All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, daniel.thompson@linaro.org,
	joel@joelfernandes.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	christoffer.dall@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Subject: [PATCH v7 18/25] irqchip/gic-v3: Detect if GIC can support pseudo-NMIs
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:47:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1544633245-6036-19-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1544633245-6036-1-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com>

The values non secure EL1 needs to use for PMR and RPR registers depends on
the value of SCR_EL3.FIQ.

The values non secure EL1 sees from the distributor and redistributor
depend on whether security is enabled for the GIC or not.

To avoid having to deal with two sets of values for PMR
masking/unmasking, only enable pseudo-NMIs when GIC has non-secure view
of priorities.

Also, add firmware requirements related to SCR_EL3.

Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 Documentation/arm64/booting.txt |  5 ++++
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c    | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt b/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
index 8d0df62..e387938 100644
--- a/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
+++ b/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
@@ -188,6 +188,11 @@ Before jumping into the kernel, the following conditions must be met:
   the kernel image will be entered must be initialised by software at a
   higher exception level to prevent execution in an UNKNOWN state.
 
+  - SCR_EL3.FIQ must have the same value across all CPUs the kernel is
+    executing on.
+  - The value of SCR_EL3.FIQ must be the same as the one present at boot
+    time whenever the kernel is executing.
+
   For systems with a GICv3 interrupt controller to be used in v3 mode:
   - If EL3 is present:
     ICC_SRE_EL3.Enable (bit 3) must be initialiased to 0b1.
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 4fad03d..f833842 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -63,6 +63,31 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
 static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly;
 static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(supports_deactivate_key);
 
+/*
+ * The behaviours of RPR and PMR registers differ depending on the value of
+ * SCR_EL3.FIQ, and the behaviour of non-secure priority registers of the
+ * distributor and redistributors depends on whether security is enabled in the
+ * GIC.
+ *
+ * When security is enabled, non-secure priority values from the (re)distributor
+ * are presented to the GIC CPUIF as follow:
+ *     (GIC_(R)DIST_PRI[irq] >> 1) | 0x80;
+ *
+ * If SCR_EL3.FIQ == 1, the values writen to/read from PMR and RPR at non-secure
+ * EL1 are subject to a similar operation thus matching the priorities presented
+ * from the (re)distributor when security is enabled.
+ *
+ * see GICv3/GICv4 Architecture Specification (IHI0069D):
+ * - section 4.8.1 Non-secure accesses to register fields for Secure interrupt
+ *   priorities.
+ * - Figure 4-7 Secure read of the priority field for a Non-secure Group 1
+ *   interrupt.
+ *
+ * For now, we only support pseudo-NMIs if we have non-secure view of
+ * priorities.
+ */
+static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(supports_pseudo_nmis);
+
 static struct gic_kvm_info gic_v3_kvm_info;
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, has_rss);
 
@@ -226,6 +251,12 @@ static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 	gic_poke_irq(d, GICD_ISENABLER);
 }
 
+static inline bool gic_supports_nmi(void)
+{
+	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI) &&
+	       static_branch_likely(&supports_pseudo_nmis);
+}
+
 static int gic_irq_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
 				     enum irqchip_irq_state which, bool val)
 {
@@ -567,6 +598,12 @@ static void gic_update_vlpi_properties(void)
 		!gic_data.rdists.has_direct_lpi ? "no " : "");
 }
 
+/* Check whether it's single security state view */
+static inline bool gic_dist_security_disabled(void)
+{
+	return readl_relaxed(gic_data.dist_base + GICD_CTLR) & GICD_CTLR_DS;
+}
+
 static void gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(void)
 {
 	int i, cpu = smp_processor_id();
@@ -592,6 +629,9 @@ static void gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(void)
 	/* Set priority mask register */
 	if (!gic_prio_masking_enabled())
 		write_gicreg(DEFAULT_PMR_VALUE, ICC_PMR_EL1);
+	else if (gic_supports_nmi() && group0)
+		/* Mismatch configuration with boot CPU */
+		WARN_ON(!gic_dist_security_disabled());
 
 	/*
 	 * Some firmwares hand over to the kernel with the BPR changed from
@@ -846,12 +886,6 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
-/* Check whether it's single security state view */
-static bool gic_dist_security_disabled(void)
-{
-	return readl_relaxed(gic_data.dist_base + GICD_CTLR) & GICD_CTLR_DS;
-}
-
 static int gic_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
 			       unsigned long cmd, void *v)
 {
@@ -1095,6 +1129,11 @@ static int partition_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
 	.select = gic_irq_domain_select,
 };
 
