* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/dp: Handle zeroed port counts in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
@ 2021-04-30 22:34 ` Lyude Paul
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Lyude Paul @ 2021-04-30 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, dri-devel
Cc: Jérôme de Bretagne, David Airlie, open list,
Maxime Ripard, Jani Nikula, stable, Thomas Zimmermann
While the DP specification isn't entirely clear on if this should be
allowed or not, some branch devices report having downstream ports present
while also reporting a downstream port count of 0. So to avoid breaking
those devices, we need to handle this in drm_dp_read_downstream_info().
So, to do this we assume there's no downstream port info when the
downstream port count is 0.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3416
Fixes: 3d3721ccb18a ("drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_read_downstream_info()")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.10+
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index cb56d74e9d38..27c8c5bdf7d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -682,7 +682,14 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
!(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
return 0;
+ /* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a
+ * downstream port present. The DP spec isn't clear on if this is allowed or not, but since
+ * some branches do it we need to handle it regardless.
+ */
len = drm_dp_downstream_port_count(dpcd);
+ if (!len)
+ return 0;
+
if (dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DETAILED_CAP_INFO_AVAILABLE)
len *= 4;
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [PATCH 1/2] drm/dp: Handle zeroed port counts in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
@ 2021-04-30 22:34 ` Lyude Paul
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Lyude Paul @ 2021-04-30 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, dri-devel
Cc: Jérôme de Bretagne, David Airlie, open list,
Jani Nikula, stable, Thomas Zimmermann, Sean Paul
While the DP specification isn't entirely clear on if this should be
allowed or not, some branch devices report having downstream ports present
while also reporting a downstream port count of 0. So to avoid breaking
those devices, we need to handle this in drm_dp_read_downstream_info().
So, to do this we assume there's no downstream port info when the
downstream port count is 0.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3416
Fixes: 3d3721ccb18a ("drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_read_downstream_info()")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.10+
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index cb56d74e9d38..27c8c5bdf7d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -682,7 +682,14 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
!(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
return 0;
+ /* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a
+ * downstream port present. The DP spec isn't clear on if this is allowed or not, but since
+ * some branches do it we need to handle it regardless.
+ */
len = drm_dp_downstream_port_count(dpcd);
+ if (!len)
+ return 0;
+
if (dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DETAILED_CAP_INFO_AVAILABLE)
len *= 4;
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/2] drm/dp: Drop open-coded drm_dp_is_branch() in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
2021-04-30 22:34 ` Lyude Paul
(?)
@ 2021-04-30 22:34 ` Lyude Paul
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Lyude Paul @ 2021-04-30 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, dri-devel
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann,
David Airlie, Daniel Vetter, open list
Noticed this while fixing another issue in drm_dp_read_downstream_info(),
the open coded DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT check here just duplicates what we
already do in drm_dp_is_branch(), so just get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index 27c8c5bdf7d9..0f84df8798ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -677,9 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS);
/* No downstream info to read */
- if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) ||
- dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10 ||
- !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
+ if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10)
return 0;
/* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/dp: Drop open-coded drm_dp_is_branch() in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
@ 2021-04-30 22:34 ` Lyude Paul
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Lyude Paul @ 2021-04-30 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, dri-devel
Cc: Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, open list, Maxime Ripard
Noticed this while fixing another issue in drm_dp_read_downstream_info(),
the open coded DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT check here just duplicates what we
already do in drm_dp_is_branch(), so just get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index 27c8c5bdf7d9..0f84df8798ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -677,9 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS);
/* No downstream info to read */
- if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) ||
- dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10 ||
- !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
+ if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10)
return 0;
/* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] drm/dp: Drop open-coded drm_dp_is_branch() in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
@ 2021-04-30 22:34 ` Lyude Paul
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Lyude Paul @ 2021-04-30 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx, dri-devel; +Cc: Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, open list
Noticed this while fixing another issue in drm_dp_read_downstream_info(),
the open coded DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT check here just duplicates what we
already do in drm_dp_is_branch(), so just get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
index 27c8c5bdf7d9..0f84df8798ab 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
@@ -677,9 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS);
/* No downstream info to read */
- if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) ||
- dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10 ||
- !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
+ if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10)
return 0;
/* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a
--
2.30.2
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/dp: Drop open-coded drm_dp_is_branch() in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
2021-04-30 22:34 ` Lyude Paul
(?)
