From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> To: "Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>, "Liran Alon" <liran.alon@oracle.com>, "Laura Abbott" <labbott@redhat.com>, "Andrew Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>, "Janakarajan Natarajan" <Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>, "Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>, "Radim Krcmár" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, "KarimAllah Ahmed" <karahmed@amazon.de>, "Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>, "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>, "Tim Chen" <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, "Masami Hiramatsu" <mhiramat@kernel.org>, "Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>, "Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Andrea Arcangeli" <aarcange@redhat.com>, "KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 18:53:13 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1516992793.30244.280.camel@infradead.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <0575AF4FD06DD142AD198903C74E1CC87A601040@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 841 bytes --] On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 18:44 +0000, Van De Ven, Arjan wrote: > your question was specific to RSB not BTB. But please show the empirical evidence for RSB ? We were hypothesising, which should have been clear from: On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 09:11 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > Likewise if the RSB only stores the low 31 bits of the target, SMEP > isn't much help there either. > > Do we need to look again at the fact that we've disabled the RSB- > stuffing for SMEP? ... and later... On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 17:31 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > Note, we've switched from talking about BTB to RSB here, so this is a > valid concern if the *RSB* only has the low bits of the target. I'm glad to hear that it *isn't* a valid concern for the RSB and the code in Linus' tree is correct. Thank you for clearing that up. [-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --] [-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5213 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> To: "Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>, "Liran Alon" <liran.alon@oracle.com>, "Laura Abbott" <labbott@redhat.com>, "Andrew Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>, "Janakarajan Natarajan" <Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>, "Mallick, Asit K" <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>, "Radim Krcmár" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>, "KarimAllah Ahmed" <karahmed@amazon.de>, "Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@intel.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>, "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>, "Tim Chen" <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>, "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>, "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@lin> Subject: Re: [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2018 18:53:13 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1516992793.30244.280.camel@infradead.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <0575AF4FD06DD142AD198903C74E1CC87A601040@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 841 bytes --] On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 18:44 +0000, Van De Ven, Arjan wrote: > your question was specific to RSB not BTB. But please show the empirical evidence for RSB ? We were hypothesising, which should have been clear from: On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 09:11 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > Likewise if the RSB only stores the low 31 bits of the target, SMEP > isn't much help there either. > > Do we need to look again at the fact that we've disabled the RSB- > stuffing for SMEP? ... and later... On Fri, 2018-01-26 at 17:31 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > Note, we've switched from talking about BTB to RSB here, so this is a > valid concern if the *RSB* only has the low bits of the target. I'm glad to hear that it *isn't* a valid concern for the RSB and the code in Linus' tree is correct. Thank you for clearing that up. [-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --] [-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5213 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-26 18:53 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-01-26 2:11 [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation Liran Alon 2018-01-26 2:23 ` Dave Hansen 2018-01-26 9:11 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 9:11 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-01-26 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-01-26 17:27 ` Borislav Petkov 2018-01-26 17:27 ` Borislav Petkov 2018-01-26 17:29 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 17:29 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 17:31 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 17:31 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 17:59 ` Andi Kleen 2018-01-26 17:59 ` Andi Kleen 2018-01-26 18:11 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 18:11 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 18:12 ` Arjan van de Ven 2018-01-26 18:12 ` Arjan van de Ven 2018-01-26 18:26 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 18:26 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 18:28 ` Van De Ven, Arjan 2018-01-26 18:28 ` Van De Ven, Arjan 2018-01-26 18:43 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 18:43 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 18:44 ` Van De Ven, Arjan 2018-01-26 18:44 ` Van De Ven, Arjan 2018-01-26 18:53 ` David Woodhouse [this message] 2018-01-26 18:53 