From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:04:30 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20110210130430.GB3652@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimGa-Y6ddHknGe9Gar7+mWPuA_T2+6VL6ecfgxD@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:01:33AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Could we make the domains usage a run-time feature based on the > architecture version? For ARMv7, we need to have the vectors page > read-only anyway if the SWP emulation is enabled (and I posted a > simple patch in a reply to your email). > > The issue I see is that ARM11MPCore is reported as v7 though we still > use domains on this processor (we could always remove the domains if > TLS register is available or use some more precise architecture > version identification). We could also do the below, which I think is more logical - SWP emulation requires that CPU domains aren't enabled, so let's make that explicit in the Kconfig. arch/arm/mm/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig index c9d2d56..7ea482b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ config ARM_THUMBEE config SWP_EMULATE bool "Emulate SWP/SWPB instructions" - depends on CPU_V7 && !CPU_V6 + depends on !CPU_USE_DOMAINS && CPU_V7 && !CPU_V6 select HAVE_PROC_CPU if PROC_FS default y if SMP help
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:04:30 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20110210130430.GB3652@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw) In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimGa-Y6ddHknGe9Gar7+mWPuA_T2+6VL6ecfgxD@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:01:33AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Could we make the domains usage a run-time feature based on the > architecture version? For ARMv7, we need to have the vectors page > read-only anyway if the SWP emulation is enabled (and I posted a > simple patch in a reply to your email). > > The issue I see is that ARM11MPCore is reported as v7 though we still > use domains on this processor (we could always remove the domains if > TLS register is available or use some more precise architecture > version identification). We could also do the below, which I think is more logical - SWP emulation requires that CPU domains aren't enabled, so let's make that explicit in the Kconfig. arch/arm/mm/Kconfig | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig index c9d2d56..7ea482b 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ config ARM_THUMBEE config SWP_EMULATE bool "Emulate SWP/SWPB instructions" - depends on CPU_V7 && !CPU_V6 + depends on !CPU_USE_DOMAINS && CPU_V7 && !CPU_V6 select HAVE_PROC_CPU if PROC_FS default y if SMP help
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-10 13:04 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 254+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2011-01-17 19:20 [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:21 ` [PATCH 01/14] ARM: bitops: ensure set/clear/change bitops take a word-aligned pointer Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-18 6:00 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-18 6:00 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-18 14:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-18 14:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-18 18:20 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-18 18:20 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-18 15:11 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-01-18 15:11 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-01-25 19:50 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-25 19:50 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 19:21 ` [PATCH 02/14] ARM: bitops: switch set/clear/change bitops to use ldrex/strex Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-18 5:42 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-18 5:42 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-23 0:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-23 0:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-23 4:44 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-23 4:44 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-23 9:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-23 9:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-24 8:38 ` Poddar, Sourav 2011-01-24 8:38 ` Poddar, Sourav 2011-01-24 8:57 ` Poddar, Sourav 2011-01-24 8:57 ` Poddar, Sourav 2011-01-24 10:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-24 10:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-24 13:47 ` Poddar, Sourav 2011-01-24 13:47 ` Poddar, Sourav 2011-01-24 14:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-24 14:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-24 14:54 ` Poddar, Sourav 2011-01-24 14:54 ` Poddar, Sourav 2011-01-24 15:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-24 15:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-25 13:57 ` Will Deacon 2011-01-25 13:57 ` Will Deacon 2011-01-25 14:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-25 14:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-25 14:19 ` Will Deacon 2011-01-25 14:19 ` Will Deacon [not found] ` <000601cbbc97$cc6955d0$653c0170$%deacon@arm.com> 2011-01-25 21:38 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-25 21:38 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-25 19:51 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-25 19:51 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: v6k: remove CPU_32v6K dependencies in asm/spinlock.h Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 23:13 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 23:13 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-25 16:43 ` Dave Martin 2011-01-25 16:43 ` Dave Martin 2011-01-25 16:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-25 16:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-25 17:33 ` Dave Martin 2011-01-25 17:33 ` Dave Martin 2011-01-25 17:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-25 17:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-25 21:21 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-25 21:21 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-26 11:11 ` Dave Martin 2011-01-26 11:11 ` Dave Martin 2011-01-26 12:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-26 12:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-26 17:25 ` [PATCH] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have SMP_ON_UP fixups Dave P. Martin 2011-01-26 17:25 ` Dave P. Martin 2011-01-26 21:31 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-26 21:31 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-27 14:37 ` [PATCH v2] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have SMP_ON_UP fixups " Dave Martin 2011-01-27 14:37 ` Dave Martin 2011-01-27 16:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-27 16:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-09 14:22 ` [PATCH] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have " Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-09 14:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-10 12:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-10 12:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-10 14:11 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-10 14:11 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-10 14:13 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-10 14:13 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-10 14:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-10 14:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-10 18:29 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-10 18:29 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-10 19:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-10 19:11 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-11 9:33 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-11 9:33 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-11 10:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-11 10:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-11 10:52 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-11 10:52 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-11 16:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-11 16:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-11 16:17 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-11 16:17 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-11 16:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-11 16:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-16 16:35 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-16 16:35 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-18 17:52 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-18 17:52 ` Dave Martin 2011-01-26 15:42 ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: v6k: remove CPU_32v6K dependencies