All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Raja, Govindraj" <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
	Russ Dill <russ.dill@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] OMAP2+: UART: Add mechanism to probe uart pins and configure rx wakeup
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:17:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMrsUd+v-qhVPLbJp1ecE2+e5ayJAQrAzALr1sviH9RDJv3aMg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120417014103.GA21106@atomide.com>

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Few more comments below.
>
> * Raja, Govindraj <govindraj.raja@ti.com> [120411 04:53]:
> ...
>
>> +static int  __init omap_serial_fill_default_pads(struct omap_board_data *bdata,
>> +                                             struct omap_uart_state *uart)
>> +{
>> +     struct omap_mux_partition *tx_partition = NULL, *rx_partition = NULL;
>> +     struct omap_mux *rx_mux = NULL, *tx_mux = NULL;
>> +     char *rx_fmt, *tx_fmt;
>> +     int uart_nr = bdata->id + 1;
>> +
>> +     if (bdata->id != 2) {
>> +             rx_fmt = "uart%d_rx.uart%d_rx";
>> +             tx_fmt = "uart%d_tx.uart%d_tx";
>> +     } else {
>> +             rx_fmt = "uart%d_rx_irrx.uart%d_rx_irrx";
>> +             tx_fmt = "uart%d_tx_irtx.uart%d_tx_irtx";
>> +     }
>> +
>> +     snprintf(rx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN, rx_fmt,
>> +                     uart_nr, uart_nr);
>> +     snprintf(tx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN, tx_fmt,
>> +                     uart_nr, uart_nr);
>
> This naming won't work for the fourth port on 3630 as there are no "uart4_rx"
> or "uart4_tx" mux entries, they are "gpmc_wait2.uart4_tx" and
> "gpmc_wait3.uart4_tx".

But uart4 is unused on 3630 boards and boards trying to use them
should configure them from board file.
(I thought we agreed on this approach where only if uarts are
available in mux mode0 those ports will be dynamically muxed for wakeup
others should use omap_serial_init_port)

>
>> @@ -289,8 +354,8 @@ void __init omap_serial_board_init(struct
>> omap_uart_port_info *info)
>>               bdata.pads = NULL;
>>               bdata.pads_cnt = 0;
>>
>> -             if (cpu_is_omap44xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> -                     omap_serial_fill_default_pads(&bdata);
>> +             if (omap_serial_fill_default_pads(&bdata, uart))
>> +                     continue;
>>
>>               if (!info)
>>                       omap_serial_init_port(&bdata, NULL);
>
> Can't the omap_serial_board_init() now be just be omap_serial_init(void)
> as it's not used anywhere else?

Yes sure we can remove that.

>
> Anyways, this is getting too complex for the -rc series as at least 2430sdp
> is using alternative pins for the first uart. Let's patch to remove just
> the uart4 entry for 3630 for the -rc and then we can properly fix this
> for the next merge window.

Okay. in that case the earlier patch [1] should be fine to solve the
gpmc issue observed
and ehci issue on beagle-xm.

--
Thanks,
Govindraj.R

[1]:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-March/090961.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: govindraj.raja@ti.com (Raja, Govindraj)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] OMAP2+: UART: Add mechanism to probe uart pins and configure rx wakeup
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:17:19 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMrsUd+v-qhVPLbJp1ecE2+e5ayJAQrAzALr1sviH9RDJv3aMg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120417014103.GA21106@atomide.com>

