All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
To: "Christian Kohlschütter" <christian@kohlschutter.com>
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, heiko@sntech.de,
	lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, m.reichl@fivetechno.de,
	robin.murphy@arm.com, vincent.legoll@gmail.com, wens@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:22:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx__Ez8i9O2O30-Q1R00xOqBjkKMCwt37_AGAQjNvZqpdg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825212842.7176-1-christian@kohlschutter.com>

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 2:28 PM Christian Kohlschütter
<christian@kohlschutter.com> wrote:
>
> Previously, an unresolved regulator supply reference upon calling
> regulator_register on an always-on or boot-on regulator caused
> set_machine_constraints to be called twice.
>
> This in turn may initialize the regulator twice, leading to voltage
> glitches that are timing-dependent. A simple, unrelated configuration
> change may be enough to hide this problem, only to be surfaced by
> chance.

In your case, can you elaborate which part of the constraints/init
twice caused the issue?

I'm trying to simplify some of the supply resolving code and I'm
trying to not break your use case.

-Saravana

>
> One such example is the SD-Card voltage regulator in a NanoPI R4S that
> would not initialize reliably unless the registration flow was just
> complex enough to allow the regulator to properly reset between calls.
>
> Fix this by re-arranging regulator_register, trying resolve the
> regulator's supply early enough that set_machine_constraints does not
> need to be called twice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/core.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 77f60eef960..2ff0ab2730f 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -5391,6 +5391,7 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
>         bool dangling_of_gpiod = false;
>         struct device *dev;
>         int ret, i;
> +       bool resolved_early = false;
>
>         if (cfg == NULL)
>                 return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> @@ -5494,24 +5495,10 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
>         BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&rdev->notifier);
>         INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rdev->disable_work, regulator_disable_work);
>
> -       /* preform any regulator specific init */
> -       if (init_data && init_data->regulator_init) {
> -               ret = init_data->regulator_init(rdev->reg_data);
> -               if (ret < 0)
> -                       goto clean;
> -       }
> -
> -       if (config->ena_gpiod) {
> -               ret = regulator_ena_gpio_request(rdev, config);
> -               if (ret != 0) {
> -                       rdev_err(rdev, "Failed to request enable GPIO: %pe\n",
> -                                ERR_PTR(ret));
> -                       goto clean;
> -               }
> -               /* The regulator core took over the GPIO descriptor */
> -               dangling_cfg_gpiod = false;
> -               dangling_of_gpiod = false;
> -       }
> +       if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
> +               rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
> +       else if (regulator_desc->supply_name)
> +               rdev->supply_name = regulator_desc->supply_name;
>
>         /* register with sysfs */
>         rdev->dev.class = &regulator_class;
> @@ -5533,13 +5520,38 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
>                 goto wash;
>         }
>
> -       if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
> -               rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
> -       else if (regulator_desc->supply_name)
> -               rdev->supply_name = regulator_desc->supply_name;
> +       if ((rdev->supply_name && !rdev->supply) &&
> +               (rdev->constraints->always_on ||
> +                rdev->constraints->boot_on)) {
> +               ret = regulator_resolve_supply(rdev);
> +               if (ret != 0)
> +                       rdev_dbg(rdev, "Unable to resolve supply early: %pe\n",
> +                                ERR_PTR(ret));
> +
> +               resolved_early = true;
> +       }
> +
> +       /* perform any regulator specific init */
> +       if (init_data && init_data->regulator_init) {
> +               ret = init_data->regulator_init(rdev->reg_data);
> +               if (ret < 0)
> +                       goto wash;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (config->ena_gpiod) {
> +               ret = regulator_ena_gpio_request(rdev, config);
> +               if (ret != 0) {
> +                       rdev_err(rdev, "Failed to request enable GPIO: %pe\n",
> +                                        ERR_PTR(ret));
> +                       goto wash;
> +               }
> +               /* The regulator core took over the GPIO descriptor */
> +               dangling_cfg_gpiod = false;
> +               dangling_of_gpiod = false;
> +       }
>
>         ret = set_machine_constraints(rdev);
> -       if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> +       if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER && !resolved_early) {
>                 /* Regulator might be in bypass mode and so needs its supply
>                  * to set the constraints
>                  */
> --
> 2.36.2
>
>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
To: "Christian Kohlschütter" <christian@kohlschutter.com>
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, heiko@sntech.de,
	 lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, m.reichl@fivetechno.de,
	 robin.murphy@arm.com, vincent.legoll@gmail.com, wens@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:22:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx__Ez8i9O2O30-Q1R00xOqBjkKMCwt37_AGAQjNvZqpdg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825212842.7176-1-christian@kohlschutter.com>

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 2:28 PM Christian Kohlschütter
<christian@kohlschutter.com> wrote:
>
> Previously, an unresolved regulator supply reference upon calling
> regulator_register on an always-on or boot-on regulator caused
> set_machine_constraints to be called twice.
>
> This in turn may initialize the regulator twice, leading to voltage
> glitches that are timing-dependent. A simple, unrelated configuration
> change may be enough to hide this problem, only to be surfaced by
> chance.

In your case, can you elaborate which part of the constraints/init
twice caused the issue?

I'm trying to simplify some of the supply resolving code and I'm
trying to not break your use case.

-Saravana

>
> One such example is the SD-Card voltage regulator in a NanoPI R4S that
> would not initialize reliably unless the registration flow was just
> complex enough to allow the regulator to properly reset between calls.
>
> Fix this by re-arranging regulator_register, trying resolve the
> regulator's supply early enough that set_machine_constraints does not
> need to be called twice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/core.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 77f60eef960..2ff0ab2730f 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -5391,6 +5391,7 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
>         bool dangling_of_gpiod = false;
>         struct device *dev;
>         int ret, i;
> +       bool resolved_early = false;
>
>         if (cfg == NULL)
>                 return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> @@ -5494,24 +5495,10 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
>         BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&rdev->notifier);
>         INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rdev->disable_work, regulator_disable_work);
>
> -       /* preform any regulator specific init */
> -       if (init_data && init_data->regulator_init) {
> -               ret = init_data->regulator_init(rdev->reg_data);
> -               if (ret < 0)
> -                       goto clean;
> -       }
> -
> -       if (config->ena_gpiod) {
> -               ret = regulator_ena_gpio_request(rdev, config);
> -               if (ret != 0) {
> -                       rdev_err(rdev, "Failed to request enable GPIO: %pe\n",
> -                                ERR_PTR(ret));
> -                       goto clean;
> -               }
> -               /* The regulator core took over the GPIO descriptor */
> -               dangling_cfg_gpiod = false;
> -               dangling_of_gpiod = false;
> -       }
> +       if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
> +               rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
> +       else if (regulator_desc->supply_name)
> +               rdev->supply_name = regulator_desc->supply_name;
>
>         /* register with sysfs */
>         rdev->dev.class = &regulator_class;
> @@ -5533,13 +5520,38 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
>                 goto wash;
>         }
>
> -       if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
> -               rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
> -       else if (regulator_desc->supply_name)
> -               rdev->supply_name = regulator_desc->supply_name;
> +       if ((rdev->supply_name && !rdev->supply) &&
> +               (rdev->constraints->always_on ||
> +                rdev->constraints->boot_on)) {
> +               ret = regulator_resolve_supply(rdev);
> +               if (ret != 0)
> +                       rdev_dbg(rdev, "Unable to resolve supply early: %pe\n",
> +                                ERR_PTR(ret));
> +
> +               resolved_early = true;
> +       }
> +
> +       /* perform any regulator specific init */
> +       if (init_data && init_data->regulator_init) {
> +               ret = init_data->regulator_init(rdev->reg_data);
> +               if (ret < 0)
> +                       goto wash;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (config->ena_gpiod) {
> +               ret = regulator_ena_gpio_request(rdev, config);
> +               if (ret != 0) {
> +                       rdev_err(rdev, "Failed to request enable GPIO: %pe\n",
> +                                        ERR_PTR(ret));
> +                       goto wash;
> +               }
> +               /* The regulator core took over the GPIO descriptor */
> +               dangling_cfg_gpiod = false;
> +               dangling_of_gpiod = false;
> +       }
>
>         ret = set_machine_constraints(rdev);
> -       if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> +       if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER && !resolved_early) {
>                 /* Regulator might be in bypass mode and so needs its supply
>                  * to set the constraints
>                  */
> --
> 2.36.2
>
>

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
To: "Christian Kohlschütter" <christian@kohlschutter.com>
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, heiko@sntech.de,
	 lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, m.reichl@fivetechno.de,
	 robin.murphy@arm.com, vincent.legoll@gmail.com, wens@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:22:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGETcx__Ez8i9O2O30-Q1R00xOqBjkKMCwt37_AGAQjNvZqpdg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220825212842.7176-1-christian@kohlschutter.com>

On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 2:28 PM Christian Kohlschütter
<christian@kohlschutter.com> wrote:
>
> Previously, an unresolved regulator supply reference upon calling
> regulator_register on an always-on or boot-on regulator caused
> set_machine_constraints to be called twice.
>
> This in turn may initialize the regulator twice, leading to voltage
> glitches that are timing-dependent. A simple, unrelated configuration
> change may be enough to hide this problem, only to be surfaced by
> chance.

In your case, can you elaborate which part of the constraints/init
twice caused the issue?

I'm trying to simplify some of the supply resolving code and I'm
trying to not break your use case.

