All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, khilman@baylibre.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 3/3] clk: meson: pll: switch to determine_rate for the PLL ops
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 17:10:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1j1ra2dajh.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFBinCBREyEp0gj_-ac2OccjSruULPG1m2=L5D7GEA4HoqQqLg@mail.gmail.com>


On Tue 18 May 2021 at 22:17, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jerome,
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:50 AM Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon 17 May 2021 at 22:37, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > This increases the maxmium supported frequency on 32-bit systems from
>> > 2^31 (signed long as used by clk_ops.round_rate, maximum value:
>> > approx. 2.14GHz) to 2^32 (unsigned long as used by
>> > clk_ops.determine_rate, maximum value: approx. 4.29GHz).
>> > On Meson8/8b/8m2 the HDMI PLL and it's OD (post-dividers) are
>> > capable of running at up to 2.97GHz. So switch the divider
>> > implementation in clk-regmap to clk_ops.determine_rate to support these
>> > higher frequencies on 32-bit systems.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
>>
>> Looks good. I see no reason to keep this one as RFC.
> Great, thanks for checking!
>
>> I can take it directly if this is OK with you ?
> That would be amazing.
> Obviously no objections from my side :-)
>
>
> Best regards,
> Martin

Applied then. Thx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, khilman@baylibre.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 3/3] clk: meson: pll: switch to determine_rate for the PLL ops
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 17:10:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1j1ra2dajh.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFBinCBREyEp0gj_-ac2OccjSruULPG1m2=L5D7GEA4HoqQqLg@mail.gmail.com>


On Tue 18 May 2021 at 22:17, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jerome,
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:50 AM Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon 17 May 2021 at 22:37, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > This increases the maxmium supported frequency on 32-bit systems from
>> > 2^31 (signed long as used by clk_ops.round_rate, maximum value:
>> > approx. 2.14GHz) to 2^32 (unsigned long as used by
>> > clk_ops.determine_rate, maximum value: approx. 4.29GHz).
>> > On Meson8/8b/8m2 the HDMI PLL and it's OD (post-dividers) are
>> > capable of running at up to 2.97GHz. So switch the divider
>> > implementation in clk-regmap to clk_ops.determine_rate to support these
>> > higher frequencies on 32-bit systems.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
>>
>> Looks good. I see no reason to keep this one as RFC.
> Great, thanks for checking!
>
>> I can take it directly if this is OK with you ?
> That would be amazing.
> Obviously no objections from my side :-)
>
>
> Best regards,
> Martin

Applied then. Thx

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Cc: mturquette@baylibre.com, sboyd@kernel.org,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, khilman@baylibre.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 3/3] clk: meson: pll: switch to determine_rate for the PLL ops
Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 17:10:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1j1ra2dajh.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFBinCBREyEp0gj_-ac2OccjSruULPG1m2=L5D7GEA4HoqQqLg@mail.gmail.com>


On Tue 18 May 2021 at 22:17, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Jerome,
>
> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 9:50 AM Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon 17 May 2021 at 22:37, Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > This increases the maxmium supported frequency on 32-bit systems from
>> > 2^31 (signed long as used by clk_ops.round_rate, maximum value:
>> > approx. 2.14GHz) to 2^32 (unsigned long as used by
>> > clk_ops.determine_rate, maximum value: approx. 4.29GHz).
>> > On Meson8/8b/8m2 the HDMI PLL and it's OD (post-dividers) are
>> > capable of running at up to 2.97GHz. So switch the divider
>> > implementation in clk-regmap to clk_ops.determine_rate to support these
>> > higher frequencies on 32-bit systems.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
>>
>> Looks good. I see no reason to keep this one as RFC.
> Great, thanks for checking!
>
>> I can take it directly if this is OK with you ?
> That would be amazing.
> Obviously no objections from my side :-)
>
>
> Best regards,
> Martin

Applied then. Thx

_______________________________________________
linux-amlogic mailing list
linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-amlogic

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-19 15:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-17 20:37 [PATCH RFC v1 0/3] clk: meson: rounding for fast clocks on 32-bit SoCs Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-17 20:37 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-17 20:37 ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-17 20:37 ` [PATCH RFC v1 1/3] clk: divider: Add re-usable determine_rate implementations Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-17 20:37   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-17 20:37   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-18  7:44   ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18  7:44     ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18  7:44     ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18 20:33     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-18 20:33       ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-18 20:33       ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-19 12:31       ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-19 12:31         ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-19 12:31         ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-17 20:37 ` [PATCH RFC v1 2/3] clk: meson: regmap: switch to determine_rate for the dividers Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-17 20:37   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-17 20:37   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-18  7:47   ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18  7:47     ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18  7:47     ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-17 20:37 ` [PATCH RFC v1 3/3] clk: meson: pll: switch to determine_rate for the PLL ops Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-17 20:37   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-17 20:37   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-18  7:50   ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18  7:50     ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18  7:50     ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18 20:17     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-18 20:17       ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-18 20:17       ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-19 15:10       ` Jerome Brunet [this message]
2021-05-19 15:10         ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-19 15:10         ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18  7:37 ` [PATCH RFC v1 0/3] clk: meson: rounding for fast clocks on 32-bit SoCs Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18  7:37   ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18  7:37   ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-18 20:20   ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-18 20:20     ` Martin Blumenstingl
2021-05-18 20:20     ` Martin Blumenstingl

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1j1ra2dajh.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com \
    --to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.