All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] PCI: mvebu: increment nports only for registered ports
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:15:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130813091539.20d4b6a3@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376333215-12885-3-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>

Dear Sebastian Hesselbarth,

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:46:48 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> index d5fe674..0a359d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> @@ -842,21 +842,21 @@ static int __init mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	i = 0;
>  	for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) {
>  		if (!of_device_is_available(child))
>  			continue;
> -		pcie->nports++;
> +		i++;
>  	}
>  
> -	pcie->ports = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, pcie->nports *
> +	pcie->ports = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, i *
>  				   sizeof(struct mvebu_pcie_port),
>  				   GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!pcie->ports)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	i = 0;
>  	for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) {
> -		struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = &pcie->ports[i];
> +		struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = &pcie->ports[pcie->nports];
>  
>  		if (!of_device_is_available(child))
>  			continue;
> @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static int __init mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		port->dn = child;
>  		spin_lock_init(&port->conf_lock);
>  		mvebu_sw_pci_bridge_init(port);
> -		i++;
> +		pcie->nports++;
>  	}

I think I'd prefer using 'i' in this loop, and then after the loop have
a:

	pcie->nports = i;

assignment. That's nitpicking, but I don't like the fact that within
the loop 'pcie->nports' doesn't mean "Number of enabled PCIe ports",
but means "Last enabled PCIe port".

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/9] PCI: mvebu: increment nports only for registered ports
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:15:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130813091539.20d4b6a3@skate> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1376333215-12885-3-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>

Dear Sebastian Hesselbarth,

On Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:46:48 +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> index d5fe674..0a359d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c
> @@ -842,21 +842,21 @@ static int __init mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return ret;
>  	}
>  
> +	i = 0;
>  	for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) {
>  		if (!of_device_is_available(child))
>  			continue;
> -		pcie->nports++;
> +		i++;
>  	}
>  
> -	pcie->ports = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, pcie->nports *
> +	pcie->ports = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, i *
>  				   sizeof(struct mvebu_pcie_port),
>  				   GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!pcie->ports)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	i = 0;
>  	for_each_child_of_node(pdev->dev.of_node, child) {
> -		struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = &pcie->ports[i];
> +		struct mvebu_pcie_port *port = &pcie->ports[pcie->nports];
>  
>  		if (!of_device_is_available(child))
>  			continue;
> @@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ static int __init mvebu_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		port->dn = child;
>  		spin_lock_init(&port->conf_lock);
>  		mvebu_sw_pci_bridge_init(port);
> -		i++;
> +		pcie->nports++;
>  	}

I think I'd prefer using 'i' in this loop, and then after the loop have
a:

	pcie->nports = i;

assignment. That's nitpicking, but I don't like the fact that within
the loop 'pcie->nports' doesn't mean "Number of enabled PCIe ports",
but means "Last enabled PCIe port".

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-13  7:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-12 18:46 [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dove: DT PCIe support Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/9] PCI: mvebu: move clock enable before register access Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13  7:11   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-13  7:11     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-13  9:22     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13  9:22       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13  7:58   ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-13  7:58     ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-12 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/9] PCI: mvebu: increment nports only for registered ports Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13  7:15   ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2013-08-13  7:15     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-13  9:23     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13  9:23       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46 ` [PATCH 3/9] PCI: mvebu: remove subsys_initcall Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13  7:19   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-13  7:19     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-13  8:06     ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-13  8:06       ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-13  9:25       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13  9:25         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46 ` [PATCH 4/9] PCI: mvebu: add support for reset on GPIO Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13  0:56   ` Kumar Gala
2013-08-13  0:56     ` Kumar Gala
2013-08-13  9:19     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13  9:19       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13  8:09   ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-13  8:09     ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-13  8:30     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-13  8:30       ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-13  9:59       ` Sascha Hauer
2013-08-13  9:59         ` Sascha Hauer
2013-08-13 10:03       ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-13 10:03         ` Thierry Reding
2013-08-13 10:40         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 10:40           ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 10:59           ` Philipp Zabel
2013-08-13 10:59             ` Philipp Zabel
2013-08-12 18:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] PCI: mvebu: add support for Marvell Dove SoCs Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46 ` [PATCH 6/9] ARM: dove: update dove_defconfig with SI5351, PCI, and xHCI Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 20:00   ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-12 20:00     ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-12 18:46 ` [PATCH 7/9] ARM: dove: add PCIe controllers to SoC DT Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 20:04   ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-12 20:04     ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-13 11:28     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 11:28       ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-13 13:21       ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-13 13:21         ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-13 13:48       ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-13 13:48         ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-12 18:46 ` [PATCH 8/9] ARM: dove: add initial DT file for Globalscale D3Plug Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46 ` [PATCH 9/9] ARM: dove: remove legacy pcie and clock init Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 18:46   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-08-12 20:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] ARM: dove: DT PCIe support Bjorn Helgaas
2013-08-12 20:54   ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130813091539.20d4b6a3@skate \
    --to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.