All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Martin <dave.martin@linaro.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have SMP_ON_UP fixups
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:33:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim0RRw-xHQYTdHLCXCS_GXkaCiW8y9Fz=jMmwPa@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110210191125.GA12582@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 06:29:41PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 02:13:13PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
>> >> Note that this tree contains some extra patches (though I believe
>> >> nothing is there which should cause the problem), and does not contain
>> >> everything from rmk/devel -- so it's possible this has been fixed in
>> >> the meantime or no longer occurs for some other reason...
>> >
>> > No need - I now have some modules which contain SMP alternatives, so we
>> > do need to fix the module loader for this, and keep the SMP alternatives
>> > replacement code around.  It's not worth eliminating the code as if we
>> > include an informative printk() to say why we're refusing to load the
>> > module, the string would be larger than the code it eliminates.  So, I
>> > think we need to merge the patch below to avoid run-time problems.
>>
>> I thought the problem was not caused by removal of the fixup code, but
>> rather by the removal of code referenced by fixups?
>
> It is.  But:
>
> arm-linux-objdump -h sound/core/snd-timer.ko
>
> sound/core/snd-timer.ko:     file format elf32-littlearm
>
> Sections:
> Idx Name          Size      VMA       LMA       File off  Algn
>  0 .text         00002f34  00000000  00000000  00000034  2**2
>                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, CODE
>  1 .exit.text    00000070  00000000  00000000  00002f68  2**2
>                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, CODE
>  2 .init.text    000001b4  00000000  00000000  00002fd8  2**2
>                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, CODE
>  3 .rodata       000000bc  00000000  00000000  0000318c  2**2
>                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, DATA
>  4 .rodata.str1.1 00000156  00000000  00000000  00003248  2**0
>                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA
>  5 .alt.smp.init 00000088  00000000  00000000  0000339e  2**0
>                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, DATA
> ...
>
> Here we have a module which contains the spin_unlock assembly, which
> contains the SMP alternatives.  If we insert that into a kernel also
> built with SMP alternatives support, but which is running on a UP
> system, we need to run these fixups as well when the module is loaded.
>

Agreed -- actually, I suspected we might need to support this.  But I
don't think solving this problem (= keeping the fixup implementation
in memory and enhancing the module loader) solved the
fixups-referencing-sections-discarded-from-vmlinux problem.  These
seem to be two separate issues.  I am filing to understand something?

Cheers
---Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: dave.martin@linaro.org (Dave Martin)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have SMP_ON_UP fixups
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:33:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim0RRw-xHQYTdHLCXCS_GXkaCiW8y9Fz=jMmwPa@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110210191125.GA12582@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 06:29:41PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 02:13:13PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
>> >> Note that this tree contains some extra patches (though I believe
>> >> nothing is there which should cause the problem), and does not contain
>> >> everything from rmk/devel -- so it's possible this has been fixed in
>> >> the meantime or no longer occurs for some other reason...
>> >
>> > No need - I now have some modules which contain SMP alternatives, so we
>> > do need to fix the module loader for this, and keep the SMP alternatives
>> > replacement code around. ?It's not worth eliminating the code as if we
>> > include an informative printk() to say why we're refusing to load the
>> > module, the string would be larger than the code it eliminates. ?So, I
>> > think we need to merge the patch below to avoid run-time problems.
>>
>> I thought the problem was not caused by removal of the fixup code, but
>> rather by the removal of code referenced by fixups?
>
> It is. ?But:
>
> arm-linux-objdump -h sound/core/snd-timer.ko
>
> sound/core/snd-timer.ko: ? ? file format elf32-littlearm
>
> Sections:
> Idx Name ? ? ? ? ?Size ? ? ?VMA ? ? ? LMA ? ? ? File off ?Algn
> ?0 .text ? ? ? ? 00002f34 ?00000000 ?00000000 ?00000034 ?2**2
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, CODE
> ?1 .exit.text ? ?00000070 ?00000000 ?00000000 ?00002f68 ?2**2
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, CODE
> ?2 .init.text ? ?000001b4 ?00000000 ?00000000 ?00002fd8 ?2**2
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, CODE
> ?3 .rodata ? ? ? 000000bc ?00000000 ?00000000 ?0000318c ?2**2
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, DATA
> ?4 .rodata.str1.1 00000156 ?00000000 ?00000000 ?00003248 ?2**0
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, DATA
> ?5 .alt.smp.init 00000088 ?00000000 ?00000000 ?0000339e ?2**0
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, RELOC, READONLY, DATA
> ...
>
> Here we have a module which contains the spin_unlock assembly, which
> contains the SMP alternatives. ?If we insert that into a kernel also
> built with SMP alternatives support, but which is running on a UP
> system, we need to run these fixups as well when the module is loaded.
>

Agreed -- actually, I suspected we might need to support this.  But I
don't think solving this problem (= keeping the fixup implementation
in memory and enhancing the module loader) solved the
fixups-referencing-sections-discarded-from-vmlinux problem.  These
seem to be two separate issues.  I am filing to understand something?

Cheers
---Dave

  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-11  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 254+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-17 19:20 [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:20 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:21 ` [PATCH 01/14] ARM: bitops: ensure set/clear/change bitops take a word-aligned pointer Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:21   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18  6:00   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18  6:00     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18 14:30     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 14:30       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 18:20       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18 18:20         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18 15:11     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-18 15:11       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-25 19:50   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-25 19:50     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:21 ` [PATCH 02/14] ARM: bitops: switch set/clear/change bitops to use ldrex/strex Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:21   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18  5:42   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18  5:42     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-23  0:16   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-23  0:16     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-23  4:44     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-23  4:44       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-23  9:35       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-23  9:35         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24  8:38         ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24  8:38           ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24  8:57           ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24  8:57             ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 10:28             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 10:28               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 13:47               ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 13:47                 ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 14:11                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 14:11                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 14:54                   ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 14:54                     ` Poddar, Sourav
2011-01-24 15:00                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-24 15:00                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 13:57     ` Will Deacon
2011-01-25 13:57     ` Will Deacon
2011-01-25 14:11       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 14:11         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 14:19         ` Will Deacon
2011-01-25 14:19         ` Will Deacon
     [not found]     ` <000601cbbc97$cc6955d0$653c0170$%deacon@arm.com>
2011-01-25 21:38       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-25 21:38         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-25 19:51   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-25 19:51     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: v6k: remove CPU_32v6K dependencies in asm/spinlock.h Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:22   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:13   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:13     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-25 16:43   ` Dave Martin
2011-01-25 16:43     ` Dave Martin
2011-01-25 16:59     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 16:59       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 17:33       ` Dave Martin
2011-01-25 17:33         ` Dave Martin
2011-01-25 17:46         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 17:46           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-25 21:21           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-25 21:21             ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 11:11             ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 11:11               ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 12:44               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-26 12:44                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-26 17:25                 ` [PATCH] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have SMP_ON_UP fixups Dave P. Martin
2011-01-26 17:25                   ` Dave P. Martin
2011-01-26 21:31                   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 21:31                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-27 14:37                     ` [PATCH v2] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have SMP_ON_UP fixups " Dave Martin
2011-01-27 14:37                       ` Dave Martin
2011-01-27 16:46                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-27 16:46                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 14:22                   ` [PATCH] ARM: Avoid discarding sections that might have " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 14:22                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 12:56                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 12:56                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 14:11                       ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 14:11                         ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 14:13                         ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 14:13                           ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 14:46                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 14:46                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 18:29                             ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 18:29                               ` Dave Martin
2011-02-10 19:11                               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 19:11                                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11  9:33                                 ` Dave Martin [this message]
2011-02-11  9:33                                   ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 10:13                                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 10:13                                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 10:52                                     ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 10:52                                       ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 16:05                                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 16:05                                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 16:17                                         ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 16:17                                           ` Dave Martin
2011-02-11 16:32                                           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 16:32                                             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-16 16:35                                             ` Dave Martin
2011-02-16 16:35                                               ` Dave Martin
2011-02-18 17:52                                               ` Dave Martin
2011-02-18 17:52                                                 ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 15:42               ` [PATCH 03/14] ARM: v6k: remove CPU_32v6K dependencies in asm/spinlock.h Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 15:42                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 15:52                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-26 15:52                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-26 16:59                   ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 16:59                     ` Dave Martin
2011-01-26 21:06                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-26 21:06                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-27 11:44                       ` Dave P. Martin
2011-01-27 11:44                         ` Dave P. Martin
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 04/14] ARM: v6k: introduce CPU_V6K option Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:22   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:14   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:14     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 10:36   ` Will Deacon
2011-01-18 10:36   ` Will Deacon
2011-01-18 11:09     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 11:09       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 13:35       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 13:35         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 15:22         ` Will Deacon
2011-01-18 15:22         ` Will Deacon
2011-01-17 19:22 ` [PATCH 05/14] ARM: v6k: Realview EB 11MPCore and PB11MPCore use V6K architecture CPUs Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:22   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 06/14] ARM: v6k: Dove platforms " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:23   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:39   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 23:39     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 07/14] ARM: v6k: select clear exclusive code seqences according to V6 variants Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:23   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:15   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:15     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:23 ` [PATCH 08/14] ARM: v6k: select cmpxchg code sequences " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:23   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:18   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:18     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 09/14] ARM: v6k: select generic atomic64 code " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:24   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:21   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:21     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 10:24   ` Will Deacon
2011-01-18 10:24   ` Will Deacon
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 10/14] ARM: v6k: select TLS register " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:24   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:23   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 22:23     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 22:36     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:36       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:52       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:52         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18  4:27         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18  4:27           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18  4:25       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-18  4:25         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 23:21     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:21       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:24 ` [PATCH 11/14] ARM: v6k: use CPU domain feature if we include support for arch < ARMv6K Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:24   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 22:03   ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 22:03     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-01-17 23:23     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:23       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-27 18:14   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-27 18:14     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-27 18:59     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-27 18:59       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28  9:46       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28  9:46         ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28  9:59         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28  9:59           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 10:46           ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 10:46             ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 11:06             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 11:06               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 12:25               ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 12:25                 ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 13:05                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:05                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:10                   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 13:10                     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 13:22                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:22                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:21                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 13:21                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-28 15:11                   ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 15:11                     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-01-28 16:49                     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-28 16:49                       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 12/14] ARM: v6k: do not disable CPU_32v6K based on platform selection Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:25   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:24   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:24     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 13/14] ARM: v6k: allow swp emulation again when ARMv7 is enabled Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:25   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:24   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:24     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 19:25 ` [PATCH 14/14] ARM: v6k: only allow SMP if we have v6k or v7 CPU Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 19:25   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-17 23:25   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 23:25     ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 22:21 ` [PATCH 00/14] Fix issues with ARMv6+v6k+v7 kernels Tony Lindgren
2011-01-17 22:21   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-01-18 14:30 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-01-18 14:30   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-01-18 14:40   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 14:40     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 14:44     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-01-18 14:44       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2011-01-18 15:01       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-01-18 15:01         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-08 16:36 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08 16:36   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08 16:47   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-08 16:47     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-08 16:58     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08 16:58       ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-08 20:43       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-08 20:43         ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-09  0:35         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09  0:35           ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09  6:04           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09  6:04             ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09  9:48             ` Dave Martin
2011-02-09  9:48               ` Dave Martin
2011-02-09 10:00               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 10:00                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 16:24                 ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 16:24                   ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 16:27                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 16:27                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2011-02-09 16:32                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 16:32                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 16:44                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 16:44                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-09 16:45                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-09 16:45                       ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-09 17:48                       ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 17:48                         ` Tony Lindgren
2011-02-09 10:01     ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-09 10:01       ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-10 13:04       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 13:04         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 13:12         ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-10 13:12           ` Catalin Marinas
2011-02-10 13:16           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-10 13:16             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 20:45           ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-11 20:45             ` Nicolas Pitre
2011-02-11 21:07             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-11 21:07               ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTim0RRw-xHQYTdHLCXCS_GXkaCiW8y9Fz=jMmwPa@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dave.martin@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.