xf30) {
> /* GICD_SPENDSGIRn */
> - if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
> + if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> goto bad_reg;
> }
> irq = (offset - 0xf20);
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
> index 4a8df44..70f1134 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
> @@ -99,9 +99,7 @@ void gic_init_irqs_and_mmio(GICState *s, qemu_irq_handler handler,
> * [N+32..N+63] PPIs for CPU 1
> * ...
> */
> - if (s->revision != REV_NVIC) {
> - i += (GIC_INTERNAL * s->num_cpu);
> - }
> + i += (GIC_INTERNAL * s->num_cpu);
> qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(s), handler, i);
>
> for (i = 0; i < s->num_cpu; i++) {
> @@ -121,16 +119,12 @@ void gic_init_irqs_and_mmio(GICState *s, qemu_irq_handler handler,
> memory_region_init_io(&s->iomem, OBJECT(s), ops, s, "gic_dist", 0x1000);
> sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->iomem);
>
> - if (s->revision != REV_NVIC) {
> - /* This is the main CPU interface "for this core". It is always
> - * present because it is required by both software emulation and KVM.
> - * NVIC is not handled here because its CPU interface is different,
> - * neither it can use KVM.
> - */
> - memory_region_init_io(&s->cpuiomem[0], OBJECT(s), ops ? &ops[1] : NULL,
> - s, "gic_cpu", s->revision == 2 ? 0x2000 : 0x100);
> - sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->cpuiomem[0]);
> - }
> + /* This is the main CPU interface "for this core". It is always
> + * present because it is required by both software emulation and KVM.
> + */
> + memory_region_init_io(&s->cpuiomem[0], OBJECT(s), ops ? &ops[1] : NULL,
> + s, "gic_cpu", s->revision == 2 ? 0x2000 : 0x100);
> + sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->cpuiomem[0]);
> }
>
> static void arm_gic_common_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> @@ -162,7 +156,7 @@ static void arm_gic_common_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> }
>
> if (s->security_extn &&
> - (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC)) {
> + (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE)) {
> error_setg(errp, "this GIC revision does not implement "
> "the security extensions");
> return;
> @@ -255,7 +249,6 @@ static Property arm_gic_common_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("num-irq", GICState, num_irq, 32),
> /* Revision can be 1 or 2 for GIC architecture specification
> * versions 1 or 2, or 0 to indicate the legacy 11MPCore GIC.
> - * (Internally, 0xffffffff also indicates "not a GIC but an NVIC".)
> */
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("revision", GICState, revision, 1),
> /* True if the GIC should implement the security extensions */
--
Alex Bennée
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] arm: gic: Remove references to NVIC
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] arm: gic: Remove references to NVIC Peter Maydell
2017-02-15 12:49 ` Alex Bennée
@ 2017-04-17 3:11 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
1 sibling, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2017-04-17 3:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell, qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Cc: Liviu Ionescu, Michael Davidsaver, Alex Bennée, patches
On 02/02/2017 05:02 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
>
> Now that the NVIC is its own separate implementation, we can
> clean up the GIC code by removing REV_NVIC and conditionals
> which use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> hw/intc/gic_internal.h | 7 ++-----
> hw/intc/arm_gic.c | 31 +++++--------------------------
> hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c | 23 ++++++++---------------
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/gic_internal.h b/hw/intc/gic_internal.h
> index 3f31174..7fe87b1 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/gic_internal.h
> +++ b/hw/intc/gic_internal.h
> @@ -25,9 +25,7 @@
>
> #define ALL_CPU_MASK ((unsigned)(((1 << GIC_NCPU) - 1)))
>
> -/* The NVIC has 16 internal vectors. However these are not exposed
> - through the normal GIC interface. */
> -#define GIC_BASE_IRQ ((s->revision == REV_NVIC) ? 32 : 0)
> +#define GIC_BASE_IRQ 0
>
> #define GIC_SET_ENABLED(irq, cm) s->irq_state[irq].enabled |= (cm)
> #define GIC_CLEAR_ENABLED(irq, cm) s->irq_state[irq].enabled &= ~(cm)
> @@ -75,7 +73,6 @@
>
> /* The special cases for the revision property: */