@ 2021-05-03 3:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2021-05-03 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lyude Paul
Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, open list,
Maxime Ripard
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 06:34:28PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Noticed this while fixing another issue in drm_dp_read_downstream_info(),
> the open coded DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT check here just duplicates what we
> already do in drm_dp_is_branch(), so just get rid of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index 27c8c5bdf7d9..0f84df8798ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -677,9 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS);
>
> /* No downstream info to read */
> - if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) ||
> - dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10 ||
> - !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
> + if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10)
BTW that DPCD_REV check looks rather wrong.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> return 0;
>
> /* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a
> --
> 2.30.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/dp: Drop open-coded drm_dp_is_branch() in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
@ 2021-05-03 3:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2021-05-03 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lyude Paul
Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, open list, Maxime Ripard, dri-devel,
Thomas Zimmermann
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 06:34:28PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Noticed this while fixing another issue in drm_dp_read_downstream_info(),
> the open coded DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT check here just duplicates what we
> already do in drm_dp_is_branch(), so just get rid of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index 27c8c5bdf7d9..0f84df8798ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -677,9 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS);
>
> /* No downstream info to read */
> - if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) ||
> - dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10 ||
> - !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
> + if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10)
BTW that DPCD_REV check looks rather wrong.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> return 0;
>
> /* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a
> --
> 2.30.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/dp: Drop open-coded drm_dp_is_branch() in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
@ 2021-05-03 3:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2021-05-03 3:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lyude Paul
Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, open list, dri-devel, Thomas Zimmermann
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 06:34:28PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Noticed this while fixing another issue in drm_dp_read_downstream_info(),
> the open coded DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT check here just duplicates what we
> already do in drm_dp_is_branch(), so just get rid of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index 27c8c5bdf7d9..0f84df8798ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -677,9 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS);
>
> /* No downstream info to read */
> - if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) ||
> - dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10 ||
> - !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
> + if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10)
BTW that DPCD_REV check looks rather wrong.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> return 0;
>
> /* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a
> --
> 2.30.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/dp: Drop open-coded drm_dp_is_branch() in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
2021-05-03 3:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
(?)
@ 2021-05-07 21:28 ` Lyude Paul
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Lyude Paul @ 2021-05-07 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ville Syrjälä
Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel, Thomas Zimmermann, David Airlie, open list,
Maxime Ripard
On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 06:06 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 06:34:28PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > Noticed this while fixing another issue in drm_dp_read_downstream_info(),
> > the open coded DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT check here just duplicates what
> > we
> > already do in drm_dp_is_branch(), so just get rid of it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 4 +---
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > index 27c8c5bdf7d9..0f84df8798ab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > @@ -677,9 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux
> > *aux,
> > memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS);
> >
> > /* No downstream info to read */
> > - if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) ||
> > - dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10 ||
> > - !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
> > + if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10)
>
> BTW that DPCD_REV check looks rather wrong.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
I'll send out a separate fix for this in just a moment, thanks for pointing it
out!
>
> > return 0;
> >
> > /* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also
> > advertising they have a
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/dp: Drop open-coded drm_dp_is_branch() in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
@ 2021-05-07 21:28 ` Lyude Paul
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Lyude Paul @ 2021-05-07 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ville Syrjälä
Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, open list, Maxime Ripard, dri-devel,
Thomas Zimmermann
On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 06:06 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 06:34:28PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > Noticed this while fixing another issue in drm_dp_read_downstream_info(),
> > the open coded DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT check here just duplicates what
> > we
> > already do in drm_dp_is_branch(), so just get rid of it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 4 +---
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > index 27c8c5bdf7d9..0f84df8798ab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > @@ -677,9 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux
> > *aux,
> > memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS);
> >
> > /* No downstream info to read */
> > - if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) ||
> > - dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10 ||
> > - !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
> > + if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10)
>
> BTW that DPCD_REV check looks rather wrong.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
I'll send out a separate fix for this in just a moment, thanks for pointing it
out!
