All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: magnus.damm@gmail.com (Magnus Damm)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: ARM Machine SoC I/O setup and PAD initialization code
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2010 18:01:41 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTina_kcTLFPVhKtGidno14Yu-cPnsWYY3vaxsKP_@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinxKrFdYxfr2X1y9Tkivo3t9Ahz2hNMQDtD7emb@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 08:20:34AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:32:53AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
>>>> > Would it be feasible to ?use Linux + kexec as the boot loader as
>>>> > a long term solution to fixing boot loaders by eliminating them?
>>>>
>>>> So what you're proposing is that a broken boot loader should boot a
>>>> version of Linux to fix the pin MUX, which then kexecs a kernel which
>>>> doesn't have that code?
>>>>
>>>> What's the point of that - when the first kernel will be able to run
>>>> the system?
>>>
>>> Ok, point taken, its impossible to remove the boot loaders.
>>
>> I disagree. We already use upstream Linux as a boot loader on SuperH.
>>
>> For ARM and other architectures check out the ELC2010 presentation by
>> Greg Ungerer here:
>> http://elinux.org/images/7/7b/LinuxWithoutABootLoader.pdf
>>
>> For SH and a more zoomed our perspective have a look at my presentation:
>> http://elinux.org/images/2/2f/ELC-2010-Damm-Kexec.pdf
>>
>
> I agree with Magnus, that kernel as a bootloader is a good idea to go.
>
> And the kexecboot works awesome on my zaurus, I like that very much
> instead of flashing my device with a series of awkward steps.

Good to hear!

> Looking into shmobile, there are some specially customized _defconfig
> to support that. More _defconfig in ARM might not be a good idea, but I
> guess we can solve that in a different way though.

On SuperH (arch/sh), the multiple defconfigs are there to give users a
known working boot loader configuration. They may not be there for
long though.

To build a kernel that can be burned into the reset vector in NOR
flash on SuperH, you simply use the romImage target instead of zImage
or uImage. The romImage target makes sure low level setup code (memory
setup etc) is included in the kernel image.

I recently got MMC boot working on SuperH, so by selecting
CONFIG_ROMIMAGE_MMCIF=y you can now build a romImage that can be dd:ed
into an MMC card and booted straight by the MASK ROM. Nothing ground
breaking - but at least it's available upstream. I'd like to share
parts of that code with ARM SH-Mobile, but I still have not figured
out how to integrate it cleanly on ARM.

Cheers,

/ magnus

  reply	other threads:[~2010-07-22  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-07-21  8:29 ARM Machine SoC I/O setup and PAD initialization code David Jander
2010-07-21  8:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22  2:32   ` Simon Horman
2010-07-22  7:20     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22  7:29       ` Simon Horman
2010-07-22  8:38         ` Magnus Damm
2010-07-22  8:49           ` Eric Miao
2010-07-22  9:01             ` Magnus Damm [this message]
2010-07-22  9:02             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22  8:46         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22  9:14           ` Simon Horman
2010-07-24 21:36         ` Grant Likely
2010-07-22  8:16       ` Magnus Damm
2010-07-22 12:10         ` David Jander
2010-07-22 12:35           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22 12:56           ` Mark Brown
2010-07-22 13:31             ` David Jander
2010-07-22 13:54               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-23 10:35                 ` David Jander
2010-07-23 13:02                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-22 14:20               ` Mark Brown
2010-07-23 10:18                 ` David Jander
2010-07-23 12:57                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-07-23 14:17                   ` Mark Brown
2010-07-23 18:38                     ` david at protonic.nl
2010-07-23 19:59                       ` Jason McMullan
2010-07-23 21:03                       ` Robert Schwebel
2010-07-26  1:37                         ` Magnus Damm
2010-07-26  6:56                           ` Robert Schwebel
2010-07-24 18:50                       ` Mark Brown
2010-07-22 15:00               ` Nicolas Pitre
2010-07-23 10:31                 ` David Jander
2010-07-22 13:41           ` Rob Herring
2010-07-22 21:20 ` Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AANLkTina_kcTLFPVhKtGidno14Yu-cPnsWYY3vaxsKP_@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.