Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification

[Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>]

On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 12:39:13PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 7:54 AM, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> >On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> >>Anthony, Blue
> >> >>
> >> >>No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied?
> >> >
> >> >Does that mean everyone's happy or have folks not gotten around to
> >> >review it?
> >> >
> >> >IOW, last call if you have objections :-)
> >> >
> >>
> >> I haven't reviewed this - I trust the author and maintainers to get
> >> it right.
> >>
> >> But I notice the there is no documentation - surely some is needed?
> >>
> >
> > The patch creates Openfirmware device path from qdev
> > hierarchy. Each element of a device path depends on type of a bus
> > the device resides on. You can find various bus bindings here:
> > http://playground.sun.com/1275/bindings/ and main spec is here
> > http://forthworks.com/standards/of1275.pdf. Format in which list of
> > device paths is passed to firmware is documented by comment (it is very
> > simple). The only thing missing is command line option documentation. I
> > will add it and resend if no more changes are needed for patch to be
> > excepted.
> 
> The patches don't apply anymore due to recent changes to pcnet.c.
Will resend rebased with documentation fixes after concluding discussion
with Kevin. 

--
			Gleb.