>
> > return 0;
> >
> > /* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also
> > advertising they have a
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm/dp: Drop open-coded drm_dp_is_branch() in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
@ 2021-05-07 21:28 ` Lyude Paul
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Lyude Paul @ 2021-05-07 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ville Syrjälä
Cc: David Airlie, intel-gfx, open list, dri-devel, Thomas Zimmermann
On Mon, 2021-05-03 at 06:06 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 06:34:28PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > Noticed this while fixing another issue in drm_dp_read_downstream_info(),
> > the open coded DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT check here just duplicates what
> > we
> > already do in drm_dp_is_branch(), so just get rid of it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 4 +---
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > index 27c8c5bdf7d9..0f84df8798ab 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> > @@ -677,9 +677,7 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux
> > *aux,
> > memset(downstream_ports, 0, DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS);
> >
> > /* No downstream info to read */
> > - if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) ||
> > - dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10 ||
> > - !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
> > + if (!drm_dp_is_branch(dpcd) || dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] < DP_DPCD_REV_10)
>
> BTW that DPCD_REV check looks rather wrong.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
I'll send out a separate fix for this in just a moment, thanks for pointing it
out!
>
> > return 0;
> >
> > /* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also
> > advertising they have a
> > --
> > 2.30.2
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
--
Cheers,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/dp: Handle zeroed port counts in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
2021-04-30 22:34 ` Lyude Paul
(?)
@ 2021-05-03 3:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2021-05-03 3:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lyude Paul
Cc: intel-gfx, dri-devel, Jérôme de Bretagne, David Airlie,
open list, Jani Nikula, stable, Thomas Zimmermann, Sean Paul
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 06:34:27PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> While the DP specification isn't entirely clear on if this should be
> allowed or not, some branch devices report having downstream ports present
> while also reporting a downstream port count of 0. So to avoid breaking
> those devices, we need to handle this in drm_dp_read_downstream_info().
>
> So, to do this we assume there's no downstream port info when the
> downstream port count is 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
> Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3416
> Fixes: 3d3721ccb18a ("drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_read_downstream_info()")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.10+
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index cb56d74e9d38..27c8c5bdf7d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -682,7 +682,14 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
> return 0;
>
> + /* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a
> + * downstream port present. The DP spec isn't clear on if this is allowed or not, but since
> + * some branches do it we need to handle it regardless.
> + */
> len = drm_dp_downstream_port_count(dpcd);
> + if (!len)
> + return 0;
> +
Seems sane enough.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> if (dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DETAILED_CAP_INFO_AVAILABLE)
> len *= 4;
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/dp: Handle zeroed port counts in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
@ 2021-05-03 3:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2021-05-03 3:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lyude Paul
Cc: Jérôme de Bretagne, David Airlie, intel-gfx, open list,
dri-devel, Jani Nikula, stable, Thomas Zimmermann
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 06:34:27PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> While the DP specification isn't entirely clear on if this should be
> allowed or not, some branch devices report having downstream ports present
> while also reporting a downstream port count of 0. So to avoid breaking
> those devices, we need to handle this in drm_dp_read_downstream_info().
>
> So, to do this we assume there's no downstream port info when the
> downstream port count is 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
> Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3416
> Fixes: 3d3721ccb18a ("drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_read_downstream_info()")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.10+
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index cb56d74e9d38..27c8c5bdf7d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -682,7 +682,14 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
> return 0;
>
> + /* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a
> + * downstream port present. The DP spec isn't clear on if this is allowed or not, but since
> + * some branches do it we need to handle it regardless.
> + */
> len = drm_dp_downstream_port_count(dpcd);
> + if (!len)
> + return 0;
> +
Seems sane enough.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> if (dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DETAILED_CAP_INFO_AVAILABLE)
> len *= 4;
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/dp: Handle zeroed port counts in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
@ 2021-05-03 3:13 ` Ville Syrjälä
0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Ville Syrjälä @ 2021-05-03 3:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lyude Paul
Cc: Jérôme de Bretagne, David Airlie, intel-gfx, open list,
dri-devel, Jani Nikula, stable, Thomas Zimmermann, Sean Paul
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 06:34:27PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> While the DP specification isn't entirely clear on if this should be
> allowed or not, some branch devices report having downstream ports present
> while also reporting a downstream port count of 0. So to avoid breaking
> those devices, we need to handle this in drm_dp_read_downstream_info().
