From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, devel@openvz.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] kmem accounting basic infrastructure
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:15:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120927121558.GB29104@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120926233334.GD10453@mtj.dyndns.org>
On Wed 26-09-12 16:33:34, Tejun Heo wrote:
[...]
> > > So, this seems properly crazy to me at the similar level of
> > > use_hierarchy fiasco. I'm gonna NACK on this.
> >
> > As I said: all use cases I particularly care about are covered by a
> > global switch.
> >
> > I am laying down my views because I really believe they make more sense.
> > But at some point, of course, I'll shut up if I believe I am a lone voice.
> >
> > I believe it should still be good to hear from mhocko and kame, but from
> > your point of view, would all the rest, plus the introduction of a
> > global switch make it acceptable to you?
>
> The only thing I'm whining about is per-node switch + silently
> ignoring past accounting, so if those two are solved, I think I'm
> pretty happy with the rest.
I think that per-group "switch" is not nice as well but if we make it
hierarchy specific (which I am proposing for quite some time) and do not
let enable accounting for a group with tasks then we get both
flexibility and reasonable semantic. A global switch sounds too coars to
me and it really not necessary.
Would this work with you?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@parallels.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, devel@openvz.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, Suleiman Souhlal <suleiman@google.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] kmem accounting basic infrastructure
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:15:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120927121558.GB29104@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120926233334.GD10453@mtj.dyndns.org>
On Wed 26-09-12 16:33:34, Tejun Heo wrote:
[...]
> > > So, this seems properly crazy to me at the similar level of
> > > use_hierarchy fiasco. I'm gonna NACK on this.
> >
> > As I said: all use cases I particularly care about are covered by a
> > global switch.
> >
> > I am laying down my views because I really believe they make more sense.
> > But at some point, of course, I'll shut up if I believe I am a lone voice.
> >
> > I believe it should still be good to hear from mhocko and kame, but from
> > your point of view, would all the rest, plus the introduction of a
> > global switch make it acceptable to you?
>
> The only thing I'm whining about is per-node switch + silently
> ignoring past accounting, so if those two are solved, I think I'm
> pretty happy with the rest.
I think that per-group "switch" is not nice as well but if we make it
hierarchy specific (which I am proposing for quite some time) and do not
let enable accounting for a group with tasks then we get both
flexibility and reasonable semantic. A global switch sounds too coars to
me and it really not necessary.
Would this work with you?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer-bzQdu9zFT3WakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
kamezawa.hiroyu-+CUm20s59erQFUHtdCDX3A@public.gmane.org,
devel-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
Suleiman Souhlal
<suleiman-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker
<fweisbec-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman-l3A5Bk7waGM@public.gmane.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] kmem accounting basic infrastructure
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 14:15:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120927121558.GB29104@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120926233334.GD10453-9pTldWuhBndy/B6EtB590w@public.gmane.org>
On Wed 26-09-12 16:33:34, Tejun Heo wrote:
[...]
> > > So, this seems properly crazy to me at the similar level of
> > > use_hierarchy fiasco. I'm gonna NACK on this.
> >
> > As I said: all use cases I particularly care about are covered by a
> > global switch.
> >
> > I am laying down my views because I really believe they make more sense.
> > But at some point, of course, I'll shut up if I believe I am a lone voice.
> >
> > I believe it should still be good to hear from mhocko and kame, but from
> > your point of view, would all the rest, plus the introduction of a
> > global switch make it acceptable to you?
>
> The only thing I'm whining about is per-node switch + silently
> ignoring past accounting, so if those two are solved, I think I'm
> pretty happy with the rest.
I think that per-group "switch" is not nice as well but if we make it
hierarchy specific (which I am proposing for quite some time) and do not
let enable accounting for a group with tasks then we get both
flexibility and reasonable semantic. A global switch sounds too coars to
me and it really not necessary.
Would this work with you?
