From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arm@kernel.org, Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] ARM: topology: mark init_cpu_topology as __init Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 19:14:17 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <201208081914.17651.arnd@arndb.de> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5022A79E.6050504@codeaurora.org> On Wednesday 08 August 2012, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 08/08/12 07:47, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > The init_cpu_topology function can be put into the __init section > > and discarded after boot, because it is only called from > > smp_prepare_cpus, which is also marked __init. This was reported > > by gcc after Vincent Guittot added the parse_dt_topology function > > in 339ca09d7ada "ARM: 7463/1: topology: Update cpu_power according to DT > > information". > > > > Without this patch, building kzm9g_defconfig results in: > > > > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xb5a0): Section mismatch in reference from the function init_cpu_topology() to the function .init.text:parse_dt_topology() > > The function init_cpu_topology() references > > the function __init parse_dt_topology(). > > This is often because init_cpu_topology lacks a __init > > annotation or the annotation of parse_dt_topology is wrong. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> > > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> > > Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> > > --- > > This is already in the patch tracker > > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=7482/1 Ok, dropped here. > I also notice that store_cpu_topology() should be marked __cpuinit and > update_siblings_mask, middle_capacity, cpu_capacity, and > update_cpu_power should be static. We should probably also rename > update_cpu_power() so as to not conflict with the one in kernel/sched/fair.c Yes, all good points. Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH 01/11] ARM: topology: mark init_cpu_topology as __init Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2012 19:14:17 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <201208081914.17651.arnd@arndb.de> (raw) In-Reply-To: <5022A79E.6050504@codeaurora.org> On Wednesday 08 August 2012, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > On 08/08/12 07:47, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > The init_cpu_topology function can be put into the __init section > > and discarded after boot, because it is only called from > > smp_prepare_cpus, which is also marked __init. This was reported > > by gcc after Vincent Guittot added the parse_dt_topology function > > in 339ca09d7ada "ARM: 7463/1: topology: Update cpu_power according to DT > > information". > > > > Without this patch, building kzm9g_defconfig results in: > > > > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0xb5a0): Section mismatch in reference from the function init_cpu_topology() to the function .init.text:parse_dt_topology() > > The function init_cpu_topology() references > > the function __init parse_dt_topology(). > > This is often because init_cpu_topology lacks a __init > > annotation or the annotation of parse_dt_topology is wrong. > > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> > > Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> > > Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> > > Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> > > --- > > This is already in the patch tracker > > http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/viewpatch.php?id=7482/1 Ok, dropped here. > I also notice that store_cpu_topology() should be marked __cpuinit and > update_siblings_mask, middle_capacity, cpu_capacity, and > update_cpu_power should be static. We should probably also rename > update_cpu_power() so as to not conflict with the one in kernel/sched/fair.c Yes, all good points. Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-08 19:14 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-08-08 14:47 [PATCH 00/11] recently added ARM defconfig warnings Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` [PATCH 01/11] ARM: topology: mark init_cpu_topology as __init Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 17:53 ` Stephen Boyd 2012-08-08 17:53 ` Stephen Boyd 2012-08-08 19:14 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message] 2012-08-08 19:14 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` [PATCH 02/11] mfd/asic3: fix asic3_mfd_probe return value Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` [PATCH 03/11] usb/ohci-omap: remove unused variable Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 15:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2012-08-08 15:25 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2012-08-08 15:34 ` Alan Stern 2012-08-08 15:34 ` Alan Stern 2012-08-08 14:47 ` [PATCH 04/11] ARM: ux500: really kill snowball_of_platform_devs Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 16:22 ` Lee Jones 2012-08-08 16:22 ` Lee Jones 2012-08-08 17:19 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 17:19 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` [PATCH 05/11] ARM: exynos: exynos_pm_add_dev_to_genpd may be unused Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-10 6:48 ` Kukjin Kim 2012-08-10 6:48 ` Kukjin Kim 2012-08-10 6:57 ` Thomas Abraham 2012-08-10 6:57 ` Thomas Abraham 2012-08-08 14:47 ` [PATCH 06/11] gpio: em: do not discard em_gio_irq_domain_cleanup Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-10 10:59 ` Linus Walleij 2012-08-10 10:59 ` Linus Walleij 2012-08-10 11:33 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-10 11:33 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` [PATCH 07/11] net/stmmac: mark probe function as __devinit Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 15:07 ` Stefan Roese 2012-08-08 15:07 ` Stefan Roese 2012-08-08 23:08 ` David Miller 2012-08-08 23:08 ` David Miller 2012-08-08 14:47 ` [PATCH 08/11] mtd/omap2: fix dmaengine_slave_config error handling Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` [PATCH 09/11] regulator/twl: remove fixed resource handling Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:50 ` Mark Brown 2012-08-08 14:50 ` Mark Brown 2012-08-08 15:06 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 15:06 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` [PATCH 10/11] spi/s3c64xx: improve error handling Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-10 6:39 ` Kukjin Kim 2012-08-10 6:39 ` Kukjin Kim 2012-08-10 7:34 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-10 7:34 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-10 6:58 ` Thomas Abraham 2012-08-10 6:58 ` Thomas Abraham 2012-08-08 14:47 ` [PATCH 11/11] pm/drivers: fix use of SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 14:47 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 15:40 ` Stephen Warren 2012-08-08 15:40 ` Stephen Warren 2012-08-08 16:22 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 16:22 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 16:43 ` Takashi Iwai 2012-08-08 16:43 ` Takashi Iwai 2012-08-08 17:26 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 17:26 ` Arnd Bergmann 2012-08-08 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2012-08-08 19:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2012-08-20 8:32 ` Herbert Xu 2012-08-20 8:32 ` Herbert Xu 2012-08-08 18:11 ` Kevin Hilman 2012-08-08 18:11 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=201208081914.17651.arnd@arndb.de \ --to=arnd@arndb.de \ --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \ --cc=arm@kernel.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \ --cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \ --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \ --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.