All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/10] KVM: arm64: Propagate vcpu into read_id_reg()
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:00:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1552984243-7689-2-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552984243-7689-1-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com>

From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>

Architecture features that are conditionally visible to the guest
will require run-time checks in the ID register accessor functions.
In particular, read_id_reg() will need to perform checks in order
to generate the correct emulated value for certain ID register
fields such as ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE for example.

This patch propagates vcpu into read_id_reg() so that future
patches can add run-time checks on the guest configuration here.

For now, there is no functional change.

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennee <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 539feec..a5d14b5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1044,7 +1044,8 @@ static bool access_arch_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 /* Read a sanitised cpufeature ID register by sys_reg_desc */
-static u64 read_id_reg(struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
+static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+		struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
 {
 	u32 id = sys_reg((u32)r->Op0, (u32)r->Op1,
 			 (u32)r->CRn, (u32)r->CRm, (u32)r->Op2);
@@ -1078,7 +1079,7 @@ static bool __access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (p->is_write)
 		return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
 
-	p->regval = read_id_reg(r, raz);
+	p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz);
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -1107,16 +1108,18 @@ static u64 sys_reg_to_index(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg);
  * are stored, and for set_id_reg() we don't allow the effective value
  * to be changed.
  */
-static int __get_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
+static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
 			bool raz)
 {
 	const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
-	const u64 val = read_id_reg(rd, raz);
+	const u64 val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz);
 
 	return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, id);
 }
 
-static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
+static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
 			bool raz)
 {
 	const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
@@ -1128,7 +1131,7 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
 		return err;
 
 	/* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
-	if (val != read_id_reg(rd, raz))
+	if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -1137,25 +1140,25 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
 static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 		      const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
 {
-	return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false);
+	return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false);
 }
 
 static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 		      const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
 {
-	return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false);
+	return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false);
 }
 
 static int get_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 			  const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
 {
-	return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true);
+	return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true);
 }
 
 static int set_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 			  const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
 {
-	return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true);
+	return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true);
 }
 
 static bool access_ctr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
-- 
2.7.4


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
	Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Kristina Martsenko <kristina.martsenko@arm.com>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com>,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
	Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 1/10] KVM: arm64: Propagate vcpu into read_id_reg()
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:00:34 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1552984243-7689-2-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552984243-7689-1-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com>

From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>

Architecture features that are conditionally visible to the guest
will require run-time checks in the ID register accessor functions.
In particular, read_id_reg() will need to perform checks in order
to generate the correct emulated value for certain ID register
fields such as ID_AA64PFR0_EL1.SVE for example.

This patch propagates vcpu into read_id_reg() so that future
patches can add run-time checks on the guest configuration here.

For now, there is no functional change.

Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Bennee <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 539feec..a5d14b5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -1044,7 +1044,8 @@ static bool access_arch_timer(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 /* Read a sanitised cpufeature ID register by sys_reg_desc */
-static u64 read_id_reg(struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
+static u64 read_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+		struct sys_reg_desc const *r, bool raz)
 {
 	u32 id = sys_reg((u32)r->Op0, (u32)r->Op1,
 			 (u32)r->CRn, (u32)r->CRm, (u32)r->Op2);
@@ -1078,7 +1079,7 @@ static bool __access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	if (p->is_write)
 		return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
 
-	p->regval = read_id_reg(r, raz);
+	p->regval = read_id_reg(vcpu, r, raz);
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -1107,16 +1108,18 @@ static u64 sys_reg_to_index(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg);
  * are stored, and for set_id_reg() we don't allow the effective value
  * to be changed.
  */
-static int __get_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
+static int __get_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
 			bool raz)
 {
 	const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
-	const u64 val = read_id_reg(rd, raz);
+	const u64 val = read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz);
 
 	return reg_to_user(uaddr, &val, id);
 }
 
-static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
+static int __set_id_reg(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+			const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
 			bool raz)
 {
 	const u64 id = sys_reg_to_index(rd);
@@ -1128,7 +1131,7 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
 		return err;
 
 	/* This is what we mean by invariant: you can't change it. */
-	if (val != read_id_reg(rd, raz))
+	if (val != read_id_reg(vcpu, rd, raz))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -1137,25 +1140,25 @@ static int __set_id_reg(const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, void __user *uaddr,
 static int get_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 		      const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
 {
-	return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false);
+	return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false);
 }
 
 static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 		      const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
 {
-	return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, false);
+	return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, false);
 }
 
 static int get_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 			  const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
 {
-	return __get_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true);
+	return __get_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true);
 }
 
 static int set_raz_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 			  const struct kvm_one_reg *reg, void __user *uaddr)
 {
-	return __set_id_reg(rd, uaddr, true);
+	return __set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, uaddr, true);
 }
 
 static bool access_ctr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
-- 
2.7.4


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-19  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-19  8:30 [PATCH v7 0/10] Add ARMv8.3 pointer authentication for kvm guest Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30 ` Amit Daniel Kachhap [this message]
2019-03-19  8:30   ` [PATCH v7 1/10] KVM: arm64: Propagate vcpu into read_id_reg() Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30 ` [PATCH v7 2/10] KVM: arm64: Support runtime sysreg visibility filtering Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30 ` [PATCH v7 3/10] KVM: arm64: Move hyp_symbol_addr to fix dependency Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-20  8:49   ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-20  8:49     ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-21  5:29     ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-21  5:29       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-21  5:29       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30 ` [PATCH v7 4/10] KVM: arm/arm64: preserve host HCR_EL2 value Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30 ` [PATCH v7 5/10] KVM: arm/arm64: preserve host MDCR_EL2 value Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-25 20:04   ` Kristina Martsenko
2019-03-25 20:04     ` Kristina Martsenko
2019-03-26  3:55     ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-26  3:55       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30 ` [PATCH v7 6/10] KVM: arm64: Add vcpu feature flags to control ptrauth accessibility Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30 ` [PATCH v7 7/10] KVM: arm/arm64: context-switch ptrauth registers Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-20 12:13   ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-20 12:13     ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-21  6:08     ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-21  6:08       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-21  8:29       ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-21  8:29         ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-25 20:04   ` Kristina Martsenko
2019-03-25 20:04     ` Kristina Martsenko
2019-03-26  4:03     ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-26  4:03       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-26 18:01       ` Kristina Martsenko
2019-03-26 18:01         ` Kristina Martsenko
2019-03-27  3:21         ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-27  3:21           ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-27  3:21           ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-27 18:16           ` James Morse
2019-03-27 18:16             ` James Morse
2019-03-27 18:16             ` James Morse
2019-03-28 11:29             ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-28 11:29               ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-28 18:51   ` James Morse
2019-03-28 18:51     ` James Morse
2019-03-29  5:54     ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-29  5:54       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-29  5:54       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30 ` [PATCH v7 8/10] KVM: arm64: Add capability to advertise ptrauth for guest Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-25 20:05   ` Kristina Martsenko
2019-03-25 20:05     ` Kristina Martsenko
2019-03-26  4:12     ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-26  4:12       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-26  4:12       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30 ` [PATCH v7 9/10] KVM: arm64: docs: document KVM support of pointer authentication Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-20 13:37   ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-20 13:37     ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-20 15:04     ` Kristina Martsenko
2019-03-20 15:04       ` Kristina Martsenko
2019-03-20 18:06       ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-20 18:06         ` Julien Thierry
2019-03-20 20:56         ` Kristina Martsenko
2019-03-20 20:56           ` Kristina Martsenko
2019-03-21  6:41           ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-21  6:41             ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-25 20:05   ` Kristina Martsenko
2019-03-25 20:05     ` Kristina Martsenko
2019-03-27 10:44     ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 10:44       ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 11:49       ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-27 11:49         ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-27 13:50         ` Dave Martin
2019-03-27 13:50           ` Dave Martin
2019-03-28 10:13           ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-28 10:13             ` Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30 ` [kvmtool PATCH v7 10/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Add a vcpu feature for " Amit Daniel Kachhap
2019-03-19  8:30   ` Amit Daniel Kachhap

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1552984243-7689-2-git-send-email-amit.kachhap@arm.com \
    --to=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
    --cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
    --cc=kristina.martsenko@arm.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ramana.radhakrishnan@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.