From: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com>,
"naveenkrishna.ch@gmail.com" <naveenkrishna.ch@gmail.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"cpgs@samsung.com" <cpgs@samsung.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] arm64: exynos7: Enable ARMv8 based Exynos7 (SoC) support
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 21:05:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140828040517.GF4972@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140827145021.GC13850@arm.com>
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:50:21PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:09:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:44:20AM +0100, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> > > + select HAVE_SMP
> >
> > I may have missed something, but I didn't see any SMP support in this
> > series.
>
> We don't even have HAVE_SMP defined for arm64 (just SMP, which is on in
> defconfig).
>
> In theory we don't need any specific SMP support for a new SoC as long
> as it uses a standard booting protocol (e.g. PSCI). But for whatever
> reason, I only received about four patches in this series, so can't see
> the rest.
Seems like about 9 of them made it to the list for me.
-Olof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: olof@lixom.net (Olof Johansson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 13/14] arm64: exynos7: Enable ARMv8 based Exynos7 (SoC) support
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 21:05:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140828040517.GF4972@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140827145021.GC13850@arm.com>
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 03:50:21PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:09:28PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:44:20AM +0100, Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> > > + select HAVE_SMP
> >
> > I may have missed something, but I didn't see any SMP support in this
> > series.
>
> We don't even have HAVE_SMP defined for arm64 (just SMP, which is on in
> defconfig).
>
> In theory we don't need any specific SMP support for a new SoC as long
> as it uses a standard booting protocol (e.g. PSCI). But for whatever
> reason, I only received about four patches in this series, so can't see
> the rest.
Seems like about 9 of them made it to the list for me.
-Olof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-28 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-27 9:44 [PATCH 00/14] Support 64bit Cortex A57 based Exynos7 SoC Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
2014-08-27 9:44 ` Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
2014-08-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 10/14] arm64: dts: add pinctrl support to EXYNOS7 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
2014-08-27 9:44 ` Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
2014-08-27 11:14 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-08-27 11:14 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-08-29 5:46 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2014-08-29 5:46 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2014-08-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 11/14] arm64: dts: Add initial device tree support for EXYNOS7 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
2014-08-27 9:44 ` Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
2014-08-27 10:42 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-27 10:42 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-27 14:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-27 14:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-09-03 7:48 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2014-09-03 7:48 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2014-08-27 11:30 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-08-27 11:30 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-03 7:55 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2014-09-03 7:55 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2014-08-28 3:56 ` Olof Johansson
2014-08-28 3:56 ` Olof Johansson
2014-08-28 8:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-28 8:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-28 9:48 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-28 9:48 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-28 16:28 ` Olof Johansson
2014-08-28 16:28 ` Olof Johansson
2014-08-28 17:03 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-28 17:03 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-28 17:19 ` Olof Johansson
2014-08-28 17:19 ` Olof Johansson
2014-08-28 17:39 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-28 17:39 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-28 17:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-08-28 17:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-08-28 18:17 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-28 18:17 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-28 17:54 ` Rob Herring
2014-08-28 17:54 ` Rob Herring
2014-08-28 22:23 ` Olof Johansson
2014-08-28 22:23 ` Olof Johansson
2014-08-28 23:30 ` Simon Horman
2014-08-28 23:30 ` Simon Horman
2014-08-28 17:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-28 17:27 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-28 17:30 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-28 17:30 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-28 17:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-28 17:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-08-28 17:45 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-28 17:45 ` Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <53FF6668.4080502-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
2014-08-28 17:33 ` Rob Herring
2014-08-28 17:33 ` Rob Herring
2014-08-28 17:43 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-28 17:43 ` Mark Rutland
2014-09-03 8:05 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2014-09-03 8:05 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2014-08-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 12/14] arm64: dts: add Exynos7 based Espresso board dts file Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
2014-08-27 9:44 ` Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
2014-08-27 11:32 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-08-27 11:32 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-08-28 4:00 ` Olof Johansson
2014-08-28 4:00 ` Olof Johansson
2014-08-29 5:51 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2014-08-29 5:51 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2014-08-27 9:44 ` [PATCH 13/14] arm64: exynos7: Enable ARMv8 based Exynos7 (SoC) support Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
2014-08-27 9:44 ` Naveen Krishna Chatradhi
2014-08-27 11:09 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-27 11:09 ` Mark Rutland
2014-08-27 14:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-27 14:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-08-28 4:05 ` Olof Johansson [this message]
2014-08-28 4:05 ` Olof Johansson
2014-09-03 8:14 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2014-09-03 8:14 ` Naveen Krishna Ch
2014-08-27 11:34 ` [PATCH 00/14] Support 64bit Cortex A57 based Exynos7 SoC Tomasz Figa
2014-08-27 11:34 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-13 10:57 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-13 10:57 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-09-14 13:45 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-09-14 13:45 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-08-28 3:47 ` Olof Johansson
2014-08-28 3:47 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140828040517.GF4972@localhost \
--to=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=ch.naveen@samsung.com \
--cc=cpgs@samsung.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=naveenkrishna.ch@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.