All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf kmem: Add more functions and show more statistics
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:49:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091124184927.GA4994@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091124100724.GA5570@elte.hu>

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:07:24AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > > 3)
> > > 
> > > it doesnt seem to be working on one of my boxes, which has perf and kmem 
> > > events as well:
> > > 
> > > aldebaran:~/linux/linux/tools/perf> perf kmem record
> > > ^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.050 MB perf.data (~2172 samples) ]
> > > 
> > 
> > Seems no kmem event is recorded. No sure what happened here.
> > 
> > Might be that the parameters that perf-kmem passes to perf-record
> > are not properly selected?
> > 
> > Do perf-sched and perf-timechart work on this box?
> 
> yeah:
> 
> aldebaran:~> perf sched record sleep 1
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.017 MB perf.data (~758 samples) ]
> aldebaran:~> perf trace | tail -5
>          distccd-20944 [010]  1792.787376: sched_stat_runtime: comm=distccd pid=20944 runtime=11196 [ns] vruntime=696395420043 [ns]
>             init-0     [009]  1792.914837: sched_stat_wait: comm=x86_64-linux-gc pid=881 delay=10686 [ns]
>             init-0     [009]  1792.915082: sched_stat_sleep: comm=events/9 pid=44 delay=2183651362 [ns]
>               as-889   [013]  1793.008008: sched_stat_runtime: comm=as pid=889 runtime=156807 [ns] vruntime=1553569219042 [ns]
>             init-0     [004]  1793.154400: sched_stat_wait: comm=events/4 pid=39 delay=12155 [ns]
> 
> aldebaran:~> perf kmem record sleep 1
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.078 MB perf.data (~3398 samples) ]
> aldebaran:~> perf trace | tail -5
> aldebaran:~> 
> 
> the perf.data has mmap and exit events - but no kmem events.
> 
> I've attached the config, in case it matters. It runs latest -tip, with 
> your latest series applied as well.
> 
> 	Ingo



I think this is a problem external to kmem events. It's about
trace events/perf in general. It looks like we have some losses.
Steve and Arjan have reported similar things.

I'll investigate this way.

Thanks.


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] perf kmem: Add more functions and show more statistics
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:49:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091124184927.GA4994@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091124100724.GA5570@elte.hu>

On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:07:24AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> 
> > > 3)
> > > 
> > > it doesnt seem to be working on one of my boxes, which has perf and kmem 
> > > events as well:
> > > 
> > > aldebaran:~/linux/linux/tools/perf> perf kmem record
> > > ^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > > [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.050 MB perf.data (~2172 samples) ]
> > > 
> > 
> > Seems no kmem event is recorded. No sure what happened here.
> > 
> > Might be that the parameters that perf-kmem passes to perf-record
> > are not properly selected?
> > 
> > Do perf-sched and perf-timechart work on this box?
> 
> yeah:
> 
> aldebaran:~> perf sched record sleep 1
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.017 MB perf.data (~758 samples) ]
> aldebaran:~> perf trace | tail -5
>          distccd-20944 [010]  1792.787376: sched_stat_runtime: comm=distccd pid=20944 runtime=11196 [ns] vruntime=696395420043 [ns]
>             init-0     [009]  1792.914837: sched_stat_wait: comm=x86_64-linux-gc pid=881 delay=10686 [ns]
>             init-0     [009]  1792.915082: sched_stat_sleep: comm=events/9 pid=44 delay=2183651362 [ns]
>               as-889   [013]  1793.008008: sched_stat_runtime: comm=as pid=889 runtime=156807 [ns] vruntime=1553569219042 [ns]
>             init-0     [004]  1793.154400: sched_stat_wait: comm=events/4 pid=39 delay=12155 [ns]
> 
> aldebaran:~> perf kmem record sleep 1
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.078 MB perf.data (~3398 samples) ]
> aldebaran:~> perf trace | tail -5
> aldebaran:~> 
> 
> the perf.data has mmap and exit events - but no kmem events.
> 
> I've attached the config, in case it matters. It runs latest -tip, with 
> your latest series applied as well.
> 
> 	Ingo



I think this is a problem external to kmem events. It's about
trace events/perf in general. It looks like we have some losses.
Steve and Arjan have reported similar things.

I'll investigate this way.

Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-11-24 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-24  5:25 [PATCH 0/5] perf kmem: Add more functions and show more statistics Li Zefan
2009-11-24  5:25 ` Li Zefan
2009-11-24  5:25 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf kmem: Add new option to show raw ip Li Zefan
2009-11-24  5:25   ` Li Zefan
2009-11-24 16:54   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Li Zefan
2009-11-24 16:54     ` tip-bot for Li Zefan
2009-11-24  5:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] perf kmem: Default to sort by fragmentation Li Zefan
2009-11-24  5:26   ` Li Zefan
2009-11-24 16:55   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Li Zefan
2009-11-24 16:55     ` tip-bot for Li Zefan
2009-11-24  5:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] perf kmem: Collect cross node allocation statistics Li Zefan
2009-11-24  5:26   ` Li Zefan
2009-11-24 16:55   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Li Zefan
2009-11-24 16:55     ` tip-bot for Li Zefan
2009-11-24  5:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf kmem: Measure kmalloc/kfree CPU ping-pong call-sites Li Zefan
2009-11-24  5:26   ` Li Zefan
2009-11-24 16:55   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Li Zefan
2009-11-24 16:55     ` tip-bot for Li Zefan
2009-11-24  5:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] perf kmem: Add help file Li Zefan
2009-11-24  5:27   ` Li Zefan
2009-11-24 16:55   ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Li Zefan
2009-11-24 16:55     ` tip-bot for Li Zefan
2009-11-24  7:15 ` [PATCH 0/5] perf kmem: Add more functions and show more statistics Pekka Enberg
2009-11-24  7:15   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-24  7:34   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24  7:34     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24  7:45     ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-24  7:45       ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-24  7:47       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24  7:47         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24  8:04     ` Li Zefan
2009-11-24  8:04       ` Li Zefan
2009-11-24  8:34       ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24  8:34         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24 14:57         ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-11-24 14:57           ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-11-24  7:18 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-24  7:18   ` Pekka Enberg
2009-11-24  9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24  9:38   ` Li Zefan
2009-11-24  9:38     ` Li Zefan
2009-11-24 10:07     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24 11:04       ` Li Zefan
2009-11-24 11:04         ` Li Zefan
2009-11-24 20:35         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24 20:35           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24 22:34           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24 22:34             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-11-24 18:49       ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2009-11-24 18:49         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-24 19:38       ` [PATCH] perf: Fix bad software/trace event recursion counting Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-24 20:36         ` [tip:perf/core] perf_events: " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
2009-11-24 20:48         ` [PATCH] perf: " Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20091124184927.GA4994@nowhere \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=eduard.munteanu@linux360.ro \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.