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Few more comments below.
>
> * Raja, Govindraj <govindraj.raja@ti.com> [120411 04:53]:
> ...
>
>> +static int ?__init omap_serial_fill_default_pads(struct omap_board_data *bdata,
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? struct omap_uart_state *uart)
>> +{
>> + ? ? struct omap_mux_partition *tx_partition = NULL, *rx_partition = NULL;
>> + ? ? struct omap_mux *rx_mux = NULL, *tx_mux = NULL;
>> + ? ? char *rx_fmt, *tx_fmt;
>> + ? ? int uart_nr = bdata->id + 1;
>> +
>> + ? ? if (bdata->id != 2) {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? rx_fmt = "uart%d_rx.uart%d_rx";
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? tx_fmt = "uart%d_tx.uart%d_tx";
>> + ? ? } else {
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? rx_fmt = "uart%d_rx_irrx.uart%d_rx_irrx";
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? tx_fmt = "uart%d_tx_irtx.uart%d_tx_irtx";
>> + ? ? }
>> +
>> + ? ? snprintf(rx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN, rx_fmt,
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? uart_nr, uart_nr);
>> + ? ? snprintf(tx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN, tx_fmt,
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? uart_nr, uart_nr);
>
> This naming won't work for the fourth port on 3630 as there are no "uart4_rx"
> or "uart4_tx" mux entries, they are "gpmc_wait2.uart4_tx" and
> "gpmc_wait3.uart4_tx".

But uart4 is unused on 3630 boards and boards trying to use them
should configure them from board file.
(I thought we agreed on this approach where only if uarts are
available in mux mode0 those ports will be dynamically muxed for wakeup
others should use omap_serial_init_port)

>
>> @@ -289,8 +354,8 @@ void __init omap_serial_board_init(struct
>> omap_uart_port_info *info)
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? bdata.pads = NULL;
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? bdata.pads_cnt = 0;
>>
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? if (cpu_is_omap44xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx())
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? omap_serial_fill_default_pads(&bdata);
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? if (omap_serial_fill_default_pads(&bdata, uart))
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? continue;
>>
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (!info)
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? omap_serial_init_port(&bdata, NULL);
>
> Can't the omap_serial_board_init() now be just be omap_serial_init(void)
> as it's not used anywhere else?

Yes sure we can remove that.

>
> Anyways, this is getting too complex for the -rc series as at least 2430sdp
> is using alternative pins for the first uart. Let's patch to remove just
> the uart4 entry for 3630 for the -rc and then we can properly fix this
> for the next merge window.

Okay. in that case the earlier patch [1] should be fine to solve the
gpmc issue observed
and ehci issue on beagle-xm.

--
Thanks,
Govindraj.R

[1]:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-March/090961.html

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-17 12:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-10 13:40 [PATCH 0/2] OMAP2+: UART: Fix usage of default mux pads Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 13:40 ` Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 13:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] OMAP2+: UART: Fix incorrect population of default uart pads Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 13:40   ` Govindraj.R
2012-04-11 20:14   ` Russ Dill
2012-04-11 20:14     ` Russ Dill
2012-04-13 23:14   ` Russ Dill
2012-04-13 23:14     ` Russ Dill
2012-04-17 17:50     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-17 17:50       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-23 23:45   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-23 23:45     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-24  8:38     ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-24  8:38       ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-05-04 17:24       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-04 17:24         ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-07 17:39         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-07 17:39           ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-07 17:54           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-07 17:54             ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-10 13:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] OMAP2+: UART: Add mechanism to probe uart pins and configure rx wakeup Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 13:40   ` Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 16:11   ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-10 16:11     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-10 16:40     ` Russ Dill
2012-04-10 16:40       ` Russ Dill
2012-04-11 11:50     ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-11 11:50       ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-11 20:16       ` Russ Dill
2012-04-11 20:16         ` Russ Dill
2012-04-13 23:39       ` Russ Dill
2012-04-13 23:39         ` Russ Dill
2012-04-17  1:41       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-17  1:41         ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-17 12:47         ` Raja, Govindraj [this message]
2012-04-17 12:47           ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-17 17:47           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-17 17:47             ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMrsUd+v-qhVPLbJp1ecE2+e5ayJAQrAzALr1sviH9RDJv3aMg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=govindraj.raja@ti.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=russ.dill@gmail.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.