+static void gic_enable_nmi_support(void)
+{
+	static_branch_enable(&supports_pseudo_nmis);
+}
+
 static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base,
 				 struct redist_region *rdist_regs,
 				 u32 nr_redist_regions,
@@ -1164,6 +1203,13 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base,
 		its_cpu_init();
 	}
 
+	if (gic_prio_masking_enabled()) {
+		if (!gic_has_group0() || gic_dist_security_disabled())
+			gic_enable_nmi_support();
+		else
+			pr_warn("SCR_EL3.FIQ is cleared, cannot enable use of pseudo-NMIs\n");
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 
 out_free:
-- 
1.9.1


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, daniel.thompson@linaro.org,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	marc.zyngier@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	will.deacon@arm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	christoffer.dall@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	joel@joelfernandes.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH v7 18/25] irqchip/gic-v3: Detect if GIC can support pseudo-NMIs
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 16:47:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1544633245-6036-19-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1544633245-6036-1-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com>

The values non secure EL1 needs to use for PMR and RPR registers depends on
the value of SCR_EL3.FIQ.

The values non secure EL1 sees from the distributor and redistributor
depend on whether security is enabled for the GIC or not.

To avoid having to deal with two sets of values for PMR
masking/unmasking, only enable pseudo-NMIs when GIC has non-secure view
of priorities.

Also, add firmware requirements related to SCR_EL3.

Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
---
 Documentation/arm64/booting.txt |  5 ++++
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c    | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt b/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
index 8d0df62..e387938 100644
--- a/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
+++ b/Documentation/arm64/booting.txt
@@ -188,6 +188,11 @@ Before jumping into the kernel, the following conditions must be met:
   the kernel image will be entered must be initialised by software at a
   higher exception level to prevent execution in an UNKNOWN state.
 
+  - SCR_EL3.FIQ must have the same value across all CPUs the kernel is
+    executing on.
+  - The value of SCR_EL3.FIQ must be the same as the one present at boot
+    time whenever the kernel is executing.
+
   For systems with a GICv3 interrupt controller to be used in v3 mode:
   - If EL3 is present:
     ICC_SRE_EL3.Enable (bit 3) must be initialiased to 0b1.
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
index 4fad03d..f833842 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3.c
@@ -63,6 +63,31 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
 static struct gic_chip_data gic_data __read_mostly;
 static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(supports_deactivate_key);
 
+/*
+ * The behaviours of RPR and PMR registers differ depending on the value of
+ * SCR_EL3.FIQ, and the behaviour of non-secure priority registers of the
+ * distributor and redistributors depends on whether security is enabled in the
+ * GIC.
+ *
+ * When security is enabled, non-secure priority values from the (re)distributor
+ * are presented to the GIC CPUIF as follow:
+ *     (GIC_(R)DIST_PRI[irq] >> 1) | 0x80;
+ *
+ * If SCR_EL3.FIQ == 1, the values writen to/read from PMR and RPR at non-secure
+ * EL1 are subject to a similar operation thus matching the priorities presented
+ * from the (re)distributor when security is enabled.
+ *
+ * see GICv3/GICv4 Architecture Specification (IHI0069D):
+ * - section 4.8.1 Non-secure accesses to register fields for Secure interrupt
+ *   priorities.
+ * - Figure 4-7 Secure read of the priority field for a Non-secure Group 1
+ *   interrupt.
+ *
+ * For now, we only support pseudo-NMIs if we have non-secure view of
+ * priorities.
+ */
+static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(supports_pseudo_nmis);
+
 static struct gic_kvm_info gic_v3_kvm_info;
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, has_rss);
 
@@ -226,6 +251,12 @@ static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
 	gic_poke_irq(d, GICD_ISENABLER);
 }
 
+static inline bool gic_supports_nmi(void)
+{
+	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI) &&
+	       static_branch_likely(&supports_pseudo_nmis);
+}
+
 static int gic_irq_set_irqchip_state(struct irq_data *d,
 				     enum irqchip_irq_state which, bool val)
 {
@@ -567,6 +598,12 @@ static void gic_update_vlpi_properties(void)
 		!gic_data.rdists.has_direct_lpi ? "no " : "");
 }
 
+/* Check whether it's single security state view */
+static inline bool gic_dist_security_disabled(void)
+{
+	return readl_relaxed(gic_data.dist_base + GICD_CTLR) & GICD_CTLR_DS;
+}
+
 static void gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(void)
 {
 	int i, cpu = smp_processor_id();
@@ -592,6 +629,9 @@ static void gic_cpu_sys_reg_init(void)
 	/* Set priority mask register */
 	if (!gic_prio_masking_enabled())
 		write_gicreg(DEFAULT_PMR_VALUE, ICC_PMR_EL1);
+	else if (gic_supports_nmi() && group0)
+		/* Mismatch configuration with boot CPU */
+		WARN_ON(!gic_dist_security_disabled());
 