>
> So, to do this we assume there's no downstream port info when the
> downstream port count is 0.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Jérôme de Bretagne <jerome.debretagne@gmail.com>
> Bugzilla: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/3416
> Fixes: 3d3721ccb18a ("drm/i915/dp: Extract drm_dp_read_downstream_info()")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.10+
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> index cb56d74e9d38..27c8c5bdf7d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_helper.c
> @@ -682,7 +682,14 @@ int drm_dp_read_downstream_info(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> !(dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
> return 0;
>
> + /* Some branches advertise having 0 downstream ports, despite also advertising they have a
> + * downstream port present. The DP spec isn't clear on if this is allowed or not, but since
> + * some branches do it we need to handle it regardless.
> + */
> len = drm_dp_downstream_port_count(dpcd);
> + if (!len)
> + return 0;
> +
Seems sane enough.
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> if (dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & DP_DETAILED_CAP_INFO_AVAILABLE)
> len *= 4;
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/dp: Handle zeroed port counts in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
2021-04-30 22:34 ` Lyude Paul
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2021-05-03 14:26 ` Patchwork
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-05-03 14:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lyude Paul; +Cc: intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2446 bytes --]
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/dp: Handle zeroed port counts in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/89719/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10036 -> Patchwork_20050
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/index.html
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20050 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
- fi-snb-2600: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2] ([i915#2782])
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/fi-snb-2600/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/fi-snb-2600/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
* igt@runner@aborted:
- fi-bdw-5557u: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][3] ([i915#1602] / [i915#2029])
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@runner@aborted.html
{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).
[i915#1602]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1602
[i915#2029]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2029
[i915#2782]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/2782
[i915#3303]: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/3303
Participating hosts (46 -> 40)
------------------------------
Missing (6): fi-ilk-m540 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bsw-n3050 fi-bsw-cyan fi-ctg-p8600 fi-bdw-samus
Build changes
-------------
* Linux: CI_DRM_10036 -> Patchwork_20050
CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_10036: 08705ab833ebfc80bc683cb5269d04944bcf8d20 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGT_6077: 126a3f6fc0e97786e2819085efc84e741093aed5 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/intel-gpu-tools
Patchwork_20050: 2dbd176a3ab267c99500634d523e2aa0d9f3821f @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
== Linux commits ==
2dbd176a3ab2 drm/dp: Drop open-coded drm_dp_is_branch() in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
d8d17055526c drm/dp: Handle zeroed port counts in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/index.html
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3020 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread* [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for series starting with [1/2] drm/dp: Handle zeroed port counts in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
2021-04-30 22:34 ` Lyude Paul
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
(?)
@ 2021-05-03 16:54 ` Patchwork
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2021-05-03 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lyude Paul; +Cc: intel-gfx
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 30316 bytes --]
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/dp: Handle zeroed port counts in drm_dp_read_downstream_info()
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/89719/
State : success
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_10036_full -> Patchwork_20050_full
====================================================
Summary
-------
**SUCCESS**
No regressions found.
