From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@freescale.com>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Add a generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:20:52 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20120731042050.GF762@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20120730185344.GT4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 07:53:45PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > Quite honestly this seems totally unrealistic for the majority of users, I doubt that. Searching drivers/cpufreq folder, I can see there are several cpufreq drivers scaling voltage with regulator API, but none of them is calling regulator_set_voltage_time to find voltage latency. That said, all these users are specify transition latency on their own. > especially given the very poor documentation for this stuff which SoC > vendors typically provide. It's a reasonable amount of work to go back > and figure this stuff out (especially given that it should be varying > depending on the transition in question), and it's going to give us a > bunch of magic numbers in people's bindings. > There will be only one magic number, and it can easily become "magic" with some comments put there. > No, add a new API. > Is the following patch what you are ordering here? diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h b/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h index da339fd..bfd3cfb 100644 --- a/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h +++ b/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h @@ -352,4 +352,11 @@ static inline void regulator_set_drvdata(struct regulator *regulator, #endif +static inline int regulator_set_voltage_tolerance(struct regulator *regulator, + int new_uV, int tol_uV) +{ + return regulator_set_voltage(regulator, + new_uV - tol_uV, new_uV + tol_uV); +} + #endif -- Regards, Shawn
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: shawn.guo@linaro.org (Shawn Guo) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Add a generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 12:20:52 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20120731042050.GF762@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20120730185344.GT4468@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 07:53:45PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > Quite honestly this seems totally unrealistic for the majority of users, I doubt that. Searching drivers/cpufreq folder, I can see there are several cpufreq drivers scaling voltage with regulator API, but none of them is calling regulator_set_voltage_time to find voltage latency. That said, all these users are specify transition latency on their own. > especially given the very poor documentation for this stuff which SoC > vendors typically provide. It's a reasonable amount of work to go back > and figure this stuff out (especially given that it should be varying > depending on the transition in question), and it's going to give us a > bunch of magic numbers in people's bindings. > There will be only one magic number, and it can easily become "magic" with some comments put there. > No, add a new API. > Is the following patch what you are ordering here? diff --git a/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h b/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h index da339fd..bfd3cfb 100644 --- a/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h +++ b/include/linux/regulator/consumer.h @@ -352,4 +352,11 @@ static inline void regulator_set_drvdata(struct regulator *regulator, #endif +static inline int regulator_set_voltage_tolerance(struct regulator *regulator, + int new_uV, int tol_uV) +{ + return regulator_set_voltage(regulator, + new_uV - tol_uV, new_uV + tol_uV); +} + #endif -- Regards, Shawn
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-31 4:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-07-19 15:54 [PATCH 0/3] Add a generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver Shawn Guo 2012-07-19 15:54 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-19 15:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: add cpufreq transiton notifier to adjust loops_per_jiffy for smp Shawn Guo 2012-07-19 15:54 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-20 6:36 ` Shilimkar, Santosh 2012-07-20 6:36 ` Shilimkar, Santosh 2012-07-20 7:56 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-20 7:56 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-20 8:27 ` Shilimkar, Santosh 2012-07-20 8:27 ` Shilimkar, Santosh 2012-07-19 15:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] PM / OPP: Initialize OPP table from device tree Shawn Guo 2012-07-19 15:54 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-20 6:00 ` Menon, Nishanth 2012-07-20 6:00 ` Menon, Nishanth 2012-07-20 8:46 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-20 8:46 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-20 9:04 ` Menon, Nishanth 2012-07-20 9:04 ` Menon, Nishanth 2012-07-19 15:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: Add a generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver Shawn Guo 2012-07-19 15:54 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-20 6:52 ` Shilimkar, Santosh 2012-07-20 6:52 ` Shilimkar, Santosh [not found] ` <CAMQu2gw32LogXJJa+K5ZjmCZzBNK3FY2wYwZXU8fsftsVzEO2Q-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2012-07-20 12:33 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-20 12:33 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-20 15:50 ` Turquette, Mike 2012-07-20 15:50 ` Turquette, Mike 2012-07-21 5:04 ` Shilimkar, Santosh 2012-07-21 5:04 ` Shilimkar, Santosh 2012-07-21 6:38 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-21 6:38 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-27 2:04 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-27 2:04 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-30 4:57 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-30 4:57 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-20 12:51 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-20 12:51 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-20 13:15 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-20 13:15 ` Shawn Guo [not found] ` <1342713281-31114-4-git-send-email-shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> 2012-07-26 13:11 ` Mark Brown 2012-07-26 13:11 ` Mark Brown [not found] ` <20120726131121.GB7306-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org> 2012-07-27 2:13 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-27 2:13 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-27 10:08 ` Mark Brown 2012-07-27 10:08 ` Mark Brown 2012-07-30 6:52 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-30 6:52 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-30 8:20 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-30 8:20 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-30 18:55 ` Mark Brown 2012-07-30 18:55 ` Mark Brown 2012-07-30 18:53 ` Mark Brown 2012-07-30 18:53 ` Mark Brown 2012-07-31 4:20 ` Shawn Guo [this message] 2012-07-31 4:20 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-31 13:40 ` Mark Brown 2012-07-31 13:40 ` Mark Brown 2012-07-27 6:33 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-27 6:33 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-30 8:17 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-30 8:17 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-30 8:50 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-30 8:50 ` Richard Zhao 2012-07-30 9:24 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-30 9:24 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-19 18:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Rafael J. Wysocki 2012-07-19 18:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2012-07-20 0:29 ` Shawn Guo 2012-07-20 0:29 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20120731042050.GF762@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net \ --to=shawn.guo@linaro.org \ --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \ --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \ --cc=khilman@ti.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \ --cc=mturquette@linaro.org \ --cc=nm@ti.com \ --cc=richard.zhao@freescale.com \ --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.