File System shootout...

File System shootout...

[Mike Benoit]

To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
I've been running over the last week between all the major file systems
(and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
come in. 

Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
different file systems strengths and weaknesses.

http://fsbench.netnation.com/

-- 
Best Regards,
 
Mike Benoit

Re: File System shootout...

[Nikita Danilov]

Mike Benoit writes:
 > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
 > I've been running over the last week between all the major file systems
 > (and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
 > tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
 > come in. 
 > 
 > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
 > different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
 > 
 > http://fsbench.netnation.com/

I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++ results
for reiser4 vs. ext3:

on the box with 128M of ram:

./bonnie++ -s 1g -n 10 -x 5

Version  1.03       ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                    -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite-   -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine        Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
v4.128M          1G 19903  89 37911  20 15392  11 13624  58 41807  12 131.0   0
v4.128M          1G 19965  89 37600  20 15845  11 13730  58 41751  12 130.0   0
v4.128M          1G 19937  89 37746  20 15404  11 13624  58 41793  12 132.1   0
v4.128M          1G 19998  89 37184  19 15007  10 13393  56 41611  11 130.2   0
v4.128M          1G 19771  89 37679  20 15206  11 13466  57 41808  11 130.2   1
ext3.128M        1G 21236  99 37258  22 11357   4 13460  56 41748   6 120.0   0
ext3.128M        1G 20821  99 36838  23 12176   5 13154  55 40671   6 120.7   0
ext3.128M        1G 20755  99 37032  24 12069   4 12908  54 40851   5 120.2   0
ext3.128M        1G 20651  99 37094  24 11817   5 13038  54 40842   6 121.3   0
ext3.128M        1G 20928  99 37300  23 12287   4 13067  55 41404   6 120.1   0
                    ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
                    -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete--
files:max:min        /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP  /sec %CP
v4.128M          10 18503 100 +++++ +++  9488  99 10158  99 +++++ +++ 11635  99
v4.128M          10 19760  99 +++++ +++  9696  99 10441 100 +++++ +++ 11831  99
v4.128M          10 19583 100 +++++ +++  9672 100 10597  99 +++++ +++ 11846 100
v4.128M          10 19720 100 +++++ +++  9577  99 10126 100 +++++ +++ 11924 100
v4.128M          10 19682 100 +++++ +++  9683 100 10461 100 +++++ +++ 11834 100
ext3.128M        10  3279  97 +++++ +++ +++++ +++  3406 100 +++++ +++  8951  95
ext3.128M        10  3303  98 +++++ +++ +++++ +++  3423  99 +++++ +++  8558  96
ext3.128M        10  3317  98 +++++ +++ +++++ +++  3402 100 +++++ +++  8721  93
ext3.128M        10  3325  98 +++++ +++ +++++ +++  3390 100 +++++ +++  9242 100
ext3.128M        10  3315  97 +++++ +++ +++++ +++  3439 100 +++++ +++  8896  96

./bonnie++ -f -d . -s 3072 -n 10:100000:10:10 -x 1

Version  1.03        ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
                     -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine         Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP  /sec %CP
v4                3G           37579  19 15657  11           41531  11 105.8   0
v4                3G           37993  20 15478  11           41632  11 105.4   0
ext3              3G           35221  22 10987   4           41105   6  90.9   0
ext3              3G           35099  22 11517   4           41416   6  90.7   0
		             ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create--------
		             -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Creat

Re: File System shootout...

[Dieter Nützel]

Am Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2003 23:15 schrieb Mike Benoit:
> On Fri, 2003-10-10 at 04:55, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > > Mike Benoit writes:
> > >  > To all those who are interested, here are the results of the
> > >  > benchmarks I've been running over the last week between all the
> > >  > major file systems (and there different mount options) using both
> > >  > Bonnie++ and IOzone. More tests are currently underway, so the
> > >  > results will be updated as they come in.
> > >  >
> > >  > Hopefully these results will give you a good comparative overview of
> > >  > each of the different file systems strengths and weaknesses.
> > >  >
> > >  > http://fsbench.netnation.com/
> > >
> > > I should probably add that I am getting quite different bonnie++
> > > results for reiser4 vs. ext3:
> > >
> > > on the box with 128M of ram:
> >
> > Why no numbers for ReiserFS 3.xx plus data-logging patch
> > (odered/journal/writeback, e.g. current code) like ext3?
>
> Do you have a link to the 2.6.0-test5+ data-logging patch?

v3 experimental data=ordered and logging speedups for 2.6.1
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=reiserfs&m=107453067611552&w=2

And following posts.

Hope it's not too late or double post...;-)

Running very well with SuSE's 9.0 2.6.2-6 on RAID0 and RAID1, U320 15k.

Cheers,
	Dieter

Re: File System shootout...

[Mike Fedyk]

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:36:02AM +0200, KELEMEN Peter wrote:
> effects.  Also, since you're obviously processing the results,
> percentage relative to best (or worst) performance would help
> comparison.

Also some color coding from worst to best would be nice too.  Since you
can't sort on each inidividual test, this will help identify the changes at
a glance.

Re: File System shootout...

[KELEMEN Peter]

* Mike Benoit (mikeb@netnation.com) [20031007 15:45]:

> http://fsbench.netnation.com/

Nice pages, but please repeat measurements with file sizes at
least 16x larger than physical memory to eliminate caching
effects.  Also, since you're obviously processing the results,
percentage relative to best (or worst) performance would help
comparison.

Peter

-- 
    .+'''+.         .+'''+.         .+'''+.         .+'''+.         .+''
 Kelemen Péter     /       \       /       \     Peter.Kelemen@cern.ch
.+'         `+...+'         `+...+'         `+...+'         `+...+'

Re: File System shootout...

[Mike Fedyk]

On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 07:02:18PM -0400, Barry, Christopher wrote:
> Link is broken for me...;-(

It works but it's slow though...

RE: File System shootout...

[Barry, Christopher]

Link is broken for me...;-(

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Benoit [mailto:mikeb@netnation.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 6:46 PM
To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: File System shootout...


To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
I've been running over the last week, between all the major file systems
(and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
come in. 

Hopefully they will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
different file systems strengths and weaknesses.

http://fsbench.netnation.com/

-- 
Best Regards,
 
Mike Benoit

File System shootout...

[Mike Benoit]

To all those who are interested, here are the results of the benchmarks
I've been running over the last week, between all the major file systems
(and there different mount options) using both Bonnie++ and IOzone. More
tests are currently underway, so the results will be updated as they
come in. 

Hopefully they will give you a good comparative overview of each of the
different file systems strengths and weaknesses.

http://fsbench.netnation.com/

-- 
Best Regards,
 
Mike Benoit