All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Brent Casavant <bcasavan@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	hugh@veritas.com, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use MPOL_INTERLEAVE for tmpfs files
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 17:43:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4186E62E.9000609@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.58.0411011901540.77038@kzerza.americas.sgi.com>

Brent Casavant wrote:
> This patch causes memory allocation for tmpfs files to be distributed
> evenly across NUMA machines.  In most circumstances today, tmpfs files
> will be allocated on the same node as the task writing to the file.
> In many cases, particularly when large files are created, or a large
> number of files are created by a single task, this leads to a severe
> imbalance in free memory amongst nodes.  This patch corrects that
> situation.

Why don't you just use the NUMA API in your application for this?  Won't 
this hurt any application that uses tmpfs and never leaves a node in its 
lifetime, like a short gcc run?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
To: Brent Casavant <bcasavan@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	hugh@veritas.com, ak@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use MPOL_INTERLEAVE for tmpfs files
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 17:43:10 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4186E62E.9000609@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.58.0411011901540.77038@kzerza.americas.sgi.com>

Brent Casavant wrote:
> This patch causes memory allocation for tmpfs files to be distributed
> evenly across NUMA machines.  In most circumstances today, tmpfs files
> will be allocated on the same node as the task writing to the file.
> In many cases, particularly when large files are created, or a large
> number of files are created by a single task, this leads to a severe
> imbalance in free memory amongst nodes.  This patch corrects that
> situation.

Why don't you just use the NUMA API in your application for this?  Won't 
this hurt any application that uses tmpfs and never leaves a node in its 
lifetime, like a short gcc run?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2004-11-02  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-02  1:07 [PATCH] Use MPOL_INTERLEAVE for tmpfs files Brent Casavant
2004-11-02  1:07 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-02  1:43 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2004-11-02  1:43   ` Dave Hansen
2004-11-02  9:13 ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-02  9:13   ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-02 15:46 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-02 15:46   ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-02 15:55   ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-02 15:55     ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-02 16:55     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-02 16:55       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-02 22:17       ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-02 22:17         ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-02 22:51         ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-02 22:51           ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-03  1:12           ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-03  1:12             ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-03  1:30             ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-03  8:44           ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-03  8:44             ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-03  9:01             ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-03  9:01               ` Andi Kleen
2004-11-03 16:32               ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-03 16:32                 ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-03 21:00                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-03 21:00                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-08 19:58                   ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-08 19:58                     ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-08 20:57                     ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-08 20:57                       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-09 19:04                     ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-09 19:04                       ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-09 20:09                       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-09 20:09                         ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-09 21:08                         ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-09 21:08                           ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-09 22:07                           ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-09 22:07                             ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-10  2:41                       ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-10  2:41                         ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-10 14:20                         ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-10 14:20                           ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-11 19:48                       ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-11 19:48                         ` Hugh Dickins
2004-11-11 23:10                         ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-11 23:10                           ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-15 22:07                         ` Brent Casavant
2004-11-15 22:07                           ` Brent Casavant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4186E62E.9000609@us.ibm.com \
    --to=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=bcasavan@sgi.com \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.