Known issues
------------
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_20050_full that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
#### Issues hit ####
* igt@feature_discovery@psr2:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][1] -> [SKIP][2] ([i915#658])
[1]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-iclb2/igt@feature_discovery@psr2.html
[2]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@feature_discovery@psr2.html
* igt@gem_create@create-clear:
- shard-glk: [PASS][3] -> [FAIL][4] ([i915#1888] / [i915#3160])
[3]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-glk5/igt@gem_create@create-clear.html
[4]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-glk9/igt@gem_create@create-clear.html
* igt@gem_ctx_persistence@clone:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#1099]) +7 similar issues
[5]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-snb7/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@clone.html
* igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-hostile@render:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#2410])
[6]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-hostile@render.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#2846])
[7]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl2/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline.html
[8]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][9] -> [FAIL][10] ([i915#2842])
[9]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-tglb1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html
[10]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-share@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][11] -> [FAIL][12] ([i915#2842])
[11]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0.html
[12]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl7/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][13] -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#2849])
[13]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-iclb1/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0.html
[14]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-throttle@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-wide-active@rcs0:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][15] ([i915#2389]) +2 similar issues
[15]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-snb7/igt@gem_exec_reloc@basic-wide-active@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked-all:
- shard-glk: [PASS][16] -> [DMESG-WARN][17] ([i915#118] / [i915#95])
[16]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-glk4/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked-all.html
[17]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-glk1/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked-all.html
* igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][18] -> [SKIP][19] ([i915#2190])
[18]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html
[19]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-tglb6/igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy.html
* igt@gem_pwrite@basic-exhaustion:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [WARN][20] ([i915#2658])
[20]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-snb7/igt@gem_pwrite@basic-exhaustion.html
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [WARN][21] ([i915#2658])
[21]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl6/igt@gem_pwrite@basic-exhaustion.html
* igt@gem_render_copy@x-tiled-to-vebox-yf-tiled:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][22] ([fdo#109271]) +87 similar issues
[22]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_render_copy@x-tiled-to-vebox-yf-tiled.html
* igt@gem_userptr_blits@set-cache-level:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][23] ([i915#3324])
[23]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_userptr_blits@set-cache-level.html
* igt@gem_vm_create@destroy-race:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][24] -> [TIMEOUT][25] ([i915#2795])
[24]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_vm_create@destroy-race.html
[25]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-tglb2/igt@gem_vm_create@destroy-race.html
* igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single:
- shard-skl: [PASS][26] -> [DMESG-WARN][27] ([i915#1436] / [i915#716])
[26]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-skl2/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html
[27]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl9/igt@gen9_exec_parse@allowed-single.html
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-non-lpsp:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][28] ([fdo#110892])
[28]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@i915_pm_rpm@modeset-non-lpsp.html
* igt@i915_suspend@fence-restore-tiled2untiled:
- shard-apl: [PASS][29] -> [DMESG-WARN][30] ([i915#180])
[29]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-apl7/igt@i915_suspend@fence-restore-tiled2untiled.html
[30]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl1/igt@i915_suspend@fence-restore-tiled2untiled.html
* igt@i915_suspend@forcewake:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][31] ([i915#180])
[31]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl1/igt@i915_suspend@forcewake.html
* igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][32] -> [INCOMPLETE][33] ([i915#155])
[32]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl2/igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader.html
[33]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl3/igt@i915_suspend@sysfs-reader.html
* igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-32bpp-rotate-270:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][34] ([fdo#110725] / [fdo#111614])
[34]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_big_fb@x-tiled-32bpp-rotate-270.html
* igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-addfb:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][35] ([fdo#111615])
[35]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_big_fb@yf-tiled-addfb.html
* igt@kms_big_joiner@invalid-modeset:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][36] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2705])
[36]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl6/igt@kms_big_joiner@invalid-modeset.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@dp-audio-edid:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][37] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +5 similar issues
[37]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl9/igt@kms_chamelium@dp-audio-edid.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-edid-change-during-suspend:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][38] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +14 similar issues
[38]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl8/igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-edid-change-during-suspend.html
* igt@kms_color@pipe-d-ctm-blue-to-red:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][39] ([fdo#109278] / [i915#1149])
[39]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_color@pipe-d-ctm-blue-to-red.html
* igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-ctm-blue-to-red:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][40] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +28 similar issues
[40]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-snb6/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-ctm-blue-to-red.html
* igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-ctm-green-to-red:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][41] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827]) +1 similar issue
[41]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-ctm-green-to-red.html
* igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-gamma:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][42] ([fdo#109284] / [fdo#111827])
[42]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-a-gamma.html
* igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-c-ctm-0-25:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][43] ([fdo#109271] / [fdo#111827]) +12 similar issues
[43]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_color_chamelium@pipe-c-ctm-0-25.html
* igt@kms_content_protection@srm:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [TIMEOUT][44] ([i915#1319])
[44]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_content_protection@srm.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-32x32-rapid-movement:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][45] ([i915#3319])
[45]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-32x32-rapid-movement.html
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-512x512-offscreen:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][46] ([fdo#109278] / [fdo#109279])
[46]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-c-cursor-512x512-offscreen.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursorb-vs-flipa-toggle:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][47] ([fdo#109274] / [fdo#109278])
[47]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@cursorb-vs-flipa-toggle.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-torture-move:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][48] ([fdo#109271]) +80 similar issues
[48]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl9/igt@kms_cursor_legacy@pipe-d-torture-move.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@b-hdmi-a1:
- shard-glk: [PASS][49] -> [FAIL][50] ([i915#2122])
[49]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-glk9/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@b-hdmi-a1.html
[50]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-glk3/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank-interruptible@b-hdmi-a1.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@a-dp1:
- shard-kbl: [PASS][51] -> [DMESG-WARN][52] ([i915#180]) +5 similar issues
[51]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl3/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@a-dp1.html
[52]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend-interruptible@a-dp1.html
* igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible@b-edp1:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][53] ([i915#2122])
[53]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl9/igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible@b-edp1.html
* igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-64bpp-ytile:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][54] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2642])
[54]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl6/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytile-to-64bpp-ytile.html
* igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytileccs-to-64bpp-ytile:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][55] ([fdo#109271]) +532 similar issues
[55]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-snb6/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-32bpp-ytileccs-to-64bpp-ytile.html
* igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilercccs:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][56] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2672])
[56]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_flip_scaled_crc@flip-64bpp-ytile-to-32bpp-ytilercccs.html
* igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-scndscrn-indfb-plflip-blt:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][57] ([fdo#109280]) +5 similar issues
[57]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbcpsr-2p-scndscrn-indfb-plflip-blt.html
* igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch:
- shard-skl: [PASS][58] -> [FAIL][59] ([i915#1188])
[58]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-skl2/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch.html
[59]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl9/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch.html
* igt@kms_pipe_b_c_ivb@disable-pipe-b-enable-pipe-c:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][60] ([fdo#109271]) +150 similar issues
[60]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl6/igt@kms_pipe_b_c_ivb@disable-pipe-b-enable-pipe-c.html
* igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][61] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533]) +1 similar issue
[61]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl7/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@compare-crc-sanitycheck-pipe-d.html
* igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-pipe-d-frame-sequence:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][62] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#533])
[62]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl4/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@nonblocking-crc-pipe-d-frame-sequence.html
* igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][63] ([i915#180])
[63]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_pipe_crc_basic@suspend-read-crc-pipe-b.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-opaque-fb:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][64] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265])
[64]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl2/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-opaque-fb.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-transparent-fb:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][65] ([i915#265])
[65]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl2/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-alpha-transparent-fb.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-alpha-opaque-fb:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][66] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265])
[66]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl1/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-b-alpha-opaque-fb.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-7efc:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][67] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) +1 similar issue
[67]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl1/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-7efc.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-transparent-fb:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][68] ([i915#265])