> #define REV_11MPCORE 0
> -#define REV_NVIC 0xffffffff
>
> void gic_set_pending_private(GICState *s, int cpu, int irq);
> uint32_t gic_acknowledge_irq(GICState *s, int cpu, MemTxAttrs attrs);
> @@ -87,7 +84,7 @@ void gic_set_priority(GICState *s, int cpu, int irq, uint8_t val,
>
> static inline bool gic_test_pending(GICState *s, int irq, int cm)
> {
> - if (s->revision == REV_NVIC || s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> + if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> return s->irq_state[irq].pending & cm;
> } else {
> /* Edge-triggered interrupts are marked pending on a rising edge, but
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
> index 521aac3..8e5a9d8 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic.c
> @@ -156,17 +156,6 @@ static void gic_set_irq_11mpcore(GICState *s, int irq, int level,
> }
> }
>
> -static void gic_set_irq_nvic(GICState *s, int irq, int level,
> - int cm, int target)
> -{
> - if (level) {
> - GIC_SET_LEVEL(irq, cm);
> - GIC_SET_PENDING(irq, target);
> - } else {
> - GIC_CLEAR_LEVEL(irq, cm);
> - }
> -}
> -
> static void gic_set_irq_generic(GICState *s, int irq, int level,
> int cm, int target)
> {
> @@ -214,8 +203,6 @@ static void gic_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
>
> if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> gic_set_irq_11mpcore(s, irq, level, cm, target);
> - } else if (s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
> - gic_set_irq_nvic(s, irq, level, cm, target);
> } else {
> gic_set_irq_generic(s, irq, level, cm, target);
> }
> @@ -367,7 +354,7 @@ uint32_t gic_acknowledge_irq(GICState *s, int cpu, MemTxAttrs attrs)
> return 1023;
> }
>
> - if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
> + if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> /* Clear pending flags for both level and edge triggered interrupts.
> * Level triggered IRQs will be reasserted once they become inactive.
> */
> @@ -589,11 +576,6 @@ void gic_complete_irq(GICState *s, int cpu, int irq, MemTxAttrs attrs)
> DPRINTF("Set %d pending mask %x\n", irq, cm);
> GIC_SET_PENDING(irq, cm);
> }
> - } else if (s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
> - if (GIC_TEST_LEVEL(irq, cm)) {
> - DPRINTF("Set nvic %d pending mask %x\n", irq, cm);
> - GIC_SET_PENDING(irq, cm);
> - }
> }
>
> group = gic_has_groups(s) && GIC_TEST_GROUP(irq, cm);
> @@ -768,7 +750,7 @@ static uint32_t gic_dist_readb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, MemTxAttrs attrs)
> } else if (offset < 0xf10) {
> goto bad_reg;
> } else if (offset < 0xf30) {
> - if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
> + if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> goto bad_reg;
> }
>
> @@ -802,9 +784,6 @@ static uint32_t gic_dist_readb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, MemTxAttrs attrs)
> case 2:
> res = gic_id_gicv2[(offset - 0xfd0) >> 2];
> break;
> - case REV_NVIC:
> - /* Shouldn't be able to get here */
> - abort();
> default:
> res = 0;
> }
> @@ -1028,7 +1007,7 @@ static void gic_dist_writeb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
> continue; /* Ignore Non-secure access of Group0 IRQ */
> }
>
> - if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
> + if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> if (value & (1 << (i * 2))) {
> GIC_SET_MODEL(irq + i);
> } else {
> @@ -1046,7 +1025,7 @@ static void gic_dist_writeb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
> goto bad_reg;
> } else if (offset < 0xf20) {
> /* GICD_CPENDSGIRn */
> - if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
> + if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> goto bad_reg;
> }
> irq = (offset - 0xf10);
> @@ -1060,7 +1039,7 @@ static void gic_dist_writeb(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
> }
> } else if (offset < 0xf30) {
> /* GICD_SPENDSGIRn */
> - if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC) {
> + if (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE) {
> goto bad_reg;
> }
> irq = (offset - 0xf20);
> diff --git a/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c b/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
> index 4a8df44..70f1134 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/arm_gic_common.c
> @@ -99,9 +99,7 @@ void gic_init_irqs_and_mmio(GICState *s, qemu_irq_handler handler,
> * [N+32..N+63] PPIs for CPU 1
> * ...