-Saravana

>
> One such example is the SD-Card voltage regulator in a NanoPI R4S that
> would not initialize reliably unless the registration flow was just
> complex enough to allow the regulator to properly reset between calls.
>
> Fix this by re-arranging regulator_register, trying resolve the
> regulator's supply early enough that set_machine_constraints does not
> need to be called twice.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Kohlschütter <christian@kohlschutter.com>
> ---
>  drivers/regulator/core.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 77f60eef960..2ff0ab2730f 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -5391,6 +5391,7 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
>         bool dangling_of_gpiod = false;
>         struct device *dev;
>         int ret, i;
> +       bool resolved_early = false;
>
>         if (cfg == NULL)
>                 return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> @@ -5494,24 +5495,10 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
>         BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&rdev->notifier);
>         INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&rdev->disable_work, regulator_disable_work);
>
> -       /* preform any regulator specific init */
> -       if (init_data && init_data->regulator_init) {
> -               ret = init_data->regulator_init(rdev->reg_data);
> -               if (ret < 0)
> -                       goto clean;
> -       }
> -
> -       if (config->ena_gpiod) {
> -               ret = regulator_ena_gpio_request(rdev, config);
> -               if (ret != 0) {
> -                       rdev_err(rdev, "Failed to request enable GPIO: %pe\n",
> -                                ERR_PTR(ret));
> -                       goto clean;
> -               }
> -               /* The regulator core took over the GPIO descriptor */
> -               dangling_cfg_gpiod = false;
> -               dangling_of_gpiod = false;
> -       }
> +       if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
> +               rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
> +       else if (regulator_desc->supply_name)
> +               rdev->supply_name = regulator_desc->supply_name;
>
>         /* register with sysfs */
>         rdev->dev.class = &regulator_class;
> @@ -5533,13 +5520,38 @@ regulator_register(const struct regulator_desc *regulator_desc,
>                 goto wash;
>         }
>
> -       if (init_data && init_data->supply_regulator)
> -               rdev->supply_name = init_data->supply_regulator;
> -       else if (regulator_desc->supply_name)
> -               rdev->supply_name = regulator_desc->supply_name;
> +       if ((rdev->supply_name && !rdev->supply) &&
> +               (rdev->constraints->always_on ||
> +                rdev->constraints->boot_on)) {
> +               ret = regulator_resolve_supply(rdev);
> +               if (ret != 0)
> +                       rdev_dbg(rdev, "Unable to resolve supply early: %pe\n",
> +                                ERR_PTR(ret));
> +
> +               resolved_early = true;
> +       }
> +
> +       /* perform any regulator specific init */
> +       if (init_data && init_data->regulator_init) {
> +               ret = init_data->regulator_init(rdev->reg_data);
> +               if (ret < 0)
> +                       goto wash;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (config->ena_gpiod) {
> +               ret = regulator_ena_gpio_request(rdev, config);
> +               if (ret != 0) {
> +                       rdev_err(rdev, "Failed to request enable GPIO: %pe\n",
> +                                        ERR_PTR(ret));
> +                       goto wash;
> +               }
> +               /* The regulator core took over the GPIO descriptor */
> +               dangling_cfg_gpiod = false;
> +               dangling_of_gpiod = false;
> +       }
>
>         ret = set_machine_constraints(rdev);
> -       if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> +       if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER && !resolved_early) {
>                 /* Regulator might be in bypass mode and so needs its supply
>                  * to set the constraints
>                  */
> --
> 2.36.2
>
>

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-02-17 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-03 14:33 [PATCH v2] regulator: core: Resolve supply name earlier to prevent double-init Vincent Legoll
2022-08-04 10:44 ` [PATCH v3] " Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-04 10:44   ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-04 10:44   ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-15 11:17   ` Mark Brown
2022-08-15 11:17     ` Mark Brown
2022-08-15 11:17     ` Mark Brown
2022-08-18 12:46     ` [PATCH v4] " Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-18 12:46       ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-18 12:46       ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-18 15:23       ` Mark Brown
2022-08-18 15:23         ` Mark Brown
     [not found]       ` <CGME20220825113251eucas1p247c3d57de823da148ca4790975a4aba8@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2022-08-25 11:32         ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 11:32           ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 11:32           ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 12:21           ` Mark Brown
2022-08-25 12:21             ` Mark Brown
2022-08-25 12:21             ` Mark Brown
2022-08-25 14:23             ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 14:23               ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 14:23               ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-25 15:18               ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 15:18                 ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 15:18                 ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:28                 ` [PATCH v5] " Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:28                   ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:28                   ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:35                   ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:35                     ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-25 21:35                     ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-26  5:55                   ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-26  5:55                     ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-26  5:55                     ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-08-29 15:43                   ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 15:43                     ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 15:43                     ` Mark Brown
2022-08-29 17:01                     ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-29 17:01                       ` Christian Kohlschütter
2022-08-29 17:01                       ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-17 23:22                   ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2023-02-17 23:22                     ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-17 23:22                     ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-17 23:33                     ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-17 23:33                       ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-17 23:33                       ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-17 23:46                       ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-17 23:46                         ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-17 23:46                         ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-18  0:01                         ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-18  0:01                           ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-18  0:01                           ` Christian Kohlschütter
2023-02-18  0:05                           ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-18  0:05                             ` Saravana Kannan
2023-02-18  0:05                             ` Saravana Kannan
2022-08-18 15:22   ` [PATCH v3] " Mark Brown
2022-08-18 15:22     ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGETcx__Ez8i9O2O30-Q1R00xOqBjkKMCwt37_AGAQjNvZqpdg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=christian@kohlschutter.com \
    --cc=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=m.reichl@fivetechno.de \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.legoll@gmail.com \
    --cc=wens@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.