 	/*
 	 * Some firmwares hand over to the kernel with the BPR changed from
@@ -846,12 +886,6 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
-/* Check whether it's single security state view */
-static bool gic_dist_security_disabled(void)
-{
-	return readl_relaxed(gic_data.dist_base + GICD_CTLR) & GICD_CTLR_DS;
-}
-
 static int gic_cpu_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *self,
 			       unsigned long cmd, void *v)
 {
@@ -1095,6 +1129,11 @@ static int partition_domain_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
 	.select = gic_irq_domain_select,
 };
 
+static void gic_enable_nmi_support(void)
+{
+	static_branch_enable(&supports_pseudo_nmis);
+}
+
 static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base,
 				 struct redist_region *rdist_regs,
 				 u32 nr_redist_regions,
@@ -1164,6 +1203,13 @@ static int __init gic_init_bases(void __iomem *dist_base,
 		its_cpu_init();
 	}
 
+	if (gic_prio_masking_enabled()) {
+		if (!gic_has_group0() || gic_dist_security_disabled())
+			gic_enable_nmi_support();
+		else
+			pr_warn("SCR_EL3.FIQ is cleared, cannot enable use of pseudo-NMIs\n");
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 
 out_free:
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-12-12 16:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 91+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-12 16:47 [PATCH v7 00/25] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3 Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 01/25] arm64: Fix HCR.TGE status for NMI contexts Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 21:39   ` Sasha Levin
2018-12-12 21:39     ` Sasha Levin
2018-12-17  8:49   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-17  8:49     ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 02/25] arm64: Remove unused daif related functions/macros Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 03/25] arm64: cpufeature: Set SYSREG_GIC_CPUIF as a boot system feature Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 04/25] arm64: cpufeature: Add cpufeature for IRQ priority masking Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 05/25] arm/arm64: gic-v3: Add PMR and RPR accessors Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 06/25] irqchip/gic-v3: Switch to PMR masking before calling IRQ handler Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 07/25] arm64: ptrace: Provide definitions for PMR values Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 08/25] arm64: Make PMR part of task context Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 09/25] arm64: Unmask PMR before going idle Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 10/25] arm64: kvm: Unmask PMR before entering guest Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 11/25] arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 17:27   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-12 17:27     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-12 17:59     ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 17:59       ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 18:10       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-12 18:10         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-13  8:54         ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-13  8:54           ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-13 11:35           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-13 11:35             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-13 12:02             ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-13 12:02               ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-13 15:03               ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-13 15:03                 ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-14 15:23                 ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-14 15:23                   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-14 15:49                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-14 15:49                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-14 16:40                     ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-14 16:40                       ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-19 17:01                       ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-19 17:01                         ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-20 17:53                         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-20 17:53                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-12-21 10:25                           ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-21 10:25                             ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-16 14:47   ` Jian-Lin Chen
2018-12-16 14:47     ` Jian-Lin Chen
2018-12-17  9:26     ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-17  9:26       ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-18  8:36       ` Jian-Lin Chen
2018-12-18  8:36         ` Jian-Lin Chen
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 12/25] arm64: daifflags: Include PMR in daifflags restore operations Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 13/25] arm64: alternative: Allow alternative status checking per cpufeature Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 14/25] arm64: alternative: Apply alternatives early in boot process Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 15/25] irqchip/gic-v3: Factor group0 detection into functions Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 16/25] arm64: Switch to PMR masking when starting CPUs Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 17/25] arm64: gic-v3: Implement arch support for priority masking Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` Julien Thierry [this message]
2018-12-12 16:47   ` [PATCH v7 18/25] irqchip/gic-v3: Detect if GIC can support pseudo-NMIs Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 19/25] irqchip/gic-v3: Handle pseudo-NMIs Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 20/25] irqchip/gic: Add functions to access irq priorities Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 21/25] irqchip/gic-v3: Allow interrupts to be set as pseudo-NMI Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 22/25] arm64: Handle serror in NMI context Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 23/25] arm64: Skip preemption when exiting an NMI Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 24/25] arm64: Skip irqflags tracing for NMI in IRQs disabled context Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47 ` [PATCH v7 25/25] arm64: Enable the support of pseudo-NMIs Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:47   ` Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:52 ` [PATCH v7 00/25] arm64: provide pseudo NMI with GICv3 Julien Thierry
2018-12-12 16:52   ` Julien Thierry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1544633245-6036-19-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --to=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.