> */
> - if (s->revision != REV_NVIC) {
> - i += (GIC_INTERNAL * s->num_cpu);
> - }
> + i += (GIC_INTERNAL * s->num_cpu);
> qdev_init_gpio_in(DEVICE(s), handler, i);
>
> for (i = 0; i < s->num_cpu; i++) {
> @@ -121,16 +119,12 @@ void gic_init_irqs_and_mmio(GICState *s, qemu_irq_handler handler,
> memory_region_init_io(&s->iomem, OBJECT(s), ops, s, "gic_dist", 0x1000);
> sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->iomem);
>
> - if (s->revision != REV_NVIC) {
> - /* This is the main CPU interface "for this core". It is always
> - * present because it is required by both software emulation and KVM.
> - * NVIC is not handled here because its CPU interface is different,
> - * neither it can use KVM.
> - */
> - memory_region_init_io(&s->cpuiomem[0], OBJECT(s), ops ? &ops[1] : NULL,
> - s, "gic_cpu", s->revision == 2 ? 0x2000 : 0x100);
> - sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->cpuiomem[0]);
> - }
> + /* This is the main CPU interface "for this core". It is always
> + * present because it is required by both software emulation and KVM.
> + */
> + memory_region_init_io(&s->cpuiomem[0], OBJECT(s), ops ? &ops[1] : NULL,
> + s, "gic_cpu", s->revision == 2 ? 0x2000 : 0x100);
> + sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->cpuiomem[0]);
> }
>
> static void arm_gic_common_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> @@ -162,7 +156,7 @@ static void arm_gic_common_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> }
>
> if (s->security_extn &&
> - (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE || s->revision == REV_NVIC)) {
> + (s->revision == REV_11MPCORE)) {
> error_setg(errp, "this GIC revision does not implement "
> "the security extensions");
> return;
> @@ -255,7 +249,6 @@ static Property arm_gic_common_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("num-irq", GICState, num_irq, 32),
> /* Revision can be 1 or 2 for GIC architecture specification
> * versions 1 or 2, or 0 to indicate the legacy 11MPCore GIC.
> - * (Internally, 0xffffffff also indicates "not a GIC but an NVIC".)
> */
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("revision", GICState, revision, 1),
> /* True if the GIC should implement the security extensions */
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/9] armv7m: Escalate exceptions to HardFault if necessary
2017-02-02 20:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite NVIC to not depend on the GIC Peter Maydell
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/9] arm: gic: Remove references to NVIC Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-02 20:02 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-15 14:15 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] armv7m: Remove unused armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq() return value Peter Maydell
` (3 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-02 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Cc: patches, Alex Bennée, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
The v7M exception architecture requires that if a synchronous
exception cannot be taken immediately (because it is disabled
or at too low a priority) then it should be escalated to
HardFault (and the HardFault exception is then taken).
Implement this escalation logic.
Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
[PMM: extracted from another patch]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
target/arm/helper.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
index 3d77cbf..2eaac3d 100644
--- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
@@ -334,6 +334,59 @@ void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq)
vec = &s->vectors[irq];
trace_nvic_set_pending(irq, vec->enabled, vec->prio);
+
+
+ if (irq >= ARMV7M_EXCP_HARD && irq < ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV) {
+ /* If a synchronous exception is pending then it may be
+ * escalated to HardFault if:
+ * * it is equal or lower priority to current execution
+ * * it is disabled
+ * (ie we need to take it immediately but we can't do so).
+ * Asynchronous exceptions (and interrupts) simply remain pending.
+ *
+ * For QEMU, we don't have any imprecise (asynchronous) faults,
+ * so we can assume that PREFETCH_ABORT and DATA_ABORT are always
+ * synchronous.
+ * Debug exceptions are awkward because only Debug exceptions
+ * resulting from the BKPT instruction should be escalated,
+ * but we don't currently implement any Debug exceptions other
+ * than those that result from BKPT, so we treat all debug exceptions
+ * as needing escalation.
+ *
+ * This all means we can identify whether to escalate based only on
+ * the exception number and don't (yet) need the caller to explicitly
+ * tell us whether this exception is synchronous or not.
+ */
+ int running = nvic_exec_prio(s);
+ bool escalate = false;
+
+ if (vec->prio >= running) {
+ trace_nvic_escalate_prio(irq, vec->prio, running);
+ escalate = true;
+ } else if (!vec->enabled) {
+ trace_nvic_escalate_disabled(irq);
+ escalate = true;
+ }
+
+ if (escalate) {
+ if (running < 0) {
+ /* We want to escalate to HardFault but we can't take a
+ * synchronous HardFault at this point either. This is a
+ * Lockup condition due to a guest bug. We don't model
+ * Lockup, so report via cpu_abort() instead.
+ */
+ cpu_abort(&s->cpu->parent_obj,
+ "Lockup: can't escalate %d to HardFault "
+ "(current priority %d)\n", irq, running);
+ }
+
+ /* We can do the escalation, so we take HardFault instead */
+ irq = ARMV7M_EXCP_HARD;
+ vec = &s->vectors[irq];
+ s->cpu->env.v7m.hfsr |= R_V7M_HFSR_FORCED_MASK;
+ }
+ }
+
if (!vec->pending) {
vec->pending = 1;
nvic_irq_update(s);
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index c23df1b..6c86eac 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -6067,8 +6067,6 @@ void arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
/* For exceptions we just mark as pending on the NVIC, and let that
handle it. */
- /* TODO: Need to escalate if the current priority is higher than the
- one we're raising. */
switch (cs->exception_index) {
case EXCP_UDEF:
armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE);
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/9] armv7m: Escalate exceptions to HardFault if necessary
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/9] armv7m: Escalate exceptions to HardFault if necessary Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-15 14:15 ` Alex Bennée
0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2017-02-15 14:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell
Cc: qemu-arm, qemu-devel, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
>
> The v7M exception architecture requires that if a synchronous
> exception cannot be taken immediately (because it is disabled
> or at too low a priority) then it should be escalated to
> HardFault (and the HardFault exception is then taken).
> Implement this escalation logic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
> [PMM: extracted from another patch]
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> target/arm/helper.c | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> index 3d77cbf..2eaac3d 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> @@ -334,6 +334,59 @@ void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq)
>
> vec = &s->vectors[irq];
> trace_nvic_set_pending(irq, vec->enabled, vec->prio);
> +
> +
> + if (irq >= ARMV7M_EXCP_HARD && irq < ARMV7M_EXCP_PENDSV) {
> + /* If a synchronous exception is pending then it may be
> + * escalated to HardFault if:
> + * * it is equal or lower priority to current execution
> + * * it is disabled
> + * (ie we need to take it immediately but we can't do so).
> + * Asynchronous exceptions (and interrupts) simply remain pending.
> + *
> + * For QEMU, we don't have any imprecise (asynchronous) faults,
> + * so we can assume that PREFETCH_ABORT and DATA_ABORT are always
> + * synchronous.
> + * Debug exceptions are awkward because only Debug exceptions
> + * resulting from the BKPT instruction should be escalated,
> + * but we don't currently implement any Debug exceptions other
> + * than those that result from BKPT, so we treat all debug exceptions
> + * as needing escalation.
> + *
> + * This all means we can identify whether to escalate based only on
> + * the exception number and don't (yet) need the caller to explicitly
> + * tell us whether this exception is synchronous or not.
> + */
> + int running = nvic_exec_prio(s);
> + bool escalate = false;
> +
> + if (vec->prio >= running) {
> + trace_nvic_escalate_prio(irq, vec->prio, running);
> + escalate = true;
> + } else if (!vec->enabled) {
> + trace_nvic_escalate_disabled(irq);
> + escalate = true;
> + }
> +
> + if (escalate) {
> + if (running < 0) {
> + /* We want to escalate to HardFault but we can't take a
> + * synchronous HardFault at this point either. This is a
> + * Lockup condition due to a guest bug. We don't model
> + * Lockup, so report via cpu_abort() instead.
> + */
> + cpu_abort(&s->cpu->parent_obj,
> + "Lockup: can't escalate %d to HardFault "
> + "(current priority %d)\n", irq, running);
> + }
> +
> + /* We can do the escalation, so we take HardFault instead */
> + irq = ARMV7M_EXCP_HARD;
> + vec = &s->vectors[irq];
> + s->cpu->env.v7m.hfsr |= R_V7M_HFSR_FORCED_MASK;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (!vec->pending) {
> vec->pending = 1;
> nvic_irq_update(s);
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index c23df1b..6c86eac 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -6067,8 +6067,6 @@ void arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
>
> /* For exceptions we just mark as pending on the NVIC, and let that
> handle it. */
> - /* TODO: Need to escalate if the current priority is higher than the
> - one we're raising. */
> switch (cs->exception_index) {
> case EXCP_UDEF:
> armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE);
--
Alex Bennée
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] armv7m: Remove unused armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq() return value
2017-02-02 20:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite NVIC to not depend on the GIC Peter Maydell
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/9] armv7m: Escalate exceptions to HardFault if necessary Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-02 20:02 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-15 14:16 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] armv7m: Simpler and faster exception start Peter Maydell
` (2 subsequent siblings)
9 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-02 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Cc: patches, Alex Bennée, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
Having armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq() return the new value of
env->v7m.exception and its one caller assign the return value
back to env->v7m.exception is pointless. Just make the return
type void instead.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/cpu.h | 2 +-
hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 4 +---
target/arm/helper.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index ac20a56..36cccfc 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ static inline bool armv7m_nvic_can_take_pending_exception(void *opaque)
}
#endif
void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq);
-int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque);
+void armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque);
void armv7m_nvic_complete_irq(void *opaque, int irq);
/* Interface for defining coprocessor registers.
diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
index 2eaac3d..7b61fe6 100644
--- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq)
}
/* Make pending IRQ active. */
-int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
+void armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
{
NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
CPUARMState *env = &s->cpu->env;
@@ -421,8 +421,6 @@ int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
env->v7m.exception = s->vectpending;
nvic_irq_update(s);
-
- return env->v7m.exception;
}
void armv7m_nvic_complete_irq(void *opaque, int irq)
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 6c86eac..78bf9ab 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -6103,7 +6103,7 @@ void arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_DEBUG);
return;
case EXCP_IRQ:
- env->v7m.exception = armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(env->nvic);
+ armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(env->nvic);
break;
case EXCP_EXCEPTION_EXIT:
do_v7m_exception_exit(env);
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] armv7m: Remove unused armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq() return value
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] armv7m: Remove unused armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq() return value Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-15 14:16 ` Alex Bennée
0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2017-02-15 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell
Cc: qemu-arm, qemu-devel, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> Having armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq() return the new value of
> env->v7m.exception and its one caller assign the return value
> back to env->v7m.exception is pointless. Just make the return
> type void instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> ---
> target/arm/cpu.h | 2 +-
> hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 4 +---
> target/arm/helper.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
> index ac20a56..36cccfc 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> @@ -1344,7 +1344,7 @@ static inline bool armv7m_nvic_can_take_pending_exception(void *opaque)
> }
> #endif
> void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq);
> -int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque);
> +void armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque);
> void armv7m_nvic_complete_irq(void *opaque, int irq);
>
> /* Interface for defining coprocessor registers.
> diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> index 2eaac3d..7b61fe6 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> @@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ void armv7m_nvic_set_pending(void *opaque, int irq)
> }
>
> /* Make pending IRQ active. */
> -int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
> +void armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
> {
> NVICState *s = (NVICState *)opaque;
> CPUARMState *env = &s->cpu->env;
> @@ -421,8 +421,6 @@ int armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(void *opaque)
> env->v7m.exception = s->vectpending;
>
> nvic_irq_update(s);
> -
> - return env->v7m.exception;
> }
>
> void armv7m_nvic_complete_irq(void *opaque, int irq)
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index 6c86eac..78bf9ab 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -6103,7 +6103,7 @@ void arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_DEBUG);
> return;
> case EXCP_IRQ:
> - env->v7m.exception = armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(env->nvic);
> + armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(env->nvic);
> break;
> case EXCP_EXCEPTION_EXIT:
> do_v7m_exception_exit(env);
--
Alex Bennée
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] armv7m: Simpler and faster exception start
2017-02-02 20:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite NVIC to not depend on the GIC Peter Maydell
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/9] armv7m: Remove unused armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq() return value Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-02 20:02 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-15 14:18 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] armv7m: VECTCLRACTIVE and VECTRESET are UNPREDICTABLE Peter Maydell
2017-02-10 14:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite NVIC to not depend on the GIC Peter Maydell
9 siblings, 1 reply; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-02 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Cc: patches, Alex Bennée, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
All the places in armv7m_cpu_do_interrupt() which pend an
exception in the NVIC are doing so for synchronous
exceptions. We know that we will always take some
exception in this case, so we can just acknowledge it
immediately, rather than returning and then immediately
being called again because the NVIC has raised its outbound
IRQ line.
Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
[PMM: tweaked commit message; added DEBUG to the set of
exceptions we handle immediately, since it is synchronous
when it results from the BKPT instruction]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
target/arm/helper.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
index 78bf9ab..8bdd99c 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -6071,22 +6071,22 @@ void arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
case EXCP_UDEF:
armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE);
env->v7m.cfsr |= R_V7M_CFSR_UNDEFINSTR_MASK;
- return;
+ break;
case EXCP_NOCP:
armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE);
env->v7m.cfsr |= R_V7M_CFSR_NOCP_MASK;
- return;
+ break;
case EXCP_SWI:
/* The PC already points to the next instruction. */
armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_SVC);
- return;
+ break;
case EXCP_PREFETCH_ABORT:
case EXCP_DATA_ABORT:
/* TODO: if we implemented the MPU registers, this is where we
* should set the MMFAR, etc from exception.fsr and exception.vaddress.
*/
armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM);
- return;
+ break;
case EXCP_BKPT:
if (semihosting_enabled()) {
int nr;
@@ -6101,9 +6101,8 @@ void arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
}
}
armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_DEBUG);
- return;
+ break;
case EXCP_IRQ:
- armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(env->nvic);
break;
case EXCP_EXCEPTION_EXIT:
do_v7m_exception_exit(env);
@@ -6113,6 +6112,10 @@ void arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
return; /* Never happens. Keep compiler happy. */
}
+ armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(env->nvic);
+
+ qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, "... as %d\n", env->v7m.exception);
+
/* Align stack pointer if the guest wants that */
if ((env->regs[13] & 4) && (env->v7m.ccr & R_V7M_CCR_STKALIGN_MASK)) {
env->regs[13] -= 4;
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] armv7m: Simpler and faster exception start
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] armv7m: Simpler and faster exception start Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-15 14:18 ` Alex Bennée
0 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2017-02-15 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell
Cc: qemu-arm, qemu-devel, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
>
> All the places in armv7m_cpu_do_interrupt() which pend an
> exception in the NVIC are doing so for synchronous
> exceptions. We know that we will always take some
> exception in this case, so we can just acknowledge it
> immediately, rather than returning and then immediately
> being called again because the NVIC has raised its outbound
> IRQ line.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
> [PMM: tweaked commit message; added DEBUG to the set of
> exceptions we handle immediately, since it is synchronous
> when it results from the BKPT instruction]
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> ---
> target/arm/helper.c | 15 +++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index 78bf9ab..8bdd99c 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -6071,22 +6071,22 @@ void arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> case EXCP_UDEF:
> armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE);
> env->v7m.cfsr |= R_V7M_CFSR_UNDEFINSTR_MASK;
> - return;
> + break;
> case EXCP_NOCP:
> armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE);
> env->v7m.cfsr |= R_V7M_CFSR_NOCP_MASK;
> - return;
> + break;
> case EXCP_SWI:
> /* The PC already points to the next instruction. */
> armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_SVC);
> - return;
> + break;
> case EXCP_PREFETCH_ABORT:
> case EXCP_DATA_ABORT:
> /* TODO: if we implemented the MPU registers, this is where we
> * should set the MMFAR, etc from exception.fsr and exception.vaddress.
