All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>,
	Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
Cc: wens@kernel.org, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Markus Reichl <m.reichl@fivetechno.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 16:22:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <166083617788.142744.9952816090089797555.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EC5FFA28-21D3-4FBB-B188-7DB1C9E1AA9E@kohlschutter.com>

On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 12:44:29 +0200, Christian Kohlschütter wrote:
> Previously, an unresolved regulator supply reference upon calling
> regulator_register on an always-on or boot-on regulator caused
> set_machine_constraints to be called twice.
> 
> This in turn may initialize the regulator twice, leading to voltage
> glitches that are timing-dependent. A simple, unrelated configuration
> change may be enough to hide this problem, only to be surfaced by
> chance.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init
      commit: 8a866d527ac0441c0eb14a991fa11358b476b11d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>,
	Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
Cc: wens@kernel.org, Heiko Stübner <heiko@sntech.de>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..."
	<linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Markus Reichl <m.reichl@fivetechno.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2022 16:22:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <166083617788.142744.9952816090089797555.b4-ty@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EC5FFA28-21D3-4FBB-B188-7DB1C9E1AA9E@kohlschutter.com>

On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 12:44:29 +0200, Christian Kohlschütter wrote:
> Previously, an unresolved regulator supply reference upon calling
> regulator_register on an always-on or boot-on regulator caused
> set_machine_constraints to be called twice.
> 
> This in turn may initialize the regulator twice, leading to voltage
> glitches that are timing-dependent. A simple, unrelated configuration
> change may be enough to hide this problem, only to be surfaced by
> chance.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init
      commit: 8a866d527ac0441c0eb14a991fa11358b476b11d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-08-18 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-03 14:33 [PATCH v2] regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init Vincent Legoll
2022-08-04 10:44 ` [PATCH v3] " Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-04 10:44   ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-04 10:44   ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-15 11:17   ` Mark Brown
2022-08-15 11:17     ` Mark Brown
2022-08-15 11:17     ` Mark Brown
2022-08-18 12:46     ` [PATCH v4] " Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-18 12:46       ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-18 12:46       ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-18 15:23       ` Mark Brown
2022-08-18 15:23         ` Mark Brown
     [not found]       ` <CGME20220825113251eucas1p247c3d57de823da148ca4790975a4aba8@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2022-08-25 11:32         ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 11:32           ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 11:32           ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 12:21           ` Mark Brown
2022-08-25 12:21             ` Mark Brown
2022-08-25 12:21             ` Mark Brown
2022-08-25 14:23             ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 14:23               ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 14:23               ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 15:18               ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 15:18                 ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 15:18                 ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:28                 ` [PATCH v5] " Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:28                   ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:28                   ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:35                   ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:35                     ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:35                     ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-26  5:55                   ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-26  5:55                     ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-26  5:55                     ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-29 15:43                   ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 15:43                     ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 15:43                     ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 17:01                     ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-29 17:01                       ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-29 17:01                       ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-17 23:22                   ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-17 23:22                     ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-17 23:22                     ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-17 23:33                     ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-17 23:33                       ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-17 23:33                       ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-17 23:46                       ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-17 23:46                         ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-17 23:46                         ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-18  0:01                         ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-18  0:01                           ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-18  0:01                           ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-18  0:05                           ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-18  0:05                             ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-18  0:05                             ` Saravana Kannan
2022-08-18 15:22   ` Mark Brown [this message]
2022-08-18 15:22     ` [PATCH v3] " Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=166083617788.142744.9952816090089797555.b4-ty@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian@kohlschutter.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=m.reichl@fivetechno.de \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.legoll@gmail.com \
    --cc=wens@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.