* linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes
@ 2014-09-13 12:52 Sedat Dilek
2014-09-13 15:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sedat Dilek @ 2014-09-13 12:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjørn Mork, LKML
Hi Greg,
I hoped the acpi-fixes from [1] (especially [2]) would fix my shown
"85% battery available", but a Ubuntu/trusty kernel reports the same
(battery defect?).
The 2nd revert is applicable, the 1st not, both are labeled with 3.16+.
Wanna pick them or have it already on your to-do?
Thanks.
Regards,
- Sedat -
[1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=acpi-battery
[2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=acpi-battery&id=508b3c677601797f2d51df3df5caa436dd235cb9
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes
2014-09-13 12:52 linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes Sedat Dilek
@ 2014-09-13 15:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-09-13 15:32 ` Sedat Dilek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2014-09-13 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sedat Dilek, stable; +Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjørn Mork, LKML
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 02:52:52PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> I hoped the acpi-fixes from [1] (especially [2]) would fix my shown
> "85% battery available", but a Ubuntu/trusty kernel reports the same
> (battery defect?).
> The 2nd revert is applicable, the 1st not, both are labeled with 3.16+.
>
> Wanna pick them or have it already on your to-do?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> - Sedat -
>
> [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=acpi-battery
> [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=acpi-battery&id=508b3c677601797f2d51df3df5caa436dd235cb9
First off, stable kernel questions should go to stable@vger.kernel.org,
not just to me.
Secondly, I don't understand what you are asking here. What exact fix
in Linus's tree do you want to see in a stable backport that I haven't
taken already? I've queued up a number of ACPI fixes for 3.16.3, are
they not sufficient?
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes
2014-09-13 15:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2014-09-13 15:32 ` Sedat Dilek
2014-09-13 15:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sedat Dilek @ 2014-09-13 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman; +Cc: stable, Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjørn Mork, LKML
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 5:24 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 02:52:52PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> I hoped the acpi-fixes from [1] (especially [2]) would fix my shown
>> "85% battery available", but a Ubuntu/trusty kernel reports the same
>> (battery defect?).
>> The 2nd revert is applicable, the 1st not, both are labeled with 3.16+.
>>
>> Wanna pick them or have it already on your to-do?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Regards,
>> - Sedat -
>>
>> [1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=acpi-battery
>> [2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/commit/?h=acpi-battery&id=508b3c677601797f2d51df3df5caa436dd235cb9
>
> First off, stable kernel questions should go to stable@vger.kernel.org,
> not just to me.
>
> Secondly, I don't understand what you are asking here. What exact fix
> in Linus's tree do you want to see in a stable backport that I haven't
> taken already? I've queued up a number of ACPI fixes for 3.16.3, are
> they not sufficient?
>
> thanks,
>
Sorry, if I was nor precise enough and forgot about CCing the
linux-stable email-address.
With jumping to Linux v3.16.y I have 1st seen that my battery reports
85% whereas the LED shows me it's full (green vs. charging orange).
So, I hoped the fix from Bjorn fixes the issue for me but did not help here.
Those acpi-battery fixes are labeled for 3.16+, don't you get them
automatically and consider for inclusion?
No, I did not try the pending ACPI patches in the stable-queue tree.
Is there a stable-review v3.16.3-rc1 around?
- Sedat -
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes
2014-09-13 15:32 ` Sedat Dilek
@ 2014-09-13 15:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman @ 2014-09-13 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sedat Dilek; +Cc: stable, Rafael J. Wysocki, Bjørn Mork, LKML
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 05:32:50PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> With jumping to Linux v3.16.y I have 1st seen that my battery reports
> 85% whereas the LED shows me it's full (green vs. charging orange).
> So, I hoped the fix from Bjorn fixes the issue for me but did not help here.
> Those acpi-battery fixes are labeled for 3.16+, don't you get them
> automatically and consider for inclusion?
I do get them, so if they are marked for stable, they should be in a
future stable kernel release, no need to do anything on your end.
But note, I'm way behind in stable patches as there are about 300+
pending ones.
> No, I did not try the pending ACPI patches in the stable-queue tree.
> Is there a stable-review v3.16.3-rc1 around?
That should happen next week, until then, there is the stable-queue on
git.kernel.org if you want to see what is queued up.
thanks,
greg k-h
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-13 15:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-13 12:52 linux-3.16.y: acpi-battery fixes Sedat Dilek
2014-09-13 15:24 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-09-13 15:32 ` Sedat Dilek
2014-09-13 15:37 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.