From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Brent Casavant <bcasavan@sgi.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use MPOL_INTERLEAVE for tmpfs files
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:01:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041103090112.GJ8907@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0411030826310.6096-100000@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 08:44:32AM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >
> > Another way might be a tmpfs mount option ... I'd prefer that to a sysctl
> > personally, but maybe others wouldn't. Hugh, is that nuts?
>
> Only nuts if I am, I was going to suggest the same: the sysctl idea seems
> very inadequate; a mount option at least allows the possibility of having
> different tmpfs files allocated with different policies at the same time.
>
> But I'm not usually qualified to comment on NUMA matters, and my tmpfs
> maintenance shouldn't be allowed to get in the way of progress. Plus
> I've barely been attending in recent days: back to normality tomorrow.
If you want to go more finegraid then you can always use numactl
or even libnuma in the application. For a quick policy decision a sysctl
is fine imho.
-Andi
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Brent Casavant <bcasavan@sgi.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use MPOL_INTERLEAVE for tmpfs files
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:01:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041103090112.GJ8907@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0411030826310.6096-100000@localhost.localdomain>
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 08:44:32AM +0000, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> >
> > Another way might be a tmpfs mount option ... I'd prefer that to a sysctl
> > personally, but maybe others wouldn't. Hugh, is that nuts?
>
> Only nuts if I am, I was going to suggest the same: the sysctl idea seems
> very inadequate; a mount option at least allows the possibility of having
> different tmpfs files allocated with different policies at the same time.
>
> But I'm not usually qualified to comment on NUMA matters, and my tmpfs
> maintenance shouldn't be allowed to get in the way of progress. Plus
> I've barely been attending in recent days: back to normality tomorrow.
If you want to go more finegraid then you can always use numactl
or even libnuma in the application. For a quick policy decision a sysctl
is fine imho.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-03 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-02 1:07 [PATCH] Use MPOL_INTERLEAVE for tmpfs files Brent Casavant
2004-11-02 1:07 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-02 1:43 ` Dave Hansen
2004-11-02 1:43 ` Dave Hansen
2004-11-02 9:13 ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-02 9:13 ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-02 15:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-02 15:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-02 15:55 ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-02 15:55 ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-02 16:55 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-02 16:55 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-02 22:17 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-02 22:17 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-02 22:51 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-02 22:51 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-03 1:12 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-03 1:12 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-03 1:30 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-03 8:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-03 8:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-03 9:01 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-11-03 9:01 ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-03 16:32 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-03 16:32 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-03 21:00 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-03 21:00 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-08 19:58 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-08 19:58 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-08 20:57 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-08 20:57 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-09 19:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-09 19:04 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-09 20:09 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-09 20:09 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-09 21:08 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-09 21:08 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-09 22:07 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-09 22:07 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-10 2:41 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-10 2:41 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-10 14:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-10 14:20 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-11 19:48 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-11 19:48 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-11 23:10 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-11 23:10 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-15 22:07 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-15 22:07 ` Brent Casavant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041103090112.GJ8907@wotan.suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bcasavan@sgi.com \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.