in asm/spinlock.h Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-26 15:42 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-26 15:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-26 15:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-26 16:59 ` Dave Martin 2011-01-26 16:59 ` Dave Martin 2011-01-26 21:06 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-26 21:06 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-27 11:44 ` Dave P. Martin 2011-01-27 11:44 ` Dave P. Martin 2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 04/14] ARM: v6k: introduce CPU_V6K option Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 23:14 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 23:14 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-18 10:36 ` Will Deacon 2011-01-18 10:36 ` Will Deacon 2011-01-18 11:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-18 11:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-18 13:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-18 13:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-18 15:22 ` Will Deacon 2011-01-18 15:22 ` Will Deacon 2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 05/14] ARM: v6k: Realview EB 11MPCore and PB11MPCore use V6K architecture CPUs Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: v6k: Dove platforms " Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 23:39 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-17 23:39 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 07/14] ARM: v6k: select clear exclusive code seqences according to V6 variants Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 23:15 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 23:15 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 08/14] ARM: v6k: select cmpxchg code sequences " Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 23:18 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 23:18 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: v6k: select generic atomic64 code " Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 23:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 23:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-18 10:24 ` Will Deacon 2011-01-18 10:24 ` Will Deacon 2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 10/14] ARM: v6k: select TLS register " Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 22:23 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-17 22:23 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-17 22:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 22:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 22:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 22:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-18 4:27 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-18 4:27 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-18 4:25 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-18 4:25 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-17 23:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 23:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 11/14] ARM: v6k: use CPU domain feature if we include support for arch < ARMv6K Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 22:03 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-17 22:03 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-01-17 23:23 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 23:23 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-27 18:14 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-01-27 18:14 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-01-27 18:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-27 18:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-28 9:46 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-01-28 9:46 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-01-28 9:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-28 9:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-28 10:46 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-01-28 10:46 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-01-28 11:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-28 11:06 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-28 12:25 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-01-28 12:25 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-01-28 13:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-28 13:05 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-28 13:10 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-01-28 13:10 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-01-28 13:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-28 13:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-28 13:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-28 13:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-28 15:11 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-01-28 15:11 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-01-28 16:49 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-28 16:49 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: v6k: do not disable CPU_32v6K based on platform selection Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 23:24 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 23:24 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: v6k: allow swp emulation again when ARMv7 is enabled Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 23:24 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 23:24 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: v6k: only allow SMP if we have v6k or v7 CPU Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 19:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-17 23:25 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 23:25 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 22:21 ` [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Tony Lindgren 2011-01-17 22:21 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-01-18 14:30 ` Kirill A. Shutemov 2011-01-18 14:30 ` Kirill A. Shutemov 2011-01-18 14:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-18 14:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-18 14:44 ` Kirill A. Shutemov 2011-01-18 14:44 ` Kirill A. Shutemov 2011-01-18 15:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-01-18 15:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-08 16:36 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-02-08 16:36 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-02-08 16:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-08 16:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-08 16:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-02-08 16:58 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-02-08 20:43 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-02-08 20:43 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-02-09 0:35 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-02-09 0:35 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-02-09 6:04 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-02-09 6:04 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-02-09 9:48 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-09 9:48 ` Dave Martin 2011-02-09 10:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-02-09 10:00 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-02-09 16:24 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-02-09 16:24 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-02-09 16:27 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-02-09 16:27 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2011-02-09 16:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-09 16:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-09 16:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-09 16:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-09 16:45 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-02-09 16:45 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-02-09 17:48 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-02-09 17:48 ` Tony Lindgren 2011-02-09 10:01 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-02-09 10:01 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-02-10 13:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message] 2011-02-10 13:04 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-10 13:12 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-02-10 13:12 ` Catalin Marinas 2011-02-10 13:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-10 13:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-11 20:45 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-02-11 20:45 ` Nicolas Pitre 2011-02-11 21:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2011-02-11 21:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20110210130430.GB3652@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \ --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.