* linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes @ 2014-09-13 12:52 Sedat Dilek 2014-09-13 15:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Sedat Dilek @ 2014-09-13 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjørn Mork, LKML Hi Greg, I hoped the acpi-fixes from [1] (especially [2]) would fix my shown "85% battery available", but a Ubuntu/trusty kernel reports the same (battery defect?). The 2nd revert is applicable, the 1st not, both are labeled with 3.16+. Wanna pick them or have it already on your to-do? Thanks. Regards, - Sedat - [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=acpi-battery [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=acpi-battery&id=508b3c677601797f2d51df3df5caa436dd235cb9 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes 2014-09-13 12:52 linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes Sedat Dilek @ 2014-09-13 15:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2014-09-13 15:32 ` Sedat Dilek 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2014-09-13 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sedat Dilek, stable; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjørn Mork, LKML On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 02:52:52PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > Hi Greg, > > I hoped the acpi-fixes from [1] (especially [2]) would fix my shown > "85% battery available", but a Ubuntu/trusty kernel reports the same > (battery defect?). > The 2nd revert is applicable, the 1st not, both are labeled with 3.16+. > > Wanna pick them or have it already on your to-do? > > Thanks. > > Regards, > - Sedat - > > [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=acpi-battery > [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=acpi-battery&id=508b3c677601797f2d51df3df5caa436dd235cb9 First off, stable kernel questions should go to stable@vger.kernel.org, not just to me. Secondly, I don't understand what you are asking here. What exact fix in Linus's tree do you want to see in a stable backport that I haven't taken already? I've queued up a number of ACPI fixes for 3.16.3, are they not sufficient? thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes 2014-09-13 15:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2014-09-13 15:32 ` Sedat Dilek 2014-09-13 15:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread From: Sedat Dilek @ 2014-09-13 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: stable, Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjørn Mork, LKML On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 02:52:52PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> Hi Greg, >> >> I hoped the acpi-fixes from [1] (especially [2]) would fix my shown >> "85% battery available", but a Ubuntu/trusty kernel reports the same >> (battery defect?). >> The 2nd revert is applicable, the 1st not, both are labeled with 3.16+. >> >> Wanna pick them or have it already on your to-do? >> >> Thanks. >> >> Regards, >> - Sedat - >> >> [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=acpi-battery >> [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=acpi-battery&id=508b3c677601797f2d51df3df5caa436dd235cb9 > > First off, stable kernel questions should go to stable@vger.kernel.org, > not just to me. > > Secondly, I don't understand what you are asking here. What exact fix > in Linus's tree do you want to see in a stable backport that I haven't > taken already? I've queued up a number of ACPI fixes for 3.16.3, are > they not sufficient? > > thanks, > Sorry, if I was nor precise enough and forgot about CCing the linux-stable email-address. With jumping to Linux v3.16.y I have 1st seen that my battery reports 85% whereas the LED shows me it's full (green vs. charging orange). So, I hoped the fix from Bjorn fixes the issue for me but did not help here. Those acpi-battery fixes are labeled for 3.16+, don't you get them automatically and consider for inclusion? No, I did not try the pending ACPI patches in the stable-queue tree. Is there a stable-review v3.16.3-rc1 around? - Sedat - ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes 2014-09-13 15:32 ` Sedat Dilek @ 2014-09-13 15:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2014-09-13 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sedat Dilek; +Cc: stable, Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjørn Mork, LKML On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 05:32:50PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > > With jumping to Linux v3.16.y I have 1st seen that my battery reports > 85% whereas the LED shows me it's full (green vs. charging orange). > So, I hoped the fix from Bjorn fixes the issue for me but did not help here. > Those acpi-battery fixes are labeled for 3.16+, don't you get them > automatically and consider for inclusion? I do get them, so if they are marked for stable, they should be in a future stable kernel release, no need to do anything on your end. But note, I'm way behind in stable patches as there are about 300+ pending ones. > No, I did not try the pending ACPI patches in the stable-queue tree. > Is there a stable-review v3.16.3-rc1 around? That should happen next week, until then, there is the stable-queue on git.kernel.org if you want to see what is queued up. thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-13 15:38 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-09-13 12:52 linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes Sedat Dilek 2014-09-13 15:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman 2014-09-13 15:32 ` Sedat Dilek 2014-09-13 15:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.