From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.de>
To: paul.devriendt@amd.com
Cc: pavel@ucw.cz, davej@redhat.com, mark.langsdorf@amd.com,
cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Cleanups for powernow-k8
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:08:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040114150806.GA5137@dominikbrodowski.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99F2150714F93F448942F9A9F112634C080EF3A4@txexmtae.amd.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1128 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:49:18AM -0600, paul.devriendt@amd.com wrote:
> Absolutely. I am planning on using them also in the new ACPI based driver,
> along with your acpi-perflib.
Excellent.
> What is your progress on getting acpi-perflib merged into the kernel so that
> an additional patch is not needed ?
Unfortunately, it seems to be too invasive in the form it was proposed at
first. However, I'm currently in the process of getting the same
infrastructure[*] in place by doing small, logical, incremental changes to
drivers/acpi/processor.c. The first three patches are submitted to Len Brown
[1][2][3]; I haven't received a reply from him about these patches yet.
What helps in developing this is that I finally own a notebook
which supports ACPI P-States....
Dominik
[*] or almost the same infrastructure. The first two core patches assure
that
_PPC and passive cooling work.
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=107398569012495&w=2
[2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=107398568612489&w=2
[3] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=107407671712989&w=2
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.de>
To: paul.devriendt@amd.com
Cc: davej@redhat.com, mark.langsdorf@amd.com,
cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk, pavel@ucw.cz,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Cleanups for powernow-k8
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 16:08:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040114150806.GA5137@dominikbrodowski.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <99F2150714F93F448942F9A9F112634C080EF3A4@txexmtae.amd.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1128 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 08:49:18AM -0600, paul.devriendt@amd.com wrote:
> Absolutely. I am planning on using them also in the new ACPI based driver,
> along with your acpi-perflib.
Excellent.
> What is your progress on getting acpi-perflib merged into the kernel so that
> an additional patch is not needed ?
Unfortunately, it seems to be too invasive in the form it was proposed at
first. However, I'm currently in the process of getting the same
infrastructure[*] in place by doing small, logical, incremental changes to
drivers/acpi/processor.c. The first three patches are submitted to Len Brown
[1][2][3]; I haven't received a reply from him about these patches yet.
What helps in developing this is that I finally own a notebook
which supports ACPI P-States....
Dominik
[*] or almost the same infrastructure. The first two core patches assure
that
_PPC and passive cooling work.
[1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=107398569012495&w=2
[2] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=107398568612489&w=2
[3] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=107407671712989&w=2
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 143 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Cpufreq mailing list
Cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk
http://www.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/cpufreq
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-14 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-14 14:49 Cleanups for powernow-k8 paul.devriendt
2004-01-14 14:49 ` paul.devriendt
2004-01-14 15:08 ` Dominik Brodowski [this message]
2004-01-14 15:08 ` Dominik Brodowski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-14 3:39 paul.devriendt
2004-01-14 3:39 ` paul.devriendt
2004-01-14 3:42 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-14 3:42 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-14 9:01 ` Pavel Machek
2004-01-14 9:25 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-14 9:25 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-14 9:11 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-14 9:11 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-14 2:49 paul.devriendt
2004-01-14 2:49 ` paul.devriendt
2004-01-14 3:33 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-14 3:33 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-14 10:24 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-14 10:24 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-13 22:37 paul.devriendt
2004-01-13 22:37 ` paul.devriendt
2004-01-13 23:06 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-13 23:06 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-14 9:33 ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-14 10:10 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-14 10:10 ` Dominik Brodowski
2004-01-14 15:21 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-14 0:03 ` Pavel Machek
2004-01-14 0:03 ` Pavel Machek
2004-01-14 9:17 ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-14 9:17 ` Ducrot Bruno
2004-01-13 21:51 Pavel Machek
2004-01-13 21:59 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-13 21:59 ` Dave Jones
2004-01-13 23:59 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040114150806.GA5137@dominikbrodowski.de \
--to=linux@dominikbrodowski.de \
--cc=cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.langsdorf@amd.com \
--cc=paul.devriendt@amd.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.