All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
	Russ Dill <russ.dill@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] OMAP2+: UART: Add mechanism to probe uart pins and configure rx wakeup
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:11:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120410161136.GF6487@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334065246-21294-3-git-send-email-govindraj.raja@ti.com>

* Govindraj.R <govindraj.raja@ti.com> [120410 06:44]:
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
> @@ -120,11 +120,63 @@ static void omap_uart_set_smartidle(struct platform_device *pdev) {}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_MUX
> -static void omap_serial_fill_default_pads(struct omap_board_data *bdata)
> +
> +#define OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN	28
> +static char rx_pad_name[OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN],
> +		tx_pad_name[OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN] __initdata;
> +static struct omap_device_pad default_omap_uart_pads[2] __initdata;

Won't the default_omap_uart_pads get overwritten for each port?
We need that information in the driver too for each port? Why don't you
just allocate bdata.pads in omap_serial_board_init as we now assume it's
needed for each port?

> +static void  __init omap_serial_fill_default_pads(struct omap_board_data *bdata)
>  {
> +	struct omap_mux_partition *tx_partition = NULL, *rx_partition = NULL;
> +	struct omap_mux *rx_mux = NULL, *tx_mux = NULL;
> +
> +	if (bdata->id != 2) {
> +		snprintf(rx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN,
> +			 "uart%d_rx.uart%d_rx", bdata->id + 1, bdata->id + 1);
> +		snprintf(tx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN,
> +			 "uart%d_tx.uart%d_tx", bdata->id + 1, bdata->id + 1);
> +	} else {
> +		snprintf(rx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN,
> +			"uart%d_rx_irrx.uart%d_rx_irrx", bdata->id + 1,
> +			bdata->id + 1);
> +		snprintf(tx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN,
> +			"uart%d_tx_irtx.uart%d_tx_irtx", bdata->id + 1,
> +			bdata->id + 1);
> +	}

This would be simpler with something like this (untested):

	char *rx_fmt, *tx_fmt;
	int uart_nr = bdata->id + 1;

	if (bdata->id == 2) {
		rx_fmt = "uart%d_rx.uart%d_rx";
		tx_fmt = "uart%d_tx.uart%d_tx";
        } else {
		rx_fmt = "uart%d_rx_irrx.uart%d_rx_irrx";
		tx_fmt = "uart%d_tx_irtx.uart%d_tx_irtx";
        }

	snprintf(rx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN, rx_fmt,
			uart_nr, uart_nr);
	snprintf(tx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN, tx_fmt,
			uart_nr, uart_nr);

> +	if (omap_mux_get_by_name(rx_pad_name, &rx_partition, &rx_mux) >= 0 &&
> +			omap_mux_get_by_name
> +				(tx_pad_name, &tx_partition, &tx_mux) >= 0) {
> +		u16 tx_mode, rx_mode;
> +
> +		tx_mode = omap_mux_read(tx_partition, tx_mux->reg_offset);
> +		rx_mode = omap_mux_read(rx_partition, rx_mux->reg_offset);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Check if uart is used in default tx/rx mode i.e. in mux mode0
> +		 * if yes then configure rx pin for wake up capability
> +		 */
> +		if (!(rx_mode & 0x07) && !(tx_mode & 0x07)) {
> +			default_omap_uart_pads[0].name = rx_pad_name;
> +			default_omap_uart_pads[0].flags  =
> +				OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_REMUX | OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_WAKEUP;
> +			default_omap_uart_pads[0].enable = OMAP_PIN_INPUT |
> +								OMAP_MUX_MODE0;
> +			default_omap_uart_pads[0].idle = OMAP_PIN_INPUT |
> +								OMAP_MUX_MODE0;
> +
> +			default_omap_uart_pads[1].name = tx_pad_name;
> +			default_omap_uart_pads[1].enable = OMAP_PIN_OUTPUT |
> +								OMAP_MUX_MODE0;
> +			bdata->pads = default_omap_uart_pads;
> +			bdata->pads_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(default_omap_uart_pads);
> +		}
> +	}
>  }

Then looking at omap_serial_board_init, it still looks wrong:

void __init omap_serial_board_init(struct omap_uart_port_info *info)
{
	struct omap_uart_state *uart;
	struct omap_board_data bdata;

	list_for_each_entry(uart, &uart_list, node) {
		bdata.id = uart->num;
		bdata.flags = 0;
		bdata.pads = NULL;
		bdata.pads_cnt = 0;

		if (cpu_is_omap44xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx())
			omap_serial_fill_default_pads(&bdata);

Why don't you fill the pads for omap2? It has the same pads, although
it does not have the serial wake-up events working.

And why don't you exit if omap_serial_fill_default_pads fails for the
no info case?

Shouldn't it be something like:

		if (!info) {
			res = omap_serial_fill_default_pads(&bdata);
			if (!res)
				return;
			port = NULL;
		} else {
			port = &info[uart->num];		
		}
		omap_serial_init_port(&bdata, port);

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] OMAP2+: UART: Add mechanism to probe uart pins and configure rx wakeup
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:11:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120410161136.GF6487@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334065246-21294-3-git-send-email-govindraj.raja@ti.com>

* Govindraj.R <govindraj.raja@ti.com> [120410 06:44]:
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c
> @@ -120,11 +120,63 @@ static void omap_uart_set_smartidle(struct platform_device *pdev) {}
>  #endif /* CONFIG_PM */
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_OMAP_MUX
> -static void omap_serial_fill_default_pads(struct omap_board_data *bdata)
> +
> +#define OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN	28
> +static char rx_pad_name[OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN],
> +		tx_pad_name[OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN] __initdata;
> +static struct omap_device_pad default_omap_uart_pads[2] __initdata;

Won't the default_omap_uart_pads get overwritten for each port?
We need that information in the driver too for each port? Why don't you
just allocate bdata.pads in omap_serial_board_init as we now assume it's
needed for each port?

