All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 6/9] clk: ti: add support for omap4 module clocks
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:42:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160104144221.GA5783@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <568A735D.2060309@ti.com>

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 03:27:57PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 01/04/2016 12:21 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >FWIW, there are small loops with just a cpu_relax() in various clock drivers
> >under drivers/clk/shmobile/.
> 
> Just did a quick profiling round, and the clk_enable/disable delay loops
> take anything from 0...1500ns, most typically consuming some 400-600ns. So,
> based on this, dropping the udelay and adding cpu_relax instead looks like a
> good change. I just verified that changing the udelay to cpu_relax works
> fine also, I just need to change the bail-out period to be something sane.

Was that profiling done with lockdep/lock debugging enabled or disabled?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 6/9] clk: ti: add support for omap4 module clocks
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2016 14:42:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160104144221.GA5783@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <568A735D.2060309@ti.com>

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 03:27:57PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 01/04/2016 12:21 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >FWIW, there are small loops with just a cpu_relax() in various clock drivers
> >under drivers/clk/shmobile/.
> 
> Just did a quick profiling round, and the clk_enable/disable delay loops
> take anything from 0...1500ns, most typically consuming some 400-600ns. So,
> based on this, dropping the udelay and adding cpu_relax instead looks like a
> good change. I just verified that changing the udelay to cpu_relax works
> fine also, I just need to change the bail-out period to be something sane.

Was that profiling done with lockdep/lock debugging enabled or disabled?

-- 
RMK's Patch system: http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-04 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-18 13:58 [RFC 0/9] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod clkctrl conversion to DT + clock driver Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58 ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58 ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58 ` [RFC 1/9] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: create clock alias purely from DT data Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 15:16   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-18 15:16     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-18 13:58 ` [RFC 2/9] ARM: OMAP2+: hwmod: initialize main clocks directly from DT Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58 ` [RFC 3/9] clk: ti: remove un-used definitions from public clk_hw_omap struct Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58 ` [RFC 4/9] clk: ti: mux: export mux clock APIs locally Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58 ` [RFC 5/9] dt-bindings: clk: ti: Document module clock type Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58 ` [RFC 6/9] clk: ti: add support for omap4 module clocks Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 15:36   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-18 15:36     ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-01  5:48   ` Michael Turquette
2016-01-01  5:48     ` Michael Turquette
2016-01-01  5:48     ` Michael Turquette
2016-01-04  7:36     ` Tero Kristo
2016-01-04  7:36       ` Tero Kristo
2016-01-04  7:36       ` Tero Kristo
2016-01-04 10:21       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-01-04 10:21         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-01-04 10:21         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-01-04 13:27         ` Tero Kristo
2016-01-04 13:27           ` Tero Kristo
2016-01-04 14:42           ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2016-01-04 14:42             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-01-04 16:37             ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-04 16:37               ` Tony Lindgren
2016-01-04 19:15               ` Tero Kristo
2016-01-04 19:15                 ` Tero Kristo
2016-01-05  1:23                 ` Michael Turquette
2016-01-05  1:23                   ` Michael Turquette
2016-01-05  1:23                   ` Michael Turquette
2016-01-05  1:29       ` Michael Turquette
2016-01-05  1:29         ` Michael Turquette
2016-01-05  1:29         ` Michael Turquette
2015-12-18 13:58 ` [RFC 7/9] ARM: dts: omap4: add hwmod " Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:58   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 15:06   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-18 15:06     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-18 13:59 ` [RFC 8/9] ARM: OMAP4: hwmod_data: use module clocks from DT Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:59   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:59   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 15:11   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-18 15:11     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-18 13:59 ` [RFC 9/9] clk: ti: omap4: update clock aliases to reflect new module clocks Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:59   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-18 13:59   ` Tero Kristo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160104144221.GA5783@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.