[68]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl9/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-c-alpha-transparent-fb.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-d-alpha-transparent-fb:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][69] ([fdo#109278]) +11 similar issues
[69]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-d-alpha-transparent-fb.html
* igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-3:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][70] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +2 similar issues
[70]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl9/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-3.html
* igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-5:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][71] ([i915#658])
[71]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-5.html
* igt@kms_psr2_sf@plane-move-sf-dmg-area-2:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][72] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +3 similar issues
[72]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl1/igt@kms_psr2_sf@plane-move-sf-dmg-area-2.html
* igt@kms_psr2_sf@primary-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-3:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][73] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#658]) +2 similar issues
[73]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_psr2_sf@primary-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-3.html
* igt@kms_psr2_su@frontbuffer:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][74] -> [SKIP][75] ([fdo#109642] / [fdo#111068] / [i915#658])
[74]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_su@frontbuffer.html
[75]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr2_su@frontbuffer.html
* igt@kms_psr@psr2_dpms:
- shard-iclb: [PASS][76] -> [SKIP][77] ([fdo#109441]) +2 similar issues
[76]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_dpms.html
[77]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_psr@psr2_dpms.html
* igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_render:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][78] ([fdo#109441])
[78]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_render.html
* igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_render:
- shard-tglb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][79] ([i915#132])
[79]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-tglb5/igt@kms_psr@psr2_sprite_render.html
* igt@kms_setmode@basic:
- shard-snb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][80] ([i915#31])
[80]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-snb7/igt@kms_setmode@basic.html
* igt@kms_writeback@writeback-invalid-parameters:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][81] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2437]) +1 similar issue
[81]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl1/igt@kms_writeback@writeback-invalid-parameters.html
* igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-a-ctx-flip-detection:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][82] ([i915#2530])
[82]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@nouveau_crc@pipe-a-ctx-flip-detection.html
* igt@perf@blocking:
- shard-skl: [PASS][83] -> [FAIL][84] ([i915#1542]) +1 similar issue
[83]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-skl10/igt@perf@blocking.html
[84]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl1/igt@perf@blocking.html
* igt@prime_nv_test@i915_import_gtt_mmap:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][85] ([fdo#109291])
[85]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@prime_nv_test@i915_import_gtt_mmap.html
* igt@sysfs_clients@fair-0:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][86] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994])
[86]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl7/igt@sysfs_clients@fair-0.html
* igt@sysfs_clients@fair-7:
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][87] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2994]) +3 similar issues
[87]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl7/igt@sysfs_clients@fair-7.html
#### Possible fixes ####
* igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-hostile@bsd2:
- shard-tglb: [FAIL][88] ([i915#2410]) -> [PASS][89]
[88]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-tglb5/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-hostile@bsd2.html
[89]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-tglb3/igt@gem_ctx_persistence@legacy-engines-hostile@bsd2.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-vip@rcs0:
- shard-glk: [FAIL][90] ([i915#2842]) -> [PASS][91]
[90]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-glk6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-vip@rcs0.html
[91]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-glk5/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none-vip@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3:
- shard-kbl: [DMESG-WARN][92] ([i915#180]) -> [PASS][93] +2 similar issues
[92]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl7/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html
[93]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s3.html
* igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked-all:
- shard-iclb: [INCOMPLETE][94] ([i915#1895]) -> [PASS][95]
[94]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-iclb2/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked-all.html
[95]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb5/igt@gem_exec_whisper@basic-fds-forked-all.html
* igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-basic-small-copy-odd:
- shard-glk: [FAIL][96] ([i915#307]) -> [PASS][97]
[96]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-glk9/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-basic-small-copy-odd.html
[97]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-glk3/igt@gem_mmap_gtt@cpuset-basic-small-copy-odd.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck:
- shard-snb: [INCOMPLETE][98] ([i915#2782]) -> [PASS][99]
[98]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-snb7/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
[99]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-snb2/igt@i915_selftest@live@hangcheck.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank@c-edp1:
- shard-skl: [FAIL][100] ([i915#79]) -> [PASS][101]
[100]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-skl8/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank@c-edp1.html
[101]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl8/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-expired-vblank@c-edp1.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-rmfb@c-edp1:
- shard-skl: [DMESG-WARN][102] -> [PASS][103]
[102]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-skl3/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-rmfb@c-edp1.html
[103]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl2/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-rmfb@c-edp1.html
* igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@a-dp1:
- shard-kbl: [INCOMPLETE][104] ([i915#155] / [i915#180]) -> [PASS][105]