> +static void  __init omap_serial_fill_default_pads(struct omap_board_data *bdata)
>  {
> +	struct omap_mux_partition *tx_partition = NULL, *rx_partition = NULL;
> +	struct omap_mux *rx_mux = NULL, *tx_mux = NULL;
> +
> +	if (bdata->id != 2) {
> +		snprintf(rx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN,
> +			 "uart%d_rx.uart%d_rx", bdata->id + 1, bdata->id + 1);
> +		snprintf(tx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN,
> +			 "uart%d_tx.uart%d_tx", bdata->id + 1, bdata->id + 1);
> +	} else {
> +		snprintf(rx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN,
> +			"uart%d_rx_irrx.uart%d_rx_irrx", bdata->id + 1,
> +			bdata->id + 1);
> +		snprintf(tx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN,
> +			"uart%d_tx_irtx.uart%d_tx_irtx", bdata->id + 1,
> +			bdata->id + 1);
> +	}

This would be simpler with something like this (untested):

	char *rx_fmt, *tx_fmt;
	int uart_nr = bdata->id + 1;

	if (bdata->id == 2) {
		rx_fmt = "uart%d_rx.uart%d_rx";
		tx_fmt = "uart%d_tx.uart%d_tx";
        } else {
		rx_fmt = "uart%d_rx_irrx.uart%d_rx_irrx";
		tx_fmt = "uart%d_tx_irtx.uart%d_tx_irtx";
        }

	snprintf(rx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN, rx_fmt,
			uart_nr, uart_nr);
	snprintf(tx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN, tx_fmt,
			uart_nr, uart_nr);

> +	if (omap_mux_get_by_name(rx_pad_name, &rx_partition, &rx_mux) >= 0 &&
> +			omap_mux_get_by_name
> +				(tx_pad_name, &tx_partition, &tx_mux) >= 0) {
> +		u16 tx_mode, rx_mode;
> +
> +		tx_mode = omap_mux_read(tx_partition, tx_mux->reg_offset);
> +		rx_mode = omap_mux_read(rx_partition, rx_mux->reg_offset);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Check if uart is used in default tx/rx mode i.e. in mux mode0
> +		 * if yes then configure rx pin for wake up capability
> +		 */
> +		if (!(rx_mode & 0x07) && !(tx_mode & 0x07)) {
> +			default_omap_uart_pads[0].name = rx_pad_name;
> +			default_omap_uart_pads[0].flags  =
> +				OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_REMUX | OMAP_DEVICE_PAD_WAKEUP;
> +			default_omap_uart_pads[0].enable = OMAP_PIN_INPUT |
> +								OMAP_MUX_MODE0;
> +			default_omap_uart_pads[0].idle = OMAP_PIN_INPUT |
> +								OMAP_MUX_MODE0;
> +
> +			default_omap_uart_pads[1].name = tx_pad_name;
> +			default_omap_uart_pads[1].enable = OMAP_PIN_OUTPUT |
> +								OMAP_MUX_MODE0;
> +			bdata->pads = default_omap_uart_pads;
> +			bdata->pads_cnt = ARRAY_SIZE(default_omap_uart_pads);
> +		}
> +	}
>  }

Then looking at omap_serial_board_init, it still looks wrong:

void __init omap_serial_board_init(struct omap_uart_port_info *info)
{
	struct omap_uart_state *uart;
	struct omap_board_data bdata;

	list_for_each_entry(uart, &uart_list, node) {
		bdata.id = uart->num;
		bdata.flags = 0;
		bdata.pads = NULL;
		bdata.pads_cnt = 0;

		if (cpu_is_omap44xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx())
			omap_serial_fill_default_pads(&bdata);

Why don't you fill the pads for omap2? It has the same pads, although
it does not have the serial wake-up events working.

And why don't you exit if omap_serial_fill_default_pads fails for the
no info case?

Shouldn't it be something like:

		if (!info) {
			res = omap_serial_fill_default_pads(&bdata);
			if (!res)
				return;
			port = NULL;
		} else {
			port = &info[uart->num];		
		}
		omap_serial_init_port(&bdata, port);

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-10 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-10 13:40 [PATCH 0/2] OMAP2+: UART: Fix usage of default mux pads Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 13:40 ` Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 13:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] OMAP2+: UART: Fix incorrect population of default uart pads Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 13:40   ` Govindraj.R
2012-04-11 20:14   ` Russ Dill
2012-04-11 20:14     ` Russ Dill
2012-04-13 23:14   ` Russ Dill
2012-04-13 23:14     ` Russ Dill
2012-04-17 17:50     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-17 17:50       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-23 23:45   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-23 23:45     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-24  8:38     ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-24  8:38       ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-05-04 17:24       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-04 17:24         ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-07 17:39         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-07 17:39           ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-07 17:54           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-07 17:54             ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-10 13:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] OMAP2+: UART: Add mechanism to probe uart pins and configure rx wakeup Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 13:40   ` Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 16:11   ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-04-10 16:11     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-10 16:40     ` Russ Dill
2012-04-10 16:40       ` Russ Dill
2012-04-11 11:50     ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-11 11:50       ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-11 20:16       ` Russ Dill
2012-04-11 20:16         ` Russ Dill
2012-04-13 23:39       ` Russ Dill
2012-04-13 23:39         ` Russ Dill
2012-04-17  1:41       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-17  1:41         ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-17 12:47         ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-17 12:47           ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-17 17:47           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-17 17:47             ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120410161136.GF6487@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=govindraj.raja@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=russ.dill@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.