> */
> armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_MEM);
> - return;
> + break;
> case EXCP_BKPT:
> if (semihosting_enabled()) {
> int nr;
> @@ -6101,9 +6101,8 @@ void arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> }
> }
> armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_DEBUG);
> - return;
> + break;
> case EXCP_IRQ:
> - armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(env->nvic);
> break;
> case EXCP_EXCEPTION_EXIT:
> do_v7m_exception_exit(env);
> @@ -6113,6 +6112,10 @@ void arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
> return; /* Never happens. Keep compiler happy. */
> }
>
> + armv7m_nvic_acknowledge_irq(env->nvic);
> +
> + qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_INT, "... as %d\n", env->v7m.exception);
> +
> /* Align stack pointer if the guest wants that */
> if ((env->regs[13] & 4) && (env->v7m.ccr & R_V7M_CCR_STKALIGN_MASK)) {
> env->regs[13] -= 4;
--
Alex Bennée
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] armv7m: VECTCLRACTIVE and VECTRESET are UNPREDICTABLE
2017-02-02 20:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite NVIC to not depend on the GIC Peter Maydell
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/9] armv7m: Simpler and faster exception start Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-02 20:02 ` Peter Maydell
2017-02-10 14:31 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-02-15 14:19 ` Alex Bennée
2017-02-10 14:05 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite NVIC to not depend on the GIC Peter Maydell
9 siblings, 2 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-02 20:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Cc: patches, Alex Bennée, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
The VECTCLRACTIVE and VECTRESET bits in the AIRCR are both
documented as UNPREDICTABLE if you write a 1 to them when
the processor is not halted in Debug state (ie stopped
and under the control of an external JTAG debugger).
Since we don't implement Debug state or emulated JTAG
these bits are always UNPREDICTABLE for us. Instead of
logging them as unimplemented we can simply log writes
as guest errors and ignore them.
Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
[PMM: change extracted from another patch; commit message
constructed from scratch]
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
---
hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
index 7b61fe6..18c0e60 100644
--- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
+++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
@@ -698,10 +698,14 @@ static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
qemu_irq_pulse(s->sysresetreq);
}
if (value & 2) {
- qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "VECTCLRACTIVE unimplemented\n");
+ qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+ "Setting VECTCLRACTIVE when not in DEBUG mode "
+ "is UNPREDICTABLE\n");
}
if (value & 1) {
- qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "AIRCR system reset unimplemented\n");
+ qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
+ "Setting VECTRESET when not in DEBUG mode "
+ "is UNPREDICTABLE\n");
}
s->prigroup = extract32(value, 8, 3);
nvic_irq_update(s);
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] armv7m: VECTCLRACTIVE and VECTRESET are UNPREDICTABLE
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] armv7m: VECTCLRACTIVE and VECTRESET are UNPREDICTABLE Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-10 14:31 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2017-02-15 14:19 ` Alex Bennée
1 sibling, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé @ 2017-02-10 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell, qemu-arm, qemu-devel
Cc: Liviu Ionescu, Michael Davidsaver, Alex Bennée, patches
On 02/02/2017 05:02 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
>
> The VECTCLRACTIVE and VECTRESET bits in the AIRCR are both
> documented as UNPREDICTABLE if you write a 1 to them when
> the processor is not halted in Debug state (ie stopped
> and under the control of an external JTAG debugger).