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 19:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2018-01-26 19:02 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2018-01-26 19:11 ` Hansen, Dave 2018-01-26 19:11 ` Hansen, Dave 2018-01-27 13:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2018-01-27 13:42 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk 2018-01-27 15:55 ` Dave Hansen 2018-01-27 15:55 ` Dave Hansen 2018-01-26 19:11 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 19:11 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 8:46 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-26 8:46 ` David Woodhouse -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2018-01-26 2:50 Liran Alon 2018-01-26 2:55 ` Van De Ven, Arjan 2018-01-26 2:55 ` Van De Ven, Arjan 2018-01-23 11:13 Liran Alon 2018-01-25 22:20 ` Dave Hansen 2018-01-22 22:15 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton 2018-01-20 19:22 [RFC 00/10] Speculation Control feature support KarimAllah Ahmed 2018-01-20 19:23 ` [RFC 09/10] x86/enter: Create macros to restrict/unrestrict Indirect Branch Speculation KarimAllah Ahmed 2018-01-20 19:23 ` KarimAllah Ahmed 2018-01-21 19:14 ` Andy Lutomirski 2018-01-21 19:14 ` Andy Lutomirski 2018-01-23 16:12 ` Tom Lendacky 2018-01-23 16:12 ` Tom Lendacky 2018-01-23 16:20 ` Woodhouse, David 2018-01-23 16:20 ` Woodhouse, David 2018-01-23 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky 2018-01-23 22:37 ` Tom Lendacky 2018-01-23 22:49 ` Andi Kleen 2018-01-23 22:49 ` Andi Kleen 2018-01-23 23:14 ` Woodhouse, David 2018-01-23 23:14 ` Woodhouse, David 2018-01-23 23:22 ` Andi Kleen 2018-01-23 23:22 ` Andi Kleen 2018-01-24 0:47 ` Tim Chen 2018-01-24 0:47 ` Tim Chen 2018-01-24 1:00 ` Andy Lutomirski 2018-01-24 1:00 ` Andy Lutomirski 2018-01-24 1:22 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-24 1:22 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-24 1:59 ` Van De Ven, Arjan 2018-01-24 1:59 ` Van De Ven, Arjan 2018-01-24 3:25 ` Andy Lutomirski 2018-01-24 3:25 ` Andy Lutomirski 2018-01-21 19:34 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-01-21 20:28 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-21 20:28 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-21 21:35 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-01-21 21:35 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-01-21 22:00 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-21 22:00 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-21 22:27 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-01-21 22:27 ` Linus Torvalds 2018-01-22 16:27 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-22 16:27 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-23 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-01-23 7:29 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-01-23 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-01-23 7:53 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-01-23 9:27 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-01-23 9:27 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-01-23 9:37 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-23 9:37 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-23 15:01 ` Dave Hansen 2018-01-23 15:01 ` Dave Hansen 2018-01-23 9:30 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-23 9:30 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-23 10:15 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-01-23 10:15 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-01-23 10:27 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-23 10:27 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-23 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-01-23 10:44 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-01-23 10:57 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-23 10:23 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-01-23 10:23 ` Ingo Molnar 2018-01-23 10:35 ` David Woodhouse 2018-02-04 18:43 ` Thomas Gleixner 2018-02-04 18:43 ` Thomas Gleixner 2018-02-04 20:22 ` David Woodhouse 2018-02-04 20:22 ` David Woodhouse 2018-02-06 9:14 ` David Woodhouse 2018-02-06 9:14 ` David Woodhouse 2018-01-25 16:19 ` Mason 2018-01-25 16:19 ` Mason 2018-01-25 17:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2018-01-25 17:16 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2018-01-29 11:59 ` Mason 2018-01-29 11:59 ` Mason 2018-01-24 0:05 ` Andi Kleen 2018-01-23 20:16 ` Pavel Machek 2018-01-23 20:16 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1516992793.30244.280.camel@infradead.org \ --to=dwmw2@infradead.org \ --cc=Janakarajan.Natarajan@amd.com \ --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \ --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \ --cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \ --cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \ --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \ --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \ --cc=bp@suse.de \ --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \ --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \ --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=hpa@zytor.com \ --cc=joro@8bytes.org \ --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \ --cc=karahmed@amazon.de \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=labbott@redhat.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \ --cc=luto@kernel.org \ --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \ --cc=mingo@redhat.com \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=peterz@infradead.org \ --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \ --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \ --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \ --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \ --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=x86@kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.