Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe

From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
	Support Opensource <support.opensource@diasemi.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
	Milo Kim <milo.kim@ti.com>,
	patches@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@freescale.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: da9052: fix broken regulator probe
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 08:19:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150514071943.GA20358@x1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150513172936.GE2761@sirena.org.uk>

On Wed, 13 May 2015, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 05:54:19PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 May 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > If you're looking for me to review something you need to send it to me,
> > > and the chances of me looking at it are very much increased if there's a
> > > relevant subject line.  I'm CCed (not even on the to list) on endless
> > > large threads and reposts of patch serieses about MFD drivers most of
> > > which are of very little relevance to me so they get ignored very
> > > easily.
> 
> > Calm down dear, it's only a commercial.
> 
> > I wasn't having a pop.  Rather empathising with your situation and
> > facilitating a resend that you're likely to see.
> 
> > I'm sure Johan will do the right thing.
> 
> My point is that a simple resend has a reasonable chance of getting
> dropped on the floor.

As I say, I'm sure Johan will do what's required for that not to
happen.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog