All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: ARM Machine SoC I/O setup and PAD initialization code
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 08:20:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20100722072034.GA6802@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100722023250.GC27663@verge.net.au>

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:32:53AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Would it be feasible to  use Linux + kexec as the boot loader as
> a long term solution to fixing boot loaders by eliminating them?

So what you're proposing is that a broken boot loader should boot a
version of Linux to fix the pin MUX, which then kexecs a kernel which
doesn't have that code?

What's the point of that - when the first kernel will be able to run
the system?

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-22  7:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-21  8:29 ARM Machine SoC I/O setup and PAD initialization code David Jander
2010-07-21  8:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22  2:32   ` Simon Horman
2010-07-22  7:20     ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-07-22  7:29       ` Simon Horman
2010-07-22  8:38         ` Magnus Damm
2010-07-22  8:49           ` Eric Miao
2010-07-22  9:01             ` Magnus Damm
2010-07-22  9:02             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22  8:46         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22  9:14           ` Simon Horman
2010-07-24 21:36         ` Grant Likely
2010-07-22  8:16       ` Magnus Damm
2010-07-22 12:10         ` David Jander
2010-07-22 12:35           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22 12:56           ` Mark Brown
2010-07-22 13:31             ` David Jander
2010-07-22 13:54               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-23 10:35                 ` David Jander
2010-07-23 13:02                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22 14:20               ` Mark Brown
2010-07-23 10:18                 ` David Jander
2010-07-23 12:57                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-23 14:17                   ` Mark Brown
2010-07-23 18:38                     ` david at protonic.nl
2010-07-23 19:59                       ` Jason McMullan
2010-07-23 21:03                       ` Robert Schwebel
2010-07-26  1:37                         ` Magnus Damm
2010-07-26  6:56                           ` Robert Schwebel
2010-07-24 18:50                       ` Mark Brown
2010-07-22 15:00               ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-07-23 10:31                 ` David Jander
2010-07-22 13:41           ` Rob Herring
2010-07-22 21:20 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20100722072034.GA6802@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.