> Since we don't implement Debug state or emulated JTAG
> these bits are always UNPREDICTABLE for us. Instead of
> logging them as unimplemented we can simply log writes
> as guest errors and ignore them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
> [PMM: change extracted from another patch; commit message
> constructed from scratch]
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> index 7b61fe6..18c0e60 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> @@ -698,10 +698,14 @@ static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
> qemu_irq_pulse(s->sysresetreq);
> }
> if (value & 2) {
> - qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "VECTCLRACTIVE unimplemented\n");
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> + "Setting VECTCLRACTIVE when not in DEBUG mode "
> + "is UNPREDICTABLE\n");
> }
> if (value & 1) {
> - qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "AIRCR system reset unimplemented\n");
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> + "Setting VECTRESET when not in DEBUG mode "
> + "is UNPREDICTABLE\n");
> }
> s->prigroup = extract32(value, 8, 3);
> nvic_irq_update(s);
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] armv7m: VECTCLRACTIVE and VECTRESET are UNPREDICTABLE
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] armv7m: VECTCLRACTIVE and VECTRESET are UNPREDICTABLE Peter Maydell
2017-02-10 14:31 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
@ 2017-02-15 14:19 ` Alex Bennée
1 sibling, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Alex Bennée @ 2017-02-15 14:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell
Cc: qemu-arm, qemu-devel, patches, Michael Davidsaver, Liviu Ionescu
Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
> From: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
>
> The VECTCLRACTIVE and VECTRESET bits in the AIRCR are both
> documented as UNPREDICTABLE if you write a 1 to them when
> the processor is not halted in Debug state (ie stopped
> and under the control of an external JTAG debugger).
> Since we don't implement Debug state or emulated JTAG
> these bits are always UNPREDICTABLE for us. Instead of
> logging them as unimplemented we can simply log writes
> as guest errors and ignore them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Davidsaver <mdavidsaver@gmail.com>
> [PMM: change extracted from another patch; commit message
> constructed from scratch]
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> ---
> hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> index 7b61fe6..18c0e60 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/armv7m_nvic.c
> @@ -698,10 +698,14 @@ static void nvic_writel(NVICState *s, uint32_t offset, uint32_t value)
> qemu_irq_pulse(s->sysresetreq);
> }
> if (value & 2) {
> - qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "VECTCLRACTIVE unimplemented\n");
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> + "Setting VECTCLRACTIVE when not in DEBUG mode "
> + "is UNPREDICTABLE\n");
> }
> if (value & 1) {
> - qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "AIRCR system reset unimplemented\n");
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR,
> + "Setting VECTRESET when not in DEBUG mode "
> + "is UNPREDICTABLE\n");
> }
> s->prigroup = extract32(value, 8, 3);
> nvic_irq_update(s);
--
Alex Bennée
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite NVIC to not depend on the GIC
2017-02-02 20:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Rewrite NVIC to not depend on the GIC Peter Maydell
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2017-02-02 20:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 9/9] armv7m: VECTCLRACTIVE and VECTRESET are UNPREDICTABLE Peter Maydell
@ 2017-02-10 14:05 ` Peter Maydell
9 siblings, 0 replies; 33+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2017-02-10 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-arm, QEMU Developers; +Cc: Liviu Ionescu, Michael Davidsaver, patches
On 2 February 2017 at 20:02, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
> This patchset is the revamp of the NVIC code from Michael
> Davidsaver's patchset of a year ago.
>
> Despite some superficial similarities of register layout, the
> M-profile NVIC is really very different from the A-profile GIC. Our
> current attempt to reuse the GIC code means that we have significant
> bugs in our NVIC. The series pulls the NVIC apart from the GIC code
> (fixing a few accidental bugs in the process), and then once it has a
> place to stand, implements a few minor cleanups, a key bugfix
> (getting priority calculations and masking right) and a missing
> feature (escalation to HardFault).
Ping?
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 33+ messages in thread