Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe

From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	Support Opensource <support.opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Milo Kim <milo.kim@ti.com>,
	patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 18:29:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150513172936.GE2761@sirena.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150513165419.GF19543@x1>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 782 bytes --]

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 05:54:19PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 13 May 2015, Mark Brown wrote:

> > If you're looking for me to review something you need to send it to me,
> > and the chances of me looking at it are very much increased if there's a
> > relevant subject line.  I'm CCed (not even on the to list) on endless
> > large threads and reposts of patch serieses about MFD drivers most of
> > which are of very little relevance to me so they get ignored very
> > easily.

> Calm down dear, it's only a commercial.

> I wasn't having a pop.  Rather empathising with your situation and
> facilitating a resend that you're likely to see.

> I'm sure Johan will do the right thing.

My point is that a simple resend has a reasonable chance of getting
dropped on the floor.

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]