All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Chen Fan <fan.chen@mediatek.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Howard Chen <ibanezchen@gmail.com>,
	"Joe.C" <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] cpufreq: mediatek: add Mediatek cpufreq driver
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:46:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150311124620.GC28806@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohponaQYYgYFAbpY3KZjt4+QhjBsqQtEpG5QpdMH0p__YUEQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 341 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 05:16:42PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> I think until the time we revive the voltage-domain stuff we need to support
> mediatek's driver. And probably a virtual regulator is the best approach
> unless someone else comes up with another idea.

Why not just write a custom cpufreq driver if it's too hard to abstract?

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Chen Fan <fan.chen@mediatek.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Howard Chen <ibanezchen@gmail.com>,
	"Joe.C" <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>,
	"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@mediatek.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>Linux Kernel Mailing List
	<l>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] cpufreq: mediatek: add Mediatek cpufreq driver
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:46:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150311124620.GC28806@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohponaQYYgYFAbpY3KZjt4+QhjBsqQtEpG5QpdMH0p__YUEQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 341 bytes --]

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 05:16:42PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> I think until the time we revive the voltage-domain stuff we need to support
> mediatek's driver. And probably a virtual regulator is the best approach
> unless someone else comes up with another idea.

Why not just write a custom cpufreq driver if it's too hard to abstract?

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] cpufreq: mediatek: add Mediatek cpufreq driver
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:46:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150311124620.GC28806@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohponaQYYgYFAbpY3KZjt4+QhjBsqQtEpG5QpdMH0p__YUEQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 05:16:42PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> I think until the time we revive the voltage-domain stuff we need to support
> mediatek's driver. And probably a virtual regulator is the best approach
> unless someone else comes up with another idea.

Why not just write a custom cpufreq driver if it's too hard to abstract?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150311/1bc74ad1/attachment.sig>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-03-11 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-04  8:49 [PATCH v2 0/4] cpufreq: add cpufreq driver for Mediatek MT8173 SoC pi-cheng.chen
2015-03-04  8:49 ` pi-cheng.chen
2015-03-04  8:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] cpufreq-dt: add clock domain and intermediate frequency support pi-cheng.chen
2015-03-04  8:49   ` pi-cheng.chen
2015-03-04  8:49   ` pi-cheng.chen
2015-03-04 10:15   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-04 10:15     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-04 10:15     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-04 10:17     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-04 10:17       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-04 10:17       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-05  3:32     ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-05  3:32       ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-05  3:32       ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-05  3:58       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-05  3:58         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-05  3:58         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-05  7:28         ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-05  7:28           ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-05  7:28           ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-04  8:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] cpufreq: dt-bindings: add bindings for mtk-cpufreq driver pi-cheng.chen
2015-03-04  8:49   ` pi-cheng.chen
2015-03-04 10:29   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-04 10:29     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-04 10:29     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-04  8:49 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] cpufreq: mediatek: add Mediatek cpufreq driver pi-cheng.chen
2015-03-04  8:49   ` pi-cheng.chen
2015-03-04 11:09   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-04 11:09     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-04 11:09     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-05  7:27     ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-05  7:27       ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-05  7:27       ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-05  9:55       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-05  9:55         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-05  9:55         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-06  5:49         ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-06  5:49           ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-06  5:49           ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-10  2:50           ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-10  2:50             ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-10  2:50             ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-11 10:53             ` Mark Brown
2015-03-11 10:53               ` Mark Brown
2015-03-11 10:53               ` Mark Brown
2015-03-11 11:03               ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-11 11:03                 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-11 11:03                 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-11 11:42                 ` Lucas Stach
2015-03-11 11:42                   ` Lucas Stach
2015-03-11 11:42                   ` Lucas Stach
2015-03-11 11:46                   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-11 11:46                     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-11 11:46                     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-11 12:46                     ` Mark Brown [this message]
2015-03-11 12:46                       ` Mark Brown
2015-03-11 12:46                       ` Mark Brown
2015-03-11 12:45                 ` Mark Brown
2015-03-11 12:45                   ` Mark Brown
2015-03-11 12:45                   ` Mark Brown
2015-03-12  9:28                   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-12  9:28                     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-12  9:28                     ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-12 11:15                     ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-12 11:15                       ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-12 11:15                       ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-18  6:59                       ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-18  6:59                         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-18  6:59                         ` Viresh Kumar
2015-03-09 16:28   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-09 16:28     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-03-10  1:57     ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-10  1:57       ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-10  1:57       ` Pi-Cheng Chen
2015-03-04  8:49 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] ARM64: dts: mediatek: add cpufreq dts for MT8173 SoC pi-cheng.chen
2015-03-04  8:49   ` pi-cheng.chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150311124620.GC28806@sirena.org.uk \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=eddie.huang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=fan.chen@mediatek.com \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ibanezchen@gmail.com \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.