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-27 12:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 323+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-18 14:03 [PATCH v3 00/13] kmem controller for memcg Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:03 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:03 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:03 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] memcg: Make it possible to use the stock for more than one page Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:03 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:03 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 18:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-10-01 18:48 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-09-18 14:03 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] memcg: Reclaim when more than one page needed Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:03 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:03 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 19:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-10-01 19:00 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-09-18 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] memcg: change defines to an enum Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 19:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-10-01 19:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-10-01 19:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-10-02 9:10 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-02 9:10 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] kmem accounting basic infrastructure Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-21 16:34 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-21 16:34 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-24 8:09 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-24 8:09 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-24 8:09 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 14:03 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-26 14:03 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-26 14:03 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-26 14:33 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 14:33 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 16:01 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-26 16:01 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-26 16:01 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-26 17:34 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 17:34 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 16:36 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 16:36 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 16:36 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:36 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 17:36 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 17:44 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:44 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:44 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 17:53 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 17:53 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 18:01 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 18:01 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 18:56 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 18:56 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 18:56 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 19:34 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 19:34 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 19:34 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 19:46 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 19:46 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 19:56 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 19:56 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 19:56 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 20:02 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 20:02 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 20:16 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 20:16 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 20:16 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 21:24 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 21:24 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 22:10 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 22:10 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 22:10 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 22:29 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 22:29 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 22:42 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 22:42 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 22:42 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 22:54 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 22:54 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 23:08 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 23:08 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 23:08 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 23:20 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 23:20 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 23:33 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-26 23:33 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-27 12:15 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2012-09-27 12:15 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 12:15 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 12:20 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 12:20 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 12:40 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 12:40 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 12:40 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 12:40 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 12:40 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 12:40 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 12:54 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 12:54 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 14:28 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 14:28 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 14:28 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 14:49 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-27 14:49 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-27 14:57 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 14:57 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 17:46 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-27 17:46 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-27 17:46 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-27 17:56 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 17:56 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 18:45 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 18:45 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-30 7:57 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-30 7:57 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-30 7:57 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-30 8:02 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-30 8:02 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-30 8:56 ` James Bottomley
2012-09-30 8:56 ` James Bottomley
2012-09-30 8:56 ` James Bottomley
2012-09-30 10:37 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-30 10:37 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-30 10:37 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-30 11:25 ` James Bottomley
2012-09-30 11:25 ` James Bottomley
2012-10-01 0:57 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-01 0:57 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-01 0:57 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-01 8:43 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 8:43 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 8:46 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 8:46 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-03 22:59 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-03 22:59 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-01 8:36 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 8:36 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 12:08 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 12:08 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 12:08 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 12:11 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 12:11 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 14:33 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-27 14:33 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-27 14:43 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 14:43 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 14:43 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 14:58 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-27 14:58 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-27 18:30 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 18:30 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-30 8:23 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-30 8:23 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-01 8:45 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 8:45 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-03 22:54 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-03 22:54 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-04 11:55 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-04 11:55 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-06 2:19 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-06 2:19 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-06 2:19 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-27 15:09 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 15:09 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-30 8:47 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-30 8:47 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-01 9:27 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 9:27 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-03 22:43 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-03 22:43 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-03 22:43 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-05 13:47 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-05 13:47 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-05 13:47 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-26 22:11 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-09-26 22:11 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-09-26 22:11 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-09-26 22:45 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-26 22:45 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] Add a __GFP_KMEMCG flag Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:15 ` Rik van Riel
2012-09-18 14:15 ` Rik van Riel
2012-09-18 15:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-18 15:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-18 15:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-19 7:39 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-19 7:39 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-19 7:39 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-19 14:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-19 14:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-19 14:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2012-09-27 13:34 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 13:34 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 13:41 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 13:41 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 19:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-10-01 19:09 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-09-18 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] memcg: kmem controller infrastructure Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-20 16:05 ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-09-20 16:05 ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-09-20 16:05 ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-09-21 8:41 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-21 8:41 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-21 8:41 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-21 9:14 ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-09-21 9:14 ` JoonSoo Kim
2012-09-26 15:51 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-26 15:51 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-26 15:51 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 11:31 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 11:31 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 13:44 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 13:44 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 13:44 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-28 11:34 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-28 11:34 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-28 11:34 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-30 8:25 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-30 8:25 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-01 8:28 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 8:28 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-03 22:11 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-03 22:11 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-03 22:11 ` Tejun Heo
2012-10-01 9:44 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 9:44 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 9:44 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 9:48 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 9:48 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 9:48 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 10:09 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 10:09 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 11:51 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 11:51 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 11:51 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 11:51 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 11:51 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 11:58 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 11:58 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 12:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 12:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 12:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] mm: Allocate kernel pages to the right memcg Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-27 13:50 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 13:50 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-28 9:43 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-28 9:43 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-28 9:43 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-28 13:28 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-28 13:28 ` Mel Gorman
2012-09-27 13:52 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 13:52 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-27 13:52 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-18 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] res_counter: return amount of charges after res_counter_uncharge Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 10:00 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 10:00 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 10:01 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 10:01 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] memcg: kmem accounting lifecycle management Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 12:15 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 12:15 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 12:15 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 12:29 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 12:29 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 12:29 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 12:36 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 12:36 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 12:36 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 12:43 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 12:43 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 12:43 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] memcg: use static branches when code not in use Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 12:25 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 12:25 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 12:27 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 12:27 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 12:27 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] memcg: allow a memcg with kmem charges to be destructed Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2012-09-18 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] execute the whole memcg freeing in rcu callback Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-21 17:23 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-21 17:23 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-21 17:23 ` Tejun Heo
2012-09-24 8:48 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-24 8:48 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-24 8:48 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 13:27 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 13:27 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 13:27 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-04 10:53 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-04 10:53 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-04 10:53 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-04 14:20 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-04 14:20 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-05 15:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-10-05 15:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-10-05 15:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2012-10-08 9:45 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-08 9:45 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] protect architectures where THREAD_SIZE >= PAGE_SIZE against fork bombs Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-09-18 14:04 ` Glauber Costa
2012-10-01 13:17 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 13:17 ` Michal Hocko
2012-10-01 13:17 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120927121558.GB29104@dhcp22.suse.cz \
--to=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=glommer@parallels.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=suleiman@google.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.