All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: "Raja, Govindraj" <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, Russ Dill <russ.dill@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] OMAP2+: UART: Fix incorrect population of default uart pads
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 10:24:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120504172417.GE5613@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMrsUdKnDaO7qV2NpNvTb3QdO-XeM_PF645Mc43RozFVex71hQ@mail.gmail.com>

* Raja, Govindraj <govindraj.raja@ti.com> [120424 01:41]:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote:
> > "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com> writes:
> >
> >> From: "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
> >>
> >> The following commit:
> >> (7496ba3  ARM: OMAP2+: UART: Add default mux for all uarts)
> >> added default pads for all uarts. But not all boards tend to
> >> use all uarts and most of unused uart pins are muxed for
> >> other purpose. This commit breaks the modules which where trying
> >> to use unused uart pins on their boards.
> >>
> >> So remove the default pads adding.
> >
> > I just noticed that this patch breaks runtime PM & wakeups for UART
> > console (at least on 3530/Overo with ttyO2 console.)
> >
> > By removing the pads, the initial device_init_wakeup() is not called on
> > port init.  Without this call serial_omap_pm() disables runtime PM
> > because it checks device_may_wakeup().
> >
> > Since runtime PM was disabled, I manually re-enabled it and then enabled
> > wakeups:
> >
> >  echo auto > /sys/devices/platform/omap_uart.2/power/control
> >  echo enabled > /sys/devices/platform/omap_uart.2/tty/ttyO2/power/wakeup
> >
> > Then, after enabling auto-suspend timeouts, it seems wakeups are still
> > not working since the console hangs.
> >
> > Reverting $SUBJECT patch gets things working again.
> 
> This was decided as part of discussion [1]
> 
> If we are _reconsidering_ taking this patch [2]
> to dynamically probe uart pins and enable rx wakeup.
> 
> I can re-work on the patch[2] as per tony's comments[1]
> and re-post it.
 
Just to follow up on this.. Let's first get things working reliably,
and only then add more PM support.

We absolutely can't revert $SUBJECT because it's known to mess up
at least smsc911x and ehci on zoom3, hsi on n900 and probably
many other things.

For the -rc cycle, it seems that [2] is out of question at this point
as too intrusive. If the PM & wakeups are broken in the default cases,
then I suggest we just take few steps back and disable any deeper PM
states in the -rc series.

Regards,

Tony

 
> [1]:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg68226.html
> 
> [2]:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg67822.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] OMAP2+: UART: Fix incorrect population of default uart pads
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 10:24:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120504172417.GE5613@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMrsUdKnDaO7qV2NpNvTb3QdO-XeM_PF645Mc43RozFVex71hQ@mail.gmail.com>

* Raja, Govindraj <govindraj.raja@ti.com> [120424 01:41]:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> wrote:
> > "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com> writes:
> >
> >> From: "Govindraj.R" <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
> >>
> >> The following commit:
> >> (7496ba3 ?ARM: OMAP2+: UART: Add default mux for all uarts)
> >> added default pads for all uarts. But not all boards tend to
> >> use all uarts and most of unused uart pins are muxed for
> >> other purpose. This commit breaks the modules which where trying
> >> to use unused uart pins on their boards.
> >>
> >> So remove the default pads adding.
> >
> > I just noticed that this patch breaks runtime PM & wakeups for UART
> > console (at least on 3530/Overo with ttyO2 console.)
> >
> > By removing the pads, the initial device_init_wakeup() is not called on
> > port init. ?Without this call serial_omap_pm() disables runtime PM
> > because it checks device_may_wakeup().
> >
> > Since runtime PM was disabled, I manually re-enabled it and then enabled
> > wakeups:
> >
> > ?echo auto > /sys/devices/platform/omap_uart.2/power/control
> > ?echo enabled > /sys/devices/platform/omap_uart.2/tty/ttyO2/power/wakeup
> >
> > Then, after enabling auto-suspend timeouts, it seems wakeups are still
> > not working since the console hangs.
> >
> > Reverting $SUBJECT patch gets things working again.
> 
> This was decided as part of discussion [1]
> 
> If we are _reconsidering_ taking this patch [2]
> to dynamically probe uart pins and enable rx wakeup.
> 
> I can re-work on the patch[2] as per tony's comments[1]
> and re-post it.
 
Just to follow up on this.. Let's first get things working reliably,
and only then add more PM support.

We absolutely can't revert $SUBJECT because it's known to mess up
at least smsc911x and ehci on zoom3, hsi on n900 and probably
many other things.

For the -rc cycle, it seems that [2] is out of question at this point
as too intrusive. If the PM & wakeups are broken in the default cases,
then I suggest we just take few steps back and disable any deeper PM
states in the -rc series.

Regards,

Tony

 
> [1]:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg68226.html
> 
> [2]:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg67822.html

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-04 17:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-10 13:40 [PATCH 0/2] OMAP2+: UART: Fix usage of default mux pads Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 13:40 ` Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 13:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] OMAP2+: UART: Fix incorrect population of default uart pads Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 13:40   ` Govindraj.R
2012-04-11 20:14   ` Russ Dill
2012-04-11 20:14     ` Russ Dill
2012-04-13 23:14   ` Russ Dill
2012-04-13 23:14     ` Russ Dill
2012-04-17 17:50     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-17 17:50       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-23 23:45   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-23 23:45     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-24  8:38     ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-24  8:38       ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-05-04 17:24       ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-05-04 17:24         ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-07 17:39         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-07 17:39           ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-07 17:54           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-07 17:54             ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-10 13:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] OMAP2+: UART: Add mechanism to probe uart pins and configure rx wakeup Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 13:40   ` Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 16:11   ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-10 16:11     ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-10 16:40     ` Russ Dill
2012-04-10 16:40       ` Russ Dill
2012-04-11 11:50     ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-11 11:50       ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-11 20:16       ` Russ Dill
2012-04-11 20:16         ` Russ Dill
2012-04-13 23:39       ` Russ Dill
2012-04-13 23:39         ` Russ Dill
2012-04-17  1:41       ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-17  1:41         ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-17 12:47         ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-17 12:47           ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-17 17:47           ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-17 17:47             ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120504172417.GE5613@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=govindraj.raja@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=russ.dill@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.