[104]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl4/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@a-dp1.html
[105]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl6/igt@kms_flip@flip-vs-suspend@a-dp1.html
* igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-coverage-7efc:
- shard-skl: [FAIL][106] ([fdo#108145] / [i915#265]) -> [PASS][107]
[106]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-skl5/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-coverage-7efc.html
[107]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl7/igt@kms_plane_alpha_blend@pipe-a-coverage-7efc.html
* igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_gtt:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][108] ([fdo#109441]) -> [PASS][109]
[108]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-iclb4/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_gtt.html
[109]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr@psr2_primary_mmap_gtt.html
#### Warnings ####
* igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-fence:
- shard-iclb: [WARN][110] ([i915#2684]) -> [WARN][111] ([i915#1804] / [i915#2684])
[110]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-iclb8/igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-fence.html
[111]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb4/igt@i915_pm_rc6_residency@rc6-fence.html
* igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-4:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][112] ([i915#658]) -> [SKIP][113] ([i915#2920]) +1 similar issue
[112]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-iclb4/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-4.html
[113]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_sf@overlay-plane-update-sf-dmg-area-4.html
* igt@kms_psr2_sf@plane-move-sf-dmg-area-2:
- shard-iclb: [SKIP][114] ([i915#2920]) -> [SKIP][115] ([i915#658]) +1 similar issue
[114]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-iclb2/igt@kms_psr2_sf@plane-move-sf-dmg-area-2.html
[115]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-iclb8/igt@kms_psr2_sf@plane-move-sf-dmg-area-2.html
* igt@runner@aborted:
- shard-kbl: ([FAIL][116], [FAIL][117], [FAIL][118], [FAIL][119], [FAIL][120], [FAIL][121], [FAIL][122], [FAIL][123], [FAIL][124], [FAIL][125], [FAIL][126]) ([i915#180] / [i915#1814] / [i915#2292] / [i915#2505] / [i915#3002] / [i915#3363] / [i915#602] / [i915#92]) -> ([FAIL][127], [FAIL][128], [FAIL][129], [FAIL][130], [FAIL][131], [FAIL][132], [FAIL][133], [FAIL][134], [FAIL][135], [FAIL][136]) ([i915#1436] / [i915#180] / [i915#1814] / [i915#2292] / [i915#3002] / [i915#3363] / [i915#92])
[116]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl2/igt@runner@aborted.html
[117]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl3/igt@runner@aborted.html
[118]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl2/igt@runner@aborted.html
[119]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl4/igt@runner@aborted.html
[120]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl4/igt@runner@aborted.html
[121]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl7/igt@runner@aborted.html
[122]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl7/igt@runner@aborted.html
[123]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl6/igt@runner@aborted.html
[124]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl1/igt@runner@aborted.html
[125]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl1/igt@runner@aborted.html
[126]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-kbl2/igt@runner@aborted.html
[127]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl4/igt@runner@aborted.html
[128]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl7/igt@runner@aborted.html
[129]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl4/igt@runner@aborted.html
[130]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl1/igt@runner@aborted.html
[131]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl1/igt@runner@aborted.html
[132]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl2/igt@runner@aborted.html
[133]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl4/igt@runner@aborted.html
[134]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl1/igt@runner@aborted.html
[135]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl7/igt@runner@aborted.html
[136]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-kbl4/igt@runner@aborted.html
- shard-apl: ([FAIL][137], [FAIL][138]) ([i915#3002] / [i915#3363]) -> ([FAIL][139], [FAIL][140], [FAIL][141]) ([i915#180] / [i915#3002] / [i915#3363])
[137]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-apl3/igt@runner@aborted.html
[138]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-apl2/igt@runner@aborted.html
[139]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl1/igt@runner@aborted.html
[140]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl7/igt@runner@aborted.html
[141]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-apl1/igt@runner@aborted.html
- shard-skl: ([FAIL][142], [FAIL][143], [FAIL][144], [FAIL][145]) ([i915#2029] / [i915#3002] / [i915#3363]) -> ([FAIL][146], [FAIL][147], [FAIL][148], [FAIL][149], [FAIL][150], [FAIL][151], [FAIL][152], [FAIL][153]) ([i915#1436] / [i915#1814] / [i915#2029] / [i915#3002] / [i915#3363])
[142]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-skl7/igt@runner@aborted.html
[143]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-skl3/igt@runner@aborted.html
[144]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-skl3/igt@runner@aborted.html
[145]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_10036/shard-skl6/igt@runner@aborted.html
[146]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl9/igt@runner@aborted.html
[147]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl3/igt@runner@aborted.html
[148]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl3/igt@runner@aborted.html
[149]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl5/igt@runner@aborted.html
[150]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl6/igt@runner@aborted.html
[151]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl5/igt@runner@aborted.html
[152]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl4/igt@runner@aborted.html
[153]: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/shard-skl2/igt@runner@aborted.html
[fdo#108145]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108145
[fdo#109271]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109271
[fdo#109274]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109274
[fdo#109278]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109278
[fdo#109279]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109279
[fdo#109280]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109280
[fdo#109284]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109284
[fdo#109291]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109291
[fdo#109441]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109441
[fdo#109642]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109642
[fdo#110725]: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_20050/index.html
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 35477 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread